-Caveat Lector- Regarding this statement: "In fact, Clinton has tipped his hand and unknowingly (or purposely) let it slip that the attack on U.S. Citizens and civilians WILL definitely be biological or germ warfare." I could be mistaken, but I don't recall hearing Clinton say (or reading that Clinton said) we would *DEFINITELY* be attacked by biological or germ warfare. Where did you get that statement? The actual statement is: "WASHINGTON -- President Clinton said Thursday that it is "*HIGHLY LIKELY*" that a terrorist group will launch or threaten a germ or chemical attack on American soil within the next few years." Clinton aside, anyone with any kind of AWARENESS realizes that sooner or later this country will be the target of a biological or chemical attack, probably by Islamic Terrorists. I would even go so far as to suggest it will probably happen this year, since these subjects are being PRESENTED to the masses at this particular space/time nexus. It makes perfectly good sense to attempt to counter an attack that one can reasonably assume is on the way. What would YOU suggest to counter this potential threat? Is there any doubt this chemical/biological attack scenario could be used to initiate (to use YOUR words) "the Emergency War Powers Act to invoke martial law, suspend the U.S. Constitution, put FEMA and the United Nations fighting 'Peace FORCES' in charge of the United States, confiscate ALL weapons from civilians, Citizens, Patriots, Constitutionalists, and Civilian Militias, give up our sovereignty and turn our nation over to the control of the United Nations under the New World Order" (end quote)? Of course this is a possibility/probability, but that is beside the point. Another statement you make is: "Why does Clinton want to have terrorists attack the U.S.?" Now how do you know all that? Show me where this was stated. Unless you have the facts, you can only ASSUME that Clinton thinks that, unless you are very psychic. You do YOUR cause (whatever that is) more harm than good by stretching the facts and making statements that are obviously false. It is ok to talk about what a LIAR Clinton is, but you might want to practice what you preach: "Why do you see the splinter which is in your brother's eye, and do not feel the beam which is in your own eye?" -- HOLY BIBLE, MATTHEW 7:3, GEORGE M. LAMSA's Translation from the ARAMAIC of the PESHITTA. (most accurate English translation available) For information on the CIA's GENOCIDE EARLY WARNING CENTER, which was just recently revealed to the public, see the following link: http://news.flora.org/flora.mai-not/8648 ME On Friday, January 22, 1999 5:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > -> SNETNEWS Mailing List > > (sent to USCMike1's 12,750+ readers - please re-post to your own mailing > lists) > > "Clinton Prepares for NBC (Biological) Terrorist Attack on U.S. Within 24 > months" > > Dear Citizens and Patriots: > > Please read the below mainstream press report (New York Times) on Clinton > appropriating over $10 Billion to protect the U.S. from an impending (within > 24 months) NBC - Nuclear, Biological, Chemical warfare attack using weapons of > mass destruction as to be perpetrated by "international" and/or "domestic" > terrorists upon the Citizens of these United States of America. Notice how > Clinton keeps hyping it and trying to "egg on" some nebulous, unknown > "terrorists." When that has not worked Clinton bombed Iraq, Sudan, > Afganistan, Lebanon, Pakistsan, etc. to provoke the Islamics into attacking > the United States. > > Why does Clinton want to have terrorists attack the U.S.? So that he can > use the Emergency War Powers Act to invoke martial law, suspend the U.S. > Constitution, put FEMA and the United Nations fighting "Peace FORCES" in > charge of the United States, confiscate ALL weapons from civilians, Citizens, > Patriots, Constitutionalists, and Civilian Militias, give up our sovereignty > and turn our nation over to the control of the United Nations under the New > World Order. > > In fact, Clinton has tipped his hand and unknowingly (or purposely) let it > slip that the attack on U.S. Citizens and civilians WILL definitely be > biological or germ warfare. Remember, in my last post I explained how the > feds could save $2000 per square kilometer and even $800 per square kilometer > and spend only $1 per square kilometer to exterminate all human life within > that small 1/4 square mile area? > > How would he know unless he was planning to do it himself? And notice the > value is in U.S. dollars NOT foreign money! > > Just listen to The New York Times quoting Clinton: > > 'Clinton said that of all the new threats, the one that "keeps me awake > at night" is the possibility of germ attack. "A chemical attack would be > horrible, but it would be finite," he said, adding that it would not spread. > But a biological attack could spread, he added, "kind of like the gift that > keeps on giving." > > That, Citizens and Patriots, is what Clinton is planning > > So, please read the following article published by the New York Times: > > Thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce B.) for forwearding this New York > Times article by JUDITH MILLER and WILLIAM J. BROAD on Clinton's plan to > prepare for an NBC terrorist attack upon the U.S. within 24 months. > > Subj: Fear where this will take us ... > Date: 99-01-22 07:27:17 EST > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce B.) > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Let's see who will get defined as "terrorists." > =================================================================== > http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/global/012299germ-warfare.html > > January 22, 1999 > New York Times page 1 > Clinton Describes Terrorism Threat for 21st Century > > By JUDITH MILLER and WILLIAM J. BROAD > > WASHINGTON -- President Clinton said Thursday that it is "highly likely" > that a terrorist group will launch or threaten a germ or chemical attack > on American soil within the next few years. > > In an interview in the Oval Office, Clinton said he had been persuaded > by intelligence reports that the United States needs to bolster its > defenses. > > "I just want the American people to know what they need to know and have > a realistic view of this," the President said in the 45-minute > interview, "not to be afraid, or asleep. I think that's the trick." > > Without providing specifics, Clinton warned that any attack with germ or > chemical weapons would prompt "at least a proportionate if not a > disproportionate response." The United States has signed treaties not to > use chemical or germ weapons. > > Clinton said he is weighing a proposal from the Defense Department to > establish a commander in chief for the defense of the continental > United States, a step that civil liberties groups strongly resist. > > Such a program would go far beyond the civil defense measures and bomb > shelters that marked the cold war, setting up instead a military > leadership to help fight chaos and disarray if an attack occurred. > Pentagon commanders oversee regions around the globe, but not the > continental United States. > > Critics fear such moves could open the door to rising military influence > and a loss of individual rights, but Clinton insisted that such > erosions would never occur. > > Clinton gave the interview as his lawyers ended their defense > presentation at his impeachment trial in the Senate. Since the Monica > Lewinsky issue surfaced a year ago Thursday, the President has given > almost no interviews to major American news organizations. > > With his Presidency under fire, it is unclear how much of the proposed > new military funds -- more than $2 billion -- Clinton will be able to > get through the Republican-dominated Congress. But Congress has usually > supported White House efforts to fight terrorism. > > Despite the political pressures, Clinton appeared relaxed and deeply > engaged in the complex scientific and policy issues raised by what the > White House has called 21st-century threats. He smiled repeatedly, yet > spoke of spending sleepless nights pondering new security challenges > after the end of the cold war. > > In the interview, Clinton said he hoped a major legacy of his Presidency > would be to stave off unconventional attacks. He said he would delighted > if, decades later, Americans look back on any such threat as "the dog > that didn't bark." > > Clinton described how he had come to see germ, chemical and computer > attacks as the greatest emerging threat to national security, and the > White House said Thursday that he would propose $2.8 billion in his next > budget to fight such terrorism. > > On Friday Clinton plans to announce the Administration's > program to combat exotic forms of terrorism that he said would dominate > national defense in the next century. The steps include developing new > vaccines, stockpiling antibiotics, setting up emergency medical teams in > major cities and a corps of computer experts who could respond quickly > to electronic attacks. > > Clinton said that of all the new threats, the one that "keeps me awake > at night" is the possibility of germ attack. "A chemical attack would be > horrible, but it would be finite," he said, adding that it would not > spread. But a biological attack could spread, he added, "kind of like > the gift that keeps on giving." > > During Clinton's Presidency, terrorism has emerged as one of the > nation's thorniest security challenges, its dangers more diffuse than > those of the cold war yet more immediate. > > Clinton said he had began worrying about biological terrorism > and other unconventional threats six years ago, in February 1993, after > Islamic radicals exploded a bomb under the World Trade Center in New > York. The bombing killed six people and injured more than a thousand. > > He said his concerns about the danger of germ or chemical attack were > deepened by reports that Iraq had retained some chemical weapons and by > the activities of a Japanese cult, Aum Shinrikyo, which attacked the > Tokyo subway system in 1995 with a nerve agent, killing 12 and injuring > 5,000. > > Clinton said he thought it was more likely that a rogue state would more > likely attack American surrogates overseas that wage terrorism in the > United States itself. > > He noted that Osama bin Laden, a Saudi fugitive who is accused of > masterminding the United States Embassy bombings in Africa in August, > has "made an effort to get chemical weapons" and "may have" tried to get > germ weapons. "We don't know that they have them," Clinton said. > > Clinton said "a lot of what we've done already," some of it secret, "has > delayed" foreign efforts to develop and deploy chemical, biological or > nuclear weapons. > > He said that ultimately, the best defense against unconventional warfare > and biological terrorism in particular would be scientific strides in > deciphering the genetic material in microbes and humans, so vaccines > could be tailored for quick response to an attack. > > This, he said, would allow defense to stay ahead of the offense. His > hope, he said, was that the United States would use "each new wave of > technology to close the gap between offense and defense." > > Specifically he endorsed the Human Genome Project, a costly federally > funded effort to map human genetic material, saying it would be an > important part of the shield that his Administration is building. > > Clinton's personal interest in the threat, aides agree, has become a > powerful force behind secret meetings, actions and directives meant to > bolster antiterrorism work and to counter what aides describe as a > growing danger to civilians. > > The budget outlined by the White House today, to be formally presented > by the President on Friday at the National Academy of Sciences, includes > $10 billion to defend against terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and > "cyber attacks," according to the White House statement. > > Most of the money -- about $8.5 billion -- is earmarked for the defense > of American embassies and other buildings and personnel against > conventional weapons like car and truck bombs. The rest is divided > among existing and new programs to counter biological, chemical and > computer attacks, especially those that could cripple key parts of the > Government or the economy. > > Over the last two years, the Administration has almost doubled the money > spent to protect Americans against attacks with unconventional weapons. > In fiscal 1998, this budget was $770 million; in the new budget, it > rises to $1,336 million. > > > > Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company > > -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -> Posted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
