-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.parascope.com/ds/articles/subliminalCIA.htm
<A HREF="http://www.parascope.com/ds/articles/subliminalCIA.htm">Subliminal
CIA</A>
-----
Many embedded links at site.
Om
K
-----
Subliminal CIA

by Jon Elliston
Dossier Editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Forty years ago, the American public suddenly faced an unsettling
question: could subliminal persuasion be used to influence the
unsuspecting? The anecdotal evidence seemed to confirm the Big
Brotherish power of undetected commands slipped "beneath the threshold
of awareness." The Central Intelligence Agency, then in the midst of a
multi-million dollar mind war research program, was intrigued by the
potential power of subliminal messages. Classified documents released
decades after these events reveal an obscure and intriguing chapter in
the CIA's long involvement with techniques of mental manipulation.
As the CIA learned, the effectiveness of subliminal communication is
very much open to question. Even today, the scientific community
continues to debate whether subliminals, which are messages too brief to
be noticed by the viewer or listener, have any impact at all.
When the CIA peered into the power of subliminal persuasion, what did it
find? The best available evidence is the surviving documentation on the
CIA's research programs. These records have surfaced sporadically since
the mid-1970s, when Congressional investigators and investigative
reporters probed into some of the agency's notorious experiments in mind
and behavior control.

A few years ago, the CIA began declassifying back copies of Studies in
Intelligence, its internal journal on the history and methodology of the
spy trade. At last the public can read what is probably the agency's
first assessment of "The Operational Potential of Subliminal Perception
." A report bearing this title appeared in the CIA journal's Spring 1958
issue.

We don't know when -- if ever -- the CIA quit investigating subliminals,
but thanks to this recently released document, we know what piqued their
interest. The date of the report is significant; at that time, the
United States was in the midst of the first great "subliminal scare" (
see Dossier's documented feature on the evolution of this phenomenon).
It began in late 1957, when New Jersey marketing specialist James Vicary
claimed to have increased concession sales by flashing
too-brief-to-be-seen messages like "Hungry? Eat Popcorn" and "Drink
Coke" in the midst of feature films. Vicary later downplayed the
effectiveness of the technique, and admitted that his research data on
subliminal projection was "too small to be meaningful." But the damage
was done. Subliminal mania spread like wildfire across the national
consciousness, as people began to wonder, "What do I see that I don't
notice, and what can it do to me?"

The concern spread to Washington, D.C., where legislators led by Utah
Representative William Dawson started a drive to ban subliminal
broadcasting, which he called the "secret pitch." Dawson spoke of the
"frightening aspects" of subliminals. "Put to political propaganda
purposes," he warned, subliminal communication "would be made to order
for the establishment and maintenance of a totalitarian government."
Was Dawson right about the brainwashing potential of subliminals? Could
propaganda be secretly delivered and imprinted on the psyche? Down the
street from Capitol Hill, at CIA headquarters, some spy scientists were
actively exploring such questions.

Martin A. Lee, co-author of Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of
LSD, revealed some of this research in an article called "The CIA's
Subliminal Seduction," which appeared in the February 1980 issue of High
Times magazine. Lee quoted an unnamed "former CIA operative" as saying
that "some thought was given to whether or not we could affect political
outcomes by using subliminal perception on things like radio and TV."
One partially declassified CIA document cited by Lee contained the
ominous observation that "it may be that subliminal projection can be
utilized in such a way as to feature a visual suggestion such as 'Obey
[deleted].'"

The document, dated January 17, 1958, said that the subliminal method
"has achieved some success in commercial advertising" and cited James
Vicary's now-discredited movie experiments as proof. According to Lee,
the CIA then staged in own tests in American movie theaters. "On one
occasion, the agency admonished an audience in Alexandria, Virginia, to
'buy popcorn,' but instead, many of the viewers lined up at the drinking
fountains because the suggestion made them thirsty," Lee reported.
"Operational Assessment of Subliminal Perception"

This report, which appeared in the Spring 1958 issue of the agency's
classified journal Studies in Intelligence, may be the CIA's first
serious assessment of subliminal persuasion.

MKULTRA Subproject No. 83
Declassified CIA memo by Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, chief of the Chemical
Division of the agency's Technical Services Staff. Gottlieb, who oversaw
many MKULTRA projects, reviewed covert support for studies of hypnosis,
truth drugs, psychic powers and subliminal persuasion.

Rep. Dawson on
Subliminal Telecasts
This collection of materials was entered into the Congressional Record
on January 28, 1958 by Representative William Dawson, who led the
legislative fight against subliminal advertising when the technique
first came into use.

FCC Notice on
Subliminals
A rare official statement on subliminal communication, this January 24,
1973 public notice states the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
position on the issue.

FCC Information Bulletin
on Subliminals
In 1977, twenty years after the first reported use of subliminal ads in
movies, the Federal Communications Commission released this 8-page
information bulletin on subliminal projection.

FCC's 1984 Statement
on Subliminals
Representative Dan Glickman opened an August 6, 1984 hearing on
subliminal communication technology with a reference to Orwellian
developments.

The CIA's subliminal experiments on unwitting Americans, alarming as
they may seem, were hardly an extreme example of the abuses that the
agency's scientists committed. By 1958, the CIA had already spent at
least five years testing ways to breach the mind's defenses. CIA
Director Allen Dulles had in 1953 launched MKULTRA, a super-secret set
of experiments on the science and techniques of mind and behavior
control. The program examined everything from sensory deprivation to
hypnosis to drugs like LSD.

Amidst this adventurous era that was the dawn of the "Cold War on the
mind," as author John Marks calls it, the declassified Studies in
Intelligence report on subliminals seems tame and cautious. Richard
Gafford, the author of the report, brought a skeptical approach to the
subject, and he raised many hard questions for those who take for
granted the power of subliminals.

The report directly criticizes Vicary's claims of subliminal success.
"It is evident that there are several mighty leaps in logic in the
advertising man's argument, and a great many places where his scheme can
go astray," Gafford wrote. "He has taken several psychological phenomena
which have been demonstrated to a limited degree in controlled
laboratory experiments and strung them together into an appealing
argument for a 'technique.'"

Gafford did not reject the feasibility of subliminal communication
outright. The CIA was rather open-minded when it came to unconventional
psychology, after all. "Interest in the operational potential of
subliminal perception has precedent in serious consideration of the
techniques of hypnosis, extrasensory perception, and various forms of
conditioning," he noted. "By each of these techniques, it has been
demonstrated, certain individuals can at certain times and under certain
circumstances be influenced to act abnormally without awareness of the
influence or at least without antagonism."

Ultimately these methods -- "although they occasionally produced
dramatic results" -- proved unreliable, the report says. The subliminal
tactic was likewise fraught with difficulties. It was too hard to
identify and test indicators of the effects of secret stimuli, and
probably impossible to standardize a technique that would succeed with
most people.

The Studies in Intelligence report concluded with a dim view of the
effectiveness of the projection technique that was still spooking the
nation: "there are so many elusive variables and so many sources of
irregularity in the device of directing subliminal messages to a target
individual that its operational feasibility is exceedingly limited."
Did the story of the CIA and subliminals end with Richard Gafford's
skeptical assessment? Absolutely not, according to other declassified
evidence. Gafford may or may not have been aware of the MKULTRA project,
knowledge of which was off limits for all but a handful of CIA
officials. His report, therefore, is best viewed as one piece of
multi-dimensional puzzle; it represents one CIA officer's take on
subliminals, but tells us little about how far the agency's mind control
investigators may have gone with the technique.

One CIA memo written shortly after Gafford's report appeared in Studies
in Intelligence shows that the agency wasn't done with subliminals. On
April 18, 1958, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, the scientist who administered the
various MKULTRA projects, summarized Subproject No. 83, which financed
"technical surveys" of "controversial and misunderstood areas" such as
ESP, hypnosis, truth drugs, and yes, "subliminal perception." (Click
here to read the document.)

Whatever conclusions the CIA drew from the MKULTRA subliminal survey are
not publicly known. Would the CIA have shied away from using subliminals
on operational targets? The legacy of the MKULTRA experiments strongly
suggests not. Time and time again, techniques developed under the
auspices of the program were applied in Cold War covert operations.
The presently available documentation does not say when (or if) the CIA
quit investigating and/or using subliminals. However, Congressional
investigations revealed that MKULTRA scientists tested several severe
techniques on unwitting citizens that made subliminal manipulation seem
like a walk in the park. So when it comes to the CIA and subliminals, we
can be sure of one thing: the agency's mind molders would not have
rejected subliminal persuasion operations on ethical grounds.

© Copyright 1998-1999 ParaScope, Inc.

Related Article: The Subliminal Scares MKULTRA: The CIA and LSD Dossier:
Covert Operations
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to