-Caveat Lector-

Activist Mailing List - http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/

U$ gives the orders:UK stands up for Gen Manipulated crops

NOTE the following refs. below : =20

<Under a new international treaty, a ban on GMOs would only be
justifiable on scientific grounds if it were shown traditional crops
or local plants were likely to be wiped out or damaged by mutant
intruders.>

IS THIS A REF TO the prospective treaty mentioned next, or to
something already in force ??

<That is exactly the kind of issue that a new international agreement
on controlling the import and export of live genetic material is to
cover. The final negotiating session between 170 countries starts in
Colombia on February 14, but there is wide disagreement over what it
should contain.>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guardian (London)               Friday February 5, 1999

Britain and the United States have decided to block attempts to ban
genetically modified organisms by India and other developing countries
who want to protect their traditional farming methods and the food
supply of the poor.

Tony Blair and the European Union are backing the US position that a
ban on GM crops on those grounds is a restraint of free trade.

Under a new international treaty, a ban on GMOs would only be
justifiable on scientific grounds if it were shown traditional crops
or local plants were likely to be wiped out or damaged by mutant
intruders.

Britain and the US believe their biotechnology companies specialising
in GM products will lose exports if developing countries ban them on
social or economic grounds.

Meanwhile, the Environment Minister, Michael Meacher, disclosed
yesterday that three test sites growing GM food have broken rules on
their development. In a Commons written reply he said a Health and
Safety inspector found breaches of regulations by Nickersons Biochem
at Holton-le-Moor, Lincolnshire, and by the Scottish Crop Research
Institute at two sites in Invergowrie, Dundee. Nickersons Biochem had
planted GM oilseed rape less than the approved 400 metres from non-GM
oilseed rape, while the SCRI had grown field beans instead of barley
after testing GM potatoes.

News of the rule breaches, which took place in 1997, came as Mr
Meacher disclosed in another written reply that GM crops could have
greater potential to affect the environment than non-GM crops.

He told MPs that in one laboratory study in 1998 there was a higher
likelihood that lacewing flies fed on moth caterpillars that had been
fed on GM maize would die.

That is exactly the kind of issue that a new international agreement
on controlling the import and export of live genetic material is to
cover. The final negotiating session between 170 countries starts in
Colombia on February 14, but there is wide disagreement over what it
should contain.

India and African states believe that if multinational companies like
Monsanto are allowed to control the seed supply, their traditional
agriculture - in which part of the crop is saved by farmers for sowing
the next year - will be in jeopardy. If Monsanto have patented the
seed or included a terminator gene so crops cannot reproduce, then
traditional agricultural practices on which their economies are based
would end.

The row over the right to ban GM organisms which might damage local
crops or traditional agriculture must be resolved before the protocol
can be finalised for signing in New York in three months.



______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to