-Caveat Lector-
an excerpt from:
America's Secret Establishment
An introduction to The Order of Skull & Bones
by ANTONY C. SUTTON
Liberty House Press
2027 Iris
Billings, Montana 59102
1986
-----
Highly reccomended. There is more in this book than can be presented here.
Many charts and reproductions of orginal source material.As always, Caveat
Lector.
In stock: A-albionic Research, PO Box 20273, Ferndale, MI 48220-0273
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lloyd Miller, Research Director)
Om
K
-----
Memorandum Number Six:
Operations Of The Order
In 1981 The Anglo American Establishment by Caroll Quigley, was
published in New York by a small anti-Establishment publisher. Quigley
was formerly instructor at Princeton and Harvard and then Professor at
the School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. The publisher
notes in his introduction that Quigley had been unable to find a major
publisher for the manuscript. This is not surprising. The book blows the
lid off the British equivalent of The Order.
The Anglo American Establishment has nothing at all to do with the
American establishment. which is hardly mentioned. but it has a lot to
do with the British Establishment. The publisher probably inserted the
word ''AMERICAN" into the title to enhance marketability in the States
Quigley describes in minute detail the historical operations of the British
establishment controlled by a secret society and operating very much as The
Order operates in the U.S. This is the real significance of Quigley's
explosive book.
The Group
The British secret society. known as "The Group" or just plain "US",
was founded at Oxford University. much as The Order was founded at
Yale, but without the Masonic mumbo jumbo As we noted in
Memorandum Five, the Group operates in a series of concentric circles
and like The Order consists of old line families allied with private
merchant bankers, known in the U.S. as investment bankers.
Bearing in mind, the proven existence of The Group, the operations
of The Order and the kind of penetration it has achieved cannot be ex-
plained by mere chance By examining The Orders operations we can
generate a picture of its objectives without access to any internal con-
stitutlon or statement of objectives even if such exists. It may only be
word of mouth
By contrast. The Groups objective is recorded in Cecil Rhodes' will
It was:
"The extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of
a system of emigration from the United Kingdom and of colonization by
British subjects of all lands wherein the means of livelihood are at-
tainable by energy, labor and enterprise . . . and the ultimate recovery
of the United States of America as an integral part of the British
Empire."
This objective is, of course, ridiculous and somewhat immature, but
no less ridiculous and immature than the New World order objective of
The ORDER. Yet, The Group has controlled British policy for a hundred
years and,still does
Both the Group and The Order have been created by Anglophiles
who want to pattern the world on a Hegelian-Anglo hybrid culture.
Where the Latins. the Slavs and the Sino races fit is not considered, but
clearly these cultures will be disinclined to become pawns of either the
British Empire or New England Yankees. Even within the Com-
monwealth, a voluntary association of nations, it is unlikely that
Canada, Australia and New Zealand would accept the constitutional
bondage envisaged by Cecil Rhodes. Both secret organizations
overlook, and there is a philosophic basis for this neglect, the natural
right of any ethnic group, be it white, black or yellow, English, Slavic or
Latin, to develop its own culture without coercion.
Unlike this author, Quigley sympathizes with the ends of The Group,
although he terms their methods despicable. Both The Group and The
Order are unwilling or unable to bring about a global society by volun-
tary means, so they opted for coercion. To do this they have created
wars and revolutions, they have ransacked public treasuries, they have
oppressed, they have pillaged, they have lied - even to their own
countrymen.
How have they done this?
Modus Operandi Of The Order
The activities of The Order are directed towards changing our society,
changing the world, to bring about a New World Order. This will be a
planned order with heavily restricted individual freedom, without Con-
stitutional protection, without national boundaries or cultural
distinction.
We deduce this objective by examining and then summing up the ac-
tions of individual members: there has been a consistent pattern of ac-
tivity over one hundred years. Part of this activity has been in coopera-
tion with The Group, with its parallel and recorded objectives.
Now if, for example, we found that the dominant interest of members
was raising ducks, that they wrote articles about ducks, bred ducks, sold
ducks, formed duck-studying councils, developed a philosophy of
ducks, then it would be reasonable to conclude that they had an objec-
tive concerning ducks, that this is not mere random activity.
Historically, operations of The Order have concentrated on society,
how to change society in a specific manner towards a specific goal; a
New World Order. We know the elements in society that will have to be
changed in order to bring about this New World order, we can then ex-
amine The Order's actions in this context.
More or less these elements would have to be:
Education - how the population of the future will behave,
Money - the means of holding wealth and exchanging goods,
Law - the authority to enforce the will of the state, a world law
and a world court is needed for a world state,
Politics - the direction of the State,
Economy - the creation of wealth,
History - what people believe happened in the past,
Psychology - the means of controlling how people think,
Philanthropy - so that people think well of the controllers,
Medicine - the power over health, life and death,
Religion - people spiritual beliefs, the spur to action for many,
Media - what people know and learn about current events,
Continuity - the power to appoint who follows in your
footsteps.
Operations in each of these areas will be detailed in subsequent
volumes. For example, in the next volume, The Order Controls Educa-
tion, we will describe how Daniel Coit Gilman, President of John
Hopkins University, imported Wundt psychological methods from Ger-
many, then welded education and psychology in the U.S., established
laboratories. brought these educational laboratories into major Univer-
sities and generated 100s of PhDs to teach the new educational condi-
tioning system. One of the first of these Johns Hopkins doctorates was
John Dewey. The result we well know. The educational morass of the
'80s where most kids - not all - can't spell, read or write. yet can be
programmed into mass behavior channels.
The Order's next move was to control the Foundations - They got all
the big ones - Carnegie, Ford, Peabody. Slater, Russell Sage and so
on That's the topic of another volume. As in education, the modus
operandi of The Order was to get in FIRST and set the stage for the
future. The initial objective was to establish a direction in an organiza-
tion. Selection of managers, intuitive or amoral enough to catch on to
the direction, kept the momentum going. In the case of Foundations,
The Order has usually maintained a continuing presence over decades.
When it comes to activities by individual members, at first sight the
pattern is confusing and superficially inconsistent. Let's give some
examples:
- Andrew Carnegie profited from war through his vast steel
holdings, but under the guidance of member Daniel Coit
Gilman, Carnegie was also an enthusiastic president and
financial backer of the American Peace Society. This is seem-
ingly inconsistent. Could Carnegie be for war and peace at the
same time?
- The League to Enforce the Peace, founded by members
William H. Taft and Theodore Marburg, was promoting peace
yet active in urging U.S. participation in World War One. How
could the League be for war and peace at the same time?
* In the 1920s, W. Averell Harriman was a prime supporter of the
Soviets with finance and diplomatic assistance, at a time when
such aid was against State Department regulations. Harriman
participated in RUSKOMBANK, the first Soviet commercial
bank. Vice-President Max May of Guaranty Trust, dominated
by the Harriman-Morgan interests, became the FIRST Vice-
President of RUSKOMBANK in charge of its foreign operations.
In brief, an American banker under guidance of a member of
The Order had a key post in a Soviet bank! But we also find that
Averell Harriman, his brother Roland Harriman, and members
E.S. James and Knight Woolley, through the Union Bank (in
which they held a major interest) were prime financial backers
of Hitler.
Now our textbooks tell us that Nazis and Soviets were bitter enemies.
and their systems are opposites. How could a rational man support
soviets and Nazis at the same time? Is Harriman irrational or is the in-
consistency explainable?
* The Bundy family (we have a Memorandum on them later)
gives us another example of seeming inconsistency. William
Bundy was with the Central Intelligence Agency for a decade
McGeorge Bundy was National Security Assistant to Presidents
Kennedy and Johnson. So the Bundys presumably support
U.S.-European policy which is pro-NATO. Yet the Bundys
have been linked to activities and organizations which are anti-
NATO and, indeed, pro-Marxist - for example, the Institute
for Policy Studies. Are the Bundys inconsistent?
* Among individual members of The Order we find a wide variety
of publicly proclaimed beliefs, ideologies and politics. William
Buckely periodically chews out the Soviets. On the other hand,
member John Burtt has been a member of a dozen communist
front groups. Member William S. Coffin, Jr. spent three years
with CIA and then became a leader of anti-Vietnam war activity
through the National Conference for a New Politics and Clergy
and Laymen Concerned about Vietnam. In fact, Coffin was one
of the Boston Five charged and indicted for conspiracy to
violate Federal laws. And, of course, W. Averell Harriman is
elder statesman of the Democratic Party.
Quite a mixture of beliefs and activities. Do they reflect inconsistent
philosophies? How can The Order have a consistent objective with this
potpourri of individual actions?
The answer is, they are not at all inconsistent: because the objec-
tive of The Order is above and beyond these actions and in fact
needs these seeming contradictions.
The State is Absolute
How can there exist a common objective when members are ap-
parently acting in opposition to one another?
Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the
reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The
Order is neither "left" nor "right". "Left" and "right" are artificial devices
to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right
are vital elements in a process of controlled change.
The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic
Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of "left" and "right"
presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical
system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from
Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.
The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim
but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany
In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis
For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about
another political system, a synthesis of the two, neither left nor right
This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change.
Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral
Commission where "change" is promoted and "conflict management"
is termed the means to bring about this change.
In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel
and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires
complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not
exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a
role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only in obedience to the
State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany, there is no
freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will there be in the
New World Order. And if it sounds like George Orwell's 1984 - it is.
In brief, the State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the
ideal society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.
So who or what is the State? Obviously it's a self-appointed elite. It is
interesting that Fichte, who developed these ideas before Hegel, was a
freemason, almost certainly Illuminati, and certainly was promoted by
the Illuminati. For example, Johann Wolfgang Goethe (Abaris in the
Illuminati code) pushed Fichte for an appointment at Jena University.
Furthermore. the Illuminate principle that the end justifies the means,
a principle that Quigley scores as immoral and used by both The Group
and The Order, is rooted in Hegel. Even the anonymous Yale student
who wrote the verse in Memorandum Three observed this principle at
work on the Yale campus.
This, then, is a vital part of our explanation of The Order. When its
co-founder, William Russell, was in Germany in 1831-2, there was no
way he could have avoided Hegelian theory and discussion. It was the
talk of the campus. It swept intellectual Germany like a Pac Man craze.
Most Americans haven't heard of it. And those who have don't want to
hear any more about it. Why? Because its assumptions are completely
at variance with our sense of individual freedom and Constitutional
guarantees. Most of us believe the State exists to serve the individual,
not vice versa.
The Order believes the opposite to most of us. That is crucial to
understanding what they are about. So any discussion between left and
right, while essential to promote change, is never allowed to develop
into a discussion along the lines of Jeffersonian democracy, i.e., the
best government is least government. The discussion and the funding is
always towards more state power, use of state power and away from
individual rights. So it doesn't matter from the viewpoint of The Order
whether it is termed left, right, Democratic, Republican, secular or
religious - so long as the discussion is kept within the framework of the
State and the power of the State.
This is the common feature between the seemingly dissimilar posi-
tions taken by members - they have a higher common objectives.
in which clash of ideas is essential. So long as rights of the in-
dividual are not introduced into the discussion the clash of ideas
generates the conflict necessary for change.
As the objective is also Global control an emphasis is placed on global
thinking, i.e., internationalism. This is done through world organiza-
tions and world law. The Great contribution of the Tafts to The Order
was on the world court system and world law - to the international
aspect of the New World Order.
pp. 30-35
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
