-Caveat Lector-
Article below gives background for why the Second Abraham
Lincoln Brigade is being formed.
Brian Redman
Temporary organizer, Second Abraham Lincoln Brigade
TUESDAY
MARCH 16
1999
WND Exclusive Commentary
Odd alliance at State, CNN?
By Stella Jatras
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com
In my opinion, there is something unhealthy when the recently married
CNN's Christiane Amanpour and the State Department's James Rubin cover
the same "breaking news" story.
Ms. Amanpour, who never ceased to present a one-sided CNN perspective
throughout the Bosnian war, is now doing the same with her one-sided
anti-Serb CNN perspective of the civil war now raging in Kosovo. At
the same time, Mr. Rubin is touting the anti-Serb position from the
State Department, which is in effect: If the Serbs do not sign on the
dotted line, NATO will bomb the Serbs. If the Kosovo Liberation Army
(KLA) does not sign on the dotted line, NATO will still bomb the
Serbs!
The American people should be asking themselves, "What gives? Is CNN
running the State Department, or vice versa?" There is clearly a
conflict here. Mr. Rubin should step down as spokesman for the State
Department. How can he have any credibility considering with whom he
shares pillow talk? How can there be any semblance of journalistic
impartiality with such a relationship between a "news" agency and the
government? If there was any doubt before, the identical slant of Ms.
Amanpour's "reporting" and Mr. Rubin's "official statements" out of
Rambouillet should make it perfectly clear.
Don't underestimate Ms. Amanpour's influence, not just on the news,
but on U.S. foreign policy.
You need only ask yourself if we would be involved in Bosnia if CNN,
driven by Ms. Amanpour, had not had Bosnia on the tube night after
night. "Where there's a war there's Amanpour," wrote Stephen Kinzer of
the New York Times Magazine, Oct 9, 1994. She certainly has the drive
and an instinct for the big stories: Haiti, Rwanda, Bosnia and now
Kosovo. But what happens when she gets there? In her own words, from a
New York Times article regarding Peter Arnett's involvement in the
discredited CNN story about U.S. forces allegedly using poison gas in
Vietnam: "The bottom line is that a television correspondent's most
important contract is with the public. Trust and credibility are the
commodities we trade in; without them we are worthless." It's only
fair to ask ourselves how well Ms. Amanpour has lived up to her own
standard.
The Stephen Kinzer article gives part of the answer in a quote from a
longtime TV associate of Ms. Amanpour: "She just insisted on going
there [Rwanda], and the impact of her coverage forced the other
networks to follow. It was another example of her great news
instincts. But this same insider has doubts about Amanpour's
commitment to objective journalism. 'I have winced at some of what
she's done, at what used to be called advocacy journalism,' he said.
'She was sitting in Belgrade when that marketplace massacre happened,
and she went on the air to say that the Serbs had probably done it.
There was no way she could have known that. She was assuming an
omniscience which no journalist has. Christiane is a journalist more
in the British than the American tradition, more willing to take sides
on a story. And I think she has a little of that traditional British
contempt for America.' "
The fact that a U.N. classified report concluded that Bosnian Muslim
forces had committed the Markale marketplace massacre seems of no
consequence to Ms. Amanpour. Deutsch Presse-Agentur of June 6, 1996,
wrote: "For the first time, a senior U.N. official had admitted the
existence of a secret U.N. report that blames the Bosnian Moslems for
the February 1994 massacre of Moslems at the Sarajevo market."
Christiane Amanpour has yet to inform her viewers of this fact, but
continues to allow them to believe the massacre was a Serbian atrocity
which United States and NATO used as an excuse to drop over 6,000 tons
of bombs on the Bosnian Serbs.
During her interview on the Charlie Rose show of 25 November 1997, Ms.
Amanpour said, "...an ABC journalist was killed [in Bosnia]." She
omitted the fact that U.N. and military experts believe that David
Kaplan, the ABC journalist, was killed by Muslims. Another big CNN
story early in the Bosnian conflict was the killing, allegedly by Serb
snipers of two "Muslim babies" on a bus. Who could not have been
horrified by the tragic sight of the funeral service for those
innocent Muslim babies? Where were Ms. Amanpour and CNN to set the
record straight? If it had not been for French 2 TV that covered the
funeral, this writer would never have known that the babies were
Serbian (not Muslim) killed by a Muslim sniper, as was made painfully
clear by the presence of a Serbian Orthodox priest conducting the
funeral service... before it was interrupted by a grenade attack.
However, in the CNN coverage the priest had been cropped out, leaving
the American audience to believe that Serbs were not only the
assassins, but were also responsible for the grenade attack.
Mr. Kinzer goes on to say, "Advocate or not, Amanpour has developed a
style of her own. She has a strong ego, and is satisfied only when she
can dominate a story, as she has in Bosnia." I guess that includes a
little stage management when appropriate. According to another
journalist who was with Ms. Amanpour during a visit to Kosovo, some of
the journalists were taken on a orientation flight along the border
between Kosovo and Albania by helicopter and were advised to wear flak
jackets for the flight because of possible ground fire from Albanian
positions. When the flight returned, Ms. Amanpour, wearing a flak
jacket, taped her report for the CNN audience with scenes photographed
from the helicopter in the background... really dramatic stuff. The
only problem is, she had not accompanied her cameraman on the flight.
The flak jacket and the taped film of the flight were all for effect.
And to think that Cokie Roberts was criticized for wearing a coat and
having a picture of the Capitol Building in the background when, in
fact, she was being filmed in a studio.
In a full-page Washington Times ad of July 29, 1998, a Vietnam
veterans group wrote, "Now that the Sarin gas fraud has been exposed
-- what about Bosnia coverage by Christiane Amanpour who fed the
American people a nightly diet of slanted reports and chilling images?
Her biased reporting promoted the "We Must Do Something" approach that
enabled President Clinton to send American GIs to Bosnia without
facing the hard question from American taxpayers and their elected
representatives: What national interests justified that decision?" We
should be asking the same question today: What national interests
justify the decision to send GIs to Kosovo? It appears the "We Must Do
Something" mentality once again prevails due to the biased anti-Serb
reporting by the media.
The United States has always said that we would never negotiate with
terrorists, yet the Kosovo Liberation Army with its connections to
Osama bin Laden was invited to negotiate in Paris. NATO's Supreme
Allied Commander in Europe, US General Wesley Clark, as has Secretary
of State Madeleine Albright, met with key leaders of the rebel Kosovo
Liberation Army (KLA) in the Paris region. The question should be,
"Why are we negotiating with known terrorists?" In his AP commentary,
"Ethnic Albanians Sensing Victory," George Jahn writes: "Life or
death, bombs or peace. The outcome of the faraway talks on Kosovo
seems irrelevant for many here, where ethnic Albanians are convinced
they are winning their independence struggle and many Serbs sense
defeat."
Take the "uillet" out of Rambouillet, and what do you get? RAMBO!
Whether as Rambo or her role model Xena, Warrior Princess, U.S.
Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, in her macho cowboy hat,
kowtows to KLA terrorists and threatens the Serbian people
("Yugoslavia will 'Pay a Price,' Albright Warns," The Washington Post,
8 March 1998). All the while Ms. Amanpour and Mr. Rubin sing her
praises in close harmony.
Christiane Amanpour, James Rubin and Madeleine Albright. What a
troika!
_________________________________________________________________
Click here for more information!
_________________________________________________________________
CONTACT WND | SUPPORT WND | GO TO PAGE ONE | SEARCH WND
WorldNetDaily.com
_________________________________________________________________
© 1999 Western Journalism Center
_________________________________________________________________
This page was last built 3/16/99; 4:07:47 PM Site scripted with
UserLand Frontier
Direct corrections and technical inquiries to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
