-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.cchr.org/ect/eng/page22.htm
<A HREF="http://www.cchr.org/ect/eng/page22.htm">Apartheid and ECT: Pain as
Punishment - Psychia </A>
-----

“It’s simply too expensive, too slow and too risky... because we treat
more Africans than Whites, we would have to double our staff if we used
anesthetics.”
Dr. P. Henning
Chief State Psychiatrist, South Africa

– on why blacks receiving ECT were not anesthetized


Many of apartheid’s concepts were spawned from the German nationalist
psychiatric philosophy that “life devoid of value” or “inferior stock”
justified the mass oppression and killing of individuals. In South
Africa, psychiatrists, psychologists and other eugenicists callously
categorized blacks in this fashion, offering the government a
“scientific” means by which to deny them employment. The primary
architect of apartheid was Hendrick Verwoerd, a psychologist who had
furthered his studies in German universities at a time when these
institutions were energetically forwarding psychiatric genetics (race
betterment). He later became Prime Minister of South Africa.76
Disused mining compounds in isolated areas of South Africa were used as
psychiatric compounds for blacks. Many were given electroshock without
anesthetic. The bodies of those who died were carried from “camp”;
blacks were frequently buried in mass pauper graves.


     Eugenicists argued that the “brain capacity of natives” was far
less than Europeans. In 1934, H.L. Gordon claimed that there was a
ranking order for brain capacity as follows: 1) European, 2) educated
native, 3) psychotic native, 4) normal native, 5) criminal native and 6)
idiot native. Dr. Dunston, a psychiatrist and South Africa’s first
Commissioner of Mental Hygiene, suggested that blacks “even of the best
tribes, possibly belong to a race which is mentally inferior to
ours....”77

     Based on this fraudulent premise, tens of thousands of black South
Africans were incarcerated in “special” psychiatric institutions and
treated so atrociously that media, decades later dubbed it “mental
genocide.” The callous disregard psychiatrists have for blacks is
displayed in a 1971 study published in the South African Medical Journal
 in which the author reported that 100 South Sotho males had been given
electroshock without anesthetic on eight consecutive days. Only a
tranquilizer was used to block out the searing pain from the shock.78
The treating psychiatrists would have known that medical literature
throughout the 1960s had detailed how shock given in this way could
fracture the spine and even kill.79

     In 1976, CCHR exposed how blacks held in private psychiatric
institutions and used for slave labor were being given shock without
anesthetic. The chief state psychiatrist, Dr. P. Henning, felt this was
appropriate because “It’s simply too expensive, too slow and too risky.
Africans appear to be more susceptible to the effects of anesthetics and
because we treat more Africans than Whites, we would have to double our
staff if we used anesthetics.” 80

     The excruciating pain that would be felt from this application of
electricity was not an issue, reminiscent of Benjamin Rush, the “father”
of American psychiatry, who in 1797 theorized that blacks – being
descendants of lepers – had a morbid insensitivity to pain and, compared
to whites, were able to endure surgical operations with ease. Rush
recalled cases where blacks had actually held their upper part of a limb
during amputation without anesthetic.81

     Psychiatrists railed against public exposure of their electroshock
methods. The apartheid government, bowing to their demands, passed a law
prohibiting the reporting on or photographing of conditions in any
psychiatric facilities in South Africa. Those who violated this law were
fined or jailed for up to one year.

     When apartheid ended in 1994, the new Health Ministry ordered a
full inquiry into malpractice and racism in psychiatric hospitals. The
inquiry’s report, released in February 1996, found that because the
above law had prevented public scrutiny of psychiatric facilities,
“culprits have committed gross abuses of patients with impunity.”82 This
included frequent use of ECT.

     In some hospitals, “death certificates [were] falsified to
camouflage the real cause of death.” The general treatment of patients,
including commitment, isolation and drugging violated their “right not
to be subjected to cruel, degrading and inhuman treatment.”83

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
© 1997 Citizens Commission on Human Rights. All Rights Reserved.
For Trademark Information.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to