-Caveat Lector-
Guys and Gals, I think you are far out in left field. I know that
England has been going back to Heirloom seeds for a long time,
(since at least 1990) and that some of the aristocracy
breed mice (an animal who has short generations)
How long have they been fighting Monsanto?
The EuropaBio Propaganda? GM foods?
The Orientals have won a law case against Novartis.
I think Diana was killed as a warning, she was photographed
with children that apparently had AIDS. Consider:
AIDS has not been proved to even be a disease,
and Clinton was governer of Arkansa during the time
that the prison sold that plasma that the Canadian Goverment
appraintly wants to start a law suit about. (more below)
Also what tie was she
trying to set up, - who was she killed with, what religion was he again?
That woman was getting around in a whole lot of
places that the current Royalty could not conveniently go.
Noblesse oblige can go deep~!
Then there is the motto of the British monarch, Ich dien, "I serve"
She may not have wanted to stay with Charles, that does not mean that
she divorced her lineage or beliefs!
If the monarchy, and Europe is under the attack that I believe it is
then it might have been a good place to park the kids.
Consider the attach that the USA is under from Monsanto.
http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/contents.htm
this is on my chem page
http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/chem.htm
about and it has mega links
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/terminatorTech.html
then check out the official web site of the "Prince of Wales"
http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/
and consider when the royal family started protesting GM foods
AND when Clinton started backing GM foods and Monsanto?
Then ask your self one more question - Monsanto's Aspartame
approved during the Regan administration
but a lot of things happened during
"1989-1993" In other words Bush's administration
this was appreintly added in 1982
TITLE 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL
WARFARE PROGRAM - Chemical Testing on Civilian Populations
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/1520.html
a Pissed off,
Pied Piper
I will give you three guesses as to why I believe Diana was killed...
extra material:
Canada
Subject:
Forwarded: Canadian Ruling on Kiddie Porn
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:36:09 -0600
Canada Rules on Child Porn Case
VANCOUVER, British Columbia (AP) -- A provincial judge ruled Friday that
Canada's law against possessing child pornography violates the freedom-of-
expression clause of the country's Charter of Rights.
``There is no evidence that demonstrates a significant increase in the
danger to children caused by pornography,'' ruled Duncan Shaw, a
justice of British Columbia's Supreme Court.
He said the section of the Criminal Code that outlaws possession of child
pornography is invalid because it violates charter provisions guaranteeing
freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression.
The case involved pornography possession charges against John Sharpe.
Police raided his home near Vancouver in April 1995, seizing compact
disks, photos and writings about child pornography.
Prosecutors argued that allowing people to possess child pornography puts
children at risk from pedophiles. But Shaw said the contention that
materials depicting illegal sex with children actually prompt people to
commit such acts was ``only assumption.''
``The intrusion into freedom of expression and the right of privacy is so
profound that it is not outweighed by the limited beneficial effects of the
prohibition,'' Shaw wrote.
The provincial attorney general, Ujjal Dosanjh, said he needed time to
study the ruling before commenting or deciding on an appeal.
However, Barry Penner, justice spokesman for the opposition Liberal Party
in the provincial legislature, said the province should appeal immediately
``to look after children ... and protect them from being abused by sexual
deviants.''
Canada - BloodGate
http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/1/27/114853
Subject:
Forwarded: Child Prono
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:31:32 -0600
Have you ever really seen Hustler?
By Judith Reisman © 1999 WorldNetDaily.com
Until the current Flynt media-hype, few Americans had ever seen the
Flynt flagship publication in which he vents his barbaric brand of
graphic violence-and-sex. Who is the man who now "terrorizes"
Congress? I have really seen Flynt and his sadistic imagery and
fantasy having been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ)
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, to direct a two-year
content analysis of Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy,
Penthouse and Hustler (1953-1984).1
Our study documented each issue of Hustler averaging 14.1 children and
pseudo-children alongside 47 images of crime and violence; 52 percent
of child photos were sexually explicit and most cartooned children
were sexually violated. Flynt regularly presents a volatile
co-mingling of images of sex, violence, scatological degradation, fear
and horror. Seen routinely are blood-dripping-mutilated hands, arms,
heads, breasts and penises, often gutted, decapitated, castrated and
satanically murdered and cannibalized, racist and occult images
dominate the "magazine."
December 1978, Hustler published photographs of naked children as
young as three-years of age in sex scenes alongside an article,
"Children, Sex and Society," advocating an end to age of consent,
calling for acceptance of adult-child sex, and legalization of incest.
Hustler is not for those challenged by human compassion. For example,
in:
February 1975 in an article entitled "Adolescent Fantasy" an uncle is
photographed sexually with his niece;
October 1976 a naked girl scout is photographed soliciting sex in
August 1981, a nude young girl, photographed with her dollies, saying
to the viewer; "You would be surprised what a 'little girl can do.
..."
Recurrent cartoon and composite photo themes picturing blood-soaked
castration are seen in the reality of child rape and mutilation. In
October 26, 1990 a nine-year-old boy in Norman, Oklahoma was raped,
his penis cut off and eye gouged out causing Hustler to be removed
from local stores -- where a current Hustler depicted a young boy
similarly tortured.
Flynt's "Chester the Molester" cartoon character in March 1977, lay in
wait under a playground slide for a child to sexually assault. In
October 1977 the kidnapping and torturing three girls about 4-years
old is depicted; while in February 1979, a car, with "Just Married" is
shown driving away, with blood-drenched, aborted babies tied to the
bumper.
So much for fantasy! The May 1984 Hustler cartoon of a father sexually
abusing his daughter helped convict Hustler editorial cartoon
director, Dwaine Tinsely, in real life, of felony child sexual abuse
of his own daughter in 1989. He gave her birth control pills at age
thirteen, drugged her and sexually abused her until age eighteen, when
she became a suicidal drug addict. Tinsley alone had contributed 145
Hustler cartoons of violent child kidnapping and rape. The FBI Uniform
Crime Rate from 1972-1991 found a 128% increase in reported rapes,2
with both offenders and victims increasingly younger. The Reader's
Digest commented on the troubling FBI data, saying, "It could be
concluded that some force impelling toward sex crime has been
operating on younger males in the United States."
In reality, the abusive Hustler cartoons commonly exhibit the coarse
"humor" which defines the present White House scandal. To this trained
eye, the predatory "force impelling" the president toward a powerless
White House intern is reminiscent of Hustler's ongoing themes of
deceit, manipulation, degradation and fantasy.
1.The peer-approved study required researchers to examine each page of
every magazine (126) from Hustler's 1974 inception to 1984 which, in
1983, reached over four million consumers, numerically on a par with
Psychology Today readership.
2.See Emilie Buchwald, et al., Transforming A Rape Culture, (1993)
Milkweed, Minneapolis, MN., p. 7. and Judith Reisman, "SoftPorn" Plays
Hardball (1991). Huntington House, Lafayette, LA., (1991) p. 15.
Dr. Judith Reisman is author of 'Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences.'
-----------
"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand
by the president or any public official, save exactly to the degree he
himself stands by the country."
-Theodore Roosevelt
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you
want to test a man's character, give him power."
- Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Andrew Hennessey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >All her calls were monitored by British Security [at least]
> >and her son Wills blames dad for not giving her a safe haven in London
> >and having to find solace elsewhere .....
>
> No one forced her to spend her days getting her nails done and 'doing
> lunch', and her evenings hopping from one disco to another...this was her
> own description of her own life, as stated in an article published a year
> before her death.
>
> As for her supposed 'good works', she could have volunteered to help out
> daily in any number of offices of major charities which are headquartered
> in London...but THAT sort of work is 'grunt work', and does not afford the
> glamorous photo ops that touching down in a helicopter in some 'hot spot',
> striking a pose that will get one's picture in the world press under the
> headline 'humanitarian', and then flying out immediately afterwards in
> time for one's hair and nails to be done for one's nightly soiree' at the
> discos...
>
> The Fayeds are hardly known as major figures in the world humanitarian
> movement...in fact, quite the opposite. What then the explanation for Ms.
> Spencer's involvement with them, if she indeed was such a saint as certain
> quarters would like to make her out to be...
>
> >Princess Diana was descended from the dalriadan line of Celtic Kings
> >and an ancestor of mary Queen of Scots - the dalriadan line is considered
> >to be older than the Windsor line .... and it really looks like the word
> >NO is not an option in this case.
>
> One ALWAYS has options...
>
> Just because one can show one's branch of a family tree is attached to a
> trunk that has some famous branches, does NOT mean that one is NOT a
> brainless bimbo...
>
> Who CARES which line is older than which? They're ALL hardly geniuses...
>
> When you argue which line is older than which, you're just debating who
> has the longer claim to enslaving you people...
>
> You all should be eliminating the aristocracy all together, not debating
> who has the better claim to be your 'master' (or 'mistress')...
>
> >She addressed an important Chinese Diplomatic Congress in CHINESE and
> >was credited with much honour and acclaim for this by the Chinese.
>
> So she was given a script, WRITTEN BY SOMEONE ELSE, and taught how to say
> the words phonetically...no big deal, doesn't change the fact that she was
> not the shiniest penny in the wallet...
>
> 'Honour and acclaim...by the Chinese' is HARDLY a complement...
>
> >>Puh-leeze!! The woman was old, and had been ill for some time...it was
> >>only a matter of time until she popped off, and only a matter of
> >>coincidence that she died on the same day as Diana Spencer's funeral...
> >
> >well she was going anyway ... and history sometimes needs a wee helping
> >hand :)
>
> What PROOF do you have for this speculation?
>
> June
>
> *=======================================================================*
> The sun was warm but the wind was chill.
> You know how it is with an April day:
> When the sun is out and the wind is still,
> You're one month on in the middle of May.
> But if you so much as dare to speak,
> A cloud comes over the sunlit arch,
> A wind comes off a frozen peak,
> And you're two months back in the middle of March.
> -- Robert Frost: Two Tramps in Mudtime
> *=======================================================================*
> *-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
> revcoal AT connix DOT com
> *-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
> It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
> address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227. I assess a fee of
> $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
> email. Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
> terms. My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
> unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
> email.
> *========================================================================*
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
