-Caveat Lector-

Treason in America -- From Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman
ANTON CHAITKIN (C)1984
New Benjamin Franklin House
P. O. Box 20551
New York, New York 10023
ISBN 0-933488-32-7

--[5]--

-5-

The Murderer Marches West

Among the pro-British merchant families who connived at the dismantling of
the young American republic were the Livingston clan of New York.

The Scottish Livingstones were a rugged bunch. Edmund Burke told the story
(retold by Edward Livingston's biographer C.H. Hunt(1)) of Sir Alexander
Livingstone, who was appointed in 1449 Justiciary of Scotland and Ambassador
to England. Livingstone asked an opponent, the Earl of Douglas, to sup at the
royal table, in the castle of Edinburgh. Since Livingstone was the guardian
of the young King James II of Scotland, and the boy sovereign was to be
present at the table, Douglas felt secure. After he was seated, servants
brought in the freshly severed head of a black bull and placed it in front of
him. The Earl tried to escape but he, his brother, and a friend were captured
and beheaded.

The fifth Lord Livingstone was one of the two guardians of Mary Stuart, Queen
of Scots. The grandson of the seventh Lord Livingstone was one of two
Scotsmen to negotiate with Charles II for his accession to the Scottish
throne as well as the English.

Later the Livingstones revolted as "Jacobites" against the rule of William
III and the later House of Hanover, in favor of the continuing claim of the
Stuarts.


The clan was stripped of much of its power, titles, and lands, and retained
little love for the reigning monarchs of England.

The first Livingstone in America, son of a Scotsman exiled to Holland,
dropped the final "e" from the family name. This Robert Livingston set up a
baronial estate north of Albany on the Hudson River. He continued the
family's penchant for unusual forms of violence, by convincing the English
government to issue a commission to his protege Captain William Kidd.(2)

The Livingston family of New York, intermarried with the Smith family of New
York and Canada, the Lee family of Virginia, and the Shippen family of
Pennsylvania, provided both patriotic fighters to the cause of the American
Revolution—and others who played a bizarre part in the subversion of American
independence. This group aided Aaron Burr's treason, and they helped to
restore a subterranean, growing British power in New York and America.

The virtual coup d'etat carried out in 1782-83 by British intelligence
overlord William Shelburne, by which Scottish political boss Henry Dundas and
feudal theorist Adam Smith shared Shelburne's power in Britain, encouraged
such exile Scots to come back to the British fold.

Robert Livingston had served on the committee of the Continental Congress
which drew up the Declaration of Independence. In 1783, the leader of the
Masonic organization of the British army in New York(3) was Grand Master
William Walter, who was soon to make a forced departure to the Tory exile
station of Nova Scotia. Walter arranged that the leadership of this Masonic
organization—now no longer to be officially associated with the British
army—would be put in the hands of Robert Livingston. The latter was installed
Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of New York by William Cock, Walter's
temporary replacement, on February 4, 1784, just before Grand Master Cock
also left with the departing British troops.

>From 1798 to 1800, Burr's law client John Jacob Astor was treasurer of the
New York Grand Lodge. From 1801 to 1803, Robert Livingston's younger brother
Edward, who was also mayor of New York, and, by virtue of Burr's designation,
district attorney, served as Deputy Grand Master.

Burr's intimate friend and brother-in-law Tapping Reeve, of the Litchfield
Law School, was busy enlisting recruits for the movement to separate New
England from the Union. He wrote enthusiastically to Connecticut Senator
Uriah Tracy that "all I have seen and most I have heard from believe that we
must separate and that this is the time."(4)

Another Burr confidant, strategically situated in Boston and a friend to that
city's bankers and politicians, was Burr's personal physician, William
Eustis. The doctor entered politics after a good deal of prodding; in 1802 he
defeated John Quincy Adams for Congress and sat in Washington beside his
friend the Vice-President.

As a conduit to the New England pro-British party, Eustis would be useful to
Burr's organization a decade in the future, when he would be the U.S.
Secretary of War during the War of 1812.

Colonel Charles Williamson of British military intelligence was 0 relieved of
his upstate New York assignment as manager of a million acres of land on the
frontier, and moved into one of the New York City houses of the new
Vice-President, where he lived in 1801 and 1802.


The following year he sailed back to London, to confer with British special
operations chief Henry Dundas, Prime Minister Pitt, and others about the
military activation of British agents in North America.

Williamson's two responsibilities were Colonel Aaron Burr and General
Francisco de Miranda, both of whom were to lead military expeditions on
behalf of the British. Williamson returned to New York with a new British
ambassador to the United States, Anthony Merry; they arrived at the same
time, perhaps on the same boat.

At a dinner meeting in Washington early in 1804, Senators Timothy Pickering
and William Plumer of New Hampshire, and Senators James Hillhouse and Uriah
Tracy and Representative Roger Griswold of Connecticut, spoke to
Vice-President Burr about their plans for secession. Senator Hillhouse told
Burr at that meeting that "the United States would soon form two distinct and
separate governments."(5)

Henry Adams, the Anglophile historian of the early 19th century, wrote that
the new British ambassador "meddled" and encouraged this and other plots
against the American Union out of spite against President Jefferson. But the
huge web of associations that Aaron Burr maintained with the British-Swiss
secret service organization—one part of which is shown on the chart on page
91—must demonstrate to the impartial reader that Mr. Merry was no "foolish
diplomat."


The Death of Hamilton

Aaron Burr's New York organization had provided the margin of victory for the
Democratic-Republicans in the 1800 national elections. But Burr had been
immediately isolated within the administration by President Jefferson (though
never by Treasury Secretary Gallatin), and he was to be dropped from the
reelection ticket in 1804. Burr's place as Vice-President was to be taken by
New York's Governor George Clinton.

The plan of the pro-British party was now to elect Aaron Burr governor of New
York, where he was to lead that state, and possibly New Jersey and
Pennsylvania, out of the Union along with the otherwise weak New England
states.

Again, Alexander Hamilton plunged in with passionate intensity at the crucial
moment, denouncing Burr; and though his own Federalist Party endorsed Burr
for governor, Hamilton called for the election of his Republican opponent. By
pulling out all the stops, by ignoring all the niceties, Hamilton managed to
disturb enough otherwise sleepy people that Burr was soundly defeated.

All irrelevant "psychological" explanations aside, the plain fact was that
Burr could accomplish little to the detriment of the United States from this
point on if Alexander Hamilton remained alive. So Burr killed him.

Why Hamilton went along with the duel proposed by Burr— whether to
accommodate "popular prejudices," as Hamilton's last writings indicate, or as
a deliberate self-sacrifice calculated to end Burr's career, or as a blind
action based on Burr's manipulation of some weakness in Hamilton's
character—or whether Hamilton really intended to win the duel had his gun not
misfired, as some historians claim, may never be known. The fact remains
however, that Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton, the founder of the
independent economic system of the United States; and deliberately killing
another person was then, as now, against the law, whether in a duel or
otherwise. Burr should rightfully have been punished for murder.

Hamilton was shot on July 11, 1804, and died the following day. On July 20,
1804, while Burr awaited the coroner's findings, John Jacob Astor made
available $41, 783. The following morning, Burr fled New York.

During the period 1803 to 1805, Astor "expended in purchases from Burr . . .
a little over $116,000. " In return Burr transferred to Astor title to very
valuable Manhattan real estate—which was not Burr's property.(6)


Burr now proceeded to Philadelphia, where he conferred with Colonel Charles
Williamson of British intelligence. Williamson was Burr's law client, his
partner in the New York state legislature, and key agent in New York State
since 1792.

After the Burr-Williamson conference, the following letter was sent by the
proud British Ambassador Anthony Merry to his home office in London—it was
fished out of the British archives later on in the nineteenth century by
historian Henry Adams:

I have just received an offer from Mr. Burr, the actual Vice-President of the
United States, to lend his assistance to his majesty's government in any
matter in which they may think fit to employ him, particularly in endeavoring
to effect a separation of the western part of the United States from that
which lies between the Atlantic and the mountains, in its whole extent. His
proposition on this and other subjects will be fully detailed to your
lordship by Colonel Williamson, who has been the bearer of them to me, and
who will embark for England in a few days.(7)


The letter is dated August 4, 1804, less than a month after the killing of
Hamilton. Burr was by this time under indictment in New York and New Jersey.
But already the Burr organization was plastering over the skeleton in the
closet. Morgan Lewis, Governor of New York and brother-in-law of Robert and
Edward Livingston, denounced the indictment of Burr as "disgraceful,
illiberal, and ungentlemanly. " The Burr legal and public relations machine
succeeded in reducing the New York State murder charge to a misdemeanor; the
New Jersey murder indictment stood.

Burr traveled surreptitiously southward. He received a warm reception and had
a lively set of conferences with his son-in-law, Joseph Alston, owner of
possibly the largest plantation in South Carolina; with Senator Pierce
Butler, Burr's close friend, who had threatened a dissolution of the Union in
the First Congress, on June 11, 1789; and with other "forefathers" of the
Confederacy.

Returning now to Washington, Aaron Burr resumed his chair in the Senate as
presiding officer, as Vice-President! Legally he could not be touched—he had
immunity from state-level prosecutions as long as he was Vice-President and
on federal territory. Politically, the, hand of the administration was
extended to him, in the person of Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin.

Burr's Swiss cousin Gallatin met repeatedly with the fugitive Vice-President,
while writing that "unquenchable hatred of Burr and federal policy have
combined in producing an artificial sensation much beyond what might have
been expected; and a majority of both parties seem disposed . . . to deify
Hamilton and to treat Burr as a murderer. The duel, for a duel, was certainly
fair."(8)

Jefferson was convinced that Burr's services were yet needed, and could be
used, as presiding officer in the Senate: an impeachment trial was pending in
that body for Federalist Judge Samuel Chase, one of the judicial officers
Jefferson wanted to purge to clear the decks for his own party. With Albert
Gallatin's timely advice, the President gave Burr three appointments which
would supposedly secure Burr's aid against Judge Chase:

•General James Wilkinson, Burr's collaborator since the Conway Cabal against
George Washington—and now the highest-ranking U.S. Army officer since the
death of General Alexander Hamilton—was made governor of Upper Louisiana
Territory.

•John Bartow Prevost, Burr's stepson and a Swiss oligarchical assassin by
heredity and association, was made judge of the Territorial Superior Court at
New Orleans.

•James Browne, brother-in-law of Burr's deceased wife—the Brownes and the
Burrs had been married in a double wedding ceremony—was made secretary of the
Upper Louisiana Territory.

Burr's Louisiana appointees joined an entire Burr organization that had been
accumulating in that region since it had left Spanish jurisdiction.
Napoleon Bonaparte had thrown a monkey wrench into British plans for taking
over the Western Hemisphere in 1803. He had obtained the entire middle area
of North America from the Spanish—the Louisiana Territory, stretching from
the present state of Louisiana in a broadening triangle up to the Canadian
border. He had then sold the entire territory to the United States, which had
been hoping to obtain only a small piece.

As a result, the job of the British agents had become more complicated
attacking and conquering Louisiana would now mean attacking the United States.

James Workman, author of the British government memorandum on the conquest of
the Western Hemisphere, left Charleston, South Carolina, and traveled to New
Orleans, where he managed to have himself appointed judge of New Orleans
County.

Edward Livingston, New York's mayor and district attorney, and confederate of
Burr and Gallatin, quit his posts, accepted $12,000 from John Jacob Astor,(9)
and went to "start life anew" in Louisiana.

"Judge" Workman and Edward Livingston became the leaders of an organization
known as the Mexican Association. The group's program was explained to new
recruits by Workman and his Irish immigrant operatives, as reported in Thomas
P. Abernethy's exhaustive book, The Burr Conspiracy:

Baton Rouge was to be seized, the Mexican standard then was to be raised,
troops collected, and a British naval force from New Providence in the
Bahamas assembled on Lake Ponchartrain. Arms were to be sent up to Fort
Adams, a post that might be captured to serve as a base of operations....
After the capture of Baton Rouge, the money in the banks and the shipping in
the river at New Orleans were to be seized, in order to organize an
expedition to join Miranda by way of Mexico. (10)


The conspiracy to attack and seize the U. S. territory of Louisiana, and to
set up an as-large-as- possible western buffer state under British
protection, was the operative version of the British plan of 1800, committed
to writing by James Workman.

The French minister in Washington, Louis Marie Turreau, wrote home to Foreign
Minister Talleyrand:

Louisiana thus is going to be the seat of Mr. Burr's new intrigues; he is
going there under the aegis of General Wilkinson. It is even asserted that he
might find the means there already prepared by a certain Livingston . . .
from New York City and who is closely associated with Burr.(11)

Burr was not shy about obtaining aid from men and women of the cloth. In the
words of Burr's executor, Matthew Davis:

The Catholic bishop, resident at New Orleans, was also
consulted, and prepared to promote the enterprise. He
designated three priests of the order of Jesuits, as suitable
agents, and they were accordingly employed.... Madame
Xavier Tarjcon, superior of the convent of Ursuline nuns
at New Orleans, was in the secret. Some of the sisterhood
were also employed in Mexico. (12)

Aaron Burr spent the years 1804 to 1806 preparing to lead combinations of
American mercenaries and British naval forces in action commencing in the
Midwest and proceeding through New Orleans. Tons of paper have been wasted,
anguished millions of words have been strewn onto pages, speculating as to
Aaron Burr's intentions in this business. Since Burr had no values or
commitments in the ordinary sense, it is of far greater use to ascertain, as
we have done, the intentions of his London patrons and employers.

We have provided herein—for the first time since these events took place the
lines of association between Burr, his partner and cousin Albert Gallatin,
and the British secret service organization. Any other approach to the Burr
"Western Conspiracy" runs into the problem of having to piece through
evidence that was destroyed or tampered with by the participants, and later
reported on by historians whose sympathies for British-American
"re-association" should cast doubt on their zeal for digging into this matter.

We will cite here only those facts, among a mountain of available data, which
shed light on crucial future historical developments, and which serve to
round out the picture of the main protagonists of this history.

William Eaton, an American diplomat who had helped in the fight against the
Barbary pirates, testified at Burr's 1807 trial "Mr. Burr inquired of me with
what officers of the marine corps and of the navy I was acquainted. I told
him with most of them. It is impossible for me to remember distinctly every
adverb expressed to me in the course of conversation; but this I perfectly
recollect, that if he could gain the marine corps, and secure to his interest
the naval commanders, Truxton, Preble, and Decatur, he would turn Congress
neck and heels out of doors, assassinate the President, (or what amounted to
that,) and declare himself the protector of an energetic Government. If that
distinct expression was not used, (though the impression is distinct on my
mind that it was used in the course of conversation) yet he used such
expressions as these: 'hang him, "throw him into the Potomac,"send him to
Carter's Mountain.'....he said the blow must be struck, and if he struck it
at that time and place, he would be supported by the best blood of
America."(13)

One of Burr's assistants on the Western project was eventually promoted for
the Presidency of the United States under Burr's and Livingston's guidance.
Andrew Jackson, Burr's friend from the Senate days, had provided Burr with
hospitality, praise, recruits (including his own nephew), and the boats with
which to transport the mercenary army Burr was assembling down the Ohio River.

The collapse of the conspiracy seems to have been caused by the habit
(intensely annoying to feudal oligarchs and their employees) of ordinary
American citizens to speak out when they suspect that something is being done
against the interests of their country. Among these was Joseph Hamilton
Daveiss, district attorney for Kentucky, who wrote to President Jefferson on
January 10, 1806, outlining the secession plot and asking for the dispatch of
investigators.

Eventually General Wilkinson decided to turn against Burr, apparently to save
himself. He declared martial law in New Orleans and arrested Burr and several
co-conspirators. Judge James Workman—described only as "an Englishman of
three years residence(14) in the Abernethy account—released Burr and his
associates and began attacking Wilkinson as a liar.

But Burr was re-arrested, along with Workman and several other eligible
characters. One of those taken and sent in chains to Washington was Dr.
Justus Erich Bollman, Burr's go-between for European arms and financing, who
had previously been employed by Jacques Necker's daughter Madame de Stael in
smuggling operations within Revolutionary France.

Edward Livingston, who had been installed as Grand Master of the Louisiana
Masonic Lodge as soon as he arrived there, was in sufficient command of the
affairs of the legal community to have all charges against himself dropped.
All the main conspirators managed to get off as well.

Burr's treason trial in Richmond, Virginia, was presided over by Supreme
Court Justice John Marshall. Burr was acquitted, as the jury said, on the
basis of the evidence with which they were presented. They insisted on that
explicit verdict, despite protests from Burr's attorneys. In fact, the
crucial evidence by which all historians today judge Burr's activities—such
as the letter of British Ambassador Merry—was not available for consideration
at that trial.

Witness Andrew Jackson—who was not himself charged because he had earlier
"warned" of Burr's designs—denounced the President for "oppressing" Burr. And
Albert Gallatin's old friend, Paul Henry Mallet-Prevost! Burr's cousin, swore
that he wasn't involved in the plot, and had refused to take part.(15)

When he left the scene of the trial, Burr was a hated and a hunted man. He
was wanted by mobs, to be lynched. He was wanted by several states, on
charges including treason.


Burr Goes to Britain

Burr made his way to New York in disguise. After receiving tens of thousands
of dollars in cash advances for his house from John Jacob Astor, he fled the
country, June 7, 1808, on a ship bound for Nova Scotia.

The British governor of Nova Scotia was Sir George Prevost, Burr's nephew by
marriage, who was soon to be Governor General of Canada. Prevost welcomed
Burr effusively, and gave him a royal send-off to England with a letter of
introduction to the British Secretary of War Lord Castlereagh.(16)

When Aaron Burr arrived in England, he swore to customs officials that he was
"born within the King's allegiance and his parents British subjects." His
purpose in coming to England? "I am known personally to Lord Mulgrave and
[Prime Minister] Canning, to whom the motives for my visit have been
declared. These reasons have long been known to Lord Melville"—special
operations chief Henry Dundas.

While in Britain, Burr divided his time between visits with his
Mallet-Prevost relatives; with Jeremy Bentham, who gave Burr the entire use
of his London house and servants; and with the Scottish nobility, who, under
the leadership of Shelburne and Dundas, had poured the plague of opium upon
Asia. Perhaps it is fitting that, while visiting his applauding patrons among
the Jardines, the Hopes, and the Ogilvies, Burr was himself becoming addicted
to opium.

The diary Burr kept during the four years of his European exile(17) is
enlightening from several standpoints. It contains the record of Burr's
day-to-day relations with the British and continental noble families, whose
hostility to the existence of the United States makes the document
embarrassing to apologists for "Burr the loner." Its pornographic banality
endless details of Burr's relations with prostitutes (prices, quality,
etc.)—is shocking, considering the diary was written to be shown to his
daughter Theodosia. Most importantly, the character of the man and his
relations, when compared to that displayed in other men's diaries of the
time—such as John Quincy Adams's splendid 12-volume record(18)—places Burr's
apologists in a ridiculous light.

It is quite understandable, though not excusable, that the diary of Aaron
Burr would have found its way into the hands of New York Times founder Henry
Raymond, to be suppressed by his family until 1903.


pps 66-80
-----
1. Hunt, Charles Havens, Life of Edward Livingston, Appleton and Company,
New York. 1864.
2. The East India Company asked King William III for a privateer to be sent
into the Indian Ocean. Livingston, New England's Royal Governor the Earl
of Bellomont and five Englishmen bankrolled and outfitted Captain Kidd
who "went too far" and attacked English ships. See John Knox Laughton
"William Kidd," in Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, England, 1921-22; and Frank Monoghan, "William Kidd,;Dictionety of
American Biography, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1933.
3. For New York masonic data see Lang, Ossian, New York Freemasonry, a
Bicentennial History, 1781-1981; published by The Grand Lodge of Free and
Accepted Masons of the State of New York; New York City, 1981.
4. Documents Relating to New England Federalism, Ed. Henry Adams, (first
published 1877), reprinted by Burt Franklin, New York, 1969, pp. 342-43.
5. William Plumer to John Quincy Adams, Dec. 20, 1828, Documents Relating
to New England Federalism, p. 144.
6. Porter, John Jacob Astor, Vol. II, p. 920 and 946. Quoting Porter: "in
1797 Burr was appointed chairman of a committee from the New York legislature
to enquire into the affairs of Trinity Church. For some reason the
investigation was never made, but on May 11, 1797, the chairman emerged as
owner of the remainder of the Mortier lease. Burr, as always, was financially
embarrassed, and obtained a mortgage on this lease for $38,000 from the
Manhattan Bank, whose charter he had been responsible for procuring. Burr's
extravagence . . . soon made it necessary for him to raise some more funds .
. . to Astor he applied . . . on October 22, 1803, Astor bought for $62,500
the remainder of the Trinity lease . . . subject to the mortgage, which he
satisfied on July 20, 1804, by paying $41,783. During that autumn and the
following year Astor bought other lots and lease-remainders from Burr, to a
total value of more than $12,000, an $8,000 purchase of a lease being made in
the month after Burr's duel with Hamilton."
Whether the $41,783 mortgage was "satisfied" by a payment directly through
Burr, or to Burr's bank, the Manhattan Company, thence to Burr, somehow Burr
was enabled to make his escape journey from New York to the South.
7. Anthony Merry to British Foreign Secretary Lord Harrowby, August 6, 1804,
quoted in Adams, Henry, History of the United States of America in the First
Administration of Thomas Jefferson, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1921
Vol II,  p 395.
8. Albert Gallatin to James Nicholson, July 19, 1804, Gallatin Papers.
9. Porter, John Jacob Astor, Vol II, p. 923.
10. Abernethy, Thomas Perkins, The Burr Conspiracy, Oxford University Press,
New York, 1954, p. 25.
11. Parrnet, Herbert S. and Hecht, Mane B., Aaron Burr: Portrait of an
Ambitious Man, MacMillian Company, New York, 1967, p. 240.
12. Burr, Memoirs, Vol II, p. 382.
13. Testimony of General William Eaton, Sept. 26, 1807, in American State
Papers; Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United
States, Gales and Seaton, Washington, D. C., 1834, Vol. I, p. 537.
See also the statement to the jury by the United States Attorney for
Virginia, George Hay: "To those in whom he confided, he asserted, that all
the men of property and influence were dissatisfied with [the government's]
arrangements, because they were not in the proper situation to which they
were entitled: that with five hundred men he could effect a revolution by
which he could send the president to Monticello, intimidate congress, and
take the government of the United States into his own hands." Reports of the
Trials of Colonel Aaron Burr . . . In The Circuit Court of the United States
. . ., taken in short hand by David Robertson, Counselor at Law, Published by
Hopkins and Earle, Fry and Kammerer Philadelphia, 1808, Vol. I, p. 447.
See also Prentiss, Charles, The Life of the Late Gen. William Eaton
Principally Collected from his Correspondence end Other Manuscripts Printed
by E. Merriam and Co., Brookfield [state?], 1813, rare book room, Library of
Congress. Prentiss includes an affidavit that Eaton gave to the prosecution
before the trial, substantially the same as his courtroom testimony. The
affidavit was quite famous at the time.
14. Abernethy, The Burr Conspiracy, p. 167.
15. Clarence B. Fargo, in his History of Frenchtown [a New Jersey town just -
across the river from Pennsylvania], privately printed in New York, 1933
[copy in the local history section of the Library of Congress] tells us "Paul
Henri Mallet-Prevost . . . had fled the scene of the French Revolution and
settled at this point along the banks of the Delaware.... Gradually a small
settlement grew up about Prevost, and the people taking him for a Frenchman,
called the place Frenchtown....
"Aaron Burr had married the widow of Colonel James Marcus Prevost who had
once held the office of commander-in-chief of the King's forces in New
Jersey. He was a distant connection of Paul Henri Mallet-Prevost.
"Tradition tells us that one evening in the year of 1804, a lady and
gentleman on horseback rode up to the Prevost residence.... The gentleman['s]
name was Aaron Burr, former [sic] Vice President of the United States, and .
. . the lady was his daughter, Miss Theodosia Burr. It was the year of the
Burr-Hamilton duel and very possibly Burr was in virtual hiding at the time.
"The fact came out in conversation that Miss Burr and her host were in a
sense, relatives. Aaron Burr was dreaming of his coming Empire. All evening
long he talked ... of his ambitions.... Burr ... later fell so far from his
high estate that he was tried for treason and became an exile," hosted, of
course, by Mallet-Prevost's relatives in Britain.
The author of this curious vignette says nothing more about Paul Henry
Mallet-Prevost's actions with respect to Burr's proposals for breaking up
the United States!
16. George Prevost's Letter of passage for Aaron Burr, reel 6, frame 348 of
The Burr Papers:
"Government House, Halifax, June 20, 1808 To the Collector of His Majesty's
Customs, or who else it may concern:
"You will allow the bearer (Mr. G. H. Edwards [Burr's nom-de-guerre]) to
proceed without delay from Falmouth to London; the said G. H. Edwards having
despatches for the Right Hon. Lord Castlereagh, at whose office he is
immediately to present himself on his arrival in London.
[signed] George Prevost."
17. Private Journal of Aaron Burr, The Post Express Printing Company,
Rochester, N.Y., 1903 (2 volumes).
--cont--
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to