-Caveat Lector-

From: Euphorian



--------------------
Source: U.S. Firms on List Aided Iraq Arms Development
--------------------

By Mohamad Bazzi
United Nations Correspondent

December 13, 2002

United Nations -- Iraq's 12,000-page declaration of its weapons programs lists 
American companies that provided materials used by Baghdad to develop chemical and 
biological weapons in the 1980s, according to a senior Iraqi official.

The public release of such a list could prove embarrassing for the United States and 
highlight the extent to which the Reagan and first Bush administrations supported Iraq 
in its eight-year war with neighboring Iran in the 1980s. U.S. military and financial 
assistance to Iraq continued until Iraqi President Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 
August 1990.

The Iraqi official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, would not name the companies 
or discuss how much detail the Iraqi declaration gives about them. The official said 
the American firms are named along with other foreign companies that provided arms and 
ingredients for making chemical and biological weapons to Iraq.

The declaration, which was submitted to UN weapons inspectors Saturday, was mandated 
under a new Security Council resolution that requires Iraq to declare and destroy all 
of its nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Iraqi leaders insist they no longer 
have any such weapons, but the United States and Britain accuse Hussein of continuing 
with a secret program to develop banned weapons - and have threatened to go to war to 
disarm Iraq.

Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, said Tuesday that he does not intend to 
release the names of foreign companies that provided material to Iraq. He said such 
firms could be valuable to UN inspectors as sources of information about Iraq's 
weapons program. If the inspectors "were to give the names publicly, then they would 
never get another foreign supplier to give them any information," Blix said.

A Bush administration official declined to comment on U.S. companies' presence in the 
declaration, or the potential embarrassment if the list were made public. "The issue 
is not so much who the suppliers are. The issue is really Iraq's program and making 
sure that Iraq declares what it has," said the official, who asked not to be named. 
"We want companies to be able to provide information to the weapons inspectors. It's 
important to find out what the Iraqis may have received."

Other officials in Washington declined to comment. But U.S. officials have long 
acknowledged close military collaboration with Iraq while it was at war with Iran, 
which Washington viewed as a greater threat.

A 1994 report by the Senate Banking Committee concluded that "the United States 
provided the government of Iraq with 'dual-use' licensed materials which assisted in 
the development of Iraqi chemical, biological and missile-system programs."

This assistance, according to the report, included "chemical warfare-agent precursors; 
chemical warfare-agent production facility plans and technical drawings; chemical 
warfare filling equipment; biological warfare-related materials; missile fabrication 
equipment and missile system guidance equipment."

There is dissension within the council over the handling of Iraq's declaration. Under 
a deal quietly worked out over the weekend, the United States received the sole copy 
of the dossier and supporting material that was intended for the council. Washington 
then made duplicates for the four other permanent council members: Britain, France, 
Russia and China. Blix said the other 10 rotating council members will get edited 
copies of the dossier by Monday, with any information that could help countries 
develop weapons of mass destruction excised by UN inspectors.

Arms experts say it is likely that companies from all five permanent council members 
sold materials to Iraq that were used to develop its weapons. "All the permanent five 
members are probably on the Iraqi supplier list. They all have advanced chemical and 
biological industries," said Susan Wright, a research scientist at the University of 
Michigan and co-author of the book "Biological Warfare and Disarmament."

Wright said the release of a supplier list containing American companies would 
embarrass the United States. "It would bring people's attention to something that the 
Bush administration would rather forget about: that the United States was a supplier 
state to Saddam Hussein, even after it became clear that he was producing and using 
chemical weapons," she said.

At the heart of U.S. and other foreign trade with Iraq in the 1980s were so-called 
"dual-use" materials, which have both civilian and military applications. Under the 
new Security Council resolution, Iraq had to account for all its dual-use programs and 
materials.

The 1994 Senate report found that the United States had licensed dozens of companies 
to export various materials that helped Iraq make mustard gas, VX nerve agent, anthrax 
and other biological and chemical weapons. The report also said "the same 
micro-organisms exported by the United States were identical to those the United 
Nations inspectors found and recovered from the Iraqi biological warfare program."

Shipments to Iraq continued even after the United States learned Hussein had used 
chemical weapons against Iranian troops and Kurdish villagers in northern Iraq in 
1988, according to Senate investigators.

The U.S.-Iraqi relationship flourished from February 1986, when then-Vice President 
George Bush met with Iraq's ambassador to Washington, Nizar Hamdoon, and assured him 
that Baghdad would be permitted to receive more sophisticated U.S. technology, until 
the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Over that four-year period, the Reagan and Bush 
administrations approved licenses for the export of more than $600 million worth of 
advanced American technology to Iraq, according to congressional reports.

"The United States had a very different posture toward Iraq in the 1980s, when it was 
politically and militarily advantageous to use Iraq as an ally against Iran," Wright 
said. "Our attitude toward Iraq has been opportunist, rather than principled."

Copyright (c) 2002, Newsday, Inc.

--------------------

This article originally appeared at:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-woiraq1213,0,1042860.story

Visit Newsday online at http://www.newsday.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to