-Caveat Lector-

Grow: FBI performs a nasty little sequel to whistle-blower saga
Doug Grow
Star Tribune
Published Dec. 22, 2002
GROW22


A nasty political sequel  is being played out before our eyes. "The
Bureaucracy Strikes Back" is the story flowing from the courageous
saga of Minneapolis FBI agent Coleen Rowley, who blew the whistle
on higher-ups in the FBI's bureaucracy.

Just seven months ago she was being heralded as a national hero
for daring to testify that top-level FBI officials had stymied efforts by
Minneapolis agents to search records of Zacarias Moussaoui before
the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. A go-ahead from Washington for a
search in Minneapolis might have yielded information that might
have prevented the horrid attacks. A search of Moussaoui's
belongings after 9/11 found clues to the plot.

When Rowley appeared before congressional committees in
Washington, there were concerns being expressed that she might
pay a price for her courage.

"The real question is not what happens today or tomorrow," the late
Sen. Paul Wellstone said at the time Rowley was testifying. "It's
what happens in the next year or two, or after that. That's always the
case with whistle-blowers. It's going to be important for us to remain
vigilant in her case."

What's happened?

Even in the midst of her testimony in Washington early last June,
the FBI seemed to deliver a pointed message to Rowley that she
was on her own. During a break in her testimony, Rowley had gone
to FBI headquarters. Rather than provide a vehicle or any sort of
escort for the agent when she left the FBI building, Rowley was left
to fend for herself. She stepped out the door and into swarms of TV
news crews. The situation was so chaotic that Rowley was
concerned that some of the TV people might be injured by passing
traffic.

Now come reports of what appears to be another message being
delivered to Rowley and her ilk.

The Star Tribune's Greg Gordon reported last week that at a quiet
little ceremony earlier this month, Marion (Spike) Bowman was one
of nine people in the bureau to receive an award for "exceptional
performance." The award carries with it a cash bonus of 20 to 35
percent of the recipient's salary and a framed certificate signed by
the president.

What does this have to do with Rowley?

Bowman heads the FBI's National Security Law Unit. That's the unit
that blocked Minneapolis agents from pursuing their suspicions
about Moussaoui.

Bowman received the big pats on the back (and cash) a few days
before the House and Senate Intelligence committees turned in their
reports of pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures. The committees said
that Minneapolis agents deserved honors for their work and that
those who performed poorly should be disciplined. The National
Security Law Unit was singled out by Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala.,
for inept performance.

There were no FBI honors for the Minneapolis office. There was a
big honor for the lead antagonist of the Minneapolis office.

But the beauty of a truly slick bureaucracy is that you can never
really know the motive for an action.

Obviously, no FBI official ever said that Rowley was shoved out of
the bureau's headquarters and into the thundering media herd last
June as a little payback for her integrity. And FBI director Bob
Mueller isn't about to say that Bowman is getting heralded for
"exceptional performance" as a way of showing whistle-blowers
who's got the biggest whistle.

In fact, there are Mueller-defenders who gasp in horror at the
suggestion that the FBI would ever be so crass as to play
Machiavellian games with its prestigious awards. We're supposed to
believe that despite that disappointing little experience with the
Minneapolis agents before Sept. 11, Bowman's office had done just
a great job.

Brian Atwood, dean of the University of Minnesota's Humphrey
Institute of Public Affairs since Oct. 1, is an expert on the subject of
bureaucracies. Until global realities changed, Atwood was being
credited with streamlining the U.S. Agency for International
Development.

He said it's very possible that top officials in the FBI feel that
Bowman deserves being defended from what they see as unfair
"political" attacks.

"He would be seen as one of the best [in the FBI hierarchy],
otherwise he would not be in a position to make [such] a mistake,"
Atwood said.

So when Bowman was criticized by Rowley and politicians, it's very
likely that top FBI officials would ask, "What can we do to spit in
their eye?"

The FBI's Minneapolis office has not commented on Bowman's
award for "exceptional performance." Presumably, agents in
Minneapolis are so busy bracing for the next message from
Washington they don't have time to talk.

-- Doug Grow is at  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

Outgoing mail is certified virus free
Scanned by Norton AntiVirus

Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat scorned. ~~Milton
Friedman

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to