-Caveat Lector- Arab News SAUDI ARABIA'S FIRST ENGLISH LANGUAGE DAILY
Powell at UN: Something out of Beckett By Robert Fisk Published on 08 February 2003 Sources, foreign intelligence sources, “our sources,’’ defectors, sources, sources, sources. Colin Powell’s terror talk to the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday sounded like one of those government-inspired reports on the front page of The New York Times. It was a bit like heating up old soup. Haven’t we heard most of this stuff before? Should one trust the man? Gen. Powell, I mean, not Saddam. Certainly we don’t trust Saddam but Secretary of State Powell’s presentation was a mixture of awesomely funny recordings of Iraqi Republican Guard telephone intercepts a la Samuel Beckett that just might have been some terrifying little proof that Saddam really is conning the UN inspectors again, and some ancient material on the Monster of Baghdad’s all too well known record of beastliness. I am still waiting to hear the Arabic for the State Department’s translation of “Okay Buddy’’ — “Consider it done, Sir’’ — this from the Republican Guard’s “Capt. Ibrahim”, for heaven’s sake — and some dinkey illustrations of mobile biolabs whose lorries and railway trucks were in such perfect condition that they suggested the Pentagon didn’t have much idea of the dilapidated state of Saddam’s army. It was when we went back to Halabja and human rights abuses and all Saddam’s old sins, as recorded by the discredited UNSCOM team, that we started eating the old soup again. Jack Straw may have thought all this “the most powerful and authoritative case’’ but when we were forced to listen to Iraq’s officer core communicating by phone — “yeah’’, “yeah’’, “yeah?’’, “yeah...’’ — it was impossible not to ask oneself if Colin Powell had really considered the effect this would have on the outside world. >From time to time, the words “Iraq: Failing To Disarm - Denial and Deception’’ appeared on the giant video screen behind Gen. Powell. Was this a CNN logo, some of us wondered? But no, it was CNN’s sister channel, the US Department of State. Because Colin Powell is supposed to be the good cop to the Bush-Rumsfeld bad cop routine, one wanted to believe him. The Iraqi officer’s telephoned order to his subordinate — “remove ‘nerve agents’ whenever it comes up in the wireless instructions’’ — looked as if the Americans had indeed spotted a nasty new little line in Iraqi deception. But a dramatic picture of a pilotless Iraqi aircraft capable of spraying poison chemicals turned out to be the imaginative work of a Pentagon artist. And when Gen. Powell started blathering on about “decades’’ of contact between Saddam and Al-Qaeda, things went wrong for the secretary of state. Al-Qaeda only came into existence five years ago, since Bin Laden — “decades’’ ago — was working against the Russians for the CIA, whose present day director was sitting grave-faced behind Gen. Powell. And Colin Powell’s new version of his president’s State of the Union lie — that the “scientists” interviewed by UN inspectors had been Iraqi intelligence agents in disguise — was singularly unimpressive. The UN talked to scientists, the new version went, but they were posing for the real nuclear and bio boys whom the UN wanted to talk to. Gen. Powell said America was sharing its information with the UN inspectors but it was clear on Wednesday that much of what he had to say about alleged new weapons development — the decontamination truck at the Taji chemical munitions factory, for example, the “cleaning” of the Ibn Al-Haythem ballistic missile factory on Nov. 25 — had not been given to the UN at the time. Why wasn’t this intelligence information given to the inspectors months ago? Didn’t Gen. Powell’s beloved UN Resolution 1441 demand that all such intelligence information should be given to Hans Blix and his lads immediately? Were the Americans, perhaps, not being “pro-active” enough? The worst moment came when Gen. Powell started talking about anthrax and the 2001 anthrax attacks in Washington and New York, pathetically holding up a teaspoon of the imaginary spores and — while not precisely saying so — fraudulently suggesting a connection between Saddam Hussein and the 2001 anthrax scare. When the secretary of state held up Iraq’s support for the Palestinian Hamas organization, which has an office in Baghdad, as proof of Saddam’s support for “terror’’ — there was, of course, no mention of America’s support for Israel and its occupation of Palestinian land — the whole theater began to collapse. There are Hamas offices in Beirut, Damascus and Iran. Is the 82nd Airborne supposed to grind on to Lebanon, Syria and Iran? There was an almost macabre opening to the play when Gen. Powell arrived at the Security Council, cheek-kissing the delegates and winding his great arms around them. Jack Straw fairly bounded up for his big American hug. Indeed, there were moments when you might have thought that the whole chamber, with its toothy smiles and constant handshakes, contained a room full of men celebrating peace rather than war. Alas, not so. These elegantly dressed statesmen were constructing the framework that would allow them to kill quite a lot of people, the monstrous Saddam perhaps, with his cronies, but a considerable number of innocents as well. One recalled, of course, the same room four decades ago when Gen. Powell’s predecessor Adlai Stevenson showed photos of the ships carrying Soviet missiles to Cuba. Alas, today’s pictures carried no such authority. And Colin Powell is no Adlai Stevenson. (The Independent) http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=22615 Copyright © 2003 ArabNews All Rights Reserved. Forwarded for your information. The text and intent of the article have to stand on their own merits. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera- tions. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumoured by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sut <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
