-Caveat Lector-

GOING NUCLEAR IN BAGHDAD

They're just getting started.

Cancer rates across Iraq -- particularly among children -- are already 12
to 15 times higher than pre-war levels. For the people of Iraq, as well
as any occupier, constant exposure to uranium dust from hundreds of tons
of Depleted Uranium munitions fired during Desert Storm (and hundreds of
tons more from any new invasion) carries lethal risks. DU is 60% as
radioactive as the uranium used in nuclear bombs. It enters human lungs,
wombs and DNA as easily as it does open wounds and the food chain. And
exploded DU rounds remain lethal for millions -- some experts say
billions -- of years. [Bringing The War Home]

Now the boys around Bush are keen to try out their new "Robust Earth
Penetrators" by gang-raping Iraq. (You're right, it's obscene.) These
cosseted men, who have never been near a battlefield or seen the dazed
expressions of maimed children, figure their "little" nuclear bombs will
burrow far enough into their mother planet to stop radiation from leaking
out and freaking out the entire world. [Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sept. 29, 2002]

But common sense and many experts warn that a more likely scenario would
see "dirty" detonations raining a radioactive dust storm downwind,
killing plenty of people in mosques and souks in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait or
Iran -- depending on whether the Shamal is blowing. Entire regions would
be rendered uninhabitable for tens of thousands of years.

But hey, say Rumsfeld and others who pushed for the "baby nukes", we
won't know till we try it.

Just like Hiroshima.

GEORGE, DICK, DONALD AND PAUL MEET THE "INFORMATION AGE"

To everyone following this global cliffhanger, it looks like we're coming
quickly down to a tripwire that could capsize the global applecart.
Within weeks, a conscienceless Frankenstein armed with wicked weapons of
mass destruction may be once again loose in our midst.

Or maybe not.

For all their firepower and media mesmerization techniques, the Bush
junta never reckoned on running head on into an uncontrollable source of
constantly updated, augmented and corroborated information available 24/7
to anyone who can log online.

No one did.

For the first time in known human history, power-crazed bureaucrats are
finding it difficult to get away with almost anything. In this
truth-telling time of personal camcorders and computers, exposure of
official deceptions can be embarrassingly swift -- posted on the web for
a whole wide wired world to see.

If you can type it, you can probably find it online: Flight 800, Oklahoma
City, Gulf War Illness, Operation Northwoods, the "sober drunk" syndrome.
The real stories behind official mythology can be found in leaked
documents, declassified papers, eyewitness accounts, expert commentary,
fully referenced mainstream and alternate news stories, magazines and
e-books, news photos, video footage and recorded interviews. All are
available in an instantly accessible, exponentially-expanding, electronic
library called the Internet.

HOW IT WORKS

Forget B-52s. Real power comes from networked hominids tapping keyboards.
As a Secretary of State discovered, all it takes to verify an official
"story" is to go online and type in a few key search words. Try "powell
presentation" or "bush cocaine" -- then hit the key appropriately labeled
"Enter".

The results can be spectacular. Thanks to a Cambridge professor's
recollection and online retrieval, Bush's only buddy willing to send
reluctant soldiers into the irradiated ruins of Baghdad could face a
humiliating non-confidence vote within days.

Former Labour minister Glenda Jackson told BBC Radio 4, "If that was
presented to Parliament and the country as being up-to-date intelligence
and in fact as we now know they simply lifted it from a university
thesis, it is another example of how the Government is attempting to
mislead the country and Parliament on the issue of a possible war with
Iraq."

Another former Labour minister, Peter Kilfoyle, said he was "shocked" at
the way the dossier had been doctored. "It just adds to the general
impression that what we have been treated to is a farrago of half-truths,
assertions and over-the-top spin. I am shocked that on such thin evidence
-- a Californian postgraduate thesis -- that we should be trying to
convince the British people that this is a war worth fighting."
[Telegraph Feb. 8, 2003]

The implications for Washington's war plans are serious. If Tony Blair
loses a vote brought against him by his own party, the present Prime
Minister of England will find himself suddenly unemployed. And Bush will
be bereft of major backers.

BLACKOUT

Back in the USA, if "news managers" chose to expose the mass marketed
"threat" of a shattered country they know to be bogus, outraged Americans
would not take such betrayal lightly. And a blueprint drawn up long
before Sept. 11 allowed its architects to kick it into high government
gear could quickly come unraveled. [BBC Feb. 6, 2003]

But extensive U.S. televised coverage of Powell's prevarications and a
story taking the rest of the world by storm never occurred.

The spookiest episode in this story came 24 hours after the BBC exposed
empty excuses for mass murder in Iraq. By then, TV-watching, newspaper
reading Americans interviewed by Lifeboatnews in Florida and California
had yet to learn of a gaffe that has punctured Powell's pretensions and
blown Bush's credibility abroad.

As Iran accelerates its nuclear weapons program to defend against an
American attack they know is coming, and France moves this morning to
block NATO from initiating plans to involve Turkey, mainstream media in
Canada, Britain and across the USA continue to ignore revelations that
shared U.S. and British "intelligence" on Iraq is years out of date. And
cribbed from public sources. [Global TV Feb. 10]

Commenting on the media's self-censoring stories that trash all pretenses
for war, Lifeboatnews editor Paul Grignon gripes, "It's as fixed as
wrestling."

WHITE HOUSE WATCHERS

The American media's big snooze is good news for pretenders who remain in
power only as long as they continue to hoodwink the people they seek to
rule. By waving flags, suppressing contrary information, and pointing to
successive "threats" of their own devising, the Bushwhackers depend on
the zombie-like behavior of sedated and distracted masses, and a military
as robotic as their weaponry. In their mutual rush to parrot empty
slogans and do the bidding of "authorities" bent on conquest and murder,
few question the consequences, veracity or legitimacy of their actions.

But deep questions are being raised, in an intense international forum
called the Internet. Immune to cruise missiles and faked intelligence
briefings, the power of the ever-wakeful web is to network the global
village outside the filters of controlled information -- exposing
official lies almost as fast as they can be floated.

No wonder the day after Sept. 11 a President-select announced that one of
his first objectives was to get control over the Internet. Since then,
his lavishly funded Department of Cyber Security is working to force all
servers to submit to federal surveillance. [CBC Sept. 12, 2001]

But it may already be too late.

When critical mass is reached and the hundredth monkey logs on, it's all
over for the Bush regime and their successors. Even now, with more than
620 million people logged on worldwide, incessant Internet revelations
are illuminating a gang who:

1. Stole an election by rigging votes in Florida

2. Blocked investigations and interceptors that could have foiled 9/11

3. Experimented with mailing an army-designed strain of anthrax to
Americans to boost sales of a vaccine jointly controlled by the Bushes
and bin Ladens

4. Paved the way for a police state with freedom-canceling proclamations
copied almost verbatim from laws issued by someone named Adolf Hitler.
[NUA Internet Trends 2002; All Fall Down: The Politics of Terror and Mass
Persuasion]

All this with nary a murmur from a cushy, compliant and culpable press
owned by the same corporations who manufacture costly armaments for the
conflicts their news networks "sell".

It's all documented online for anyone who cares to look. But information
is only as powerful as the actions it prompts. Next weekend, organizers
say that worldwide protests coordinated through the worldwide web could
outnumber the massive anti-war demonstrations that ended years of
unprovoked aggression against the people of Vietnam.

BAGHDAD OR BUST

Despite the ballyhoo over a bogus briefing that appears to have hardened
Russia's resolve to stick with China, France and Germany in opposing a
war they cannot justify, the Gang of Four still intends to crush Iraq.
[BBC Feb. 9, 2003]

It only makes sense when they admit that their long-standing agenda is
not really concerned about Baghdad's bogeyman. "Project for the New
American Century" notes that while Saddam Hussein poses no threat to the
United States, the dictator can be "used as an excuse" to further aims
that are all about oil. Whoever controls the world's last big oil fields,
also controls a world running on empty. [Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sept. 29, 2002]

What happens next is anybody's guess. Intended as an indelible lesson to
the world, we could be weeks away from unprecedented "live fire"
demonstrations over Baghdad, Basra and Tikrit.

Or maybe not.

Type "peace protests" and hit Enter.

###

See also, "The Psychology of Mass Subservience to Terror" at
www.heartcom.org/psychtyranny.htm

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed --
and thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless
series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken (In
reference to U.S. terror threat assessment now raised at "Orange"
level... "FBI officials stressed that they had no specific information
indicating that new attacks were planned." accordinh to MSNBC and NBC
NEWS)  -

See also: Terror Alert Raises Security Nationwide at
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=542&e=3&u=/ap/20030208/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/terror_alert

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to