-Caveat Lector-
At last, some good news leaking into the mass media. Slowly but surely,
the tide is turning...
US media move away from Bush
Patrick Barrett
Friday February 21, 2003
The Guardian
The US media has begun to turn against President George Bush's hard line
on military action against Iraq.
A majority of the country's top newspapers now oppose any attack on Iraq
by US and British forces without the full support if the international
community.
Influenced by the massive anti-war demonstrations staged around the
world last weekend and the growing rift between the US and the less
hawkish countries led by France and Germany, American press coverage has
seen a substantial shift away from backing an immediate war regardless
of international opinion.
A survey of 37 leading US papers publishing editorials between February
15 and 19 found that almost two thirds now called for a "world
coalition" to be formed before any military action in the Middle East.
15 newspapers across the US were categorised as "hawkish" in editorial
stance, nine as "doves" and 13 as internationalist in positioning by a
survey carried out by Editor & Publisher, a weekly magazine covering the
north American newspaper industry.
The current press majority against unilateral action is in marked
contrast to the findings of a similar survey carried out on February 7,
immediately after Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation of
evidence of Iraq's activities involving weapons of mass destruction.
At this stage, those calling for international unity were a distinct
minority.
According to the research, the call for UN backing has now become an
established theme in most major newspapers, in marked contrast to right
leaning TV networks and papers such as Fox news and the New York Post,
both owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.
Papers such as the Detroit Free Press, the Dallas Morning News,
Minneapolis-based the Star Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle and Orange
County Register represented the prevailing opinion. "If war becomes
necessary, it will be better waged by the world than by even a broad
'coalition of the willing. The world remains safer if the peace-seeking
United Nations remains intact," thundered the Detroit Free Press.
Several papers such as the Fort Worth (Texas) and the Oregonian in
Portland, advised the President to recognise the importance of the
weekend's protests. "Heed the voices - peace demonstrations have a
point: Bush hasn't made a strong enough case for war now," said the
Newsday in Melville, New York on February 18.
However, larger papers with international reach such as the Wall Street
Journal and Washington Post were staunchly pro-war.
"The weekend's protests across Europe and elsewhere, impressive as they
were in terms of sheer numbers, only provide yet another, if secondary,
reason for prompt action," said the Journal this week.
Despite growing calls for international unity, "French bashing" amongst
the US press has become a popular theme. Top of the Francophobes were
the New York Daily News, and Murdoch owned New York Post, but others
joined in:
"Now who's the cowboy?" the Detroit News asked. "French prime minister
Jacques Chirac pitched a raging tantrum after several Eastern European
countries defied attempts to bully them beneath France's skirts."
The changing views of the US press reflect a recent survey of TV
coverage, which found that the British broadcast media is taking a hard
line on the US administration with 33% of news stories classed as
negative.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers
Limited 2003
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,900513,00.html
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
