-Caveat Lector-

>>>"Voila" vs "Screw You" Moments<<<

Comment
http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,12809,906400,00.html


Put away the cuddly toys. Now it's time to get tough

Civil disobedience may be the only way to stop the war against Iraq

Naomi Klein
Monday March 3, 2003
The Guardian

At the Pentagon they call it the Voila Moment. That's when Iraqi soldiers
and civilians, with bombs raining down on Baghdad, suddenly scratch their
heads and say to themselves: "These bombs aren't really meant to kill me
and my family, they are meant to free us from an evil dictator!" At that
point, they thank Uncle Sam, lower their weapons, abandon their posts,
and rise up against Saddam Hussein. Voila!

Or at least that's how it is supposed to work, according to the experts in
"psychological operations" who are already waging a fierce information war
in Iraq. The Voila Moment made its first foray into the language of war last
Monday, when a New York Times reporter quoted an unnamed senior US
military official using the term.

This peppering of military jargon with bon mots could be Colin Powell's
latest plan to win over the French on the security council. More likely, it's
a product of the Bush administration's penchant for hiring advertising
executives and flaky management consultants as foreign policy advisers.
(Doesn't the Voila Moment sounds suspiciously like the Wow Factor sold to
millions of corporate executives as the key to building a powerful brand?)

Wherever it came from, the Pentagon has Voila in its sights, and it is
sparing no expense to hit its target. Airborne transmitters are flying over
Iraq broadcasting radio propaganda. Iraqi business, military and political
officials have been bombarded with emails and phone calls urging them to
see the light and switch sides. Fighter planes have dropped more than 8
million leaflets informing Iraqi soldiers that their lives will be spared if they
walk away from their military equipment. "It sends a direct message to the
operator on the gun," says Lieutenant- General T Michael Moseley,
commander of allied air forces in the Gulf.

According to the senior military official quoted in the New York Times,
central command will know it has reached Voila when "we see a break with
the leadership". In other words, the US military is advocating nothing less
than mass civil disobedience in Iraq: a refusal to obey orders or to
participate in an unjust war.

Will it work? I'm sceptical. There was, after all, a Voila Moment during the
last Gulf war, when many Iraqis living near the Kuwaiti border believed US
promises that they would be supported if they rose up against Saddam. It
was followed shortly afterwards by a Screw You Moment, when the rebels
watched US forces abandon them to be massacred.

But all this Voila talk got me thinking: the civil disobedience the US military
is hoping to provoke in Iraq is exactly the sort of thing the anti-war
movement needs to inspire in our countries if we are really going to stop,
or at least curtail, the pending devastation in Iraq. What would it take for
large numbers of people in the US, the UK, Italy, Canada - and any other
country assisting the war effort - truly to break with our leaders and
refuse to comply? Can we create thousands of Voila Moments back home?

That is the question facing the global anti-war movement as it plans its
follow-up to the spectacular marches on February 15. During the Vietnam
war, thousands of young Americans decided to break with their leaders
when their draft cards arrived. And it was this willingness to go beyond
protest and into active disobedience that slowly eroded the domestic
viability of the war.

What will today's conscientious objectors and military deserters look like?
Well, in Italy activists have been blocking dozens of trains carrying US
weapons and personnel on their way to a military base near Pisa, and
dockworkers have refused to load arms shipments. Two US military bases
were blockaded in Germany, as was the US consulate in Montreal and the
air base at RAF Fairford in Gloucester, while thousands of protesters have
demonstrated at Shannon airport, which, despite Irish claims of neutrality,
is being used by the US military to refuel its planes en route to Iraq.

In Chicago, more than a hundred high-school students demonstrated
outside the headquarters of Leo Burnett, the advertising firm that
designed the US military's hip, youth-targeted Army of One campaign. The
students claim that in underfunded Latino and African-American high
schools, the army recruiters far outnumber the college scouts.

The most ambitious plan has come from San Francisco, where a coalition of
anti-war groups is calling for an emergency non-violent counter-strike the
day after the war starts: "Don't go to work or school. Call in sick, walk out.
We will impose real economic, social and political costs and stop business
as usual until the war stops."

It's a powerful idea: peace bombs exploding wherever profits are being
made from the war - gas stations, arms manufacturers, missile-happy TV
stations. It might not stop the war, but it would show that there is a
principled position between hawk and hippy: a militant resistance for the
protection of life.

For some, this escalation of the war against war seems extreme: there
should simply be more weekend marches, bigger next time, so big they are
impossible to ignore. Of course there should be more marches, but it
should also be clear by now that there is no protest too big for politicians
to ignore. They know that public opinion in most of the world is against
the war.

What they are carefully assessing, before the bombs start falling, is
whether the anti-war sentiment is "hard" or "soft". The question is not "do
people care about war?" but "how much do they care?" Is it a mild
consumer preference against war, one that will evaporate by the next
election? Or is it something deeper and more lasting - a, shall we say, Voila
kind of care?

On one end of the caring spectrum, Levi's Europe has decided to cash in
on the anti-war fad by releasing a limited edition teddy bear with a peace
symbol attached to its ear. You can clutch and hug it while watching the
scary terror alerts on CNN.

Or you could turn off CNN, refuse to be a soft and cuddly peacenik, get
out there and stop the war.

· Naomi Klein is the author of Fences and Windows.

www.nologo.org

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to