|
The Total Information Awareness System, the controversial Pentagon
research program that aims to gather and analyze a vast array of
information on people in the United States, has hired at least eight
private companies to work on the effort. Since 1997, those companies have
won contracts from the Defense Department agency that oversees the program
worth $88 million.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which oversees
the Total Information Awareness System (TIA), awarded 13 contracts to Booz
Allen & Hamilton amounting to more than $23 million. Lockheed Martin
Corporation had 23 contracts worth $27 million. The Schafer Corporation
had nine contracts totaling $15 million. Other prominent contractors
involved in the TIA program include SRS Technologies, Adroit Systems, CACI
Dynamic Systems, Syntek Technologies and ASI Systems International.
TIA itself was first proposed by an employee of a private contractor.
John Poindexter, who worked on DARPA projects for Syntek, an Arlington,
Virginia-based technical and engineering services firm, suggested the
program in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Poindexter, who headed the National Security Council during the Reagan
administration, was convicted in 1990 on five felony counts for his role
in the Iran-Contra scandal. The convictions were overturned in 1991
because he had been given immunity for his testimony during the
Congressional investigation of the affair. On January 14, 2002, he
returned to the government as the director of the Information Awareness
Office (IAO).
TIA draws heavily on the private sector. Five of the eight contractors
identified by the Center are involved in evaluating future contracts for
the program. Grey Burkhart, an associate of Booz Allen Hamilton,
identifies himself on his resumÈ as "assistant project manager" of TIA
system implementation. Even the phrase "Total Information Awareness" has a
private pedigree -- Visual Analytics, Inc., a Poolesville, Maryland-based
software developer and DARPA contractor, has applied for a trademark for
the phrase.
In addition, at least 24 universities have received almost $10 million
during the last five years to do research on TIA-related projects. Some of
the largest grants went to Cornell University, Columbia University and the
University of California, Berkeley and dealt with the TIA's language
translation program, Translingual Information Detection, Extraction and
Summarization.
"DARPA doesn't do any of its own research," says Jan Walker, a
spokesperson for the agency. She also says that DARPA doesn't require
private contractors to share their research solely with DARPA. "The
government benefits when there are commercial applications [from DARPA
research] because it keeps the cost down," she says. Any limitations on
commercial use are negotiated "on a case by case basis," she says, adding
that, "many of the things DARPA does have commercial applications."
DARPA employs 240 people and oversees a budget of roughly $2 billion.
It relies heavily on outside contractors. Some act as "systems engineering
technical assistance," or SETA contractors, who assist DARPA in managing
the efforts and representing the program with Congress, the Department of
Defense hierarchy and the military services. Typical projects involve five
to 10 contractors, two universities, and budgets between $10 and $40
million. DARPA's website notes that the best program managers -- the
agency's employees who oversee the contractors -- "have always been
freewheeling zealots in pursuit of their goals."
A lack of oversight
Congress, which exercises oversight of
the executive branch and the military, has not held a single public
hearing on TIA and sources on the Hill suggest that members know little
about it. In a November 22, 2002 letter, Senator Charles E. Grassley,
R-Iowa, asked the inspector general of the Defense Department to "conduct
a complete and thorough review of the TIA program." Noting that available
information regarding TIA was not sufficient, Grassley wrote that the
Defense Department's comments about DARPA "only provide few answers and
invite many more questions."
Grassley questioned the parameters and scope of TIA, how Poindexter was
selected to head it, and what protections are in place to ensure civil
liberties are not violated.
The Defense Department has not begun an inquiry. "They have it under
consideration," says Susan Hansen, a spokesperson at the Defense
Department. "I have not heard of any final decision about the status."
Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-California, says that she plans to
introduce legislation to address any threats to privacy rights that TIA
poses.
Despite Congress' lack of knowledge about the program, the overall
budget for TIA programs is increasing, and will nearly triple from $43
million in fiscal year (FY) 2001 to $110 million in FY 2003. According to
declassified budgets released recently from DARPA, some projects that have
existed since 1996 will receive similar spending boosts now that the TIA
office has been officially created. For instance, a TIA project called
"Wargaming the Asymmetric Environment" grew from $6.8 million in FY 2001
to $18.5 million in FY 2003.
An ongoing effort
The stated goal of TIA, which began in FY
2002, is "to revolutionize the ability of the United States to detect,
classify and identify foreign terrorists -- and decipher their plans --
and thereby enable the United States to take timely action to successfully
preempt and defeat terrorist acts." To accomplish this, the program seeks
to combine several kinds of information -- financial, education, travel,
medical, veterinary, transportation and housing transactional records, and
face, finger print and other identifying data -- into databases.
TIA draws heavily on other DARPA research projects that were ongoing
long before September 11, 2001. For example, Project Genoa, a computer
program designed to rapidly analyze and share data, and develop plans
based upon the analyses, began prior to 1997 and was completed in FY 2002.
The Defense Intelligence Agency has agreed to use Genoa. A Genoa II
project is underway at DARPA.
Syntek was a contractor for the Genoa Project providing "specialized
technical and programmatic" advice for more than five years. According to
his resumÈ -- which had been posted on the home page of the Information
Awareness Office (which oversees TIA) until November, when it was removed
along with the resumÈs of other IAO personnel -- Poindexter joined Syntek
in 1996. The first documented reference to Syntek's involvement in Genoa
indicates that the company began working for DARPA by mid-1996. Since
1997, Syntek received nine contracts from DARPA totaling $1.18 million.
Poindexter worked for Project Genoa via Syntek through 2001 before
returning to the Defense Department as the director of the Information
Awareness Office.
According to his financial disclosure documents, before joining DARPA,
Poindexter earned $147,182 a year while working for Syntek. He worked
closely with DARPA helping to develop Project Genoa, which is now a
component of TIA. Under Poindexter's guidance, IAO will continue to use
Syntek as a TIA contractor. He also reports receiving income for acting as
a consultant to the U.S. government for Syntek. These days, according to
the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Poindexter is receiving a
salary of $138,200 -- the most of any DARPA employee and equal to the
salary of DARPA Director Tony Tether.
One month after Poindexter joined the board of directors of Saffron
Technology in September 2000, the company announced it had received
funding from DARPA for Genoa, which is now part of the TIA program.
Poindexter characterized the mission of IAO as "the integration and
assured transition of components developed in the programs Genoa, Genoa
II, GENISYS, EELD, WAE, TIDES, HumanID and Bio-surveillance," in an August
2002 speech at the DARPATECH conference in Anaheim, California. Those
programs, all of which predate TIA and are under the aegis of the IAO,
analyze and extract data, allow the identification of individuals by their
characteristic body movements, or automatically translate Arab, Persian
and other languages into English. Poindexter explained that TIA is "the
overarching program that binds IAO's efforts together."
Many of the components of TIA, such as Genoa, have been ongoing
projects since the Clinton administration. In the May 13, 1999, issue of
Commerce Business Daily, a now-superceded bulletin board for government
contracts, there is a notice from DARPA that it intended to award a
company named Integral Visuals, Inc. a purchase order for technical and
engineering support for "Project Genoa and Total Information Awareness,"
suggesting that TIA, like its components, predates the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks.
In a November 20, 2002 news briefing, Undersecretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Logistics and Technology Pete Aldridge disclosed that
Poindexter was the mastermind of the TIA project. Noting that Poindexter
had "a passion for this project," Aldridge explained, "He came to us with
the project after September the 11th and volunteered it to DARPA. Tony
Tether, the director of DARPA, came over with John and briefed it to me,
and I thought it was a project worthy of pursuit."
The private connection
Last April, IAO published a document
with the bureaucratic title BAA 02-08 Information Awareness Proposer
Information Pamphlet, which asks private companies to provide "innovative
research proposals in the area of information technologies that will aid
in the detection, classification, identification and tracking of potential
foreign terrorists ... and to develop options to prevent their terrorist
acts."
The same document spells out the central role that contractors play in
IAO, which will "use personnel from SRS Technologies, Syntek Technologies,
CACI, Schafer Corporation and Adroit Systems as special resources to
assist with the logistics of administering proposal evaluation and to
provide advice on specific technical areas."
DARPA has hired diversified defense industry giants Lockheed Martin and
Booz Allen & Hamilton for TIA and related projects. Booz Allen has won
what may become the largest TIA contract, potentially worth $62 million
over the next five years if DARPA exercises all the contract's options.
Booz Allen employee Grey Burkhart's resumÈ notes that he is the
"assistant program manager for the implementation of an advanced
collaborative analysis system for the counterterrorism and intelligence
communities," which he identifies as "Total Information Awareness (TIA)
System Implementation." DARPA spokesperson Walker says that Burkhart is
not an employee of the government.
Burkhart has had more than 25 years of experience in strategic
security, intelligence and telecommunications, in both the private and
public sectors. He has served as a career intelligence officer, held a CEO
position at Allied Communications Engineering, and has become a
"recognized expert on the global proliferation of information technology."
Burkhart's resumÈ also notes that he was a member of Booz Allen's
Homeland Security Coordination Center and Tiger Team, for which he
"conducted analysis of new legislation and executive orders and assessed
their impact on current and future business."
Big brother on campus
Private companies have not been the
only players in TIA research. Dozens of universities within and without
the United States have also worked on the program's components for years.
Since late 2000, researchers at Georgia Tech have been working on a new
computer-based identification system called Human ID that theoretically
can take video images from a camera and distinguish people by the way that
they walk and their different mannerisms. The applications of this
software could have unlimited potential when used with satellite imaging,
government video and even security cameras. The theory is that each person
has distinctive body movements and that by recording and analyzing these
movements, the government could identify suspects even if they are wearing
disguises or have altered their appearances.
According to unclassified budget documents recently released by the
Defense Department, DARPA spent $11.8 million during the 2001 fiscal year
to develop a "pilot force protection system" for Human ID as well as to
create prototype models and develop advanced sensors. DARPA's new budget
increases the program's spending to $30.1 million during the next two
fiscal years to identify the limitations of the range and accuracy of the
program while fusing multi-modal technologies to derive biometric
signatures.
Overall, Georgia Tech has received four federal grants totaling $1.2
million for the "HumanID from Movement" project, beginning in the last
quarter of 2000. The funds are part of a $50 million DARPA program to
identify people from a distance that encompasses 26 research projects
including two from Georgia Tech to analyze movement.
In addition to recognizing people by body movement, Human ID is working
on facial recognition and iris recognition software. These uses have been
tested on subjects at a distance of 25 to 150 feet, but future DARPA plans
anticipate distances as far as 500 feet.
"I do computer vision research," says Aaron Bobick, an associate
professor at Georgia Tech researching HumanID for DARPA. "Part of it is to
see how to get computers to see things. One of things that I am working on
is understanding motion and recognizing people from a distance."
Bobick says that his research is still preliminary. "We've found it to
be successful in a limited number of cases but gait recognition is really
in its infancy. We don't know how successful it will be. We are still at
the point where we don't know what will be possible."
DARPA projects on identification go well beyond "naked eye" visual
appearance. The defense agency is currently trying to identify potential
suspects by their unseen traits using plumes of odorant molecules,
spending more than $427,000 on four grants to the University of Arizona
for this purpose, dating back to 1998. Like gait recognition, the smell
test is still in development.
Adam Mayle is James R. Soles Fellow and Alex Knott
is a writer with the Center for Public Integrity, for whom this story was
originally prepared. Center for Public Integrity Research associate Ben
Coates, database editor Aron Pilhofer and executive director Charles Lewis
contributed to this report.
| 
