-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

Fletcher Prouty told me the inside story of the PENTAGON PAPERS.  
Daniel Ellsberg is the OPPOSITE OF A HERO.  He edited the PENTAGON 
PAPERS to put the blame of the VIETNAM WAR on the DOD instead of on 
the CIA where it should have been.  His LEAK to the NEW YORK TIMES was 
 a scam just like WOODWARD and BERNSTINE.  The mass media makes HEROS 
of these scumbags because the last thing it wants is for the people to 
have REAL LEADERS.

For a true portrayal of Daniel Ellsberg read the definative book on 
VIETNAM by Neil Sheahan A BRIGHT SHINNING LIE.  Ellsberg was CIA 
hanging out with John Vann and David Halberstram.

Ellsberg is just one of many BRIGHT SHINNING LIES.

Brian Downing Quig

> Eerie timing. Excellent movie, especially the real news clips from 
that time. Movie will play again. Times are Eastern Time. Schedule 
info from TVguide.com search. TVguide.com info on movie after Daniel 
Ellsberg review. 2 hour movie. Set your VCR.
> 
> Date___Start Time___Title___________Channel   
> Sat 15  6:00 PM  The Pentagon Papers.  FX    
> Sat 15  10:00 PM The Pentagon Papers.  FX    
> Wed 19  8:00 PM  The Pentagon Papers.  FX    
> Thu 20  12:00 AM The Pentagon Papers.  FX  
> 
> --------------------
> 
> --------Mar 11 2003 Daniel Ellsberg article begins------
> http://www.antiwar.com/orig/ellsberg1.html
> My Thoughts on 'The Pentagon Papers' Movie
> by Daniel Ellsberg
> Ellsberg.net
> March 11, 2003
>  window.onerror=function(){clickURL=document.location.href;return 
true;} if(!self.clickURL) clickURL=parent.location.href;          
> 
> 
> 
> Tonight (Sunday March 9th), the made-for-TV movie "The Pentagon 
Papers," starring James Spader as Daniel Ellsberg and Claire Forlani 
as Patricia Ellsberg, premieres on the FX cable TV station, 8 PM 
Eastern/Pacific. The movie is not based on "Secrets: A Memoir of 
Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers," (the script was written before 
"Secrets" came out), and oddly, FX never contacted Dan about the film 
or consulted him in any way. (The only contact, an impersonal one, was 
to send Ellsberg.Net – along with hundreds of other websites – a mass 
email after the film was made, asking that we place their banner ad on 
the site, in exchange for a link from theirs, which we did). Someone 
with access to the film, who thought Dan should be able to see the 
film that portrays him before it airs, "leaked" Dan an advance copy of 
the film (FX never gave it to him and was dismayed he had seen it 
before tonight). One would think, with so little interest in 
contacting Dan or using him as a source for the movie, that the film 
would be negative. Surprisingly, it is a respectful (though 
unnecessarily fictionalized) and sympathetic portrayal, with a timely 
and important underlying message. Here are some of Dan's thoughts on 
the film:
> 
> "Every bit of dialogue is completely fictional (with the exception 
of a dozen lines or so, mainly in my interview with Cronkite), nothing 
happened very closely to the way it is portrayed, and there are errors 
in almost every minute of the film. In fact, the script often has me 
saying things that I not only didn't say, but I never would have said; 
in many cases they are the opposite of what I believed. The same is 
true for most of the dialogue associated with other named characters; 
they obviously weren't consulted any more than I was. You could say 
that everything is wrong, in some degree: and yet, the overall story 
is true to the underlying feeling of the events.
> 
> "They have made a good movie, with an important message – in favor 
of whistleblowing – that I would endorse; and the timeliness of the 
message, undoubtedly by accident, is uncanny. The inaccuracies of the 
script are somewhat frustrating to me but they won't be noticed by 
many others, and every other aspect of the production is unusually 
well-done: the casting and acting, direction and editing, the 
photography. It was fun for Patricia and me to watch it together; we 
relived the start of our romance. As in the rest of script, the 
circumstances are all wrong, but James Spader and Claire Forlani show 
the electricity of our attraction, and Forlani conveys "behind her 
eyes" – as one reviewer put it – Patricia's intelligence as well as 
her beauty. We found it a gripping film, and I think others will too: 
one that is true to the spirit and feeling of the events, if not the 
letter.
> 
> "There's a chance this film could encourage more whistleblowers, 
which is what makes it so timely right now. It shows that it's 
possible for someone with the background and values that I shared with 
many current officials to change perspective and to decide to tell the 
truth to those outside the Executive branch, and it shows that in 
unforeseeable ways that can be effective. It shows that the personal 
costs of doing this can be worthwhile, in terms of the possibility of 
saving lives.
> 
> "I've been using every opportunity in the last five months to convey 
a message to current officials who know – as I did in 1964-65 – that 
the president, and their bosses, are lying us into a wrongful, 
reckless, unnecessary war. The message, which I think is implicit in 
this movie, is that they should consider doing right now, before the 
bombs are falling, what I wish I had done at a comparable point, in 
the months before the onset of the Rolling Thunder bombing: going to 
Congress and the press with documents that undercut official lies. 
There is still time to avert this war with sufficiently comprehensive 
truth-telling, though there's only a week or two left before the 
bombing may begin. That's why I'm particularly happy this film is 
coming out at this moment. If one individual in Washington gets that 
message by seeing this movie, and unloads a file-drawer of revelatory 
current documents to the press and Congress, it could make a great 
difference. A war's worth of lives is at stake."
> 
> "The Pentagon Papers" on FX
> 
> (If you missed Sunday the 9th, it will be playing five or six more 
times throughout the month. Check out www.tvguide.com or FX's page for 
the movie, for listings of future showings this month.)
> comments on this article? send them to backtalk!
> [visit backtalk!]
> Daniel Ellsberg worked on the Top Secret McNamara study of U.S. 
Decision-making in Vietnam, 1945-68, which later came to be known as 
the Pentagon Papers. In 1970, he leaked the study to Congress, and in 
1971, to the press. Since the end of the Vietnam War he has been a 
lecturer, writer and activist on the dangers of the nuclear era and 
unlawful interventions.
> 
> 
> Back to Antiwar.com Home Page | Contact Us --------end of Mar 11 
2003 Daniel Ellsberg article------
> ----------------------------
> 
>  10:00 PMChannel FXSaturday, 15The Pentagon Papers 
> 120 min. 
> James Spader's haunting performance as controversial Vietnam War 
figure Daniel Ellsberg drives this powerful 2003 fact-based cable 
drama. 
> In 1971, Ellsberg, a former Pentagon official, leaks a 7000-page 
classified report to the press, indicating that four presidents misled 
the public about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Spader's understated 
portrayal conveys Ellsberg's mounting guilt for having supported the 
war before he becomes convinced that it can't be won and that he holds 
a document that could end it. Ellsberg's torturous internal debate 
culminates in an act he considers patriotic---but one that others view 
as treasonous. Harry Rowen: Alan Arkin. Anthony Russo: Paul Giamatti. 
(VCR Plus+ 2483196) 
> 
>    Read the CineBooks movie review 
> -->
> Cast: James Spader, Paul Giamatti, Claire Forlani, Alan Arkin, 
Kenneth Welsh, Jonas Chernick, Maria Del Mar 
> Rating: TV-PG 
> Content: Strong, Coarse Language, Explicit Sexual Situations, 
Violence 
> Category: Movie, Drama 
> Director: Rod Holcomb 
> Release Year: 2003 
> 
> -----end of TVguide.com info----
> 
> -------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *Bypassing the corporate-media hate and disinfo matrix:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cannabisaction 
> Thousands have read the public message archive.
> Cannabis, drug reform, and issues outside the drug war.
> MMM Million Marijuana March. Over 200 cities worldwide.
> Please forward any of this anywhere.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online


Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org 
OM 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to