-Caveat Lector-

A truly significant resource for the global anti-nuclear, peace,
environment, and justice movement exists in the website of the White House
Peace Park Vigil, which has ongoing continually since 1981 on the Lafayette
Park sidewalk across the street from the White House, http://www.prop1.org
A recent article distilled from information presented in recent public
demonstrations regarding the war in Yugoslavia is copied below.  The article
on the webpage referenced contains several useful links and graphics not
reproduced in the ascii format below and are worth checking out.

http://www.prop1.org/protest/serbia/9904.serbialv.htm

WILL THE TRUE OPPRESSORS
PLEASE STAND UP!


PUBLIC EXPRESSIONS


ALBANIAN MESSAGE ---------------------- SERBIAN MESSAGE [links]


PEACE & FREEDOM-LOVING ANTAGONISTS


On the First Amendment front lines in Lafayette Park we are privileged to
witness a daily stream of supplicants bringing their pleas to the White
House, the seat of World Domination. Thus, regarding the present
Serbian/Albanian/Kosovar disturbance, in Lafayette Park we've had an
opportunity to listen to both sides in the field.



THE AGREEMENT TO DISAGREE IN THE BALKANS


If there is one thing which President Clinton, Serbian President Milosevic,
as well as the head of every NATO member-state agree upon, it is the concept
of national sovereignty. Moreover, each of the aforementioned heads of state
also pays lip service to "the rule of law." In fact, the UN Charter, an act
of "International Law" to which the USA, Serbia, and all NATO members are
signatory, provides that "The (UN) is based on the principle of the
sovereign equality of all its Members." Under these universally-accepted
political fictions, a sovereign nation is a free, independent entity
entitled to administer the territory within its domestic control. Thus, from
the perspective of people who subscribe to the political fiction of the
nation state, determining who the real Nazis are must begin from the
question: "Who is the actual aggressor upon whose national sovereignty?"


On the other hand, "fighting words," in a legal sense, refers to language
intended to incite violence. Today US news media reports are using "Hitler,"
"Nazi," "genocide," "ethnic cleansing," and "free Kosovo" as fighting words.
Meanwhile, news media in Serbia and many other countries are likening US
President Clinton to "Hitler," referring to NATO as the "Nazi American
Terrorist Organization," and claiming that NATO military actions against
Serbia have nothing to do with a "free Kosovo," but are actually genocide as
a means of ethnic cleansing intended to subjugate Europe to the economic
interests of the United States.



Two Illustrative Examples of Sovereign States




       Figure 1                       Figure 2

Figure 1 depicts the sovereign state known as USA, the black lines represent
domestic political fictions known as the "various separate states."
Together, these various domestic states form the the greater national
sovereign state. The lines separating the USA from the sovereign states of
Mexico and Canada represent the demarcation points between "the rule of law"
of each sovereign state. In the case of the USA there is (1) Federal Law
[operating under authority of the U.S. Constitution], which regulates the
entire sovereign state, and (2) State Law, which is subservient to Federal
Law, but which regulates the territory within each of the separate domestic
states.


Similarly, in Figure 2 the red line depicts the territorial area which is
internationally recognized as the sovereign state of Serbia. As with the
USA, Serbia is composed of various separate states, highlighted in yellow
and orange. As in the USA, while maintaining a certain degree of autonomy,
the various separate Serbian states are ultimately ruled by provisions of
the Serbian Constitution.



For a thousand years Serbians have considered the territory of Kosovo to be
the cradle of Serbian culture, oriented toward the Greek Orthodox Church. In
the late 14th century armies of the Ottoman Turk empire, oriented toward
Islam, defeated Serbian forces at the Battle of Pristina. Nontheless, Serbs
continued to comprise the majority of the Kosovar population ... until after
World War II, when Albanians seeking a better life began streaming northward
into Kosovo.


Since the breakup of Yugoslavia into the separate sovereign states of
Croatia, Bosnia, and Montenegro, age-old Albanian/Serbian ethnic unrest has
resurfaced in Kosovo. Albanians, with an average of seven children per
marriage, versus two per Serbian marriage, have become a majority of the
population. Because they were the minority, Serbian Kosovars suffered the
brunt of Albanian Kosovar persecution, with instances of deadly violence and
forced removal from their homes. Anti-Serb persecution was mainly carried
out by a loose confederation of armed Albanian groups calling itself the
"Kosovan Liberation Army" (KLA).



After Serbian Kosovars complained to the federal government about their
treatment at the hands of the KLA, the Serbian government declared the KLA
to be "terrorists," and increased its police forces in Kosovo. As the KLA
escalated its campaign to secede from Serbia, Serbia deployed military
troops to the area.


In contrast, as can be seen from Figure 1, the USA wasn't always all the
territory it is today. For example California, Arizona, Nevada, and most of
Colorado, New Mexico and Texas were taken by military force from Mexico or
Native Americans.


Although there has always been a considerable Mexican population, lately
northward migration has increased the number of Mexicans living in
California. It is estimated that Mexicans will be the majority in California
sometime in the not so distant future. Imagine that, angered by perceptions
of economic, police, and linguistic oppression, the Latino majority decides
that they want to be recognized as "Mexicans," and demand "freedom for
California." As evidenced by its Civil War, US history teaches that the
federal government will use sufficient deadly force to "protect the Union."
Given those considerations, it is reasonable to assume that the US
government would not permit a simple state majority of Latinos to secede
California from the Union.


As can be seen in a comparison of Figures 1 & 2, the US state of California
abuts the foreign sovereign state of Mexico, much as the Serbian state of
Kosovo abuts the foreign sovereign state of Albania. By way of analogy,
let's hypothesize that elements of the Latino majority of California,
disgruntled by the Federal refusal to concede an independent sovereign state
of "California," organize a Californian Liberation Army (CLA) to "fight" for
the "liberation of California." The CLA will be working on a shoestring
budget, therefore, CLA actions are likely to be low cost bombings, attacks
on police officers and the like, because that's about all terrorists can
afford.


Unfortunately, when sovereign states are forced to confront terrorism,
things tend to get messy. How would the peace-loving, democratic government
of the USA meet a campaign of CLA terrorism? Perhaps it would begin with
local law enforcement agencies, as with MOVE in Philadelphia, 1984.
Probably, once the insurrection proved beyond control of local forces, the
government would escalate, first sending in crack ATF and FBI SWAT teams, as
in Wounded Knee (Native Americans), Waco ("extremist" Christians), or Ruby
Ridge. Finally, if absolutely necessary, the national guard, Delta Force,
attack helicopters, and military hardware sufficient to quell the
disturbance would be deployed. Although those tactics are essentially the
same as those used by the Serbian government in Kosovo, it is unlikely that
if confronted by a CLA uprising in California the US would welcome NATO
airstrikes on Washington, DC, or Sacramento.



GENOCIDE


Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines "genocide" as "the use of
deliberate, systematic measures toward the extermination of a racial,
political, or cultural group." Genocide was an apt description of the
Hutu/Tutsi conflicts in Rwanda, where hundreds of thousands were killed,
but, of course, NATO did nothing to resolve that disagreement.


Notwithstanding the fact that both Serbian and KLA fighters have been
involved in the killing of military and civilian opponents, simply because
not enough people have died, the word "genocide" is not an appropriate
description of either Serbian nor Albanian actions in Kosovo. Many Serbians
claim that NATO's deliberate, systematic bombing of both Serbia and Kosovo
qualifies as an act of genocide, particularly if NATO is using depleted
uranium weapons. NATO probably disagrees with that assessment.



ETHNIC CLEANSING


Comparing the Albanians bent on seceding from Serbia to the hypothetical
revolt of Mexicans in California, one can only expect that at the "peace
talks," the US government would take a position to the effect, "Sure, you're
free to be Mexicans, but if you want to be Mexicans you have to go across
the line into Mexico, but you have to leave California here, because
California is US territory."


Maybe the CLA would not accept the US offer to let them return to Mexico in
peace. Perhaps the CLA would insist that California was "Mexican," and that
they were committed to a "Free California." In that event, perhaps, rather
than just killing any Californian who no longer wished to be a US citizen,
the US would be pursuing a more humanitarian solution by just giving them
free transportation to Mexico. Certainly, such a "humanitarian" solution
might be protrayed as "ethnic cleansing."


Absent any clear examples of "genocide," in the present Serbian/Albanian
conflict, the most terrible accusation is "ethnic cleansing" -- wherein the
Serbians are putting dissatisfied Albanians on trains to Albania. One
Serbian wag asked, "Would you rather have them walk?"





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----




An impartial assessment of the NATO/Serb/Kosovar conflict


To emphasize the impartiality of these observations on the
NATO/Serbia/Kosovar conflict, the author hereby declares a firm personal
commitment to the belief that the world would be a much more pleasant place
if humanity would abandon its faith in the political fiction of national
boundaries, and purge itself of any notion that military and/or police force
might be a "good" idea. This assessment begins from the premises that all
human beings are members of the human race, and concepts of ethnicity are
merely shortsighted, ego-centric misperceptions of reality. This declaration
is necessary to insure that the reader does not confuse "national
sovereignty," "military and/or police action," or "ethnic superiority" as
concepts endorsed by the author.

Thomas, April 8, 1999, Peace Park
Other Kosovo Demonstrations

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to