-Caveat Lector-

World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org

http://wsws.org/articles/2003/mar2003/blai-m27.shtml


WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Britain

Blair’s press conference: lies and self-delusion

By Julie Hyland
27 March 2003

Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author

Prime Minister Tony Blair’s monthly press conference, held Tuesday,
March 25, was a distasteful spectacle.

For months a sycophantic British media has attempted to excuse the
government’s support for a US-led war against Iraq, in defiance of popular
opposition, with reference to the prime minister’s sincerely held beliefs.
Whereas President George W. Bush may be an arrogant bully and an idiot,
motivated by naked American self-interest, most media pundits have
insisted that Blair is animated by the highest moral and ethical
standards—which even his opponents are supposed to take on good faith

Tuesday’s display again confirmed that the British prime minister is just as
much at ease with lies, distortions and self-delusion as his US counterpart.
If he is sincere in anything it is in his determination to aggressively assert
the interests of British imperialism against those of the poor and oppressed
masses of the world.

Blair addressed his first press conference of this war as the political
representative of a ruling class with a long and brutal history of colonial
oppression against Iraq—until it was finally chased out in 1958—and as the
premier ally of the Bush administration. If he sought to shroud the revival
of British colonialism in the guise of its “civilising mission”, he was simply
continuing another well-worn tradition—one no less venal and fraudulent
for the passage of time.

“Iraq used to be one of the most sophisticated countries in the whole of
the Middle East ... now Baghdad and other cities have actually become like
Third World countries,” he said. Under Saddam Hussein’s rule, much of the
population has been reduced to conditions of virtual starvation, with some
60 percent of the Iraqi people currently dependent on the government for
food aid. The “mortality rates for under fives in Baghdad is higher than in
Mozambique” and “around nearly one million children died because of
malnutrition and because of leukaemia,” he continued.

Consequently, “The most important humanitarian priority is to restore the
operations of the Oil for Food Program,” Blair pronounced.

Blair could present this tissue of lies and half-truths without fear of
contradiction from the massed ranks of the British press, who are well
aware that the conditions he outlined are the direct result of the military
and economic actions undertaken by the US, the UK and the United
Nations.

The UN’s own studies have shown that Iraq’s descent from being one of
the wealthiest countries in the Middle East, with a relatively developed
system of welfare and high standards of literacy and skills, to one of the
more impoverished is the direct result of sanctions.

>From the first Gulf war in 1991, through 12 years of UN sanctions, to the
present-day offensive involving tons of bombs and missiles and hundreds of
thousands of occupying troops, the US, with British backing, has sought to
destroy a civilisation and bring the Iraqi people to their knees so as to
seize the country’s resources and establish America’s domination over the
Middle East. Moreover, as journalist John Pilger has pointed out, as of July
2002 the US, again with British backing, has blocked $5.4 billion worth of
humanitarian supplies to Iraq—despite it being approved by the UN and
paid for by Iraq. Denis Halliday, former coordinator of the “oil for food”
program who resigned in protest at the embargo, described its effects as
“nothing less than genocide”.

Blair’s references to the growing incidence of cancer in Iraq are equally
cynical, as this is directly attributable to the tons of depleted uranium-
tipped shells and missiles unleashed on Iraq’s towns and cities during the
last Gulf war.

Given that the US/UK coalition is continuing to pound Iraq with the same
type of munitions, only in even greater quantities, it can be expected that
the rates of such terrible and often fatal diseases will skyrocket.

Blair’s claim that restoring humanitarian aid is a “priority” of the US/UK
forces is no less of a gross falsification. Not only is the US/UK military
offensive wholly responsible for stopping food and medical supplies
reaching much of the population, it has made a dire situation even worse.
Once it became clear that the US intended to press ahead with its war
plans regardless of international opinion, humanitarian aid agencies were
forced to withdraw from the country.

Not only have food and medical supplies been halted, but in the city of
Basra, for example, most of the 600,000 population have been without
water and electricity for almost one week due to the bombing.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has warned of an impending humanitarian
disaster, and has called on the US/UK forces to urgently begin dispatching
food supplies. But the US and the UK insist that these can only be
resumed once they have obtained their military objectives.

It should be noted that in the $76 billion (£50 billion) war budget
presented by Bush to US Congress, just $1.7 billion is targeted for
reconstruction and $500 million for humanitarian aid.

It is hardly surprising that the US/UK invasion has not been greeted by
masses of cheering people in the streets, as Blair and others had claimed
would be the case, but with determined resistance and popular hostility.
Even the highly censored dispatches coming from Iraq have been forced to
mention widespread resistance to the “coalition of the willing”, including
reports that thousands of Iraqi exiles—outraged at seeing their country
overrun once again by imperialist forces—are returning home to fight the
American and British aggressors.

One journalist was moved to ask Blair whether there was the “real danger
that ... many Iraqis regard western forces as invaders and occupiers.”

Blair dismissed the very idea. People were simply too afraid of the regime
to do anything at the moment, he said. Until the “Iraqi people know for
sure that the regime that they despise is on the way out, they will hold
back,” he maintained.

Blair’s contention is that the main reason why the invasion has not
provoked a popular uprising against Saddam is that many Iraqis feel let
down by refusal of the western powers to support their attempted
uprising against Hussein in 1991 following the last Gulf war. Even if this
were the case, such reticence would be hardly surprising, and Blair makes
no attempt to account for why this stand was taken at the time and why
anyone should trust the US and Britain now. But most importantly, he
cannot even conceive of legitimate issues of national sovereignty and self-
determination motivating popular resistance to imperialist invasion. Yet
even as he spoke, crowds of thousands filled Baghdad’s central market
square, waving their fists and denouncing the American and British forces.

Tellingly, Blair pointed to Umm Qasr, “where British troops are now
patrolling the streets”, as a sign of Britain “making it clear to people that
we are there to help them, and we are there genuinely to liberate their
country.”

In the topsy-turvy world of official war propaganda, the sight of armed
soldiers patrolling the streets at the behest of an aggressive foreign power
is meant to reassure the Iraqi people of Britain’s good intent.

Blair’s specious logic will ultimately be used to provide the justification for
horrific atrocities. For if, as he asserts, opposition to Hussein equals de
facto support for the US and Britain then, conversely, anyone who
opposes the invasion supports Hussein.

This absurd bit of logical reductionism is everywhere applied to
international opponents of the US/UK war policy, whether it is the French
or German governments or the millions of protestors around the world.

In the case of Iraq, then, any resistance must by definition come from
agents of Saddam Hussein. And consequently any action taken to eliminate
them is a legitimate and justified war measure.

Such claims will be used to sanction the wanton bombing of civilian areas,
as well as the murderous actions of special operations forces and others
on the ground. The designation of Basra’s capture as a “military objective”
and the open targeting of civilian infrastructure such as television
broadcasting stations show that this is already under way.







Copyright 1998-2003
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to