-Caveat Lector-

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,926185,00.html
Cook in clumsy retreat over call to withdraw troops

Michael White, political editor
Monday March 31, 2003
The Guardian

Robin Cook surprised his new allies on the anti-war left last night by
backtracking from his demand that British troops be brought home from
Iraq "before more of them are killed".

The former leader of the Commons, who resigned from Tony Blair's cabinet
on the eve of war, delighted anti-war MPs with his Sunday Mirror attack,
which in turn disappointed ex-ministerial colleagues who had expected him
to "lie low" or "write a book" before returning to the political fray.

But after Mr Cook, foreign secretary until the last election, told Radio 4's
World This Weekend that he did not favour abandoning the battle or
"letting Saddam off the hook", there were angry mutterings on both sides
of the Iraqi controversy that he was "doing a Clare Short" - by taking a
tough stance, then backing down.

In his article Mr Cook singled out the "neo-conservative dogma" of the US
defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, as most blameworthy for coalition
setbacks. He also pointedly recalled being told by his cabinet colleagues
that it would be "a quick, easy war".

"I just hope those who expected a quick victory are proved right," he
wrote. "I have already had my fill of this bloody and unnecessary war. I
want our troops home and I want them home before more of them are
killed."

That seemed clear to most MPs and prompted Bernard Jenkin, the shadow
defence secretary, to accuse what he called "the author of the ethical
foreign policy [of] yet another betrayal of the Iraqi people".

But yesterday Mr Cook modified his position. "I am not in favour of
abandoning the battlefield and that is not my position. There can be no
question at this stage of letting Saddam off the hook."

He told the BBC: "I wasn't in favour of starting this war, but having started
this war, it's important to win it. The worst possible outcome will be one
which left Saddam there."

British forces had to "see the job through", he added.

But Mr Cook, who denied any wish to overthrow Tony Blair, repeated his
warnings of the likely horrors that would attend a siege of Baghdad,
ruining all hopes of postwar friendship with the Iraqi people.

"You can already see some of the consequences of that in Basra which is
without water, without power, where there is very serious risk of
humanitarian tragedy developing there. We were promised we would be
greeted as liberators, and that's not happened yet," he said.

David Blunkett, the home secretary, was among ministers who chided Mr
Cook on television and radio yesterday for the content and timing of his
latest intervention, though they did so in gentle terms.

"Robin resigned with great dignity, put his argument with great force," Mr
Blunkett said on BBC1's Breakfast with Frost. "But it's hard to retain that
dignity or force if you advocate capitulation after just 10 days."

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to