Re: [CTRL] Is this a 'Bush War on Terrorism' or the 'Federal Rese rve War on the Euro?

[Jim Rarey]

-Caveat Lector- The only problem with your argument (which has a lot of merit) is that the FED is unconstitutional thus there is no constitutional duty to protect it and the bankers that own it.   True, if OPEC were to switch to the Euro and hundreds of billions of dollar investments were withdrawn for conversion to Euros, the banks and the economy would collapse. But that's going to happen anyway because of the huge debt bubble on which the economy rests. It is only a question of timing.   JR   ----- Original Message ----- From: Dale Stonehouse To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Is this a 'Bush War on Terrorism' or the 'Federal Rese rve War on the Euro? -Caveat Lector- As President, Bush's oath of office requires him to uphold the U.S. Constitution and with it the way of life that Constitution enables. Maintaining that way of life at this time in history requires a strong U.S. Dollar that is unchallenged by any other currency. A war on the Dollar is more serious than even an attack on our shores would be to the American standard of living. Thus Bush has no choice but to defend the Dollar. As long as the vast majority of U.S. citizens make the Dollar their god, it must be defended at all cost. When these politicians say it is not a war on a people or a religion, they are not lying but telling only half of the story. It is a war on a currency, the Eurodollar. The "regime" is the acceptance of payment for Iraqi oil in Eurodollars only. Put in this context the whole thing makes perfect sense. Having said that, I DISAGREE that the Dollar must be defended and even that this way of life must be defended. But I would guess less than 1 percent of Americans are willing to give up all their stuff to avoid a war for control of oil currency. Every war protester must be prepared to give up all they have, retirement funds, savings, house, vehicle, boat, summer house. If not they are just hypocrites making noise. Undoubtedly some have nothing to lose and their protest would at least be more honest than most. But without supporting war at any time against any enemy for any reason, and though I despise their lack of honesty, I cannot say it is a war that should not be waged. I personally think it would have been better to explain WHY France and Germany are so opposed to the war, but the neocons evidently believe they cannot risk alienating their power base, the evangelicals (the biggest hypocrites of all). <A HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om