-Caveat Lector- "I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands, one Nation under God,indivisible,with liberty and justice for all."
visit my web site at http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904 for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto: http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 07:49:34 -0700 From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MRC Alert: On Successive Nights Jennings Cites Same Civilian Deaths ***Media Research Center CyberAlert*** 11:45am EST, Saturday April 5, 2003 (Vol. Eight; No. 68) The 1,475th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996 > On Successive Nights Jennings Cites Same Mosul Civilian Deaths > ABC: "Long War" Ahead; CBS: Iraq's Military Status "Disastrous" > ABC Exec "Wary" of Pro-U.S. Sentiment, U.S. Troops Intimidating > NY Times Frets Over "Uneven" Casualties, No Dead Bodies on TV > "Top Ten Saddam Hussein Weekend Plans" #### Distributed to more than 12,800 recipients by the Media Research Center, bringing political balance to the news media since 1987. The MRC is the leader in documenting, exposing and neutralizing liberal media bias. Visit the MRC on the Web: http://www.mediaresearch.org. CyberAlerts from this year are at: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/welcome.asp For 2002: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/archive02.asp Subscribe/unsubscribe information, as well as a link to the MRC donations page, are at the end of this message. When posted, this CyberAlert will be readable at: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030405.asp #### 1) ABC's Peter Jennings so liked an al-Jazeera report, about how U.S. bombing supposedly killed 18 Iraqi civilians near Mosul, that he used it twice, citing it on successive editions of World News Tonight. Jennings on Thursday night: "The television network al- Jazeera reported that 18 civilians died during bombing near the northern city of Mosul." Jennings on Friday night: "The al-Jazeera network reported today that 18 people were killed near Mosul during a U.S. bombing raid." 2) With "U.S. intelligence sources" saying "that some of Saddam Hussein's toughest security forces are now apparently digging in, apparently willing to defend" Baghdad "block by block," ABC's John McWethy warned Peter Jennings on Friday night: "This could be, Peter, a long war." Jennings expressed vindication: "As many people had anticipated." In contrast, CBS's David Martin declared that Hussein's "military situation is disastrous" and so "there's every reason to believe it's only a matter of time before all of Saddam's divisions are gone." 3) "I am as wary of pro-Saddam sentiment as I am of pro-United States sentiment," World News Tonight Executive Producer Paul Slavin told Friday's New York Times in suggesting a moral equivalence in how it is rational for an Iraqi citizen to be just as intimidated by Hussein's thugs as by American soldiers. "If I had a bunch of fedayeen and Republican Guard around me, I'd say, 'Yeah Saddam!' But if I had a bunch of American soldiers around me, I'd say, 'Yeah America!'" Slavin's reasoning goes a long way to explain the reticence of reporters on World News Tonight to see popular support for the U.S. amongst the Iraqi populace. 4) Friday's postings on the MRC's TimesWatch.org site dedicated to documenting and exposing the liberal political agenda of the New York Times. It's not fair: "The number of casualties so far in the push on Baghdad has been uneven," complained Times reporter Anthony DePalma. Bring out your dead: Times TV reporter Alessandra Stanley fretted over the lack of dead bodies on the tube: "Despite all the sobering lessons learned over the past week, there were few images of civilian casualties or dead American soldiers..." 5) Letterman's "Top Ten Saddam Hussein Weekend Plans." > 1) ABC's Peter Jennings so liked an al-Jazeera report, about how U.S. bombing supposedly killed 18 Iraqi civilians near Mosul, that he used it twice, citing it on successive editions of World News Tonight. Jennings on Thursday night: "The television network al-Jazeera reported that 18 civilians died during bombing near the northern city of Mosul." Jennings on Friday night: "The al-Jazeera network reported today that 18 people were killed near Mosul during a U.S. bombing raid." The April 3 citation came in the midst of this rundown by Jennings of uncorroborated claims about civilian numbers: "It is very hard to keep up with the effect of the fighting on Iraqi civilians. The Reuters News Agency says that a missile strike, possibly American, killed civilians as well as soldiers at a village near Baghdad airport. The television network al-Jazeera reported that 18 civilians died during bombing near the northern city of Mosul. And the International Committee of the Red Cross reports today that their doctors in southern Iraq have seen, their words, 'incredible levels of civilian casualties.'" The next night, on the Friday, April 4 World News Tonight, Jennings repeated the same allegation about what occurred in the Mosul area, as if it were fresh news: "At least 61 Americans have now died in this war, 40 of them killed in action. There is no reliable estimate, as we've said, of Iraqi military casualties, though the U.S. says that 300 were killed in the fight for the airport alone. As for Iraqi civilians, very, very difficult. The al-Jazeera network reported today that 18 people were killed near Mosul during a U.S. bombing raid. Overall statistics are just immensely difficult at this time." Apparently, in his eagerness to highlight allegations about civilian victims, it's "immensely difficult" for Jennings to keep track of which claims he's already showcased. > 2) With "U.S. intelligence sources" saying "that some of Saddam Hussein's toughest security forces are now apparently digging in, apparently willing to defend" Baghdad "block by block," ABC News Pentagon reporter John McWethy warned Peter Jennings on Friday's World News Tonight: "This could be, Peter, a long war." Jennings expressed vindication: "As many people had anticipated." In contrast, on Friday's CBS Evening News, McWethy's Pentagon press corps colleague, David Martin, declared that Hussein's "military situation is disastrous" and so "there's every reason to believe it's only a matter of time before all of Saddam's divisions are gone." NBC's Pentagon reporter, Jim Miklaszewski, came down closer to McWethy's take: "Tonight U.S. military officials say the next couple of days could be critical, that if the Iraqi regime does not fall quickly both sides could be in for a lengthy siege of Baghdad." A fuller rundown of those quotes from the Friday, April 4 evening shows: -- ABC's World News Tonight. John McWethy, after reporting on how U.S. special forces are going into Baghdad to get Iraqi regime leaders and how special forces had taken control of a dam before Iraq could destroy it and flood roads, concluded: "As the U.S. begins to really squeeze Baghdad, U.S. intelligence sources are saying that some of Saddam Hussein's toughest security forces are now apparently digging in, apparently willing to defend their city block by block. This could be, Peter, a long war." Jennings felt vindicated: "As many people had anticipated." -- CBS Evening News. David Martin observed, after video of a man purported to be Saddam Hussein walking in the streets of Baghdad, "Saddam may look confident and in charge, but his military situation is disastrous. Enemy troops at his airport and in his suburbs and his best divisions being chewed up by a ceaseless rain of bombs and artillery shells." Major General Stanley McChrystal, Joint Chiefs of Staff, at Friday's DOD briefing: "We believe that the Republican Guard, which consisted of six divisions, now is missing two of those divisions essentially in their entirety." Martin concluded: "And with Marines already pressing the attack against another Republican Guard division there's every reason to believe it's only a matter of time before all of Saddam's divisions are gone. They're already in bad shape." -- NBC Nightly News. Jim Miklaszewski forecast from the Pentagon: "U.S. troops will keep Baghdad and the Iraqi regime isolated, cut off from the rest of Iraq, an attempt to force a possible coup and eventual surrender....And tonight U.S. military officials say the next couple of days could be critical, that if the Iraqi regime does not fall quickly both sides could be in for a lengthy siege of Baghdad." Who is correct? Are McWethy and Miklaszewski prescient or is Martin? As they say in local television news, "only time will tell." > 3) "I am as wary of pro-Saddam sentiment as I am of pro-United States sentiment," World News Tonight Executive Producer Paul Slavin told Friday's New York Times in contending that it is rational for an Iraqi citizen to be just as intimidated by Hussein's thugs as by American soldiers. Slavin's attitude goes a long way to explain the reticence of reporters on World News Tonight to see popular support for the U.S. amongst the Iraqi populace. Slavin's comments came at the very end of an April 4 story by Times reporter Jim Rutenberg on the travails of journalists in Baghdad who must work under the watchful eye of Iraqi minders. Rutenberg quoted Slavin's equivalence of Hussein's operatives and U.S. soldiers: "If I had a bunch of fedayeen and Republican Guard around me, I'd say, 'Yeah Saddam!' But if I had a bunch of American soldiers around me, I'd say, 'Yeah America!' We're going to try not to draw any broad conclusions out of any of this." For the April 4 New York Times story, "Reporting War Under Eyes of Iraqi 'Minders,'" in full: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/04/international/worldspecial/04MEDI.html World News Tonight certainly hasn't drawn "any broad conclusions" as ABC reporters with stories on the program have been, compared to other media outlets, very reluctant to concede any popular support for the U.S. troops. Before citing Slavin's comments, Friday night on his 6pm EST FNC show, Brit Hume picked up on a Thursday night contrast, which was highlighted in Friday's CyberAlert, about how Ted Koppel in his World News Tonight story perceived only "moderately enthusiastic onlookers" for U.S. troops while CBS and NBC conveyed stories about much more enthusiastic receptions. Hume relayed this item in his April 4 "Grapevine" segment: "On CBS last night, embedded correspondent Jim Axelrod described the scene as U.S. forces rolled toward the Baghdad airport. Quote, 'Look at how they were met, men and women and children smiling and waving.' On NBC News, correspondent Dana Lewis in Najaf said, quote, 'For the most part, American troops have been warmly welcomed.' Later on NBC, Dexter Filkins of the New York Times spoke of a quote, 'really warm reception by just about every Iraqi that we passed.' But ABC's Ted Koppel with the Army's Third Infantry reported only, quote, 'some modestly enthusiastic onlookers.'" For more on those Thursday night reports: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030404.asp#1 Koppel represented only World News Tonight's latest effort, under the guidance of Jennings and Slavin, to downplay Iraqi public support for U.S. troops, try to attribute it to just wanting our food or to play up Iraqi disgruntlement with coalition efforts. From previous CyberAlerts: -- On the April 2 World News Tonight, Jennings saw the world in a remarkably similar way to Slavin's view, and painted the U.S. not as good, but as only the lesser of two evils for an average Iraqi: "In at least one Iraqi city today, at Najaf, when given the choice between irregulars and the Americans, much of the local population seemed to be with the Americans." -- Public support for U.S. lessens the closer you get to Baghdad. Jennings announced on the April 1 World News Tonight over a map showing the progress of U.S. forces: "Countryside is changing here now, passing from desert into farmland, and one embedded reporter with the U.S. forces, beginning we think now to move forward, said earlier today: 'When we came out of the desert where they waved at us, notice they don't wave at us any more.'" -- When the Red Crescent food trucks arrived in Safwan last week, ABC's Mike von Fremd heard Iraqis denouncing America. "People are sick and hungry" because of the U.S. invasion one woman complained and von Fremd highlighted a man who channeled Phil Donahue: "It is all because of U.S. greed for Iraqi oil." But NBC's Don Teague suggested the uniform expression of revulsion towards the U.S. and fidelity for Hussein was based on fear and playing to cameras: "Wherever there are cameras, Saddam Hussein is still the hero. Iraqis, not yet convinced he's lost control, worry they'll pay with their lives for speaking against him." See: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030327.asp#1 -- They just want our food. Bob Woodruff, embedded with the Marines, wondered on March 24, in what Jennings considered "an interesting thought," whether Iraqis along the side of the road are smiling and waving because "they are welcoming the U.S. military or whether we are simply a curiosity, maybe a source of food." World News Tonight also re-ran (see March 23 CyberAlert) video of John Donvan's trip to Safwan "where we were besieged by people demanding food and water, angry that the U.S. was not providing it." Donvan warned that if humanitarian aid does not arrive soon, "the case that this war has made Iraqis' lives better gets much harder to make." See: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030325.asp#1 -- ABC decided celebrating Iraqis were a ruse. Iraqis "tore down a picture of Saddam Hussein and jumped in the streets" when coalition forces arrived in Safwan -- "at least for the cameras," Peter Jennings snidely added before turning to ABC's John Donvan who maintained that when he went to Safwan "I didn't see anything like that." Donvan found residents who wanted to know: "Are you here to steal our oil?" See: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030323.asp#1 But ABC reporters aren't the only ones reluctant to assume Iraqi cheers are genuine. On Friday's Early Show, MRC analyst Brian Boyd noticed, embedded CBS reporter David Martin expressed his suspicions: "Now with the Iraqi military in this area folding fast, American forces are met in towns and villages along the road north and west with smiles, waves and thumbs up. While it appears sincere, it could also just be what the villagers think the Marines want to see." It's certainly not what ABC's Jennings and Slavin want to see. > 4) Friday's postings by Clay Waters on the MRC's TimesWatch.org site dedicated to documenting and exposing the liberal political agenda of the New York Times. -- Utah: Conservative, Religious, and (Naturally) Bigoted Nick Madigan's story on white supremacists in Utah takes some cheap shots: "Traditionally conservative, independent and avowedly religious, many Utahans have long tolerated what some people elsewhere consider to be extreme points of view." See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0404.asp -- It's Not Fair "The number of casualties so far in the push on Baghdad has been uneven," says Times reporter Anthony DePalma. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0404.asp#2 -- Bring Out Your Dead Times TV reporter Alessandra Stanley frets over the lack of dead bodies on the tube: "Despite all the sobering lessons learned over the past week, there were few images of civilian casualties or dead American soldiers during yesterday's high." See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0404.asp#3 -- The "Elsewhere on the Web" section links to: Journalist William Powers labels the Times' R.W. Apple the most famous member of "The Quagmire Club" -- journalists who constantly compare the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to Vietnam. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/elsewhere/welcome.asp > 5) From the April 4 Late Show with David Letterman, the "Top Ten Saddam Hussein Weekend Plans." Late Show Web site: http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/ 10. Setting clocks one hour ahead on time bombs 9. Antiquing with wives two and seven 8. Giving go-ahead for "Operation Run Like Hell" 7. Ordering bullet-proof mustache 6. Brunch with Geraldo 5. Boosting Republican Guard morale by playing Tony Robbins tapes 4. No plans, due to the fact that he's been dead for quite a while 3. Posing for ten thousandth giant mural 2. At Baghdad tennis club, playing doubles with doubles 1. Kissing his ass goodbye Number 4 earned the most applause, but I laughed hardest at #6. -- Brent Baker >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax- deductible donation. Be sure to fill in "CyberAlert" in the field which asks: "What led you to become a member or donate today?" For the secure donations page: https://secure.mediaresearch.org/Donation/Order/MediaResearch25-27/mck-cgi/mrcdonate.asp To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this message. Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews <<< ==================================================================== Update your profile here: http://topica.email-publisher.com/survey/?bUrD57.a5BZDF.d2JhY29u Unsubscribe here: http://topica.email-publisher.com/survey/?bUrD57.a5BZDF.d2JhY29u.u Delivered by Topica Email Publisher, http://topica.email-publisher.com/ <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
