-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

"compelling commentary on Bush Administration...This is perhaps the
most sober, thoughtful and compelling commentary I've seen yet on
the Bush administration's present course of action.

J. Sayre

========================

THE REASON WHY
By George McGovern
The Nation
>From the April 21, 2003 issue

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030421&s=mcgovern

"Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die."

--Alfred, Lord Tennyson
"The Charge of the Light Brigade"
(in the Crimean War)


Thanks to the most crudely partisan decision in the history of the
Supreme Court, the nation has been given a President of painfully
limited wisdom and compassion and lacking any sense of the nation's
true greatness. Appearing to enjoy his role as Commander in Chief of
the armed forces above all other functions of his office, and
unchecked by a seemingly timid Congress, a compliant Supreme Court,
a largely subservient press and a corrupt corporate plutocracy,
George W. Bush has set the nation on a course for one-man rule.

He treads carelessly on the Bill of Rights, the United Nations and
international law while creating a costly but largely useless new
federal bureaucracy loosely called "Homeland Security." Meanwhile,
such fundamental building blocks of national security as full
employment and a strong labor movement are of no concern. The nearly
$1.5 trillion tax giveaway, largely for the further enrichment of
those already rich, will have to be made up by cutting government
services and shifting a larger share of the tax burden to workers
and the elderly.

This President and his advisers know well how to get us involved in
imperial crusades abroad while pillaging the ordinary American at
home. The same families who are exploited by a rich man's government
find their sons and daughters being called to war, as they were in
Vietnam--but not the sons of the rich and well connected. (Let me
note that the son of South Dakota Senator Tim Johnson is now on duty
in the Persian Gulf. He did not use his obvious political
connections to avoid military service, nor did his father seek
exemptions for his son. That goes well with me, with my fellow South
Dakotans and with every fair-minded American.)

The invasion of Iraq and other costly wars now being planned in
secret are fattening the ever-growing military-industrial complex of
which President Eisenhower warned in his great farewell address. War
profits are booming, as is the case in all wars. While young
Americans die, profits go up. But our economy is not booming, and
our stock market is not booming. Our wages and incomes are not
booming. While waging a war against Iraq, the Bush Administration is
waging another war against the well-being of America.

Following the 9/11 tragedy at the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon, the entire world was united in sympathy and support for
America. But thanks to the arrogant unilateralism, the bullying and
the clumsy, unimaginative diplomacy of Washington, Bush converted a
world of support into a world united against us, with the exception
of Tony Blair and one or two others. My fellow South Dakotan, Tom
Daschle, the US Senate Democratic leader, has well described the
collapse of American diplomacy during the Bush Administration. For
this he has been savaged by the Bush propaganda machine. For their
part, the House of Representatives has censured the French by
changing the name of french fries on the house dining room menu to
freedom fries. Does this mean our almost sacred Statue of Liberty--a
gift from France--will now have to be demolished? And will we have
to give up the French kiss? What a cruel blow to romance.

During his presidential campaign Bush cried, "I'm a uniter, not a
divider." As one critic put it, "He's got that right. He's united
the entire world against him." In his brusque, go-it-alone approach
to Congress, the UN and countless nations big and small, Bush seemed
to be saying, "Go with us if you will, but we're going to war with a
small desert kingdom that has done us no harm, whether you like it
or not." This is a good line for the macho business. But it flies in
the face of Jefferson's phrase, "a decent respect to the opinions of
mankind." As I have watched America's moral and political standing
in the world fade as the globe's inhabitants view the senseless and
immoral bombing of ancient, historic Baghdad, I think often of
another Jefferson observation during an earlier bad time in the
nation's history: "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God
is just."

The President frequently confides to individuals and friendly
audiences that he is guided by God's hand. But if God guided him
into an invasion of Iraq, He sent a different message to the Pope,
the Conference of Catholic Bishops, the mainline Protestant National
Council of Churches and many distinguished rabbis--all of whom
believe the invasion and bombardment of Iraq is against God's will.
In all due respect, I suspect that Karl Rove, Richard Perle, Paul
Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice--and other sideline
warriors--are the gods (or goddesses) reaching the ear of our
President.

As a World War II bomber pilot, I was always troubled by the title
of a then-popular book, God Is My Co-pilot. My co-pilot was Bill
Rounds of Wichita, Kansas, who was anything but godly, but he was a
skillful pilot, and he helped me bring our B-24 Liberator through
thirty-five combat missions over the most heavily defended targets
in Europe. I give thanks to God for our survival, but somehow I
could never quite picture God sitting at the controls of a bomber or
squinting through a bombsight deciding which of his creatures should
survive and which should die. It did not simplify matters
theologically when Sam Adams, my navigator--and easily the godliest
man on my ten-member crew--was killed in action early in the war. He
was planning to become a clergyman at war's end.

Of course, my dear mother went to her grave believing that her
prayers brought her son safely home. Maybe they did. But how could I
explain that to the mother of my close friend, Eddie Kendall, who
prayed with equal fervor for her son's safe return? Eddie was torn
in half by a blast of shrapnel during the Battle of the Bulge--dead
at age 19, during the opening days of the battle--the best baseball
player and pheasant hunter I knew.

I most certainly do not see God at work in the slaughter and
destruction now unfolding in Iraq or in the war plans now being
developed for additional American invasions of other lands. The hand
of the Devil? Perhaps. But how can I suggest that a fellow Methodist
with a good Methodist wife is getting guidance from the Devil? I
don't want to get too self-righteous about all of this. After all, I
have passed the 80 mark, so I don't want to set the bar of
acceptable behavior too high lest I fail to meet the standard for a
passing grade on Judgment Day. I've already got a long list of
strikes against me. So President Bush, forgive me if I've been too
tough on you. But I must tell you, Mr. President, you are the
greatest threat to American troops. Only you can put our young
people in harm's way in a needless war. Only you can weaken
America's good name and influence in world affairs.

We hear much talk these days, as we did during the Vietnam War, of
"supporting our troops." Like most Americans, I have always
supported our troops, and I have always believed we had the best
fighting forces in the world--with the possible exception of the
Vietnamese, who were fortified by their hunger for national
independence, whereas we placed our troops in the impossible
position of opposing an independent Vietnam, albeit a Communist one.
But I believed then as I do now that the best way to support our
troops is to avoid sending them on mistaken military campaigns that
needlessly endanger their lives and limbs. That is what went on in
Vietnam for nearly thirty years--first as we financed the French in
their failing effort to regain control of their colonial empire in
Southeast Asia, 1946-54, and then for the next twenty years as we
sought unsuccessfully to stop the Vietnamese independence struggle
led by Ho Chi Minh and Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap--two great men whom we
should have accepted as the legitimate leaders of Vietnam at the end
of World War II. I should add that Ho and his men were our allies
against the Japanese in World War II. Some of my fellow pilots who
were shot down by Japanese gunners over Vietnam were brought safely
back to American lines by Ho's guerrilla forces.

During the long years of my opposition to that war, including a
presidential campaign dedicated to ending the American involvement,
I said in a moment of disgust: "I'm sick and tired of old men
dreaming up wars in which young men do the dying." That terrible
American blunder, in which 58,000 of our bravest young men died, and
many times that number were crippled physically or psychologically,
also cost the lives of some 2 million Vietnamese as well as a
similar number of Cambodians and Laotians, in addition to laying
waste most of Indochina--its villages, fields, trees and waterways;
its schools, churches, markets and hospitals.

I had thought after that horrible tragedy--sold to the American
people by our policy-makers as a mission of freedom and mercy--that
we never again would carry out a needless, ill-conceived invasion of
another country that had done us no harm and posed no threat to our
security. I was wrong in that assumption.

The President and his team, building on the trauma of 9/11, have
falsely linked Saddam Hussein's Iraq to that tragedy and then
falsely built him up as a deadly threat to America and to world
peace. These falsehoods are rejected by the UN and nearly all of the
world's people. We will, of course, win the war with Iraq. But what
of the question raised in the Bible that both George Bush and I
read: "What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose
his own soul," or the soul of his nation?

It has been argued that the Iraqi leader is hiding a few weapons of
mass destruction, which we and eight other countries have long held.
But can it be assumed that he would insure his incineration by
attacking the United States? Can it be assumed that if we are to
save ourselves we must strike Iraq before Iraq strikes us? This same
reasoning was frequently employed during the half-century of cold
war by hotheads recommending that we atomize the Soviet Union and
China before they atomize us. Courtesy of The New Yorker, we are
reminded of Tolstoy's observation: "What an immense mass of evil
must result...from allowing men to assume the right of anticipating
what may happen." Or again, consider the words of Lord Stanmore, who
concluded after the suicidal charge of the Light Brigade that it was
"undertaken to resist an attack that was never threatened and
probably never contemplated." The symphony of falsehood orchestrated
by the Bush team has been devised to defeat an Iraqi onslaught that
"was never threatened and probably never comtemplated."

I'm grateful to The Nation, as I was to Harper's, for giving me
opportunities to write about these matters. Major newspapers,
especially the Washington Post, haven't been nearly as receptive.

The destruction of Baghdad has a special poignancy for many of us.
In my fourth-grade geography class under a superb teacher, Miss
Wagner, I was first introduced to the Tigris and Euphrates rivers,
the palm trees and dates, the kayaks plying the rivers, camel
caravans and desert oases, the Arabian Nights, Aladdin and His
Wonderful Lamp (my first movie), the ancient city of Baghdad,
Mesopotamia, the Fertile Crescent. This was the first class in
elementary school that fired my imagination. Those wondrous images
have stayed with me for more than seventy years. And it now troubles
me to hear of America's bombs, missiles and military machines
ravishing the cradle of civilization.

But in God's good time, perhaps this most ancient of civilizations
can be redeemed. My prayer is that most of our soldiers and most of
the long-suffering people of Iraq will survive this war after it has
joined the historical march of folly that is man's inhumanity to
man.

------------



__________________________________________________________________
Try AOL and get 1045 hours FREE for 45 days!
http://free.aol.com/tryaolfree/index.adp?375380

Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 for FREE! Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455


portside (the left side in nautical parlance) is a
news, discussion and debate service of the Committees
of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. It
aims to provide varied material of interest to people
on the left.

Post            : mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subscribe       : mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Unsubscribe     : mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
List owner      : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web address     : <http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/portside>
Digest mode     : visit Web site


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to