Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector- "Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s The Vital Center, Reinhold
Niebuhr's essays[some published by Fabian Society -B], and
the Truman administration's hawkish National Security Council
report, nsc?68, drafted in 1950 under the supervision
of Paul Nitze. The second was the left?wing revisionism of the 1960s,
which he identifies chiefly with historian William Appleman Williams
and disciples like Richard Barnet. The third was the neoliberal
synthesis by political scientists Stanley Hoffmann and Zbigniew
Brzezinski, which stressed world order and interdependence over
containment and polarization. Neoconservatism arose as a reaction to
both left?wing revisionism and neoliberalism and as a reaffirmation of
Cold War liberalism. The neoconservatives, writes Ehrman, stood for
"continued adherence to the vital center idea of an activist
anticommunist foreign policy." They were Cold War liberals who
searched for a Truman in the 1970s and found Reagan."
Niebuhr offered to recommend my father for a Rhodes scholarship just after WWII
when Niebuhr taught at U Georgia for a year or less. That probably means Niebuhr,
listed here as a predecessor to neolib, was a Rhodes scholar and CFR. The essays
of Niebuhr mentioned were sometimes published in the British Fabian Society
journal, and Niebuhr was president of the NYC chapter of LID, League for
Industrial Democracy, a Fabian spawn. Niebuhr supported ADA, too,
Americans for Democratic Action. That's all consistent with his position we could
call Trotskyite today, nothing inconsistent to bother Sean who notices only one
crossover in one direction, from neolib to neocon, not constant mingling in a small flat
round circle circus tabletop he almost calls the earth--"CFR" and "neolib-neocon[in
context of quote here]". Nixon actually belonged to some org the title of which sounded
like LID or ADA, which was surprising at the time, and where we might begin to see a
small round circus table, an early example of neolib and neocon crossover, only in the
other direction, but pointing out the bridge across the small neolib/neocon and CFR circle
makes it a peace symbol, surely a good manipulation handle, something for everybody.
Both sides sound good, but you have to look at implementations not pontificators to
recognize it's the same entities behind both cheerleader squads. At least we see in this
quote neolib and neocon in the same circle to help Sean.
If CFR media exec and journalist Bob Zelnick said,"The news is what we say it is",
and CFR insider historian Carroll Quigley describes the political rhetoric in
British Parliament as scripted stageplay, and the writing and teaching of history as
a monopoly, perhaps circle means circus, Sean?
Richard Barnet would be Richard Barnet of IPS, Institute for Policy Studies,
correct? William Colby former CIA director was active there for a while. Those
two matrixes in juxtaposition are worth remarking on. If Zelnick's Mighty
Wurlitzer remak and Quigley's Parliament stageplay characterization and
Nixon's crossover in the other direction don't blow Sean's neat flat circle
circus map of the entire world, maybe Colby's crossing the neolib to neocon
bridge in the opposite direction like Nixon in that org will show us "Rockefeller
liberals", circus maximus. Then look at implementations, since they all sound
good to somebody when they're pontificating and blowing smoke. Some of
their witch-hunts are liberal sounding and others conservative sounding, but
in the implementation look for the same companies and a false hope and
hypocrisy and genocide and profit. For example Matthew McDaniel's
http://www.akha.org Harvard MBA neolib hype team assisted Mechai
Mr. Condom General of Pine Tree Wooden Soldiers and that's the same
genocide as neocon witch-hunts fake drugwar and their fake drugwar and
fake land reclamation relocation program is the same as neocon anticommunist
relocation, neolib same con--
http://www.noplanetb.org/cgi-bin/htsearch.cgi?words=condoms+pine+opium+relocation
It fooled skin-deep liberal Harriet Beecher Stowe in the instance of the Scottish
Clearances genocide, fooled her in think-tanking so she overlooked the real facts
of implementation, and Thai relocation manor lord Mr. Condom Mechai's mother is
Scottish. Why would he need a visiting team of Harvard MBA propagandists if
neolib was not a neocon? Neo Con, new con, new Scottish Clearance, Another
Vietnam misguided relocation under different excuse. In that Thai highlands
situation we can find more than one neolib Neo Con for Sean.
-Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
review by John Judis of The Rise of Neoconservatism : Intellectuals and
Foreign Affairs 1945-1994. John Ehrman. 1995
from Foreign Affairs, July/Aug 1995
excerpt:
George Washington University historian John Ehrman has recounted how
these intellectuals' views on foreign policy developed and, once they
were ascendant, changed. His book is well written, and, while some of
his choices of people are eccentric, many of his comments about
particular neoconservatives are insightful. Ehrman's overall history,
however, is skewed.
Ehrman describes neoconservatism as the fourth phase in the development
of liberal foreign policy. The first was Cold War liberalism, which he
identifies with Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s The Vital Center, Reinhold
Niebuhr's essays, and the Truman administration's hawkish National
Security Council report, nsc?68, drafted in 1950 under the supervision
of Paul Nitze. The second was the left?wing revisionism of the 1960s,
which he identifies chiefly with historian William Appleman Williams
and disciples like Richard Barnet. The third was the neoliberal
synthesis by political scientists Stanley Hoffmann and Zbigniew
Brzezinski, which stressed world order and interdependence over
containment and polarization. Neoconservatism arose as a reaction to
both left?wing revisionism and neoliberalism and as a reaffirmation of
Cold War liberalism. The neoconservatives, writes Ehrman, stood for
"continued adherence to the vital center idea of an activist
anticommunist foreign policy." They were Cold War liberals who searched
for a Truman in the 1970s and found Reagan.
Ehrman's history recalls that of Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz in
his 1980 book, The Present Danger. But Podhoretz and other
neoconservatives who took this view had an ulterior motive. Just as
conservative economists of the time were trying to portray the
Kemp?Roth tax cuts as a reprise of the Kennedy administration's tax
cuts, Podhoretz and the neoconservatives were trying to attract
discontented Democrats to the Republican side by portraying their own
doctrine as the true heir of Truman liberalism. Ehrman takes these
arguments at face value. This version of neoconservative history
mistakes a part, and a small part at that, for a more complex whole.
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19950701fareviewessay5058/john-b-judis/
trotskyism-to-anachronism-the-neoconservative-revolution.html
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
