-Caveat Lector-
I've been wondering why no one ever saw fit to discuss truth with the NY Times before this. Doesn't anyone recall that it took the reporters/editors at the Times only a couple of days to completely discount the years of investigative reporting on the CIA drug connection in Los Angeles. What shortcut did they use? Then there was the matter of that amazing Clinton scandal which Harper's Magazine proved was total gunk. Harper's had a C-SPAN program on it, but the Times refused to attend the party. The Times has its own agenda, and has never let truth get in the way. Prudy
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
