11-8-2003 - NIPR.MIL - MUITO INTERESSANTE
9:35 am GMT
That needs no translation, very interesting indeed. I'm not a stat freak, if I were that's all I'd be doing - scouring the logs. Every once in awhile I get this feeling to see who's currently viewing the site. This is true, I swear, every single time there's either a NIPR.MIL with a base name attached to it, or DoD, the Pentagon, HUD, weird about HUD, anyway I always check what reports they're reading. It's mostly one about chemtrails, followed with Tesla and weather engineering, and my goings off about the base I lived smack next to on a beach in California.
The last one I spotted was Friday and it was a NIPR.MIL, I won't name the base, and it was one about an email I got from an old friend who took on the California base with me and then went into the Eagle Eyes program. I have to admit to feeling a tiny shudder go through me. I spilled a lot of guts in that report and knowing they were reading the entrails was enough to get me searching to see if I'm alone in this.
Of course not.. Lots of people post their entire stats as proof, IP's from regular visitors, too, and I started checking out the sites they were hitting. Uhhuh, strange sites, sites that offer information not found anywhere else, some people's private research, so yeah, if I were a snooping fed or military person I'd go there to pick some brains. I'd definitely be checking who's talking shit.
It's weird, I did a chemtrail report with pictures from here, that went into a lot of 2 and 2's put together and it's still making the rounds. It's been linked to from unimaginable sites and is the most read report I've written and the one I wish now I hadn't written. I think that about a lot of them. Chemtrail queen. Yeah, a title I covet. I do believe they exist and that there's a cover-up and I'm not fanatical about it, but the military, government, DoD and even the Pentagon are sure hot on this subject.
I have to think, wow, some of this stuff could get me in the deep muddy if I were in the states and then that leads to flying and the lists they have of people they think aren't loyal to the current governmentl. Panic fleets fast, but its presence is felt. Then I have to think, am I being unduly paranoid? Am I being thought of as a conspiracist or have I exposed things I shouldn't? Don't they know I'm nuts? Certifiable? Damaged by their tests? See, that alone puts me in a different category because it sounds like it's something I hallucinated. It was real. The effects have lasted. Enough said. I have to stop talking about this.
I kill myself. I just reread a report I wrote in November called 'When the Pentagon Comes Calling' and I spilled more than that I ever have. I totally forgot about that one. YIKES! I need a rock, I need a rock. Ahem. See what others have to say about NIPR and some of their visits.
"Nipr.mil is not a single domain a but a hush-hush web proxy that acts as a gateway for hundreds of U.S. military domains in order to hide their identities. It was established by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) in response to a memorandum (CM-5 1099, INFOCOM) issued in March 1999 by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, calling for "actions to be taken to increase the readiness posture for Information Warfare." "Uncontrolled Internet connections," the document says, "pose a significant and unacceptable threat to all Department of Defense information systems and operations."
"Let it be know that on Mar 31 2001 at 08:54 MST NIPR.MIL, the United States Department of Defense Network Operations, completed a visit to this website, www.carnicom.com. The duration of this uninterrupted visit was approximately 10 1/2 hours and it involved an inspection or review of 53 web pages within this same internet site.
The DISA created NIPR so that NIPR is essentially a VERY secure, single point of contact for all DoD connections to the web. Imagine it as a super firewall for all of the DoD's various branches, partners, and educational institutions that work with the DoD."
These are from a site which basically lets the reader make up his/her mind about these showing in their stats, reprinting the emails he gets both from the military and private citizens.
"Yes. Some of us have Internet access. Many times, we search for information pertaining to our specialties, as the Internet is a wealth of information. It's hard to tell if the site will be helpful from the limited information given in the search's results, so people click the link. I hope you don't think you're being monitored though. People who connect through a military server just happen to hit your site sometimes. It happens. *shrug* I wouldn't worry if I were you."
"The US military has an extensive program for the study of civilian activity, location of potential leaders and their affiliates, communication lines, emotional content within "propaganda". Recall that the Internet ostensibly belongs to the Defense Department, which means civilians are by definition guests on military property, and surveillance of civilian activity on the Internet is not a violation of US law.
And so they snoop. They have vast databases and panels of "analysts" in EMF shielded rooms, sifting through the material they find. And they have a whole cultish system for evaluating the individuals they are analyzing -- the Stratton-Briggs (sp?) personality typing system that makes Astrology look tame.
How do I know about these things? I have built systems for them, worked for them, and been in their facilities. And most damning of all, I have seen the training manuals where they lay out parts of the program. They are the living proof of Rome's early wisdom: never bring the armies into Rome. And proof of the wisdom of America's founding fathers who abhored a standing army and forbade Congress to ever fund one. Infinite budget, no oversight, guaranteed secrecy, boundless ambition, and nothing better to do but crawl down your shirt and in your shorts like a hive of jungle ants."
Then there's a less nefarious explanation and of course, it makes sense, but so do the others.
"Remember all those naval personnel at sea for long tours of duty? They have access to the Internet. I run a large site about Roman antiquity, and routinely get nipr.mil visits: I'm delighted that I'm probably entertaining some troop stuck on a ship somewhat a thousand miles from anywhere!"
Others say they are bots or spiders, seeking certain words and phrases, checking them all out. Who really knows. Jerrybrito.com has an entry called "NIPR: The secret government" and he starts like this:
"No sooner had I finished reading the NYT article Joanne recommended on the Pentagon's plans for data mining and electronic surveillance than I noticed on my logs a visitor to my site from bu-wcs1-kelly.nipr.mil. "WTF is this?" I said.
Apparently this shady military outfit is spidering sites looking for info on Dmitry Sklyarov, the first person arrested on criminal charges under the DMCA. But my site, until now, hasn't mentioned Sklyarov. Could it be I'm now on a list somewhere for badmouthing the administration as much as I do?
Once the war starts and all goes to hell and FEMA suspends constitutional government and the three branches of government crown Bush emperor, will black helicopters from NIPR come for me? Well, there I go again. But really, what's a military outfit doing spidering an American citizen's site? Have you been scanned by NIPR?"
I could go on and on but I'm tired, it's been a tough week. The heat wave in this part of Portugal has tamed a bit but it's heating up as I type. I can think almost clearly, though physically I'm still a slug. I had to plug NIPR today. Maybe they'll go away. You serious? This is bait!
what they be doin on my site
i found em there jus tonight
readin 'bout chemtrails and the like
hey motherfuckers, take a hike
--plain brown (w)rapper
Brenda Stardom
Portugal
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
