Title: Man whose aim was regime change
-Caveat Lector-
Will Paul Wolfowitz go down in the history books as the worst and most destructive presidential adviser in American history?  He and his entire neocon coterie have already accumulated an impressive record of lies, incompetence, misreadings and false predictions regarding Iraq which have severely damaged the American interest.  They seem determined to redouble their efforts the more they fail.
 
 
The Scotsman   
Mon 27 Oct 2003
  
Man whose aim was regime change

ALEX MASSIE IN WASHINGTON

PAUL Wolfowitz has demonstrated a commitment to regime change in Iraq for more than a decade.

He was one of the very few administration officials to argue during the first Gulf War that the United States and its allies should move on Baghdad in 1991 following the crushing success of Operation Desert Storm.

At the time, Wolfowitz was serving as the under-secretary of defence for policy, a position he held from 1989 to January 1993.

However, neither President George Bush Snr nor Wolfowitz's boss, Dick Cheney or Colin Powell, the Defence Secretary, then the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, agreed with Wolfowitz's analysis.

Now, 12 years later, the most persistently idealistic of the current Bush administration hawks has seen his vision made real.

While others such as Cheney and Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld repeatedly stressed the dangers of Saddam's supposed arsenal of chemical and biological weapons, they were latecomers to the regime-change bandwagon. The bookish, even intellectual, Wolfowitz repeatedly couched his arguments in the run-up to this year's reprise of the Gulf War in more idealistic terms.

For Wolfowitz, previously the Dean of the School of International Affairs at Johns Hopkins University before accepting his present post as Deputy Secretary of Defence, regime change in Baghdad was an important element in not just bolstering the United States' security in the short term, but as part of a longer-term project of reforming and reordering the entire Middle East.

In his years at Johns Hopkins, Wolfowitz, who first served in the Pentagon from 1977-80 before becoming head of policy planning at the State Department from 1981-82, was close to the coterie of neo-conservatives clustered at the influential magazine the Weekly Standard and the think tank, The Project For A New American Century, both of whom urged the administration of President Bill Clinton to pursue regime change in Iraq.

When President Bush summoned his war cabinet to Camp David on 15 September, 2001, just four days after the destruction of the World Trade Centre, Wolfowitz forcefully put the case for action against Iraq in addition to, or instead of, Afghanistan.

A good deal of the morning session was spent discussing this. By the afternoon, however, Iraq was off the agenda. At least for the time being.

Wolfowitz, who previously served as US ambassador to Indonesia for three years in the 1980s, continued to press the case, however, using a briefing to call for "ending states who sponsor terrorism".

According to Bob Woodward's book Bush At War, this prompted Colin Powell to ask Hugh Shelton, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, "What the hell, what are these guys [at the Pentagon] thinking about ... Can't you get these guys back in the box?"

It would not be long before regime change became official US policy, giving the 59-year-old Wolfowitz a victory in his decade-long battle.


This article:

  http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/international.cfm?id=1185382003

Rebuilding Iraq:

  http://www.news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=404

Websites:

  Iraq Today
  http://www.iraq-today.com/

  Iraq Daily (World News Network)
  http://www.iraqdaily.com/

  Red Cross / Red Crescent
  http://www.ifrc.org/

  UN - Office of the Iraq Programme
  http://www.un.org/Depts/oip/

  Christian Aid report - The missing billions
  http://www.christianaid.org.uk/indepth/310iraqoil/index.htm

  The World Bank
  http://www.worldbank.org/

www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to