-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

WHO'S REALLY RUNNING THE BUSH PRESIDENCY?


It's no secret that Bush was a know-nothing playboy businessman
living off papa's reputation and power prior to being allowed to move
up the stepping stones of public office. After being interviewed by
kingmaker George Shultz in San Francisco, and having been
declared "ready" to serve the establishment, he still had to be
briefed for weeks on foreign and domestic policy by the likes of
Kissinger, Scowcroft and Talbot before he could face the cameras -
something he has rarely done without a written script. Even now,
savvy analysts still consider Bush only a step above a script
reader. Whenever he tries to wing it on his own, his answers are
grammatically incorrect, poorly worded, confused, or simply a rehash
of overworn "tough guy" phrases he memorized previously. So, who's
the real power behind the throne?

A rash of articles have been emerging in the alternative media lately
on the topic, all pointing to VP Dick Cheney as the real power in the
Bush administration. The details are generally correct, but the
conclusions about Cheneys overall role and power are wrong. He is
directing the president, but hes only a middleman. Heres a sampling:

Ritt Goldstein of the Sydney Morning Herald writes, "A former
Pentagon officer turned whistleblower says a group of hawks in the
Bush Administration, including the Vice-President, Dick Cheney, is
running a shadow foreign policy, contravening Washington's official
line." Karen Kwiatkowski, a former air force lieutenant-colonel in
the Pentagon claims, "George Bush isn't in control . . . the
country's been hijacked." She describes how key areas of
neoconservative concern were strategically placed throughout the
White House and in government agencies. She ought to know. She
worked under one of Cheney's boys, Undersecretary of Defense for
Policy Douglas Feith. However, Kwiatkowski is wrong about the
presidency being "hijacked." Bush is a knowing, but lower level
participant.

Another significant article describing how Cheney's boys control the
other key posts in the administration was written by Jim Lobe, a
journalist for Alternet.org and other liberal publications. In
today's world we often have to rely on the Left to do the initial
critical analysis of Bush administration policies. Most
conservatives writers either have gone to sleep or have become
inveterate yes-men to Bush.

In general, keep in mind that Lobe and other leftists believe there
is a natural tension between liberal-leaning Sec. of State Colin
Powell (including the traditionally leftist State Department), and
the "right wing" neo-cons of the White House and Pentagon. They
believe the "right wingers" in power run a capitalist conspiracy for
greed and power, which Powell and other token liberals in government
try to resist. This is not true, in reality. They do resist a
little, but few of the liberals at mid-levels of government are
quiting in protest. All those in high position, without exception,
are participants, to one degree or another, in a conspiracy of
governmental control, for globalist purposes. The degree of
difference between various players is in how much of the game plan
they are actually aware of. Occassionally a naive and subservient
conservative is given a top level agency to run, in order to help
preserve the facade of conservatism in the Bush administration. They
too know there is a powerful control system, but they think it is
benevolent, with good intentions. I don't consider Attorney General
Ashcroft as one of these naive conservatives. He's told too many
lies to qualify as an honest man any more.

Colin Powell certainly knows he is part of a powerful control
system. The system brought him up the chain of military command as
Powell fulfilled his "uncle Tom" role. He was a useful minority
officer who could be relied upon to cover-up for military mistakes.
Bush has been the recipient of a lot of favors from the establishment
as well. The control system is what has covered for his errors and
missteps throughout life, and provided him the wealth making
opportunities that otherwise would have eluded someone of average
abilities. Neither Powell nor Bush, I believe, are aware of the big
picture. They only know they are part of the sytem and protected by
it as long as they don't cross anyone higher up. As far as Cheney is
concerned, I think he is the point man within the Bush administration
for the real Powers That Be (PTB), who rarely hold public office.
Taking his orders from others higher in the power structure, Cheney
then directs the president, sometimes openly, but usually by
suggestions. Besides directly influencing the president, Cheney was
also in charge of selecting the staff of the White House, the
Pentagon, and some positions within State Department.

Most of Lobe's conclusions are wrong because he doesn't understand
the over-arching conspiracy of power that is above the office of the
President. He thinks narrowly only about people trying to "hijack
the presidency." But his analysis is still useful. I'll insert my
comments in [brackets] to give insight into what's really going on.

"While the mainstream media mostly continue to cast Bush as the
captain of his ship, hints that Cheney is the dominant figure shaping
Washington's diplomatic policy have become too numerous to ignore. A
recent Washington Post article assessing Condoleeza Rice's
performance as national security adviser revealed a most stunning
example of this lopsided state of affairs. According to the Post,
Bush had ordered Cabinet officials not to give any preferential
treatment to Ahmed Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress (INC) when US
forces moved into Iraq last spring. But soon after, in flagrant
violation of his directive, the Pentagon flew Chalabi and 600 of his
armed followers into southern Iraq in early April, with the approval
of the vice president. [The facts are right, but Lobe doesn't have
the whole story. The original Bush directive was only make a
pretense of fairness for all of those staff members in the White
House and Pentagon who still think our government tries to do what's
right. The Cheney directive was Bush's intent all along. Cheney did
and does assume the power to issue orders directly - which no other
VP has ever exercised, to my knowledge.] "It would not be the first
or last time that Cheney simply ignored his commander-in-chief. The
extent of Cheney's power is not surprising given the degree to which
Bush relied on him during his presidential campaign and in the
administration's early days. [Relied on is not correct. Whenever
the PTB bring in a relatively naive and unqualified person such as
Bush to serve as president, they assign him several advisors and one
main "handler," whom the president knows he is never to disregard -
despite his position as president. Cheney, I believe, is Bush's
handler.] And the fact that Cheney, who was asked by Bush to
recommend his running mate in 2000, picked himself for the job [a
foregone conclusion anyway; the entire "selection process" was only
for show] reveals that he expected to wield extraordinary power if
Bush won the election.

"Cheney has played a much more important role than Rice since the
early days of the administration, despite her closer personal
relationship with the president. [True, and this will always be the
case. Rice is a second rate academic still in training for higher
things. She rarely thinks for herself. No previous National
Security advisor has had this level of inexperience. Most, like
Kissinger, Scowcroft and Talbot, were high level conspirators placed
at NSA to control presidents like Nixon and Ford. Rice is a
shamefully apologist for everything Bush says or does. She has
little credibility when she does this, among the old guard of
Kissingers group, and thus is not trusted with any crucial
decisions. Like Powell, she must be corrected often by Cheney and
his plants within the State Department.] It was Cheney's choices that
prevailed in the appointment of both cabinet and sub-cabinet national-
security officials, beginning with that of Donald Rumsfeld as Defense
Secretary. Not only did Cheney personally intervene to ensure that
Powell's best friend, Richard Armitage [a CIA drug smuggling spook,
despised by the neo-cons], was denied the deputy defense secretary
position, but he also secured the post for his own protege, Paul
Wolfowitz. Moreover, it was Cheney who insisted that the ultra-
unilateralist John Bolton be placed in a top State Department arms
job - a position from which Bolton has consistently pursued policies
that run counter to Powell's own views. [True. That's because, while
Powell is a "player" and yes man, he is not trusted to know the
overall game plan. Only those who are high enough to know the big
picture are capable of understanding why the US plays both sides in
the wars on drugs, terror, and tyranny. Powell, being a naive
liberal, is a natural pick to head the State Department, which is
full of hard core leftists. Cheney had to put someone in State that
the leftists there would tolerate and trust to some degree.]

"Moreover, Cheney's own national-security staff is the largest ever
employed by a vice president. Its members have largely been chosen
for both their ideological affinity with their boss and proven
Washington experience. [Good point. The size of Cheney's staff is a
huge indication of his hidden role as handler.] They play to win,
said one State Department official. Cheney's chief of staff and
national security adviser, I. Lewis Scooter Libby, a Washington
lawyer and Wolfowitz protege, is considered a far more skilled and
experienced bureaucratic and political operator than Rice. [This is
a gross understatement. Libby is one of the real evilplayers to
watch. Hes a ruthless operator - the kind the PTB bring up in the
ranks to control others, but from behind the scenes. Libby has a
Lenin type face and would never be trusted by the public. Cheney, on
the other hand, has a cherubic expression capable of deceiving
conservatives - so hes who they put out front nowadays.] With several
of his political allies on Rice's own staff - including deputy
national security adviser Stephen Hadley and Middle East director
Elliott Abrams - Libby is able to run circles around Condi [true,
indeed],noted a former NSC official." [End of Lobe quote.]


World Affairs Brief, October 31, 2003 Copyright Joel Skousen.
Partial quotations with attribution permitted.
Cite source as Joel Skousens World Affairs Brief EXCERPTS



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/I3w.vC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/vseplB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to