-Caveat Lector-
I'm not sure what you are responding to, as there is no pre-content in your
post.
In any case, your diggy-post just re-states a given; people will draw
their own conclusion regardless whether or not I, or anybody else, claims
something is BS. Oddly, you re-enacted the strange schizo-mind exhibited by
some on this forum of doing the very same thing as you accuse others of, ie
being irrelevant.
This is just a small forum, quite irrelevant to the Big Picture or scheme
of things. That's not to say anything bad of it, but you have see
things in perspective and realise there are just squillions of forums on the
Net much like this one.
It's only sociopaths like the anti-social Shyte McDudd, who believe they
are on some type of mission from god, a holy Crusade to hunt down evil-doers,
and who have fallen victim to their own hate-rhetoric and imbibed regurgitated,
paranoid Judeophobic conspiracy theories; that take themselves overly
seriously and as you can see, in the process go quite insane.
"constructive," in the end can be a rather subjective
orientation. It's all a matter of perspective, where you're coming from and what
presuppositions one brings to the table, and where you think you are
headed.
For instance, on the surface; toddlers seem very de- or un- constructive,
but once we begin to appreciate that the apparent destructiveness of the
toddler in taking apart a flower or knocking down sand castles is in fact a
constructive effort to understand unity, we are able to revise our view of the
situation, moving from reprimand and prohibition to the intelligent channelling
of his efforts and the fostering of discovery.
Dave.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:59 PM Subject: [CTRL] David Sutherland -Caveat Lector- Im sure you have many reasons for saying what you have said although you must know that all people of intelligence will use their own determination to come to a conclusion of wether others posts are bBS or not. Thankyou you for you comments although they do no one any good when they are not constructive. -- Regards, Daniel Harrison PABX Advisory Services Pty Ltd www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ?"not soap-boxingâ?"please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â?"with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâ?"is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrlhttp://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om |
- [CTRL] David Sutherland Daniel Harrison
- Re: [CTRL] David Sutherland Davide
- Re: [CTRL] David Sutherland Daniel Harrison