The Bremer Chronicles: The Two Ayatollahs
by Andy Martin
(Wednesday 03 December 2003)
"What the bad guys in the Middle East fear most is elections. Free elections. We have been in Iraq for almost eight months and we have not taken one step, not one step, to hold elections."
One of the great stories that former Illini football coach Ray Eliot told us as new freshmen was the story of Alan Ameche and Ray Nietschke. Wisconsin has arrived in Champaignâs Memorial Stadium with a powerhouse team, led by All-American Alan Ameche. A spirited Illini team turned the game into an even match. Wisconsin was threatening to score. On the field, Nietschke yelled âSend Ameche at me!â It was a war call.
Wisconsin answered by sending Ameche right at Nietschke, and Ray stopped the powerful player. The moral: sometimes you have to challenge your opponent to run right at youâand stop him. We need a little of Nietschkeâs boldness in Baghdadâand we donât have it.
A similar morality tale is playing out between the two ayatollahs: Ayatollah Paul Bremer and Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani.
December 2ndâs Washington Post reported that Bremer was lobbying hard against elections in Iraq. Like then-candidate Ronald Reagan, I have to say âThere you go again.â Bremer has responded to Sistaniâs challenge by creating a game Bremer can only lose.
First, letâs look at Sistani. He has been a good ayatollah by anyoneâs measure. He stalled Shiite Iraqis from defending against the American invasion. Not only lives were saved; whole cities were spared. So Ayatollah Sistani is no knee-jerk opponent. He may have his own agenda, but he has proven to be reasonable, as well as resolute.
Second, Bremer. Yes, him again. I wrote my first attack on Bremerâs leadership years ago, back in June, 2003. Even then Bremerâs prissy mode of leadership boded ill for the future. Notwithstanding that President Bush likes Bremer, and the White House slammed me by implication a week ago, I still do not like Bremer. âAmbassadorâ Bremer has repeatedly made wrong decisions, isolating the U.S. mission, and setting up a potential disaster next year. Whatâs not to criticize?
Why is Bremer âintensely lobbyingâ against elections? Among a seemingly endless menu of choices to choose fromâof stupid U.S. policies and decisionsâthe effort to prevent elections ranks among the stupidest. It is âworld classâ stupid.
What the bad guys in the Middle East fear most is elections. Free elections. We have been in Iraq for almost eight months and we have not taken one step, not one step, to hold elections. What a disgrace. We have fumbled the ball into the hands of Ayatollah Sistani andâbeing given the ballâhe is holding on tightly. Sistani has become the advocate for elections. For shame, Mr. Bremer.
If I win the Illinois primary in March, the first thing I am going to ask president Bush is: hold elections in Iraq. Stop stalling. Let our opponents take their case to the Iraqi people. We will take our case to the same people. Let the chips fall where they may. There are no guarantees in government, only risks. How you manage risks determines whether you win or lose. Bremer is incompetent at managing risk.
Iraqi elections would electrify the entire world, not just Arabs. Everyone. It would be a bold, confident step. It would do more to undermine the âregime remnantsâ than the Phyrric victory Americans are celebrating in Samarra. We need to hold elections, and we need to invite the U.N. to supervise them. It is the ultimate exit strategy.
The baloney we are fed by Bremer, that it is too complicated to hold elections, is just that, baloney. Bremer cowers in his âpalace,â hiding from the Iraqi people, and telling them they are not competent to vote. Pathetic.
Elections would force the Ayatollahs out into the open: either put up or shut up. They could not hide behind cryptic messages. They would either have to jump in or stay out. It would be a free for all. There would be some violence and, no doubt, constant attacks from the Saddamites. But we would be risking American lives to do something real, something positive. Saddamites fear elections more than anything else.
Because elections confer legitimacy. The lingering suspicion that the 2000 presidential election was rigged by the U.S. Supreme Court still robs President Bush of some of the legitimacy had he wonâand he would have wonâfair and square. Nothing confers legitimacy like elections. We see it every day in democratizing nations. People want to vote. They want to choose. They want to hold the power of the ballot in their hands.
And Ayatollah Bremer is doing everything he can to deny Iraqis this power. The ultimate power. Because heâs afraid of the outcome. If we are afraid to meet the Iraqi people as equals, as decent human beings, who we can trust and take into our confidence, no amount of shooting will ever confer legitimacy on the U.S. mission or those who support it.
So I say to Ayatollah Bremer, and to President Bush: Let the elections begin! Stop stalling the vote! Stop trying Chicago tactics. Stop making a joke of Americaâs great power and great gift to the world: freedom to choose and, occasionally, freedom to make a mistake.
Or as Joan Rivers might put it to âAmbassadorâ Bremer: Let them vote already!
America will be stronger, the world will be safer, and Bush will look like a champ, not a chump.
My last word to the Ayatollahs: send your best at us. We donât want to kill Iraqis who oppose us, we want to give life to democracy. We want to see you face choices, make difficult decisions, be challenged, compromise, and start acting like part of the real world, not Saddamâs world. Elections would be the final nail in Saddamâs coffin. Itâs a pity our leaders canât see that. Maybe Ayatollah Sistani can.
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
