Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message ----Caveat Lector- Kerry was interviewed a few months ago on a major TV news mag program during the time of publicity about the book on skull and bones society exposing their world including reference to their having Geronimo's bones in their vault. The interviewer got an acknowledgement from Kerry that he was a member and tried to probe him about the society and Kerry with straight face said he couldn't talk about it because it was secret. After a couple of probes the interviewer gave up with a look on his face like "what can I say"?Does this add any new dimension to the "Republican crossover vote" and the "Kerry victory" in Iowa? If the Republicans were afraid of Dean becoming the nominee, they wouldn't organize such a campaign to scuttle him in Iowa by having fellow Bush Yale S&B man Kerry come out ahead in Iowa to deflate Dean momentum, would they? I mean those republicans wouldn't even think of such a "political strategy" in the first "primary state" would they? Dennis could take up this issue by probing in debates on Skull and Bones with Kerry and any other Demo candidates who are known as skull-boners as a point of morality by asking all candidates "if it's true that Skull and Bones has Gernomino's bones, don't you think they should give them back? Wouldn't you say any president or presidential candidate who favors stealing and keeping human remains away from their descendants who want to rebury them, isn't that immoral?" This is a test of truthfulness and morality which should be brought out in debates and to the press. It can more easily be done because both Bush and Kerry are members of this club so it will not be seen as a partisan attack on Bush but a question of viewing and understanding candidates' moral and ethical values and levels of truthfulness -- all usually covered up but with Dennis needs to see the light of day to Light Up America with the light of the truth. How about folks inputting this issue to the Associated Press via below webform and ask them to track this issue during the campaign as an important issue relating to truthfulness and ethics and morality dimensions of the candidates? --------------------------- Associated Press Campaign coverage survey As the election 2004 season begins, we invite you to help determine what issues we should address in our political coverage. We need to ask you a few, simple questions about what issues are most important to you. To fill out the short survey, please go to this Associated Press Managing Editors Web site: http://www.apme-credibility.org/survey The Star newsroom has joined a nationwide network of newsrooms asking these same questions in about 35 cities and towns across the country. So, not only will your answers help us guide coverage in our newsroom, but they will be used as part of a nationwide survey of readers that could help guide coverage on a national scale. Your responses might be used in stories produced for either a local or national audience, so we ask that you provide contact information (which might be used by reporters but not otherwise shared with anyone.) As the campaign season progresses, and new issues arise both nationally and locally, we'll be in touch with readers again to ask more specific questions. This project is part of APME's Credibility Roundtables Project, which works to encourage communication and build trust between journalists and the public. We need your support for this project to succeed. If you have any questions, comments or concerns about this process, please let me know. Thank you so much for participating in this important project. -------------------- From: lmpoyneer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [K4P] Re: GOP crossover 45% in Iowa caucus* Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:24 PM Gotta agree with Dan on this one. We WANT a lot of people who have been registered as Republicans to come over to the Democratic party now that they see how extreme Bush is. --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Daniel G. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm open to whatever truth emerges about the Independents and former > Republicans who took part in the Iowa caucuses. However, the > complaints about "shenanigans" sound bogus to me. Maybe sour grapes > from a loser's activists? > > Every so-called "new voter" signed two forms before being allowed to > play: 1) a voter-registration application which constituted > renunciation of the right to vote in any other place (and said so) > and 2) a 2004 caucus registration form for "New Democratic Voters". > > The first included this warning: "WARNING: If you sign this form and > you know it is not true, you can be convicted of perjury and fined up > to $7,500 and/or jailed for up to 5 years." > > The second included this affirmation: "I do hereby register for this > Caucus and do certify that I possess the qualifications required to > vote at the Caucus in that I will be an eligible voter on November 2, > 2004. I am registered as a Democrat, or I am 17 years of age and > otherwise qualified. I am a resident of the Precinct and I am a > supporter of the Democratic Party." > > Republican spoilers? > > Try another interpretation: Voters who couldn't bring themselves to > commit as Democrats last time are coming home! Too optimistic? Try > this: Voters who haven't decided how to vote next fall decided to > take advantage of a chance to further the cause of a Democratic > candidate, probably a candidate met in person and found attractive. > > Neither of these bothers me in the least, and both are more plausible > explanations of the "new voter" phenomenon, more plausible than a > "dirty tricks" theory. > > Dan Clark > Muscatine, Iowa "One person can make a difference" -- Dennis Kucinich http://Kucinich.us ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 4:23 PM Subject: Re: [K4P] Skull and Bones > > Dean's not? Someone told me he was. Any way to check that out? > > The 60 Minutes feature on Skull & Bones mentioned Kerry as a possible > future president and didn't bring up Dean. I'd think they would if he was > a S&B man. > > > Dean graduated from Yale in 1971; Kerry also went to Yale; > > Well, you don't automatically become a Skull & Bonesman when you attend > Yale. You have to volunteer. > But who knows, he could've been part of a different secret society, > because according to Kevin Phillips, former top Republican strategist and > author of "American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune and the Politics in the > House of Bush": > "Yale has other secret societies. Another one was called Book and Snake." > > But I'm not interested in speculating. > > > and of course so did George Bush and his father before him! > > And HIS father before him, ad infinitum. > And both Bush 41 and Bush 43 went to Andover where, again according to > Phillips, they were part of "a secret society sort of junior grade where > you practiced to be a Skull and Bones type at Yale when you were at > Andover." > > Phillips actually links the creation of the C.I.A. after World War II with > these secret societies and their obsession with secrecy. > > If you're interested in this stuff you should check out the interview with > Phillips from his recent appearance on Democracy Now !: > http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/12/1448237&mode=thread&tid= 25 > > - Andrei > > > "One person can make a difference" -- Dennis Kucinich > http://Kucinich.us David Crockett Williams 661-822-3309 One human being living in Tehachapi, California [EMAIL PROTECTED] Global Emergency Alert Response 2000 http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000 www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
--- End Message ---
