-Caveat Lector-

GERALDO RIVERA.

The buildings that AREN'T burning in Iraq

"They have a saying in the news business," Geraldo Rivera related this week. 
"Reporters don't report buildings that don't burn."  And with that introduction, he 
told a TV audience about the story that is being systematically denied to our entire 
nation: the success story of post-Saddam Iraq.

Are we losing some soldiers each week?   Yes,.
Is there some frustration in the public about electricity and water service?  Yes.
Are some Saddam Hussein loyalists throughout the land, making trouble?  Yes.
Has this opened a window for some terrorist mischief?  Yes.

But that's ALL we hear.  No wonder the country is in a mixed mood about Iraq.  If you 
hear about the buildings that are not burning, though, it is a different story indeed.

Rivera is no shill for George W. Bush.  But Bush, Condi Rice and Colin Powell together 
could not have been as effective as Geraldo was Thursday night on the Fox News 
Channel's Hannity and Colmes program.

"When I got to Baghdad, I barely recognized it," he began, Comparing his 
just-completed trip to two others he made during and just after the battle to topple 
Saddam. "You have over 30,000 Iraqi cops and militiamen already on the job.

This is four months after major fighting stopped.  Can you imagine that kind of 
gearing up in this country?  Law and order is better; archaeological sites are being 
preserved; factories, schools are being guarded."  But what about the secondhand 
griping that the media have been so efficiently relating about power, water and other 
infrastructure?

"To say that Iraq is being rebuilt is not true," answered Rivera.  "Iraq is being 
built. There was no infrastructure before; we are doing it.  I just think the good 
news is being underestimated and underreported."  At this juncture,  one must evaluate 
how to feel about the voices telling us only  about the bad news in Iraq, whether from 
the mouths of news anchors or Democratic presidential hopefuls.
At best, they are underinformed.  At worst, their one-sided assessments of post-Saddam 
Iraq are intentional falsehoods for obvious reasons.

If I hear one more person mock that "Mission Accomplished" banner beneath which 
President Bush thanked a shipload of sailors and Marines a few months back, I'm going 
to spit.  That was a reference to the ouster of Saddam's regime, and that mission was 
indeed accomplished, apparently to the great chagrin of the American left.
No one said what followed would be easy or cheap, and that's why the dripping-water 
torture of the cost and casualty stories is so infuriating.
Remember we pay our soldiers whether they are in Iraq or in
Ft Bragg, North Carolina. We should all mourn the loss of every fallen soldier.  But 
context cries out to be heard. Our present news media is not performing this task.
As some dare to wonder if this might become a Vietnam-like quagmire, I'll remind 
whoever needs it that most of our 58,000 Vietnam war toll died between 1966 and 1972, 
during which we lost an average of about 8,000 per year.  That's about 22 per day, 
every day, for thousands of days on end.

Let us hear NO MORE Vietnam comparisons.  They do not equate.  What I hope to hear is 
more truth, even if we have to wrench it from the mouths of the media and political 
hacks predisposed to bash the remarkable job we are doing every day in what was not so 
long ago a totalit! arian wasteland.
Local elections are under way across Iraq, Rivera reported. "Where Kurds and Arabs 
have been battling for decades, things have been settling down. Administrator Paul 
Bremer is doing a great job."
So does Geraldo think his media colleagues are intentionally painting with one side of 
the brush?  "I'm not into conspiracy theories,..but there's just more bang for your 
buck when you report the GI who got killed rather than the 99 who didn't get killed, 
who make friends, who helped schedule elections, who helped shops get open for 
business,  who helped traffic flow again.
"The vast majority of Iraqis are very happy to have us there.  I would like to see a 
bit more balance."  This needs to be reported to the American Public who are presently 
being duped.  I expect the dominant media culture to nitpick and attack Bush, and 
Democrats to blast him with reckless abandon.  But when that leads to the willful 
exclusion of facts that would shine truthful light on the great work of the American 
armed forces, that level of malice plumbs new depths.





__________________________________________________________________
Introducing the New Netscape Internet Service.
Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to