-Caveat Lector-
Here we go again! - JR
 
 
 
<A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v2|30ee|3|0|%2a|r%3B6859310%3B2-0%3B0%3B8707147%3B2321-160|600%3B4324044|4341940|1%3B%3B%7Efdr%3D7390954%3B0-0%3B0%3B7498105%3B2321-160|600%3B4571624|4589520|1%3B%3B%3fhttp://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?pgid=8707147&amp;aid=6859310&amp;cid=4341940" target=_new></A>
washingtonpost.com

Government Considers New Smallpox Vaccine

By Griff Witte
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 15, 2004; Page E01

Buoyed by promising results in animal experiments, government officials are contemplating buying massive quantities of a new type of smallpox vaccine to supplement the national stockpile already assembled in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Scientists believe that unlike any of the vaccines now available, the new vaccine may be effective in protecting against the deadly infectious disease without the risk of serious -- and occasionally lethal -- side effects.

Efforts to develop the new vaccine, underway for several years, have taken on an air of urgency after safety concerns stalled a 2003 campaign to vaccinate millions of health care professionals and emergency workers who might be first to respond to a biological attack. Those concerns were underscored on Tuesday, when the vaccine that makes up the bulk of the U.S. stockpile was possibly linked to cases of heart inflammation.

As doubts grow about the existing vaccines, scientists are increasingly optimistic about the prospects for the experimental vaccine, called Modified Vaccinia Ankara, or MVA.

Scientists say recently conducted studies using MVA on mice and monkeys indicated the vaccine is both effective and safe, results that are especially encouraging for the some 30 percent of the population that is not supposed to take any of the vaccines now available because of a high risk of complications. That group includes people with HIV, those with compromised immune systems due to chemotherapy, pregnant women and individuals with the skin disease eczema.

But some government officials say MVA has shown such promise that it could do far more than merely fill the gaps left by other vaccines, and that it may become the nation's primary means of defense against a smallpox attack. They say, too, that it could help resuscitate the foundering national campaign to vaccinate millions of emergency workers who would be responsible for cutting off the deadly virus's spread in the event of an outbreak.

"As of now, the front-line vaccine we have is Dryvax," said Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, referring to the only vaccine now licensed for smallpox. "The question is whether we find something that comes along that can replace it. That's looking like it could be MVA."

But to get to that point, the cost of producing the drug would be well into the hundreds of millions of dollars, if not the billions. That sum is too high, some public health experts say, especially given that scientists may not know whether MVA truly works until there's an attack. Unlike Dryvax, which was used effectively during a global eradication campaign during the 1970s, MVA has never been put to the test during an outbreak.

Most experts believe the probability of a smallpox attack is low. Following eradication, only two known stocks of the virus remained in the world: one at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, and another in Russia. Vaccination campaigns in the United States ended decades ago because the risk of the vaccine was considered greater than that of the virus.

But national security experts fear that some of the Russian stockpile could be in the hands of terrorists. Smallpox is one of the most potent bioterror agents because it spreads from person to person and because it kills 30 percent of its victims while permanently disfiguring many of the rest.

After the 2001 anthrax attacks, the federal government made it a priority to develop a stockpile of smallpox vaccine large enough for every man, woman and child in the country. Now the question is whether a second stockpile of safer vaccine is needed, and if the government can afford it.

"The cost is unknown. But that has to be factored in," said D.A. Henderson, a science adviser to the Department of Health and Human Services and one of the principal forces behind smallpox's eradication.

Henderson said that dose for dose, MVA will end up being significantly more expensive than any of the smallpox vaccines now available because a lot more of the vaccine will likely be needed to induce immunity.

The current stockpile consists of three vaccines, including Dryvax from the government's decades-old stockpile. The second was donated from the stockpiles of Aventis Pasteur, the French vaccine maker. The third, made by Acambis PLC, is an update of Dryvax using modern production techniques.

They all protect people using the same basic method, one that dates back centuries. Although the vaccines in the stockpile are produced in different ways, they all involve a virus related to smallpox that, when injected, begins to replicate vigorously and spurs the body's immunity. The replication of the virus can have side effects, however, that range from the mild -- a fever or a swollen arm -- to the serious -- an inflammation of the brain known as encephalitis or, perhaps, an inflammation of the heart.

MVA is also alive when it's injected, but it doesn't replicate well in humans so researchers believe that it's much less likely to cause side effects. The vaccine was first discovered in Turkey, and was later given to more than 100,000 people in Germany.

Because Germany didn't have smallpox at the time, the vaccine's ability to combat the disease remains unknown. But in U.S. government studies completed earlier this year on animals, the vaccine surpassed experts' expectations.

In one experiment, monkeys were given Dryvax, MVA or no vaccine at all. They were then bombarded with monkeypox, a close cousin of smallpox. The monkeys that had not been immunized died, while all of those that had been immunized by either of the vaccines lived. Bernard Moss, who conducted the experiments for Fauci's NIAID, said he was impressed with how well the MVA-immunized monkeys held up to the challenge.

"We were very gratified. They showed absolutely no signs of illness," he said.

A second study tested MVA's effectiveness with mice whose immune systems had been compromised. Again, MVA did the job without causing adverse reactions. Future studies are intended to determine how quickly the protection takes effect, and how long it lasts.

The vaccine is scheduled to enter human trials in the United States within weeks, using samples from two competing companies. One of those companies, Acambis, has already produced an updated version of Dryvax called ACAM2000, some 200 million doses of which have been purchased in the past few years by the government. The company stopped adding volunteers to a study on ACAM2000 this week, however, after at least one person exhibited swelling in the heart. Acambis officials declined to comment on their MVA program.

The other company is the Danish firm Bavarian Nordic AS. The two companies are vying for a contract to produce several million doses of MVA that will likely be awarded later this year. Another contract, calling for 60 million doses or more, is slated to go out to bid in the fall. Last year, the Congressional Budget Office estimated such a purchase would cost $900 million.

Bavarian Nordic chief executive Peter Wulff said that, at least initially, government officials are looking at MVA as a niche vaccine for those who can't take one of the other vaccines because of the threat of complications. He thinks, however, the government will eventually want to use MVA for everyone.

"If you have something that is safe, why would you want to use something that is unsafe?" Wulff said.

Bavarian Nordic and Acambis are not the only companies hoping to produce the vaccine of the future, and MVA isn't the only contender for that title. In the long term, experts say that a genetically engineered vaccine may be the solution. In the shorter term, the California-based biotechnology firm VaxGen Inc. reported this week that its vaccine, known as LC16m8, protected rabbits and mice against a pox virus just as well as Dryvax after only one dose. Scientists have yet to determine how many doses of MVA are needed to induce immunity. The question is important because in the event of an attack, there may not be time for more than one dose. "MVA would have little utility in response to an outbreak," said VaxGen chief executive Lance K. Gordon.

Some worry, too, that MVA may not be available for several years, and that focusing on it so heavily may distract from the more immediate goal of getting emergency workers immunized with Dryvax.

"We have a misperception of risk with the existing vaccine," said William Bicknell, professor of international health at Boston University and a former Massachusetts health commissioner, who insists Dryvax is safe for healthy adults. "MVA would be even safer. So much the better. But MVA is still several years away and waiting is not the best idea."

Fauci said he believes MVA could be in the stockpile within a year or two, and that it may ultimately be used to immunize health care workers who had been reluctant to get a shot of Dryvax.

Before the vaccine can be licensed for use by the Food and Drug Administration, however, it has to undergo a full battery of human trials. Approval of any smallpox vaccine is complicated by the fact that researchers can't ethically expose humans to the disease. Up until now, the best they could do was to give the vaccine to humans to check for side effects, and then test the vaccine's effectiveness on monkeys using monkeypox. But Peter Jahrling, principal scientific adviser with the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, said he could take those efforts a step further by exposing monkeys to actual smallpox.

"I would be very surprised if it didn't work," Jahrling said. "But the only way to know is to do it, and I'll do it if asked."

Staff writer Justin Gillis contributed to this report.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company


 

www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Attachment: uc.GIF?1.13&wpost&wpost&noscript
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to