-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/reagan-myth-reality.html
FAIR  Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
112 W. 27th Street   New York, NY 10001
MEDIA ADVISORY:
Reagan: Media Myth and Reality

June 9, 2004

As the media spend the week memorializing Ronald Reagan, journalists are
redefining the former president's life and accomplishments with a stream of
hagiographies that frequently skew the facts and gloss over scandal and
criticism.

Reagan's Popularity

"Ronald Reagan was the most popular president ever to leave office,"
explained ABC anchor Elizabeth Vargas (6/6/04). "His approval ratings were
higher than any other at the end of his second term." Though the claim was
repeated by many news outlets, it is not true; Bill Clinton's approval
ratings when he left office were actually higher than Reagan's, at 66
percent versus Reagan's 63 percent (Gallup, 1/10-14-01). Franklin Delano
Roosevelt also topped Reagan with a 66 percent approval rating at the time
of his death in office after three and a half terms.

In general, Reagan's popularity during his two terms tends to be overstated.
The Washington Post's lead article on June 6 began by declaring him "one of
the most popular presidents of the 20th Century," while ABC's Sam Donaldson
announced, "Through travesty, triumph and tragedy, the president enjoyed
unprecedented popularity." The Chicago Tribune (6/6/04) wrote that "his
popularity with the electorate was deep and personal... rarely did his
popularity dip below 50 percent; it often exceeded 70 percent, an
extraordinarily high mark."

But a look at Gallup polling data brings a different perspective. Through
most of his presidency, Reagan did not rate much higher than other
post-World War II presidents. And during his first two years, Reagan's
approval ratings were quite low. His 52 percent average approval rating for
his presidency places him sixth out of the past ten presidents, behind
Kennedy (70 percent), Eisenhower (66 percent), George H.W. Bush (61
percent), Clinton (55 percent), and Johnson (55 percent). His popularity
frequently dipped below 50 percent during his first term, plummeted to 46
percent during the Iran-Contra scandal, and never exceeded 68 percent. (By
contrast, Clinton's maximum approval rating hit 71 percent.)

Some in the media similarly emphasized Reagan's likeability. CBS anchor Bob
Schieffer asserted, "You could hate his policies, but it was hard not to
like Ronald Reagan (6/6/04). But Reagan's "likeability" numbers did not
score much higher than other modern presidents, including Jimmy Carter. (For
more on Reagan polling myths, see:
http://www.fair.org/extra/8903/reagan-popularity.html)

No Time for Critical Voices

Mainstream media have relied heavily on Republicans and former Reagan
officials to tell the story of Reagan and his accomplishments, which results
in a decidedly one-sided version of events. A June 7 article in the New York
Times on Reagan's impact claimed that Reagan "was almost always popular and,
many now say, usually right." The article stated that "Reagan lived long
enough to enable many of his old lieutenants, and some more dispassionate
chroniclers as well, to argue that he had also been right on some of the
bigger questions of his time."

Six of the eight sources the article quoted were former Reagan staffers or
Republicans, one was longtime Reagan devotee Margaret Thatcher, and one was
University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein, who gave no argument that
Reagan was "right" about anything. No other "dispassionate chroniclers" were
quoted. Should readers be surprised that Reagan's friends and former
colleagues still think he was right?

Television news has displayed an even more pronounced reliance on Reagan's
Republican admirers. The Sunday morning shows (6/6/04) almost exclusively
featured Republicans; former Reagan chief of staff James Baker appeared on
all three networks, as well as Fox and CNN. Fox News Sunday (6/6/04)
featured, in addition to Baker, current national security advisor
Condoleezza Rice, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and Sheila Tate,
former press secretary for Nancy Reagan. MSNBC's June 6 Hardball program
featured Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole, Republican representatives David
Dreier and Chris Cox, and Reagan strategist Richard Wirthlin.

Interviewing Reagan's admirers may have provided an intimate view of the
former president, but it yielded virtually no acknowledgment of his flaws.
Former Secretary of State Alexander Haig, when questioned by CNN's Anderson
Cooper (6/6/04) to name Reagan's greatest weakness or failing, responded,
"I'm not going to criticize the President. And even if I wanted to, I would
never do it on an occasion such as this. We should be grateful that the
world was a better place because of Ronald Reagan's presidency."

Even when potentially critical voices were included, the tendency was to
soften any disagreements over Reagan's policy. On NPR's Morning Edition
(6/7/04), Susan Stamberg interviewed Republican congressman Dana Rohrabacher
along with Democratic strategist Paul Begala. Clearly, though, this was no
time for disagreement, as evidenced by one of Stamberg's questions to
Begala: "You once famously said that politics is show business for ugly
people. Ronald Reagan makes a liar out of you. He was an extremely handsome,
attractive man." Begala's response: "Boy, was he."

Reagan's Legacy

Reagan's influence over world politics and the direction of the Republican
Party were important aspects of the media's Reagan tributes. But more often
than not, the more controversial aspects of Reagan's legacy were either
downplayed or recast as footnotes.

Time magazine (6/14/04) cheered that "the Reagan years were another of those
hinges upon which history sometimes turns. On one side, a wounded but still
vigorous liberalism with its faith in government as the answer to almost
every question. On the other, a free market so triumphant-- even after the
tech bubble burst-- that we look first to 'growth,' not government, to solve
most problems." As NBC's John Hockenberry put it (6/5/04), "The Reagan
revolution imagined the unimaginable. When poverty and welfare were at
crisis levels in the 1980s, Reagan declared war on government and turned his
back on the welfare state." The long-term impact of cuts in social spending,
gutted environmental protections and other casualties of Reagan's "war on
government" were relegated to passing mentions.

Reagan's fervent support for right-wing governments in Central America was
one of the defining foreign policies of his administration, and the fact
that death squads associated with those governments murdered tens of
thousands of civilians surely must be included in any reckoning of Reagan's
successes and failures.

But a search of major U.S. newspapers in the Nexis news database turns up
the phrase "death squad" only five times in connection with Reagan in the
days following his death--twice in commentaries (Philadelphia Inquirer,
6/6/04; Chicago Tribune, 6/8/04) and twice in letters to the editor (San
Francisco Chronicle, 6/8/04; L.A. Times, 6/8/04). Only one news article
found in the search (L.A. Times, 6/6/04) considered the death squads an
important enough part of Reagan's legacy to be worth mentioning. The three
broadcast networks, CNN and Fox didn't mention death squads at all,
according to Nexis. Nor were any references found in the transcripts of the
broadcast networks to the fact that Reagan's policy of supporting Islamicist
insurgents against the Soviet-backed government of Afghanistan led to the
rise of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

The Reagan administration's friendly policy towards Saddam Hussein was also
a neglected media topic. During the Reagan years, the U.S. offered
significant support to Iraq, including weapons components, military
intelligence, and even some of the ingredients for manufacturing biological
weapons like anthrax (Newsweek, 9/23/02).

The rare opportunities for critical reflection about Reagan's policies were
turned into additional evidence of his strength, as when Time magazine
(6/14/04) suggested, "Even when his views were most intransigent-- when he
wondered out loud whether Martin Luther King Jr. was a communist or failed
for nearly all of his presidency to speak the word AIDS even once-- Reagan
gave Reaganism a human face." Time followed that strange assessment with a
comment from Bush adviser Karl Rove: "He made us sunny optimists... His was
a conservatism of laughter and openness and community."

Journalists seemed determined to show that any criticisms of Reagan could be
turned upside down. As Dan Rather explained on CBS's 60 Minutes (6/6/04),
"The literal-minded were forever troubled by his tendency to sometimes
confuse life with the movies. But he understood, like very few leaders
before or since, the power of myth and storytelling. In his films and his
political life, Ronald Reagan stood at the intersection where dreams and
reality meet, and with a wink and a one-liner, always held out hope for a
happy ending."

Even Reagan's contradictions were somehow construed as strong points. As
Time put it (6/14/04), "So great was Reagan's victory in making his
preoccupations into enduring themes of the national conversation that it may
not matter that his record didn't always match his rhetoric. He insisted,
for instance, that a balanced budget was one of his priorities. But by the
time Reagan left office, a combination of lower tax revenues and sharply
higher spending for defense had sent the deficit through the roof."

The Iran-Contra scandal, which loomed too large to ignore, was often written
off by journalists. "As we look back today, it's like just a speck in the
eight years of his presidency," explained CNN's Judy Woodruff (6/7/04). Meet
the Press host Tim Russert (6/6/04) showed a clip of Reagan's famous
response to the scandal, in which he stated, "A few months ago, I told the
American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best
intentions still tell me that's true. But the facts and the evidence tell me
it is not." Russert described this tortured evasion of culpability as "very
believable."

Whatever reporters made of Iran-Contra, though, Reagan's triumph over such
problems was more important than the incidents themselves. CBS reporter
Anthony Mason (6/6/04) explained: "The deficit doubled during the Reagan
years. His second term was scarred by the Iran Contra scandal, but he never
lost that common touch.... Ronald Reagan had an uncanny ability to make
Americans feel good about themselves." That bond with American citizens
remained front-and-center throughout the media. As CBS anchor Dan Rather put
it (6/5/04), Reagan "was the great communicator, yes. But he was also a
master at communicating greatness. He understood that, as he once put it,
'History is a ribbon always unfurling,' and managed to convey his vision in
terms both simple and poetic. And so he was able to act as a conduit to
connect us to who we had been and who we could be."

Reagan and the Media

The overwhelmingly positive coverage of Reagan struck some as a significant
change. As Washington Post media reporter Howard Kurtz noted (6/7/04): "The
uplifting tone with which journalists are eulogizing Ronald Reagan is
obscuring a central fact of his presidency: He had a very contentious
relationship with the press." Others would certainly disagree with Kurtz's
assessment-- Mark Heertsgaard's 1991 book, "On Bended Knee: The Press & the
Reagan Presidency," for example, characterizes the press corps as being
basically uncritical during the Reagan years.

In any event, it would be hard to argue that current coverage of Reagan
carries any lingering traces of that formerly "contentious" relationship. If
anything, some reporters now seem to think that the main lesson learned from
the Reagan years was not to be critical. As ABC's Sam Donaldson put it
(6/4/04), "Reporters over the years made the mistake of saying, 'Well, he
made this mistake, he made this mistake. He got that fact wrong.' The
American public got it right. It didn't matter."

Finally, Tom Rosenstiel of the Project for Excellence in Journalism (USA
Today, 6/7/04) gave an interesting take on what he acknowledged were "almost
completely uncritical" media reports on Reagan: "For networks that are
accused of being liberal, this is a way for them to show that they are
fair." One would hope that such an overwhelmingly uncritical assessment of
important political and historical matters would not meet anyone's
definition of "fair" journalism.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to