-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1237589,00.html
Secret World of US Jails
    By Jason Burke
    The Observer U.K.
    Sunday 13 June 2004

Jason Burke charts the worldwide hidden network of prisons where more than
3,000 al-Qaeda suspects have been held without trial - and many subjected to
torture - since 9/11.
    The United States government, in conjunction with key allies, is running
an "invisible" network of prisons and detention centres into which thousands
of suspects have disappeared without trace since the "war on terror" began.

    In the past three years, thousands of alleged militants have been
transferred around the world by American, Arab and Far Eastern security
services, often in secret operations that by-pass extradition laws. The
astonishing traffic has seen many, including British citizens, sent from the
West to countries where they can be tortured to extract information.
Anything learnt is passed on to the US and, in some cases, reaches British
intelligence.

    The disclosure of the shadowy system will increase pressure on the Bush
administration over its "cavalier" approach to human rights and will
embarrass Tony Blair, a staunch ally of President George Bush.

    The practice of "renditions" - when suspects are handed directly into
the custody of another state without due process - has sparked particular
anger. At least 70 such transfers have occurred, according to CIA sources.
Many involve men who have been freed by the courts and are thus legally
innocent. Renditions are often used when American interrogators believe that
harsh treatment - banned in their own country - would produce results.

    The Observer has obtained details of two incidents in which men have
been detained by the US despite being found innocent by courts in their own
country. In one, a British businessman called Wahab al-Rami, an Iraqi living
in the UK and a Palestinian seeking asylum were arrested by US and local
officers in Gambia in November 2002 as they stepped off a flight from
London.

    Their seizure, which followed a tip-off from the UK security services -
came just days after they had been arrested by British police on suspicion
of terrorism and then freed by a British court.

    Two were transported from Gambia to Guantanamo Bay - where they remain
today - without any legal process. In the other incident, two Turks, a
Saudi, a Kenyan and a Sudanese man were arrested in Malawi in June 2003 on
suspicion of funding terrorist networks. Though freed by local courts, the
men were handed over to the CIA and held for several months. Campaigners say
these incidents are "the tip of an iceberg."

    Few escape the ghost network of detention facilities, which range from
massive prison camps such as that at Guantanamo Bay to naval vessels in the
Indian Ocean, so accounts of life inside the new gulag are rare.

    One of the most harrowing stories concerns a Syrian-born Canadian, Maher
Arar, who was arrested by US authorities in late 2002 during a stopover in
New York, on suspicion of terrorist activities.

    After several days of questioning, the 34-year-old IT specialist was
flown to Jordan, where the CIA passed him on to local security officials. He
was repeatedly assaulted in Jordan before being driven to Syria, where he
was kept in solitary confinement in a 6ft by 3ft cell for several months and
repeatedly beaten with cables. All charges were dropped on his release. Arar
said last week that he was "trying to rebuild [his] life."

    "I never did anything to make me a suspect. I could not believe they
would send me back to Syria, but they did," he said. "They sent me back to
be tortured."

    The ghost prison network stretches around the globe. The biggest
American-run facilities are at the Bagram airbase, north of Kabul in
Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, where around 400 men are held, and in Iraq,
where tens of thousands of detainees are held. Saddam Hussein and dozens of
top Baath party officials are held in a prison at Baghdad airport.

    However, Washington is relying heavily on allies. In Morocco, scores of
detainees once held by the Americans are believed to be held at the
al-Tamara interrogation centre sited in a forest five miles outside the
capital, Rabat. Many of the detainees were originally captured by the
Pakistani authorities, who passed them on to the Americans.

    One is Abdallah Tabarak, a militant who is alleged to have been Osama
bin Laden's bodyguard and was seized in late 2001 by the Pakistanis. Tabarak
was handed over to US agents, sent to Bagram and then to Guantanamo, before
being flown to Morocco. Last November, Amnesty International criticised the
"sharp rise" in torture during 2003 in Moroccan prisons.

    In Syria, detainees sent by Washington are held at "the Palestine wing"
of the main intelligence headquarters and a series of jails in Damascus and
other cities. Egypt has also received a steady flow of militants from
American installations. Many other militants have been sent to Egypt by
other countries through transfers assisted by the Americans, often using
planes run by the CIA.

    In Cairo, prisoners are kept in the interrogation centre in the general
intelligence directorate in Lazoughli and in Mulhaq al-Mazra prison,
according to Montasser al-Zayat, an Islamist lawyer in Cairo and former
spokesman for outlawed militant groups.

    Terrorists have also been sent to facilities in Baku, Azerbaijan, and to
unidentified locations in Thailand. Scores more are thought to be at a US
airbase in the Gulf state of Qatar, and a large number are believed to have
been sent to Saudi Arabia, where CIA agents are allowed to sit in on some of
the interrogations. Elsewhere, security officials merely provide the
Americans with summaries.

    The fate of high-value prisoners - such as those directly connected to
the 11 September attacks or other al-Qaeda strikes, or senior aides of bin
Laden - is unknown. Abu Zubaydah, the Palestinian-born al-Qaeda logistics
expert, was arrested after a shoot-out in the Pakistani city of Faisalabad
in March 2002 by a joint team of American and Pakistani special forces.

    After a brief interrogation, Abu Zubayda was handed over to the
Americans, who took him to Bagram and then, it is believed, flew him on to
Jordan, where he has been held, along with several other high-value
prisoners, in prisons in the capital, Amman, and in desert locations in the
east of the country. Jordanian investigators are seen as "professional" by
Western intelligence services, although the nation has been repeatedly
criticised for its human rights record.

    Khaled Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who both helped plan the
11 September attacks, were also transferred to American custody soon after
their capture by Pakistani security forces in September 2002 and March 2003
respectively. They are believed to have been interrogated in Thailand.

    The whereabouts of Riduan Isamuddin, the Indonesian activist dubbed "the
bin Laden of the Far East," who was passed to the Americans following arrest
by Thai security forces in August last year, are unknown. Jabarah Mohamed
Mansur, allegedly involved in an attempt to bomb the US and Israeli
embassies in Singapore, is reported to have been interrogated in Oman.

    What is clear is that the Americans are prepared to go to extraordinary
lengths to capture suspects and to ensure that they are taken to an
environment where information can be extracted as speedily as possible.

    In March 2003, FBI agents kidnapped a Yemeni al-Qaeda suspect from a
hospital in Mogadishu, where he was being treated for gunshot wounds. Two
months earlier, a sophisticated operation involving a fake charity lured a
54-year-old Yemeni to Germany, where he was detained and later extradited to
the US. To seize Mohammed Iqbal Madni, a suspected al-Qaeda operative, in
Indonesia, US investigators worked three states' legal systems to provide an
excuse to pick up the 24-year-old Pakistani. They then flew him to Cairo on
a private US-run jet.

    The exact number of prisoners held by the Americans or their allies is
unknown, but US officials claim that more than 3,000 al-Qaeda militants have
been arrested since 11 September. Only around 350 are held in Guantanamo
Bay. Very few have been released.

    The incarceration of prisoners captured by the Americans in jails in the
Middle East has enraged militants. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian-born
terrorist leader who is active in Iraq, said in April that prisons in his
native land had become "the Arab Guantanamo."

    "Whoever the Americans find hard to investigate in Pakistan and
Afghanistan, they move to Jordan, where they are tortured in every way," he
said.

    American officials are unrepentant. "You have to break eggs to make
omelettes," said one last week. "The world is a bad place."

    And Cofer Black, then head of the CIA counter-terrorist centre, said
last year that "there was a before 9/11 and an after 9/11. After 9/11, the
gloves came off."

    But former intelligence officers criticised the new tactics last week.
Milton Bearden, who ended a 30-year career with the CIA in 1994, said that
coercion did not work.

    "You just get all kinds of confessions that turn out to be completely
untrue," he said. "And rendition to someone who will torture a suspect is as
bad as doing it yourself."

    Wahab al-Rawi, whose brother is still being held in Guantanamo Bay, said
that he was angry at both the British government and the US government.

    "I just want to know how my own government can just give me up to the
Americans. Who do these people answer to?

    "I just ask God to punish them, because there is no power on earth that
they seem to be afraid of."



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


    Go to Original

    A Look Behind the 'Wire' At Guantanamo
    By Scott Higham
    Washington Post

    Sunday 13 June 2004

Defense memos raised questions about detainee treatment as Red Cross sought
changes.
    On the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the newly arriving
detainees thought they were walking into certain death. Dressed in reddish
jumpsuits, a hue reserved for condemned men in the Arab world, the captives
believed they were about to be executed.

    U.S. military officers wondered whether the fears could work in their
favor.

    "The detainees think they are being taken to be shot," the military
officers noted in one of a series of Defense Department memos written at the
base and obtained by The Washington Post. "Should we continue not to tell
them what is going on and keep them scared."

    The previously undisclosed memos provide one of the most complete
pictures to date of life behind the "wire" at Guantanamo. The detainees
wanted an extra pair of shorts to wear in the shower, for privacy. They
asked that the call to prayer be broadcast in camp, but a CD player could
not be found. They asked for tea with "lots of sugar." The response: "Not
now. However, we will reconsider in the future." Of the 600 detainees, 200
cooperated with their keepers.

    The memos also document for the first time the precise nature of a
number of long-standing concerns issued by the International Committee of
the Red Cross over the treatment of suspected al Qaeda terrorists and
Taliban fighters held at the base.

    Among them: U.S. interrogators were placing detainees in isolation holds
for as long as a month at a time for refusing to furnish information.
Extraordinarily long interrogation sessions were having a "cumulative
effect" on the mental health of the captives. And the reliance upon open-air
cages instead of enclosed cells constituted inhumane treatment under the
international laws of war.

    Nearly two years after the camp opened, Red Cross officials sharply
criticized the U.S. government for continuing to use the cages and keeping
detainees in "excessive isolation," and for failing to establish due process
or a stepped-up release schedule, according to the memos.

    "There was no improvement in any of the four major areas of concern," an
Oct. 9, 2003, memo states.

    The memos also contain tantalizing clues about several high-value
detainees who were off-limits to Red Cross inspectors during their periodic
visits to Guantanamo, which typically lasted four to six weeks. A source
familiar with captives at the base said one of the detainees, No. 760, is a
close associate of Osama bin Laden, Abdallah Tabarak. The Moroccan citizen
was bin Laden's personal bodyguard, took part in the Tora Bora battles in
Afghanistan at the end of 2001 and sacrificed himself to secure bin Laden's
escape by making calls on the al Qaeda leader's personal satellite
telephone.

    Red Cross officials were not permitted to interview Tabarak as recently
as Feb. 2, according to a memo documenting a meeting at the base that day.

    "Is there a possibility we can see him?" asked Vincent Cassard, the head
of the Red Cross inspection team.

    "Because of military necessity, the ICRC may not have private talks with
him," said Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller, then commander of detention
operations at Guantanamo and now in charge of U.S. prison facilities in
Iraq. ". . . He is the only one here at the Camp who has restricted access."

    A Defense Department spokeswoman declined to say last week who is being
held at Guantanamo as part of a broader policy barring the disclosure of the
identities of detainees at the base. Red Cross officials also declined to
identify detainees or discuss the memos. Red Cross officials rarely issue
public comments and criticisms, fearing they could lose access to detention
facilities and prisoners.

    "Confidentiality prevents us from being able to confirm or deny what we
have seen, what we have heard from detainees and what we have discussed with
the authorities," Red Cross spokeswoman Amanda Williamson said.

    Defense Department officials declined to discuss the memos, stressing
the importance of maintaining confidentiality in their conversations with
the Red Cross. "There's been a good working relationship," said Navy Lt.
Cmdr. Barbara Burfeind, a Defense Department spokeswoman. "A lot of the
concerns that they have brought up have been addressed."

    She said there have been "significant improvements" in the quality of
life for detainees and the Pentagon is planning hearings to review the
status of each of the 595 detainees.

    "Basically, a lot of things have changed and improved down there since
it first opened," Burfeind said. "There's been an ongoing dialogue with the
Red Cross, and that has been very helpful."

    Since Guantanamo received its first detainees in January 2002, U.S.
officials have closely guarded what takes place on the cellblocks, who is
held there and when the captives might be released. The open-ended nature of
the detentions has been condemned by foreign governments and human rights
groups. The constitutionality of the detentions is being weighed by the U.S.
Supreme Court, which is expected to rule within the next few weeks whether
detainees can be held without access to lawyers or courtrooms.

    Record of Visits
    While the Defense Department memos are not a complete record of the
half-dozen Red Cross visits to the base, they do provide a rare account of
detainee life and the conversations between members of the international
humanitarian group and top detention commanders.

    On Jan. 11, 2002, the Defense Department opened Camp X-Ray at
Guantanamo, a primitive collection of hastily erected chain-link cages on
slabs of concrete in a remote area of the Navy base. Six days later, Red
Cross officials visited the base. They met with the prison commanders on
Jan. 21.

    The conversation was cordial.

    "The meeting was very informal, but well structured," a military officer
wrote in one of the memos. "The ICRC delegates were very appreciative of
support and access provided."

    Red Cross officials said they were "very pleased" with the treatment of
the detainees and appreciate that the situation is "fluid" and commanders
must be flexible, the memo said. "They accept that the U.S. must factor
protection as a paramount consideration."

    After the meeting, military officers prepared a document titled "General
Observation and Meeting Notes." The document shows that military officers
were forced to confront numerous questions and concerns raised by the Red
Cross.

    The military officers noted that the detainees, the vast majority of
them Muslim, believed the reddish jumpsuits were a sign that they were going
to be put to death. The officers wondered whether they should explain that
was not the case, change the color of the jumpsuits or do nothing.

    In a section of the document subtitled "Issues for Commander," the
military officers wrote:

Should we continue not to tell them what is going on and keep them scared.
ICRC says that they are very scared.
What are the benefits of keeping them scared vs. telling them what is
happening?
What additional problems are caused when they are this scared?
    The military officers said the commander of Guantanamo might want to
consider that the detainees were not "thinking logically" and "the detainees
think they are being taken to be shot." The officers also noted that the
varied religious and ethnic backgrounds of the detainees were causing
confusion and generating a series of issues that had to be resolved.

    The detainees felt humiliated by being forced to shower naked in front
of other captives and military police soldiers. The prisoners were not
permitted to grow beards, a key religious practice. They did not have cloth
to keep their Korans clean and off the floor. Pakistanis said they could not
sleep unless their faces were covered. Detainees said they needed prayer
beads and caps, and wanted calls to prayer to be broadcast five times a day.

    "We need to get an expert in their culture to help us," the officers
wrote in the memo.

    Concerns Outlined
    A few days later, on Jan. 24, 2002, military officers prepared a
five-page memo documenting 29 concerns the Red Cross delegation had raised
on behalf of the detainees. The detention commanders decided to provide
detainees with cloth for their Korans, daily prayer calls once they found a
CD player and shorts for the shower. The commanders also decided to tell the
detainees that the color of the jumpsuits did not portend a death sentence.

    "Detainees are informed that the purpose of the fluorescent jump is to
identify them as 'detainees' and that it is worn for security purposes," the
memo said.

    The military commanders also denied or delayed decisions on some of the
Red Cross requests made on behalf of the detainees. The detainees would not
initially be told where they were. They would not be permitted to be
arranged in cells near those of similar nationalities who speak the same
language.

    "Not until the initial round of interrogations is completed," the memo
said.

    Within a few months, the military would close Camp X-Ray and replace it
with a more modern facility called Camp Delta. Although detainees were still
kept in metal cages, military officers made improvements to the camp. They
also started an incentive-based system in an effort to improve the flow of
intelligence during interrogations.

    In October 2003, the Red Cross team was back at Guantanamo. On this
trip, the team conducted more than 500 interviews on the cellblocks before
meeting with Miller and his top aides. The Defense Department memo
recounting that meeting suggested that the once-cordial relationship had
cooled.

    Cassard, the Red Cross team leader, said the humanitarian group was
deeply troubled that little progress had been made in four key areas: the
lack of a legal system for the detainees, the continued use of steel cages,
the "excessive use of isolation" and the lack of "repatriation" for the
detainees.

    "The ICRC feels that interrogators have too much control over the basic
needs of detainees. That the interrogators attempted to control the
detainees through use of isolation," the memo said. "Mr. Cassard stated that
the interrogators have total control of the level of isolation in which
detainees were kept; the level of comfort items detainees can receive; and
also the access of basic needs to the detainees."

    Miller bristled at the comments, telling the Red Cross representatives
that interrogation techniques were not their concern. "There is no issue
with the interrogation methods. The focus of the ICRC should be the level of
humane detention being upheld, not the interrogation methods," the memo
said.

    Cassard replied that those methods and the lengths of interrogations
were coercive and having a "cumulative effect" on the mental health of the
detainees. Cassard also said that the steel cages, coupled with the
maximum-security nature of the facility and the isolation techniques,
constituted harsh treatment. He said interrogators were putting detainees
into isolation holds for 30 days at a time for refusing to cooperate, an
apparent violation of international law.

    Miller denied the assertion. He said detainees were never put into
isolation cells for failing to cooperate. He said those cells were used to
punish those who failed to follow prison rules or had assaulted guards. He
said only he had the authority to order isolation, and he "is careful not to
exceed 30 [days] unless a detainee has committed a serious breach of the
disciplinary rules."

    Cassard then said he had been told that interrogators at the facility
were gaining access to the medical files of the detainees and using the
information to develop their interrogation plans. "This is a breach of
confidentiality between a physician and a patient," Cassard said, according
to the memo.

    Miller denied the allegation, demanding that Cassard provide proof.

    "Miller asked the ICRC to confirm their facts with regard to the medical
records issue," the memo said.

    Cassard shot back.

    "Mr. Cassard raised a concern that MG Miller was not taking the
discussion seriously," the memo said. "Miller explained that he was taking
the discussion seriously, that he respected the work and opinions of the
ICRC. He also asked the ICRC team to respect his opinions."

    Cassard also criticized Miller for expanding a section of the prison
called Camp Echo, a collection of isolation huts. Cassard said he was
"shocked" to see more of the huts going up and called conditions at the camp
"extremely harsh" with "very strict interrogations."

    Miller called Camp Echo an "appropriate facility" and said it was
designed to hold disciplinary cases and detainees scheduled to be tried
before military commissions. He said the secluded nature of the camp
permitted "detainees to have private conversations with their attorneys,"
the memo said. Miller added: "There are currently very few detainees in Camp
Echo and they are there for serious assaults against MPs."

    The chief of the Red Cross in North America, Christophe Girod, concluded
the meeting by saying that the detainees should have visitation rights and
that the open-ended detentions were "very hard" on the captives. "Mr. Girod
stated that after two years it is time for ICRC and the U.S. to put
everything on the table and make some real policy changes."

    Miller said changes were underway.

    "Miller asked that the ICRC respect the fact that some detainees here
are very high risk, very dangerous and must be treated as such," the memo
said.

    On Oct. 10, the day after the meeting, Girod issued a rare public
criticism of the Guantanamo operation, noting "a worrying deterioration in
the psychological health of a large number" of the detainees because of the
uncertainty about their fate. "One cannot keep these detainees in this
pattern, this situation, indefinitely."

    He said he spoke out because negotiations with the Bush administration
failed to produce results.

    This February, the team members returned to Guantanamo and met with
Miller for an update. The general told them they could have access to
several detainees who were previously off-limits but not Tabarak, No. 760.
"We are in the process of getting a medical summary of his record for you to
see how he's doing," Miller told the delegation, according to a Feb. 2 memo.
He also said that an Australian held in Guantanamo, David Hicks, who was
charged last week with conspiracy to commit war crimes, was cleared to make
phone calls.

    "So far, he's made two, one to his father and the other to his mother,"
Miller said in February.

    Miller also said that several juveniles being held at the base had been
freed, and more than 200 detainees - close to a third of those held at the
base - were cooperating with U.S. interrogators. Because of their
cooperation, the general said, he was "opening up new recreations" as a
reward.

    Today, a Red Cross team is on the ground in Cuba, inspecting the base
again and interviewing detainees. Williamson, the Red Cross spokeswoman,
said the U.S. government has made numerous changes since the detention camp
opened 29 months ago. Still, she said, concerns remain.

    "Some of our concerns have been addressed, and others have not,"
Williamson said. "A key problem that hasn't changed at all is the lack of a
legal framework to regulate and govern the detentions."





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to