-Caveat Lector-

This article can be found on the web at
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040712&s=greider

'Embedded Patriots'
by WILLIAM GREIDER

[from the July 12, 2004 issue]

The most intriguing story in Washington these days is a subterranean conflict
that reporters cannot cover because some of them are involved. A potent
guerrilla insurgency has formed in and around the Bush presidency--a revolt of
old pros in government who strike from the shadows with devastating effect. They
tell the truth. They explode big lies. They provide documentary evidence that
undermines popular confidence in the Commander in Chief. They prod the media and
the political community to ask penetrating questions of the Bush regime.
Doubtless, these anonymous sources act from a mixture of motives--some noble,
some self-interested--but in present circumstances one might think of them as
"embedded patriots."

The business of leaks is an everyday thing in Washington and, arguably, the
government could not function without them. It is a way to communicate official
and unofficial information in a tentative fashion--nudging events in one
direction or another without the need to take responsibility for what's
communicated. Reporters participate enthusiastically in the traffic and call it
"news." The process is sustained only because everyone can rely on the
journalists' mock-heroic code of omertŕ: Never reveal the names of your secret
sources--never--even if the revealed "information" turns out to be spurious.

But what has occurred during the past several months is not the normal commerce.
A series of explosive leaks--closely held documents and well-informed tips--have
altered the course of politics and might very well influence the outcome of this
year's presidential election. Yet we don't know whom to thank. Who gave the
Justice Department's "torture" memorandum to the Washington Post? Who provided
the International Red Cross's letter of complaints on prisoner abuses to the
Wall Street Journal? Who confirmed for the New York Times that Iyad Allawi, the
newly appointed Prime Minister of Iraq, had supervised the CIA's terrorist
bombing campaign in Baghdad a decade ago? Who informed U.S. News & World Report
that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld had authorized the holding of a "ghost prisoner"
in violation of international law? Who--someone close to the President?--leaked
the "torture" memo written by White House counsel Alberto Gonzales?

We don't need to know the identities to grasp that these and other
over-the-transom "communications" provided forceful and well-timed
contradictions to the White House line. It is also obvious that these leaks
could not have come from the lower depths of the bureaucracy. The material is
too sensitive for wide distribution. Not to take anything away from aggressive
reporters, but the leakers clearly targeted the Post, Times and Journal to
achieve maximum impact on Washington. The messages are not from some office
crank at the Xerox machine but had to originate among sophisticated and highly
placed officers of government.

My own surmise--corroborated in conversations with several long-experienced
Washington reporters--is that we are probably talking about career military
officers and senior civil servants at the Pentagon, Justice Department lawyers
and professionals at the CIA or State Department. In practice, sensitive
documents are sometimes passed off laterally to former colleagues no longer in
government who provide them to the chosen reporters. Some risk to one's career
is required, but these are smart people who know how to cover their tracks.
Oddly enough, the brutally buttoned-down Bush White House has not invoked the
usual official whine about irresponsible leaks, perhaps because the evidence
nailed them so forcefully (and there's probably more to come). Or maybe the
White House is inhibited by the embarrassing fact that its staff faces a grand
jury investigation over leaking the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame (even
the President has consulted his own lawyer).

Cynical readers may resist this explanation, but the motivations within the
permanent government are most likely grounded in principle and patriotism, not
narrow partisanship. Among bureaucrats, there is always a current of low-level
grumbling about the elected leadership, but career civil servants and military
rarely take such provocative countermeasures. In this Administration, the level
of disgust and alarm is more palpable because Bush has been willing to trash the
accepted norms of behavior and to cross perilous thresholds, unaware of the
dangers despite many warnings from the professionals. To people who will be in
government long after Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld have departed, the Bush crowd looks
like the worst possible combination of qualities--it is both incompetent and
ruthless.

"It's a wonderful country in a way," Walter Pincus, the Post's veteran
investigative reporter, observes. "People in the government community are really
concerned about what can happen. They get upset with themselves when they see
things going wrong. So they are willing to raise questions. But I also think for
some the failure to stand up before the war started is emboldening them now."
The concerns of these anonymous truth-tellers were confirmed in public by the
powerful statement issued recently by retired diplomats and military leaders,
virtually calling for Bush's defeat this fall. "We need a change," they
declared. The list of signers was striking because it was top-heavy with
Republican and conservative professionals: Reagan's ambassador to Moscow and his
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, George Bush Sr.'s ambassador to Israel
and many others.

Whatever their intentions, the leakers have now raised the stakes for the
country--posing grave implications that cannot be easily brushed aside. While
Bush tries to explain away prisoner abuse in Iraq with the "few bad apples"
argument, the White House, Pentagon and Justice Department memos justifying
torture establish an official predicate for scandalous government actions that
are more than embarrassing. Fundamentally, these are crimes--violations both of
US law and of the Geneva Conventions, according to many legal experts. The
President himself did not express alarm at these revelations. He turned aside
questions as casually as his lieutenants dismissed the Constitution. Thus, an
ominous warning light is now flashing for the Republic: the potential for
criminal charges running far up the military chain of command, and for the
lodging of impeachment charges against this President and for an international
tribunal to examine American war crimes. The connecting facts are not yet
visible to support these accusations, but a plausible outline for how they may
be connected is well exposed. These matters, in other words, could lead to a
constitutional crisis as momentous as Watergate, maybe more serious because the
offenses are far more fundamental.

Did the President authorize illegal acts? Bad advice from his lawyers is not a
defense. Did his Cabinet officers construct rationales to disobey long-settled
law and common morality? We will not learn the answers unless responsible,
independent investigations are initiated. Very few Americans may wish to go down
that road, but the consequences of ignoring the warning light are far worse. The
precedent of accepting lawless government and a corrupted constitutional order
will lead inevitably to more of both.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to