-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
<A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin Grabbe</A>
-----

The Perils of Caffeine

Ron Brown: The Chinese Connection

Met with arms dealer same day dealer attended White House coffee?

LITTLE ROCK (AP) -- FBI agents investigating Democratic Party
fund-raiser Yah Lin ``Charlie'' Trie sought evidence that Commerce
Secretary Ronald Brown met with a Chinese arms dealer the same day that
the dealer attended a White House coffee with President Clinton,
according to court documents unsealed today.
Trie faces federal charges in the campaign fund-raising probe. Agents
searched his Little Rock home in October 1997 after obtaining a search
warrant that alluded to a Feb. 6, 1996, meeting attended by Brown and
Wang Jun just weeks before Brown's death.

Trie, a central figure in the controversy over foreign-linked campaign
donations to Democrats, arranged for Wang to attend a White House coffee
with President Clinton the same day.

Wang's company, Poly Technologies, has been implicated in smuggling of
arms into the United States. He is identified as an adviser to the
Chinese government in the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee's report
on its investigation into illegal campaign fund raising in the 1996
election.

Wang's visit to the White House was previously reported and Clinton has
said it was inappropriate. Previous reports, however, did not mention a
meeting the same day between Brown and Wang.

Brown was a major player in Democratic politics. He was killed in April
1996 when the military transport he was aboard crashed into a
mountainside in Croatia. Thirty-four others aboard the plane as part of
a government trade mission also died.

The reference to a meeting between Brown and Wang adds a new twist to
the investigation into fund-raising irregularities.

Trie, a longtime friend of Clinton and a former Little Rock
restaurateur, is scheduled to go on trial May 17 on charges he made and
arranged illegal contributions to the Democratic National Committee to
buy access to Clinton and other top officials.

The indictment also claims Trie obstructed justice by ordering an
employee to destroy documents subpoenaed in 1997 by a federal grand jury
and by the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee.

Trie asked a judge to unseal the court file Thursday, claiming that an
FBI agent mislead the court in an affidavit that prompted a judge to
issue a warrant for a search of Trie's local residence.

Trie's lawyers said he had learned in late March or early this month
that, contrary to FBI Agent Daniel J. Wehr's affidavit, Wehr did not
participate in an interview of Dia Maria Mapili.

The longtime employee of Trie told agents she was instructed by Trie in
1996 to get rid of fund-raising-related documents stored at his home and
garage office.

Agents seized computers and accessories, records, books, business
papers, photographs, mail and other documents in the search of Trie's
home, according to court papers that U.S. District Judge George Howard
Jr. unsealed Friday.

Associated Press, April 23, 1999


Information Warfare

NATO Expands the War to Journalists

by Rod Pounsett

By targeting Yugoslav television facilities, knowing it would be killing
journalists, NATO has crossed a significant line concerning the rules of
war.
Although it may not be part of the Geneva Convention, it has been common
practice, especially where there has been no formal declaration of war,
that journalists have been able to report conflicts on both sides of a
battle line without fear of being regarded as legitimate enemy targets.

NATO argues that Yugoslav's media is part of the war machine because it
is involved in propaganda. But Milosevic could, therefore, argue that
any national broadcasting service within NATO countries, either wholly
of partly funded by a government, is a legitimate military target in
this conflict.

It could also now justifiably target any journalist delivering
commentary which is unsympathetic to the Yugoslav regime and in support
of NATO action. This would presumably include such operations as the
part UK government funded BBC world service, the U.S. government funded
Voice of America, the heavily subsidized French national broadcasting
service, similar operations in Germany and many other NATO states.
Judging by comments made by the Yugoslav government information service,
many private sector broadcasters would also be considered part of NATO's
propaganda machine.

And if Milosevic begins to rate these targets as importantly as NATO
obviously does, he may well be ordering his military to draw up plans to
hit back. With Belgrade's limited ability to conduct air strikes outside
its territory, any such planning would have to include clandestine
terrorist strikes.

There could also now be an increased threat to the safety of any western
journalists still remaining in Yugoslavia, especially those who have
been reporting from Belgrade, like CNN's Brent Sadler and the BBC's John
Simpson.

Also this NATO action surely brings into question claims that the West
defends freedom of speech. There can never be true freedom of speech if
it is conditional upon the opinions being expressed, as NATO seems to be
saying.

Following the strikes on the Yugoslav TV center NATO spokespeople were
claiming that eliminating these sorts of targets was considered part of
the overall strategy to destroy Belgrade's ability to wage war on the
Kosovo Albanians. When asked to be more specific in their justification,
the questions were dodged.

NATO is claiming that it wants to stop Milosevic's telling lies to his
own people. But clearly this latest tactic to silence Yugoslav media is
really an attempt to stop Milosevic's propaganda machine which is
reaching audiences outside his own country. In this way it is
undermining public and political support for the NATO action outside
Yugoslavia. That makes these political targets rather than military.

Targeting Yugoslav media is a mistake by NATO leaders, like many of
their other decisions in respect to this Kosovo crisis. It will not
lesson public support for Milosevic or lesson anger against NATO within
Yugoslavia. In fact it could have exactly the reverse effect. This is
not a third world backwoods country without technical know how and
initiative. Other ways will be found to keep up the information flow to
the Yugoslav people and to the outside world. And now Milosevic will be
able to show pictures of even more innocent civilian victims of the NATO
air strikes.

These are not military broadcasters NATO is killing. They are working
journalists and technicians just like their counterparts around the
world who will not take kindly to this new addition to NATO's target
list. NATO could soon be confronting a new propaganda machine from
within as western journalists speak out in support of their targeted
colleagues.

Central Europe Online, April 23, 1999
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to