-Caveat Lector- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Party of Citizens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 5:18 PM Subject: [LOGES-DE-CORBEAUX] UN's Illegal War
> The US does not like losing wars. Vietnam would probably be a much happier and wealthier country today if it had lost the Vietnam War. > > Anan should talk about "illegal wars". The UN has more blood on its hands than any country despite its hypocritical rhetoric. Wasn't it the Belgians who tore up their blue berets when they returned home after having their comrades slaughtered by UN incomptency? Incompetency either feigned or deliberate. What happened to General Dallaire, one of Canada's military heros? The UN destroyed his mental health with its incompetency. Who could tell what Blix was up to except for treachery? Blix/UN were responsible for the misinformation which caused the Iraq War. The "iffy" statements they kept issuing about WMDs would have made anybody doubt ... Bush and the CIA did doubt. Then they acted. What else would Blix and the UN have expected? Dallaire said to saturate Iraq with UN inspectors and that would prevent war. But the UN and Blix had convinced Saddam that war was inevitable so Iraq did not do the one thing which could have prevented war. The UN keeps war and misery going. How else could pompous buffoons like Anan find employment? > > Now let's think like Dallaire on military strategy. In Rwanda he said, First we put the people we are here to protect in safe places we can defend for a while. He realized that the soccer stadiums of Rwanda would do the job. Then we fight it out with the combatants and WIN, he said. The UN would let him do neither. > > OK, now in Iraq, the US could fight the war city-by-city. For each city the citizens are first told they must leave for a safe place ... a UN tent city. If they stay they will be treated as enemy combatants unless they are hostages. Then the US military sends in tele-robotically controlled machines to fight in the streets. When the US wins the city, the surrendering soldiers are relocated to an internment camp prior to rehabilitation and release. Also under UN control to assure humane treatment. The civilians return to the city from the UN camp. The perimeter of the pacified city is guarded by US military. And the war is taken to the next city. > > POC > http://www.geocities.com/partyofcitizens > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Smacko > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:11 AM > Subject: [HumanRobotics] Pentagon seeks ideas to fight 'urban' wars > > > > > Pentagon seeks ideas to fight 'urban' wars > By Jennifer Harper, Washington Times > September 12, 2004 > > Urban-canyon flying vehicles, persistent staring reconnaissance and perching machines may one day prove the weapons of choice among American troops doing battle in dim city streets far from home. > > That is, if someone comes up with a workable design. > > A public call for ideas to help soldiers on the unpredictable, unorthodox "urban battlefield" has been issued by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA -- the unabashedly inventive arm of the Defense Department that specializes in "revolutionary, high-payoff research," according to its mission statement. > > DARPA is looking for what it calls "force multipliers" in 11 separate disciplines, seeking ways to bolster the smaller numbers of U.S. forces commonly on patrol in the likes of Fallujah or Kabul. > > The official solicitation offers a wish list of futuristic technology, which includes devices that literally can see through walls or perhaps spirit a soldier out of a hazardous position. > > "Systems of interest include capabilities to detect and characterize personnel and equipment in severe urban clutter and through external and internal building walls; flying/perching machines able to carry and operate communications and sensor payloads; survivable urban-canyon flying vehicles," the DARPA notice says. > > An initial round of proposals already has arrived, said DARPA spokeswoman Jan Walker. She would not comment on the nature of the offerings to date, other than to note, "We're very satisfied with what we've received so far." > > The agency is prepared to offer initial grants ranging from $50,000 to $400,000 to potential suppliers who think they have the right stuff for an urban battlefield. > > Some of the specifications from the DARPA notice sound like they're from science fiction, but the agency considers them all emerging "asymmetrical warfare countermeasures." > > Among other innovations, the group is keenly interested in sensor devices that "discriminate combatants from non-combatants," or detect the presence of rocket-propelled grenades, crude improvised explosives or the odd weapons of "suicide fighters." > > DARPA would like to see troops defeat their urban enemies with a minimal disruption of the besieged neighborhood itself. > > "The objective is to develop on-demand, infantry-operated, ultra-precision, beyond line-of-sight lethal and non-lethal weaponry that has high maneuverability for use in the congested, three-dimensional urban environment," the solicitation says. > > It also seeks novel ways to deliver supplies, communicate, gather and analyze intelligence, control crowds and stabilize a community in the throes of combat. > > DARPA envisions some unusual training methods for urban "warfighters," specifically those methods that "enhance sensitivity to local non-combatants through the use of large, multi-player games tailored to the region of interest's culture, that can educate about governance, economic development, government services, etc." > > Hopeful designers have until Oct. 6 for initial proposals; DARPA will continue to accept final ideas until June 5. > > http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040912-125607-8635r.htm > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ > Yahoo! Groups Links > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HumanRobotics/ > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > > ====================================================================<<< > > http://ads.smartgroups.com/adclick/CID=fffffffcfffffffcfffffffc > ====================================================================>>> > -- > If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or start a vote > visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/LOGES-DE-CORBEAUX > > To leave the Group, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
