In a message dated 10/16/04 2:24:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Caveat Lector-
When Nader was on Alex Jones' show a few months ago, he said he hadn't
had any dealings with Etra since the early 70s.
Thanks, Do you know the date? I will put that in my database. I have Etra working with Nader 71-73. Nader had also spoken on George Noory but by writing my criticism in a "paper of record" I was trying to call attention to the lack of scrutiny and connections within the major players and the "mainstream." Ralph Nader has access to the major media. If he was asked by Alex Jones, that shows again that the "alternative" media is both more brazen and generally better informed than "mainstream," but also the fact that Nader had not used the Bones fact in any sort of mainstream or even continued "attack." He must have known about Bones, etc. If Nader really was running for President and or even trying to "influence the outcome"/ "make a statement"/etc. why wouldn't one use the fact that your two major opponents are members of this secret club? If one was running against the corporation controlled state wouldn't you talk about Bones? Especially since neither candidates nor their Democrats or Republicans supporters really want to talk about it? Seems kind of like something that could get you publicity and support? What makes Ralph run? Its not like he is William Jennings Bryan or Eugene Debs. Or is it?
I find it interesting that Bones gets mentioned in the news now but very little on the reality and undercurrents. And really no discussion of what it means. Russert asked and that was the end of "public questioning."
"They" still try and play by old-time rules can the unveil in the changing paradigm or will the "waves of time and change" do "them" in?
Co-ed and many more members from overseas and ethnicity must be having an effect on Bones.
Peace,
Om
K
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om 2">
