-Caveat Lector-

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/05/31/the_i_word?mode=PF

The 'I' word

By Ralph Nader and Kevin Zeese  |  May 31, 2005

THE IMPEACHMENT of President Bush and Vice President Cheney, under Article
II, Section 4 of the Constitution, should be part of mainstream political
discourse.

Minutes from a summer 2002 meeting involving British Prime Minister Tony
Blair reveal that the Bush administration was ''fixing" the intelligence
to justify invading Iraq. US intelligence used to justify the war
demonstrates repeatedly the truth of the meeting minutes -- evidence was
thin and needed fixing.

President Clinton was impeached for perjury about his sexual
relationships. Comparing Clinton's misbehavior to a destructive and costly
war occupation launched in March 2003 under false pretenses in violation
of domestic and international law certainly merits introduction of an
impeachment resolution.

Eighty-nine members of Congress have asked the president whether
intelligence was manipulated to lead the United States to war. The letter
points to British meeting minutes that raise ''troubling new questions
regarding the legal justifications for the war." Those minutes describe
the case for war as ''thin" and Saddam as ''nonthreatening to his
neighbors," and ''Britain and America had to create conditions to justify
a war." Finally, military action was ''seen as inevitable . . . But the
intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

Indeed, there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, nor any
imminent threat to the United States:

The International Atomic Energy Agency Iraq inspection team reported in
1998, ''there were no indications of Iraq having achieved its program
goals of producing a nuclear weapon; nor were there any indications that
there remained in Iraq any physical capability for production of amounts
of weapon-usable material." A 2003 update by the IAEA reached the same
conclusions.

The CIA told the White House in February 2001: ''We do not have any direct
evidence that Iraq has . . . reconstitute[d] its weapons of mass
destruction programs."

Colin Powell said in February 2001 that Saddam Hussein ''has not developed
any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction."

The CIA told the White House in two Fall 2002 memos not to make claims of
Iraq uranium purchases. CIA Director George Tenet personally called top
national security officials imploring them not to use that claim as proof
of an Iraq nuclear threat.

Regarding unmanned bombers highlighted by Bush, the Air Force's National
Air and Space Intelligence Center concluded they could not carry weapons
spray devices. The Defense Intelligence Agency told the president in June
2002 that the unmanned aerial bombers were unproven. Further, there was no
reliable information showing Iraq was producing or stockpiling chemical
weapons or whether it had established chemical agent production
facilities.

When discussing WMD the CIA used words like ''might" and ''could." The
case was always circumstantial with equivocations, unlike the president
and vice president, e.g., Cheney said on Aug. 26, 2002: ''Simply stated,
there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass
destruction."

The State Department in 2003 said: ''The activities we have detected do
not . . . add up to a compelling case that Iraq is currently pursuing . .
. an integrated and comprehensive approach to acquire nuclear weapons."

The National Intelligence Estimate issued in October 2002 said ''We have
no specific intelligence information that Saddam's regime has directed
attacks against US territory."

The UN, IAEA, the State and Energy departments, the Air Force's National
Air and Space Intelligence Center, US inspectors, and even the CIA
concluded there was no basis for the Bush-Cheney public assertions. Yet,
President Bush told the public in September 2002 that Iraq ''could launch
a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order
is given." And, just before the invasion, President Bush said: ''Facing
clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking
gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."

The president and vice president have artfully dodged the central
question: ''Did the administration mislead us into war by manipulating and
misstating intelligence concerning weapons of mass destruction and alleged
ties to Al Qaeda, suppressing contrary intelligence, and deliberately
exaggerating the danger a contained, weakened Iraq posed to the United
States and its neighbors?"

If this is answered affirmatively Bush and Cheney have committed ''high
crimes and misdemeanors." It is time for Congress to investigate the
illegal Iraq war as we move toward the third year of the endless quagmire
that many security experts believe jeopardizes US safety by recruiting and
training more terrorists. A Resolution of Impeachment would be a first
step. Based on the mountains of fabrications, deceptions, and lies, it is
time to debate the ''I" word.

Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate. Kevin Zeese is director of
DemocracyRising.US.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to