-Caveat Lector-


Begin forwarded message:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: March 30, 2007 6:01:00 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Red State Blues: The Far Right and Their 'Confederates' in Georgia

ATTACK OF THE CONSERVATIVE CLONES ON ACADEME

LAW WOULD ENFORCE 'AFFIRMATIVE ACTION'
-- FOR RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS

By John F. Sugg
03.28.07
http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A220971


FIGHTING THE RIGHTWARD TILT:
The Nation magazine's Charles Bittner warns that it will become "very difficult to attract top scholars."
Students, please be quiet. Like now. Quiet, I said. SHUT UP!
Thank you. I'm Professor Sugg, and I'd like to welcome some guests to our class -- state representatives Tom Rice, Bill Hembree, James Mills, Ron Forster and Brooks Coleman.

These fine Republicans are here to refresh their memories about free speech and Georgia history – two subjects that, as we'll see, are often at odds with each other. The learned gentlemen are sponsoring a bill to remedy what they see as a horrid lack of right- wing psychotics among university faculty members.

What's that you said under your breath, representative? That you're going to "get" those pointy-headed, liberal professors? Yes, I've heard all about House Bill 154, the, um, alleged "Intellectual Diversity in Higher Education Act." For you gentlemen who want to muck about with Georgia's colleges, we need to review a chapter in our textbook about the late Gov. Gene Talmadge.

Yes, I know Talmadge was a Democrat, but he was the type of Democrat we'd call a Republican today. No worry about Gene apologizing to blacks for slavery.

When it came to higher education, Gov. Talmadge in 1941 jumped headfirst into a heaping pile of doo-doo. He didn't like the fact that too many educators were "liberal" – they had the wildly insane, leftist idea that blacks, too, deserved access to universities. The gubner began firing educators, university administrators and members of the Board of Regents. A key casualty of the crusade was Walter Cocking, a dean at the University of Georgia.

Talmadge assumed the generally passive professors would crumble under his reign of intimidation. Wrong.

When 41 senior professors protested Cocking's firing, and the Regents balked at the academic pogrom, Talmadge denounced all those who advocated "communism or racial equality." He referred to an educational fund with which Cocking was associated as "Jew money for niggers." He then packed the Board of Regents, which obsequiously fired the dean.

Academe fought back. Time magazine reported on Oct. 27, 1941: "Students gaily gathered on the campus of the University of Georgia last week, marched up 'Ag' Hill shouting 'To Hell with Gene,' hanged and burned Governor Eugene Talmadge in effigy not once but twice. Women students at Lucy Cobb dormitory had a third private hanging of their own."

Educators around the nation gathered to do battle. Georgia's universities were stripped of accreditation – which sorely angered all of those families who had invested in educating their children, only to be told the degrees were worthless.

And Gov. Talmadge? Heads up, legislators, you'll want to heed this message. The guv lost re-election in 1942 to Ellis Arnall.

Across the nation, there's a deceptively named document called the "Academic Bill of Rights" that's been surfacing in state legislatures -- more than two dozen so far. We saw it here three years ago, when it was properly consigned to oblivion. But, like Dracula, this bit of corrosive legislation has arisen from its grave in the form of HB 154.

The measure is the mischief of former leftist and current neocon David Horowitz. He wants to enforce an ultraright, ultra- neoconservative, ultra-anti-Arab catechism on campus. He claims students are being muscled by professors to adopt liberal viewpoints. The remedy, he asserts, is legislation that would mandate universities to pack their staffs with those deemed [more] politically acceptable.

Enter Ruth Malhotra. She gained brief fame in the last year by suing Georgia Tech for enforcing rules that banned students from intolerant speech. The conservative graduate student was absolutely correct, when, as she told me, "There shouldn't be rules protecting people from being offended."

But Malhotra was one of the GOP props three years ago who testified about alleged abuse at the hands of a liberal professor. Malhotra wanted to skip class so she could go to Washington, D.C., and hang out with other right-wingers. Her professor apparently thought her priority should be class. Malhotra claimed discrimination – and asserts her case is justification for the McCarthyite HB 154.

"Look, students always have a grievance process if they think there's been discrimination," says Charles Bittner, the Atlanta- based academic liaison for The Nation magazine – an unabashedly leftist journal that is the largest-circulation political magazine in America.

Malhotra did complain and – defying her own rationale for the law – was allowed to switch professors. Accusations of political pressure being put on students generally turn out to be anecdotal if not delusional.

Many, perhaps most, professors are Democrats and liberals. Maybe it's because they're smarter, and don't buy the simplistic anti- intellectualism of Fox News. Whatever, affirmative action for intellectually impaired right-wing extremists isn't a solution.

HB 154 would require universities to report on their political "diversity" – meaning professors would have to confess their leanings. You can hear the screams from the administration buildings: "Oh, please, no more waterboarding. I confess, I CONFESS, I'm a liberal."

The ramifications could be serious to the quality of Georgia's colleges; why would a professor who believes in the sacred tenant of "academic freedom" want to teach in a state where it doesn't exist?

"It will become very difficult to attract top scholars," Bittner warns. "People will leave. The universities will be overwhelmed by the cost of enforcing the law, monitoring professors' beliefs."

No doubt. We'd see "diversity" on campus, all right, as the Republicans demand that, for example, Bible-waving creationists be installed in biology departments.

A petition against the bill being circulated by Bittner already has been signed by more than 150 of Georgia's top professors.

Professors, journalists, unionists, human-rights activists and others have seen the dark clouds gathering in the past.

As the great Princeton political scientist H.H. Wilson wrote in 1954, during one of the darkest periods for intellectual freedom:

"Those who are conducting this campaign against our colleges are not misguided. ... Using words like 'freedom' and 'diversity,' but fundamentally authoritarian and anti-democratic, they have a contemptuous attitude toward education and human intelligence. Believing that students are like the children of Hamelin, ready to follow the first Pied Piper that comes along, they are determined to pick the Pied Pipers."

Of the bill's five sponsors, two are salesmen, one owns miniwarehouses, one is a "consultant" – and, yes, one works for the Gwinnett school system. Is this a group we want selecting our Pied Pipers for our universities?


-------


STUPID SECESSIONISTS

A PLAGUE OF NEW CITIES AND COUNTIES
UNTIL EVERY HOUSEHOLD IS A MUNICIPALITY


By John F. Sugg
02.21.07
http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A202868


Sen. David Adelman says townships would "balance the power of developers with the interests of local areas."It's obvious there is only one rational solution to the aspirations of north metro Atlanta suburbanites for their very own governments. I'm speaking, of course, of the movement to incorporate every single-family home as a "city." Apartment buildings and homes on a single block would become "counties."

Indeed, truly creative minds in the Confederate ... er, Republican Party should find ways to make the new cities and counties grand expressions of Georgia's never-dying secessionist fervor.

Each new "city" would be entitled to collect taxes, build roads, deport illegal aliens (such as the neighbor's dog), impose capital punishment and, in the spirit of the Second Amendment, wage armed warfare.

OK, I confess. I made that up. As of this date, no legislator has proposed "single-family cities." But they're getting close.

First we had Sandy Springs, an unincorporated patch of land that has long been aggrieved by being in the same county with so many poor Atlantans (commonly called "black," although this has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with race, according to secessionists). The new city immediately privatized itself, a concept inspired by the Halliburtonizing of both Washington, D.C., and Baghdad.

Then, last December, the burgs of Johns Creek and Milton were born. It appears that Johns Creek's entire purpose is to keep people from renting naughty videos from a place called the Love Shack. With my uncanny instincts as an investigative reporter, I visited the Love Shack recently, and noted a parking lot full of Beemers and Benzes. I'm sure they were all there for the non-porn items in the store. No God-fearing Johns Creekian would countenance such, ugh, filth.

And the oh-so-Republican Legislature -- just to prove they know there are non-white folks in Georgia -- later this year will let south Fulton County areas called South Fulton (isn't it amazing those Gold Dome guys discovered South Fulton is in south Fulton?) and Chattahoochee Hill Country vote on incorporation.

That's just the beginning. In the spirit of our noble Southern secessionist heritage (do-dah do-dah), any part of north Fulton that isn't in the cities of Sandy Springs, Johns Creek or Milton would come under the jurisdiction of a new county called Milton. I guess the intellectual struggle to devise new names finally overwhelmed the suburban rebels.

DeKalb County residents, meanwhile, have hoisted their rebel banners and declared that Dunwoody must become a city. A bill was introduced last week in the Legislature to do just that.

Also, in an exercise social scientists describe as "balkanizing the already ridiculously balkanized," the trust-fund and backdated- stock-option clan along West Paces Ferry wants to revolt from the city of Atlanta and become the Nearly All White and Entirely Filthy Rich Grand Duchy of Buckhead. The city's proposed motto: "We Keep What We Plunder."

Speaking of that last case of what is commonly called "really, really stupid thinking," former Atlanta Mayor Sam Massell had a few words that are applicable to all of the northern secessions. "It is ill-conceived, racially motivated and bad government," says Massell, who heads the Buckhead Coalition and who is perfectly happy to be part of Atlanta.

Massell notes that if north Fulton is carved into new cities and a new county, what it leaves behind will be perhaps the poorest county in the nation. Which is exactly the plan of the hate- Atlanta, rural neo-Confederates in the Georgia Legislature.

Milton County has run into an obstacle, that silly old state Constitution, which limits the number of counties to 159. So, either the legislators must start the process for an amendment, or (and I'm not making this up) find two rural counties whose officials are so abysmally moronic they'd agree to consolidate. I'm sure there's no shortage of sheriffs and county commissioners willing to give up all of their bribes, graft and cronyism to benefit Atlanta suburbanites who in all likelihood are Yankees by birth.

It's a given that the Atlanta metro area -- especially Fulton County -- is honest-to-God screwed up. But this has a lot more to do with so many tiny governments and agencies -- each a fiefdom for self-important, often-corrupt officials -- than it does with the straw tiger of "big gummint." The solution isn't to starve Fulton and Atlanta by stripping away all of the affluent suburbs. If folks don't like being associated with an urban area with all of its cultural and economic benefits -- and, true, problems -- then maybe they should move. Perhaps to the 18th century. Because in 21st- century Atlanta, we need regional government and regional thinking for transportation, water, law enforcement, health care and many other issues.

There are voices of reason, not many, but a few. One is state Sen. David Adelman, D-Atlanta, who has proposed a constitutional amendment allowing "townships." These city-lite enclaves would be limited to allowing residents to decide zoning and planning for their neighborhoods. They wouldn't stand in the way of regionalization. "Developers are a source of money for county commissioners," Adelman says. "This would balance the power of developers with the interests of local areas."

Balancing interests is part of government. Secession, however, isn't a balance. It's merely larceny of public resources.



See what's free at AOL.com.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to