-Caveat Lector-

Treason in America -- From Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman
ANTON CHAITKIN (C)1984
New Benjamin Franklin House
P. O. Box 20551
New York, New York 10023
ISBN 0-933488-32-7
-----
This book has been out of print and hard to get for years, but  a NEW second
edition is just out. Highly recommended, there are charts, pix and more. Only
$15.00 retail.
Om
K
--[19a]--
-19-

The Partnership of Harriman and Dulles

On October 18 and 19, 1945, a Swiss-based organization calling itself the
World Council of Churches came into the war-wrecked city of Stuttgart,
Germany, to meet with certain German church leaders. The meeting issued a
statement declaring the collective guilt of the German people for the crimes
of Nazism.

A month later trials began at Nuremberg: Twenty-two Nazi leaders were tried
for conspiracy, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, crimes which had led
to the deaths of 50 million persons during World War II.

The declaration of "collective guilt" was intended, among other things, to
blunt the question of individual guilt at the Nuremberg trials, and has
confused the central issue of actual criminal guilt since that time. Hjalmar
Schacht got off without punishment. Many of the most important Germans, and
foreign nationals, who helped Hitler rise to power, make war and carry out
mass murder, were not even at Nuremberg, and were never tried for these
crimes.

The chief failure of the Nuremberg trials was not insufficient hangings, but
rather that there was no general inquiry into the disaster which had befallen
the world: Who had backed the Hitler revolution and what were their strategic
aims? Such an inquiry is still vital today, because the international gang
which created Nazism and backed Hitler is active, and very powerful, in
today's world.

What follows is the story of this gang as it operated in America, centering
in the political and commercial partnership of Averell Harriman and John
Foster Dulles. As this chapter shows, Harriman and Dulles—two men, with their
families, who have dictated so much American policy in this century—were
central to putting Adolf Hitler in power. And, as we show, Dulles and
Harriman in commercial partnership profited from Hitler's accession to power.
Institutions and individuals associated with the pro-Soviet Eastern
Establishment today, were architects of Nazism in the prewar period. Among
those individuals and institutions, whose stories are bound up with the
Harriman-Dulles combine, are the World Council of Churches, and the
psychoanalyst Carl Jung—in his own lifetime a Nazi, now a symbol of
"liberalism."

This narrative is a contribution to a second, more effective "Nuremberg," a
process of inquiry which may help prevent an even greater disaster than the
Holocaust of the 1940s.


The Heritage of the Dulles Brothers

The Dulles brothers, Allen and John Foster, stood at the top of American
policymaking in the 1940s and '50s. In the '20s and '30s, they helped create
Hitler. Their family background prepared them well for this.

Allen and John Foster Dulles were brought into the U. S. State Department as
intelligence agents by their uncle, Secretary of State Robert Lansing, just
before the American entry into the First World War. Secretary Lansing and his
young Dulles nephews perfectly exemplify the State Department's tradition of
treachery to American interests and ideals, going back, with few exceptions,
to the beginning of the Republic.

President Woodrow Wilson, elected in 1912, had made Robert Lansing chief
counselor in the State Department, while the populist William Jennings Bryan
was Secretary of State. When the war started in Europe in 1914, the Wilson
government declared American neutrality, and the President announced his
strong interest in ending the war.

But a powerful combination of American public figures acted for the British
to pull the U.S. into the madness of World War I as Britain's ally. The most
prominent in the British party here were:

• Former president Theodore Roosevelt, who by family connections and personal
inclination was "British Empire" to his very marrow;

• Massachusetts Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, the anglophile Boston Brahmin who,
with Teddy Roosevelt, had created the Spanish-American War in 1898;

• President Wilson's confidential adviser Col. Edward House, whose British
father had run guns into Texas for the Southern Rebellion, and had taken
young Edward back to England for a thoroughly anti American education. House
later returned to Texas and became the Texas political boss, in alliance with
the Harrimans; and

• Robert Lansing, who had married a daughter of the anglophile former
Secretary of State, John Watson Foster. Another Foster daughter married Rev.
Allen Macy Dulles, and gave birth to Allen and John Foster Dulles.

While Teddy Roosevelt and Henry Cabot Lodge campaigned openly for American
entry into the war, House and Lansing betrayed and lied to the President, l
misrepresenting themselves as neutral while carrying on continuous covert
political operations on behalf of the British.

The British Navy enforced a blockade on the Atlantic, commandeering American
ships for inspection and rerouting to stop American goods from going to
Germany. Yet British ships openly sailed back and forth from legally neutral
U.S. ports, carrying weapons and soliciting American passengers to ride
alongside the guns being shipped. When the Germans protested the use of the
British Cunard liner Lusitania as an arms supply ship, the German note went
to Counselor Lansing, who ignored it. When a German submarine sank the
Lusitania, Lansing persuaded Woodrow Wilson to protest against the
"cold-blooded murder" of American passengers. William Jennings Bryan resigned
at this obvious and bloody manipulation of the American population, and
Lansing replaced him as Secretary of State. Secretary Lansing and his allies,
aided by increasingly gross attacks by the politically blind Germans, finally
brought Wilson and the U.S. into the First World War. After trying
unsuccessfully to provoke war between the United States and Mexico, Lansing
was fired by President Wilson.
In the Dulles family biography, written with the cooperation of the Dulleses,
author Leonard Mosley politely states:

One of the reasons why Robert M. Lansing knew exactly how flagrantly the
British were breaching the United States neutrality laws was because he had
become dose friends with the two chief British agents in charge of the
operation, Sir Courtney Bennet and Captain Alex Gaunt. Both were spies
operating under the intelligence network run from London ... [out of ] the
British Admiralty.... Gaunt ... would keep Allen [Dulles] entranced for hours
with stories of his prewar missions into Germany and eastern Europe....
Lansing ... introduced [Gaunt] to American special agents and ordered one of
them, Bruce Bielaski, to cooperate with Gaunt.... Bielaski ... was chief of
the investigative division of the Department of Justice. ...

Robert Lansing was . . . so pro-English that he even took elocution lessons
to perfect the English accent he was cultivating. Allen . . . thought Gaunt
was one of the most exciting men he had ever met, and he made up his mind
that one of these days he would become an intelligence operative just like
him-except for the accent, of course.(2)


The history of the Dulles family is an epic of British Empire intrigue and
sensational aristocratic criminal activities. Two Scottish Dulles (originally
"Douglas") brothers left Ireland around 1780: Joseph Dulles went to South
Carolina, William Dulles to India as a soldier for the East India Company.
While the Company army was conquering most of the Indian subcontinent in the
years 1797-1803, William Dulles was making a fortune in his own side business
providing financial and security services for the Company's officers, and for
Indian and Persian princes who cooperated with the British conquest.

William Dulles came to South Carolina in 1807; his India loot bought the
family a substantial slave plantation, which the Dulleses held through the
American Civil War.

Joseph's son Joseph Heatley Dulles (1795-1876) joined many other young
plantation gents at Yale University. He worked with some of the Connecticut
organizers of the secessionist Hartford Convention in 1814,- and became an
intimate lifelong friend of New York lawyer Daniel Lord, founder of the Lord,
Day and Lord firm which represented the Astor family and New York's financial
elite. It was at this point that the Dulles money and investments moved
primarily into the North. Joseph H. Dulles, having been a member of the
secret "Society of Brothers in - Unity" at Yale, emerged in the religion
business as Secretary of the American Sunday School Union, a post he held for
40 years.

Joseph H. Dulles's son John Welsh Dulles (1823-89) went to British India as a
missionary, later took his father's post as Secretary of the American Sunday
School Union, and for 16 years was Editorial Superintendent of the
Presbyterian Publications Board. He and his sons played major roles
in«thefPresbyterian church; a close relative, William Dulles, was treasurer
of the Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions.
Before his missionary stint in India, John Welsh Dulles had attended the
University of Pensylvania (his uncle was Provost Charles Stille). It is
likely that he befriended there one Grayson Mallet-Prevost, since both Dulles
and Mallet-Prevost attended the Medical School in 1844, and Dulles's son
Petit Dulles later married Mallet-Prevost's daughter Julia Mallet-Prevost.
Thus the Dulleses married into one of the premier families of treason.


Among the children of John Welsh Dulles were: Petit Dulles (1852-83), who
married Julia Mallet-Prevost; Rev. Joseph H. Dulles III (1853-1937), who
reorganized and supervised the Library of the Princeton Theological Seminary
for 45 years; and Rev. Allen Macy Dulles (1854-1930), father of Allen,
Eleanor, and John Foster Dulles. Reverend Dulles became director of
Apologetics at the Auburn Theological Seminary in Auburn, New York. He and
his son John Foster were to lead a "liberal" coup within the national
Presbyterian church, preparing for John Foster Dulles's publicly obscure but
historically crucial church leadership role.

Fresh out of Princeton University, John Foster Dulles was hired as a lawyer
by William Nelson Cromwell of Sullivan and Cromwell, law firm to the Eastern
Establishment financial oligarchy. The founder of the firm, Algernon Sydney
Sullivan, was an early legal associate of John Foster Dulles's maternal
grandfather, John W. Foster, who recommended young Dulles to Cromwell.
Sullivan represented leading Civil War-era Virginia families and business
interests. He served as an attorney for men captured as "Confederate" pirates
for attacking American commercial shipping just after the outbreak of the
Civil War. At one point, the U.S. government briefly jailed Sullivan, a
Northerner, on treason charges because of this close relationship with the
leaders of the Southern insurrection.

Sullivan's partner Cromwell came to represent the J.P. Morgan bank in its
takeover of the American steel industry, and aided Edward H. Harriman in his
railroad operations. In 1903 Cromwell organized the "revolution" which
detached the Isthmus of Panama from the nation of Colombia, creating a new
country ("Panama") and making himself and the Sullivan and Cromwell law firm
the official counsellors to the new country Cromwell used as his
revolutionaries the employees of the Panama Railroad, which was controlled by
his client Edward H. Harrimam The secession better, theft—was backed by
gunboats sent to the Caribbean by President Theodore Roosevelt, who broke off
congressionally authorized negotiations with Colombia for the purchase of
canal-building rights through the isthmus.

William N. Cromwell was a director of one of the strangest instruments for
the penetration of Central and South America, and southern and eastern
Europe: the American Banknote Company. American Banknote's Albert Gallatin
Goodall (director, 1863-87) arranged with Russia, Greece, Italy and many
Ibero-American governments to have his company print the money and securities
of those countries. This was no "American" operation: Mr. Goodall was the
personal Freemasonic representative of Britain's Edward VII; Company
employees had previously printed counterfeit American money for the British
troops in the 1770s, and currency and bonds for the Southern insurrection in
the 1860s.

J.P. Morgan's early partner, the Austrian-American banker Joseph W. Drexel,
was a Banknote director in the 1880s; the company became the chief printer of
the securities traded on the New York Stock exchanges. Sullivan and Cromwell
became the corporate attorneys for American Banknote, and successive S.&C.
chief executives (Cromwell, 1900-48; Alfred Jaretski, 1906-25; John Foster
Dulles, 1925-49; and Arthur Dean, beginning 1952) sat on the Banknote board.
Allen Dulles left the Banknote board in 1951 to become director of the United
States Central Intelligence Agency.

The old Cromwell-Hartiman commercial tie was officially renewed in 1937, when
E.H. Harriman's son Roland, brother of Averell Harriman, joined John Foster
Dulles on the American Banknote board of directors. By this time, as we shall
see, the Harrimans and the Dulleses had long been engaged in a joint
political venture which was to bring tragedy and chaos to the world.

When young John Foster Dulles was called into Central American intelligence
work for the State Department by his uncle, Robert Lansing, he was gaining
experience as a neophyte lawyer in a region which was in some ways Sullivan
and Cromwell's private preserve.


The Mind of John Foster Dulles

On Aug. 18, 1911, John Foster Dulles sent a statement summing up his
philosophical standpoint to his father for review. It is the worldview of
Darwin, of the eugenicist Harriman—and of Hitler: a bald declaration of war
against Judeo-Christian moral principles, the principles of Western
civilization itself.

We read that Joshua commanded the sun and the moon to stand still, and that
"the sun stood still and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged
themselves upon their enemies."

A good- many legislators are attempting to imitate Joshua and to arrest the
working of a natural law. Joshua did not succeed for very long, and it is
doubtful if the commands of our present day legislatures will have even as
much effect as this temporary staying of Joshua's.

The natural laws to which I refer are biological and economical laws which
produce disagreeable results. And in an attempt to eliminate these
consequences, man is generally found opposing himself directly to the natural
law which creates them....

Under natural conditions all species tend to increase with great rapidity . .
. [after] a few generations the world would be literally crowded with
life.... There is a check, however . . . the limited capacity of the world to
sustain life. As the numbers of a species increase it becomes more and more
difficult for each individual to find means of sustenance . . . some must
perish, and what is known as the law of natural selection says that the ones
who will perish will be the weakest. The strongest will survive....

With man, as with every other form of life, there is this same tendency for
the birth rate to far exceed the death rate, with the inevitable result of an
overcrowded population in which some must be eliminated [emphasis added]. Who
those to be eliminated are depends upon who are weakest and who are strongest
in the competition which necessarily ensues.

Biology tells us that it is only by means of this competition and elimination
that progress is made. For the tendency of a race is to retrograde and it is
only by eliminating the lower members that a higher average is maintained....
[Emphasis added. ]

The impelling power which has led to a great part of our laws has been
sympathy.... In England people saw men -starving because of the high price of
bread . . . they must have a given amount of money or starve.... So ... a law
was passed that bread should not be sold at more than a certain sum a loaf....

In this kind of legislation . . . man has been acting in a more or less
unconscious manner....

Human society can be likened unto a wheel. One section is always down, in the
mud, if you will. .. .

Laws should not . . . have for object,. the doing away with all poverty and
distress; but rather in so determining the conditions of competition that the
most desirable [sic] find themselves best adapted to succeed, while the least
find themselves to succeed. To have progress some must [emphasis in original]
be eliminated, but let us scrutinize conditions carefully so that we will get
all the progress possible out of that elimination, and that there shall not
be any waste [sic!], suffering and misery.

. . .It is among the poor that the process of elimination takes place.They
are not killed outright, but they do perish indirectly They do not have
sufficient shelter, their food is insufficient
and perhaps . . . impure.

Consequently they and their children fall an easy prey to disease....
Legislation may do somewhat to keep down in a more humane way this sector of
population only born to perish. Some efforts have been made, and it would
seem that more might be made to restrict the increase of population among the
less desirable [sic] class of our population, particularly among those
classes where any children would be apt to inherit the same defects which
have made their parents unable to successfully adapt themselves to
circumstances. Any legislation which would prevent the increase of population
among those persons who are diseased, insane, criminals, etc. would be
economically wise [emphasis added]....

There is of course the fundamental problem of whether we want to progress.
Whether it is worthwhile that we should have so much pain and misery simply
in order that our part of the human race may not be eliminated by another
part some generations hence.... If we do not want progress, we can do away
with it and the suffering which it involves by preventing the increase of our
population, or by reducing it....

Another remedy, though one that is only temporary, is a kind of communism.
This too destroys progress. But if all the resources of a country are divided
up equally among all the population more will be able to be maintained than
if the division is unequal.... As the population keeps increasing each one's
share becomes smaller and smaller, until at last it becomes insufficient for
him, and then elimination with its attendant misery must recommence [emphasis
in original]. But in a wealthy country like our own, such a division would
postpone this time for a considerable period.(3)


With these views, John Foster Dulles was later to become an international
representative of American Protestant Christianity—and to turn that position
into a forum for promoting the politics of genocide.


Divergent Objectives in World War I

The Dulles brothers were involved from the period of the Versailles Treaty
onwards, in the attack on Germany which created the conditions for Hitlerism.
During World War I, Allen Dulles was posted by his uncle, Secretary Lansing,
to Switzerland, the home base for the Dulles cousins, the Mallets; he took
the job of chief of intelligence in the American legation at Berne. Among his
fellow operatives was a young code clerk named Robert Murphy, who, as we
shall see later, had a role to play in the Hitler project. Dulles family
biographer Mosley retells the following story from Allen Dulles's own
lectures and his private discussions with Mosley.

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, in exile in Switzerland, was accustomed to talking
over Russian affairs with diplomats at the American mission. On April 11,
1917, after Lenin was informed that the Germans were about to send him back
to Russia to overthrow the government, he telephoned the legation and asked
to meet immediately with an American to confer on this momentous occasion.
Allen Dulles spoke with Lenin and told him to forget about coming in that
day. Lenin said he could only come today, that tomorrow would be too late,
Dulles terminated the conversation, and Lenin decided to go ahead to
Russia.(4) Six months later, he directed the Bolshevik revolution there.

At the end of World War I, Secretary of State Lansing brought both his Dulles
nephews into the Paris peace treaty negotiations. Lansing had not even wanted
President Wilson to attend the negotiations. Mosley says that Lansing "saw
the forthcoming Versailles Conference as an occasion where wile, guile, and
maneuver [Lansing's] would be more important than high ideals and lofty
aspirations [Wilson's]."

Despite Wilson's presence and "high ideals, " the British, with French-
urging, bulled through a treaty calling for drastic reparations payments from
Germany. The British delegation was headed by Prime Minister David Lloyd
George, who insisted that Wilson's famous Fourteen Points for peace were
inadequate because they had no provision whatever for reparations damages.

But the Conference in fact was guided by members of a British organization
known as the Round Table, one of whom was Lloyd George's private secretary,
Philip Kerr, Lord Lothian. It was the Round Table, including Lothian, which
later promoted Hitler. At Versailles, Lothian drafted the amendment to
Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points to call for reparations.(5) Lloyd George
later told the House of Commons that the leaders of the Conference treated
Lothian "not as a Prime Minister's Secretary, but as if he were an emissary
to the Conference, and a very important one."(6)

The Round Table had been organized by Lord Alfred Milner in the tradition of
Oxford feudalist John Ruskin, and was designed to fulfill the yearning of
Cecil Rhodes for a new kind of white racialist world empire, in which the
independence of the republican United States in particular was extinguished.
The core of the Round Table group was assembled from among the "Kindergarten"
of Oxford-trained aides to Lord Milner in South Africa. Lord Lothian was the
first editor of the "Round Table" quarterly, and one of the spiritual leaders
of the group—he moved from early training for the priesthood at the
(Benedictine) Oratory School at Edgbaston, into Christian Science. Lothian
was the chief executive of the Rhodes Trust, adminstering the Rhodes
Scholarships to bring Americans and other "colonial" students to Oxford.

At the peace conference, Allen and John Foster Dulles made the acquaintance
of the principal members of this faction, and were all but formally  inducted
into the Round Table group. In a letter to Round Table founder Lionel Curtis,
Lord Lothian expressed the crucial difference between the British Round
Table's racial views shared by the Dulles brothers, as we have seen in John
Foster's letter to his father—and the viewpoint of the American System:

The real problem is going to arise from the treatment which must be accorded
to politically backward peoples.

The difficulties which I foresee will arise from the fact that there is a
fundamentally different concept in regard to this question between Great
Britain and South Africa on the one side and the United States and Canada . .
. on the other. I need not of course expound our view- as to the necessity of
civilized control over politically backward peoples.... The inhabitants of
Africa and parts Asia have proved unable to govern themselves . . . because
they were—quite unableto withstand the demoralizing influences [i.e. desire
for self-sufficient modern industry] to which they were subjected in some
civilised countries, so that the intervention of an European power is
necessary in order to protect them from those influences.... The American
view ... is quite different....

The extent of this work after the war, sometimes known as the white man's
burden, will be so vast that it will never be accomplished at all unless it
is shared.... Yet America not only has no conception of this aspect of the
problem but has been led to believe that the assumption of this kind of
responsibility is iniquitous imperialism. They take an attitude towards the
problem of world government exactly analagous to the one they took during the
first three years of the war toward the problem of the world war [emphasis
added].

...[It makes] an immense difference ... whether America comes to learn its
responsibility in regard to this matter quickly or slowly. If they are slow
in learning we shall be condemned to a period . . . of strained relations
between the various parts of the English-speaking world. [We must] get into
the heads of Canadians [sic] and Americans that a share in the burden of
world government is just as great and glorious a responsibility as
participation in the war.(7)


To continue the relationship they had established at the peace conference
with Americans who agreed with these objectives— including ending American
national sovereignity—Lothian, Curtis and the other Round Tablers set-up two
organizations: in England, the Royal Institute for International Affairs, and
a sister organization in America, the Council on Foreign Relations.(8) John
Foster Dulles was to assume great responsibility for the development of the
latter British-initiated group in New York.

A 1953 CFR publication on the problem of "Intimate Cooperation by Two
Democracies" (i.e., Britain and the U.S.) described the relationship: "The
Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations
were founded in 1920 as a result of discussions between members of the
British and American delegations at the [Versailles] Peace Conference in
Paris in 1919. The two institutions, though completely independent, have
developed their work along parallel lines in Britain and the United States."

The officers of the CFR, in 1953, included R.C. Leffingwell, a partner of
J.P. Morgan, Jr., Chairman; Henry M. Wriston, chairman.of First National City
Bank, President; David Rockefeller, chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank,
Vice-President; George S. Franklin, Jr., the protege and inductee of John
Foster Dulles, Acting Executive Director; Allen Dulles and Averell Harriman,
Board Members; and Arthur Dean, chief executive of Sullivan and Cromwell,
member of the Committee on Studies.


The State Department and the Hitler Project

At Versailles Allen Dulles met and professionally fused himself to a man
through whom he could fulfill his early desire to "become an intelligence
operative just like" British spy Alex Gaunt: T.E. Lawrence, "Lawrence of
Arabia." The world of British intelligence which Dulles entered, which
through the Dulles brothers was amalgamated with the American service, was
not in the philosophical sense a Western agency.

• T.E. Lawrence was chief of the Arab Bureau, using British run radical Arab
movements such as the Islamic fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood to reorganize
power in the Middle East.

• The "idea man" for the British Intelligence Arab Bureau at that time, and
head of Saudi Arabian operations, was Harry St. John Philby; his son and
disciple Harold "Kim" Philby was to take official charge of coordinating the
American and British intelligence services beginning in 1949. He trained the
American officers for the Central Intelligence Agency then being formed, and
was in "close, almost daily contact with Allen Dulles. "(9) Kim Philby
finally defected to the Soviet Union as a "lifelong communist."

• Director of British Intelligence for the Balkans and the Middle East in the
post-World War I period was Oxford historian Arnold Toynbee, the
pro-feudalist who would become chief of the combined British intelligence
services for World War II.

The official history of Allen Dulles's career path in the post-World War I
era is as follows. By mid-1920 he was First Secretary of the American Embassy
in Berlin, where he could help set in motion the operations for a New Germany
in which older brother John Foster would play such a large part. In 1920 he
was posted to Turkey, where he wrote back reports on T.E.

Lawrence's entire gamut of interests: Arab nationalism; Britain's rivalry
with the French in the Near East; and the problem of Turkey's "dictator"
Kemal Ataturk, who moved to free his country of the entire British- Islamic
fundamentalist priestcraft. From 1922 to 1926 Allen Dulles was head of the
Near Eastern section of the U.S. State Department.

Allen Dulles was in post-Versailles Germany (1919-20) as First Secretary
(day-to-day operations chief) of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Berlin; the
American charge d'affaires in Berlin was Ellis Loring Dresel, who had worked
on intelligence and counterespionage with Dulles in Berne, and before that
with Dulles at the Versailles Conference. Both Dresel and Allen Dulles were
appointed and closely supervised by Dulles's uncle, Secretary of State Robert
Lansing.

While Dulles and Dresel worked out of Berlin, a young American captain,
25-year-old Truman Smith, was rapidly gaining contacts and sophistication as
the chief political assistant to the Office of Civil Affairs in the U.S. Army
occupying Germany. Smith hailed from an old Connecticut establishment family:
A brother of his great grandfather named Nathaniel Smith had been a principal
organizer of the Hartford Convention for the diehard Tories in 1814; his
grandfather, Connecticut Senator Truman Smith, was the national manager of
the Whig Party when it collapsed and disintegrated in the 1850s.

In June 1920, Smith was brought into the Berlin diplomatic mission to be
"military observer," a post he held on and off until 1939. In mid-July 1920,
Allen Dulles was back in Auburn, New York at his parents' house, announcing
that he would marry Clover Todd, the daughter of a Columbia University
professor, and a very dose friend of Truman Smith since 1915.
In 1921, Robert Murphy, who had served under Allen Dulles in Berne,
Switzerland, during World War I, was called in to serve as consul in Bavaria.

These were the State Department representatives on the scene as the Weimar
Republic was born in Germany.

On October 301 1922, Benito Mussolini's fascist Black Shirt army entered Rome
and seized power in Italy. British diplomat Ivone Kirkpatrick revealed later
that Sir Samuel Hoare, a British "staff officer in charge of certain branches
of military intelligence," had instructed Mussolini to beef up his fascist
gangs for use against anti-war elements during World War I, and that British
intelligence had begun paying Mussolini at that time.

Two weeks after Mussolini took over Italy-(November 1522, 1922), Truman Smith
was dispatched to Munich by the new U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Alanson B.
Houghton. In Bavaria, Smith set himself to the task of helping spread the
fascist revolution into Germany. Smith gave only this report of the visit in
his memoirs:

I talked at length about National Socialism with the Munich consul, Mr.
Robert Murphy (later a very distinguished American ambassador), General Erich
Ludendorff, Crown Prince Ruprecht of Bavaria, and Alfred Rosenberg. The
latter became the political philosopher of the Nazi party.

On this visit I also saw much of Ernst F. S. Hanfstaengl, of the well-known
Munich art family. "Putzi" was a Harvard graduate and later became Hitler
foreign press chief. Hanfstaengl states in his 1957 memoirs, Unheard Witness,
that it was I who brought him into contact with Hitler. This may well be so,
but the actual facts of this introduction are not firmly fixed in my memory.

My interview with Hitler lasted some hours. The diary I kept in Munich
indicates that I was deeply impressed by his personality and thought it
likely that he would play an important part in German politics. I must
confess, however, that I did not see him as the future ruler of most of
Europe. (10)


On November 25, 1922, the Military Attache's Office in Berlin filed Smith's
report to the Division of Military Intelligence in the War Department in
Washington. In that report, Smith pitched in to help "sell" Hitler to the
Americans, as the necessary stern medicine to ensure Germany's
responsibilities for its debts despite public opinion, to stop Communism, and
to break labor resistance to austerity.

[In the] World War [Hitler was] wounded several times, he was given the Iron
Cross, 1st class, for bravery.... His ability to influence a popular assembly
is described as uncanny. In private conversation he disclosed himself as a
forceful and logical speaker, which, when tempered with a fanatical
earnestness, makes a very deep impression on a neutral listener.

Smith paraphrased Hitler:

His basic aim is the overthrow of Marxism . . . and the winning of labor to
the nationalist ideals of state and property.... The clash of party interests
has proved stronger than love of nation . . . demonstrat[ing] the
impossibility of Germany's rescue from her present difficulties through
democracy. His movement aims at the establishment of a national dictatorship
through nonparliamentary means. Once achieved, he demands that the
reparations demands be reduced to a possible figure, but that done, the sum
agreed on be paid to the last pfennig, as a matter of national honor. To
accomplish this, the dictator must introduce universal reparations service
and enforce it with the whole force of the state. Es power during the period
of fulfillment cannot be hampered by any legislature or popular assembly....
He believes that the "war of revenge" preached in certain national circles is
an utter absurdity....

The question whether Hitler's National Socialists can play a role in Germany
equivalent to that played by the Fascisti in Italy can still not be answered
with any degree of certainty.... It is believed that not only in Munich, but
in all Germany, there is a fertile field even among the factory workers for a
national movement.... The discipline of the German laborer to his union is a
well-recognized fact. The breaking off of this relationship is fundamental
for the success of any nationalist labor movement.(11)


Smith's report echoed an entry in his diary for November 19, 1922. General
Erich Ludendorff, who had-first deployed Corporal Adolf Hitler as his
political spy and in 1919 directed him into the tiny Nazi Party, told Smith
"America must understand that only a strong nationalist government in Germany
can preserve the country from chaos and insure reparations being paid to the
Allies."(12)

In a draft magazine article prepared in June 1924, Smith reports: "Preaching
a gospel of work and attacking labor leader and socialist agitator as false
friends of the German people, the Hitler doctrine has done its share to
resurrect again the old will to love in their work, formerly so deeply
embedded in the German. The results have become more and more noticeable to
the foreign traveler in Germany in recent months.... It is perhaps a pity,
but if merely the tremendous tasks bound up with the execution of Germany's
reparations obligations are considered, much can be said for the necessity of
Germany's adopting a dictatorial form of government for the next decade."

Smith relates how useful anti-Semitism may be in drawing the ire of the
German population away from those Round Table bankers responsible for the
Versailles Treaty, and the plunder and collapse of the German economy that
followed- from it. ". . . More serious, is the charge that an undue
percentage of Germany's wealth has passed during the war and the period of
inflation into Jewish hands. This cannot fail to stir the German middle-class
citizen who has not been financially acute enough to save his little wealth
from submergence.... The success or failure of the Racialist movement is,
however, unimportant in comparison with that dim, scarcely yet felt,
reawakening of the patriotism of the German people, of which it is but an
excrescence.... The probability of a patriotic, nationalistic Germany of the
future must still be faced."(13)

We may now see if perhaps Truman Smith was less than candid when he called
Nazism "but an excrescence" of "the reawakening of the patriotism of the
German people."


'Putzi'

Indeed, it was Truman Smith who introduced Hitler and Hanfstaengl deployment
which Hanfstaengl, as we shall see, viewed as an assignment from "American"
intelligence to work for the Nazis.

A recent slogan in Boston politics had it that "before Hitler there was
Harvard. " Its truth is borne out in the person of Ernst "Putzi" Hanfstaengl.
Putzi's father was a fancy art dealer in Munich, catering to the art-trading
aristocratic flotsam and jetsam from eastern Europe who tended to collect in
Bavaria. The Hanfstaengls had been privy councilors to the Coburg Princes.
Putzi's mother was a Sedgewick from Boston, a "Boston Brahmin." Thus, around
the turn of the century Hanfstaengl came to America and entered Harvard
University. At Harvard Putzi became close to a son of President Theodore
Roosevelt, and was invited to the White House. He and Teddy Roosevelt hit it
off, and their friendship continued until Roosevelt's death in 1919. After
Harvard, Hanfstaengl went to work managing his family's
bookshop-to-the-aristocracy on New York's Fifth Avenue. When World War I
came, he would normally have been interned along with other German aliens,
but he was kept free by a well-connected lawyer—Elihu Root, who had been
Teddy Roosevelt's Secretary of State. Around 1920 Hanfstaengl returned to
Germany. Wanting it to be understood that he did his work as an "American
agent, " Hanfstaengl recorded in his memoirs 14 his assignment by U.S.
military attache Captain Truman Smith, during Smith's fateful visit to
Bavaria in 1922: To link up with a rising young politician who seemed certain
of success— Adolf Hitler. Under the watchful eye of Consul General Robert
Murphy, Putzi Hanfstaengl joined Hitler's Nazi movement. He personally
financed the conversion of the Nazi newspaper into a daily. He introduced
Hitler to the top ranks of the Bavarian aristocracy, the friends of the
Hanfstaengls, who opened their purses for the mustachioed Corporal. Among
these family friends were the Bruckmanns, the publishers of British-linked
geopolitician Karl Haushofer. In 1923 Hitler made his first attempt at
revolution, the "Beer Hall" putsch. Personally, physically on hand,
throughout the entire affair, was U.S. Consul General Robert Murphy in the
Beer Hall and in the streets when the shooting started. (15) So was Putzi
Hanfstaengl, at Hitler's side as the Fuhrer's representative to the foreign
press correspondents who gathered in Munich. The coup attempt collapsed.
Hitler fled Munich and was driven to Hanfstaengl's country house, where
Putzi's wife and sister hid and nursed him. Hitler was arrested there after
two days, and sentenced to prison for treason. There he wrote Mein Kampf, and
there Putzi and his aristocratic circle visited him to plot the future of the
Nazi movement.

As the Nazi movement grew, Hanfstaengl with his American connections remained
Hitler's spokesman to the foreign press, most importantly the New York and
London papers. He held this job until 1937. But Hanfstaengl had other
talents. When in Boston, he had composed marches to be played at the Harvard
football games. He explained to Hitler how the masses were in this fashion
whipped into mindless enthusiasm, and suggested he should do the same for the
marching band of the SA, the Nazi private army. Hitler agreed, and
Hanfstaengl composed new marches, including the one the Nazis played as they
marched through the Brandenburger Gate after Hitler finally became
Chancellor. Hanfstaengl reports that what was first "Harvard, Harvard, Rah
Rah Rah!" became "Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil!" Ernst Hanfstaengl eventually fled
Germany, in the late 1930s. He was interned in a British prison camp, but was
released with the help of "London friends in high places," and was eased into
a job with American military intelligence—"interpreting the Nazis to the
Americans." This lasted only a few months, however, until President Franklin
D. Roosevelt decided that Putzi was an unregenerate Nazi and dumped him back
in prison.

World Government: First Approximation-

While the Hitler project was being assembled and pumped up in Bavaria, John
Foster Dulles was helping to fashion an international political and financial
system which could use the services of Hitler. In post-World
War I Europe, attorney Dulles officially represented the British banking
group—the Bank of England and the J. P. Morgan firm—to which the victorious
Allies had given the power to arrange Germany's reparations payments.

Just after Versailles, John Foster Dulles roamed chaotic Germany gathering
intelligence, wandering in and out of areas controlled by communist rebels,
while his brother Allen put together the Berlin mission which included Truman
Smith. In Germany, like his younger brother Allen, John Foster made
connections which turned out to be central to the Hitler project: among them,
a minor official of the Allied-created German banking authority, Hjalmar
Schacht—the man who later organized financing for Hitler, from American,
British and German oligarchs, and ran the Nazi economy for Hitler.

On March 20, 1922, the minor official Schacht addressed a proposal to John
Foster Dulles, Esq., for a new international system. (16) Schacht and Dulles
were already on the same team; Schacht's father had been an employee of the
Equitable Life Assurance Society from 1885 until 1919, and had been made the
co-director of Equitable's German branch in 1914 when J. P. Morgan owned
Equitable.

Hjalmar Schacht proposed:

. . .A solution of the reparation problem . . . to give Europe a couple of
years say five to restore . . . steady conditions in the different
countries.... Germany must find a loan of say 5 billions of gold marks,
proceeds of which have to be handed at once to France.... My idea is, not to
issue a state-loan but a loan of private corporations. I want to form, say,
four private German corporations; to each of these 4 corporations the German
government has to grant the monopoly of exports of some bulk articles as for
instance coal, potash, sugar and cement, each corporation controlling the
export of one of these articles. The monopoly has to be granted for 20 years.
The inland producers have to deliver their production to the corporations....

The corporations are to issue loans at a total amount of 5 billions gold
marks.... As the total export of the 4 corporations can be estimated at 500
million gold marks, the amount of the loan will be repaid within 10 years....


The loan which I propose is not . . . based on any political
treaty.... The repayment of the loan is under control of
first [sic] industrial and commercial people of the highest
standing....

This letter was forwarded by its addressee, John Foster Dulles, to Thomas W.
Lamont, partner of J.P. Morgan, with Dulles's plaudits: "Dr. Schacht is one
of the ablest and most progressive of the younger German bankers, and it
seems to me that his plan may contain some thoughts which may have some
merit."(17)

Two weeks later Dulles responded enthusiastically to Schacht's proposal: "If
a period of political stability could be assured, I have no doubt that bonds
issued by such monopolistic corporations as you mention would command the
confidence of the investing public." Dulles added his own suggestions: "I
assume that if the bonds were tax exempt in Germany quite an amount could be
raised in Germany."

Over the next several years, the years of the Weimar Republic, the essence of
this Schacht-Dulles-Morgan plan was put into effect. Hjalmar Schacht was
appointed President of the German national bank, the Reichsbank; he carried
out austerity programs and shut down productive investment, to "save money"
that could go for debt payments. Certain German coporations, attaining
monopoly status, were linked with foreign concerns in world-spanning cartel
arrangements.

The most famous cartel was the fusion between the I.G. Farben chemical
company and the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey. Others involved metals
and primary agricultural and industrial commodities.

In such a cartel, the parties set certain world price structures and
production limits for their industries, pooled their patents, and agreed to
block or destroy any parties outside the agreement, in any country, who set
competitive pricing or production policies,  or who came out with new
inventions or technology which might disturb the cartel's control. The
cartels were simply the extension onto a world scale of the "trusts" built up
by J.P. Morgan to control and police American industry during Teddy
Roosevelt's presidency. With massive credit flows associated with reparations
going into and out of Germany, the entire arrangement amounted to a
British-directed, German-centered police apparatus over the world's business
a first approximation of the world government spoken of by Lord Lothian.

John Foster Dulles had been, since 1919, the lawyer for Richard Merton,
founder of I.G. Farben. In 1924 attorney John Foster Dulles was selected by
J. P. Morgan to draw up the Dawes Plan, for reshaping Germany's reparations
payments; that same year, Thomas Lamont arranged official loans from J. P.
Morgan to bail out the new, shaky dictatorship of Benito Mussolini over Italy.

John Foster Dulles became in 1926 chief executive of Sullivan and
Cromwell—the law firm by which all the cartels were represented. After
Hitler's 1933 takeover in Germany, the cartels provided the main industrial
and commercial underpinning for the Nazi rearmament of Germany. Among the
clients of Sullivan and Cromwell were:

• I.G. Farben, the chemical giant which ran the factory at the Auschwitz
death camp, under a cartel agreement with Jersey Standard. I.G. Farben was
also fused in a cartel with International Nickel of Canada, of which John
Foster Dulles was part owner and a director. When I. G. Farben's workers at
the Auschwitz factory grew exhausted, they—with masses of Jews and other
prisoners—were exterminated with I. G. Farben's poison gas, Zyklon B.

• Steel baron Fritz Thyssen, who confessed his financial backing for Hitler
in a famous book called I Paid Hitler(perhaps Dulles should have written a
foreword titled, "I Brokered the Deal").

• Gestapo General Kurt von Schroeder and the Anglo-German Schroeder Bank.
Allen Dulles was a director of the Bank throughout the 1930s, as Schroeder's
shamelessly supported Hitler's election efforts and backed his dictatorship's
commercial ventures.

• Schroeder, Rockefeller and Company investment bank of New York.

• The North German Lloyd shipping line; Dulles represented this company in a
1933-34 New York court case, when its New York office was the location of a
Nazi Party recruiting and espionage cell involving 500 individuals. (18)

• International Telephone and Telegraph Company of Germany, of which Dulles's
law partner Gerhardt Westrick was Chairman. ITT ran Germany's telephones and
produced fuses, radar and other equipment for the Nazi army throughout World
War II.

• Ford of Germany, of which Dulles's law partner Heinrich Albert was
chairman. Ford built cars, trucks, and armored vehicles for the Nazis. and

• General Motors of Germany.

Filling the Strange Gap in Averell Harriman's Biography

In 1930, Dulles's correspondent Hjalmar Schacht resigned from the presidency
of the Reichsbank, to spend the next three years recruiting support for a
Hitler dictatorship. After Hitler took power in January 1933, he made Schacht
the Nazi economic czar, with special responsibility for the creation of a war
machine.

Then, at the outset of 1933, Germany was bankrupt, masses of its workers were
unemployed, and the country had no significant military power. In these early
months the entire Nazi enterprise was vulnerable to outside intervention,
which could have crushed it. It was at this point that the commercial and
political partnership of Averell Harriman and John Foster Dulles played a
central role, with the British Round Table faction, in cementing the Nazi
regime in power.

In May 1985, the 94-year-old Harriman received a medal from the government of
the Soviet Union commemorating what is, in the Soviet view, his exemplary
work for peace; Harriman has been for many years the "elder statesman," the
power center of the Democratic Party's pro-Soviet wing. But Harriman also had
another political career: pro-Nazism, which entirely coheres with
pro-Sovietism.

To situate Harriman's pro-Nazism, and the Harriman-Dulles partnership, it is
necessary to fill what has been a large gap in the heretofore published
biography of Averell Harriman: his international political and
racial-pro-eugenics, pro-Nazi—activities in the decades before World War II.

W. Averell Harriman's father, Edward H. Harriman (1848-1910), was a small New
York stock broker who was boosted into wealth and powerful connections by
association with managers of the old-line pro-slavery wing of the Democratic
Party— the Schell brothers, August Belmont, and Sin forth--and through them
the Astors, Vanderbilts and other British-linked financiers.

Great fame came to E.H. Harriman as an owner and monopolist over railroads.
His most consistent financial backing came from the Kuhn Loeb investment
banking firm.(19) Kuhn Loeb's chief executive, Jacob Schiff, was himself a
lifelong partner, in fact a disciple, of the British financier Sir Ernst
Cassel, Schiff and Cassel interested themselves in the railroad investments
of many nations, but Cassel's trips to America were not merely for the
purpose of talking business, as business is normally understood. Ernst Cassel
was the personal banker for the British Round Table, for their Fabian
Society, and for many of the Round Table's investment schemes in the Middle
East. Another partner of Jacob Schiff, and the eventual chief executive of
Kuhn Loeb, was Felix Warburg, whose brother Max ran the M.M. Warburg banking
firm in Germany. These family connections were crucial for E.H. Harriman's
son Averell, in his career as an American representative of the British Round
Table faction.

Late in his life E.H. Harriman became very much involved with the racialist
"Conservation" movment, and with the affairs of the American Museum of
Natural History in New York. After his death in 1910, his wife and children
used considerable sums from his immense fortune to finance the new work of
the "Conservation" movement: eugenics, or Race Purification.(20)

Widow Mary A. Harriman donated 80 acres of land and buildings in 1910 to
establish the Eugenics Records Office (ERO) and the Eugenics Research
Association in Cold Spring Harbor, New York. Mrs. Harriman, her daughter Mary
Rumsey Harriman, and her son Averell invested over $500,000 in the eugenics
center over the next several-years, making it the international center for
race science.

The monthly Eugenical News, put out by the ERO director Charles Davenport and
superintendent Harry H. Laughlin, was circulated to top policymakers
throughout America, and its articles were translated into German for use by
the fledgling Nazi Party.

The ERO's Committee to Study and Report on the Best Practical Means of
Cutting Off the Defective Germ-Plasm in the American Population released its
final report in 1914. It called for the forced sterilization of "defectives"
including paupers, the blind, the deaf, criminals, the feebleminded,
epileptics, the weak and people with tuberculosis and "hereditary laziness."

The Harrimans' ERO report, mass-distributed to American legislators,
clergymen, editors and professors, is identical in viewpoint to the
philosophical statement written by John Foster Dulles in 1911—and to Mein
Kampf:

It is held by some schools of social workers that better
schools, better churches, better food, better clothing, better living and
better social life will remedy almost-any social inadequacy in individuals.
The studies of this committee point strongly in the opposite direction.. They
prove conclusively that much social inadequacy is of a deep-seated biological
nature, and can be remedied only by cutting off the human strains that
produce it.

The Harrimans' Eugenics Records Office wrote an implementation report in
1915,21 calling for 15 million Americans to be sterilized—to produce "the
perfect man" by 1980.

The Second International Eugenics Congress was held in New York's American
Museum of Natural History in 1921. Averell Harriman, a member of the Museum's
board since 1918, gave $1,000 of his own money and served on the Museum
Executive Committee hosting the conference; his mother and sister were the
primary hostesses. Members of a congressional Committee on Immigration were
transported from Washington to view the racialist eugenics ex[h]ibits, and to
hear tirades against allowing continued immigration of "inferior" ethnic
groups such as Italians and Jews.
Also in 1921, the Harrimans' Eugenics Records Office issued its "Model
Eugenical Sterilization Law" drafted by ERO superintendent Harry H. Laughlin,
which added to the earlier candidates for forcible sterilization "orphans,
the-homeless, ne'er-do-wells,- and tramps."

The Third International Eugenics Congress was held in 1932, again at New
York's American Museum of Natural History. It was also financed by the
Harrimans and hosted by Averell's mother and sister. This conference elected
Dr. Ernst Rudin of Germany the president of the International Federation of
Eugenics Societies and gave him a medal. It was Rudin who, in 1934, wrote the
law "For the Protection of German Blood and German Honor," implemented by the
Nazi regime to remove citizenship from Jews. Rudin also wrote the Nazi
sterilization law "For the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity,"
lifted almost word-for-word from the Harriman ERO text. Two million Germans
and millions of conquered foreigners were sterilized by the Nazis between
1933 and 1945.

While he and his family were financing the fascist movement in America,
Averell Harriman became very interested in Germany. He formed a partnership
with the Hamburg-American shipping line after the First World War, developing
the largest merchant fleet owned by an American. He renewed his father's
financial partnership with the Warburgs, underwriting the bonds of the new
Soviet regime along with M.M. Warburg.

Harriman, Dulles, and Hitler

We now review the sequence of events in 1933, involving Harriman, John Foster
Dulles and Hjalmar Schacht.

Adolf Hitler took power in Germany in January 1933, after the Nazis scored a
surprising success in the elections in the state of Lippe. Hitler put
Dulles's friend, Hjalmar Schacht, in charge of the Nazi economy. Schacht
declared that in most cases payments of German private and public debts to
foreigners would be made in "blocked marks," or scrip which had no
international value except to exchange for German exports under Schacht's
rules.

On May 19, 1933, a note (signed "R.M.") on the stationery of Brown Brothers
Harriman(22) was addressed to John Foster Dulles, referring to instructions,
advice and information Harriman's firm was giving Dulles for his imminent
trip to Germany. On Saturday, May 20, 1933, the following article appeared in
the New York Times financial section:


Importers to Use 'Blocked' Mark Balances;
Syndicate Formed for Trade With Germany

The formation of a company to provide means for the liquidation of German
blocked mark balances through the financing of imports to the United States
from Germany was announced yesterday. The new company is to be called the
Syndicate of American Creditors Owning German Blocked Accounts.

The Harriman International Company is to be syndicate manager.
. . .It is estimated that about $800,000,000 of American short-term capital .
. . is locked up in Germany and cannot be withdrawn. The syndicate plans to
use these "blocked" marks, with the consent of the German Exchange Control,
for partial payment by American importers for German goods.

About 150 firms and individuals holding from 25,000,000 to 30,000,000 of
blocked marks are expected to become members of the syndicate.

The Times article carried the byline of no reporter, and mentioned no
names—other than "Harriman International."" How Harriman had worked out such
a sweet arrangement with Hjalmar Schacht—to be manager of exports from Nazi
Germany to America, under Schacht's dictatorial control—has never been
revealed.

On May 21, 1933, John Foster Dulles sailed to Germany as the representative
of Brown Brothers Harriman, Dillon Read,Kuhn Loeb and all private investment
banks and Wall Street firms. Accompanied by a Sullivan and Cromwell
subordinate and three employees of Chase bank, John Foster Dulles negotiated
in Berlin with Hjalmar Schacht on the financing of the new Hitler government.
British, Swiss, Dutch and Swedish investors were also represented.

A large pile of correspondence from that trip, between Wall Street and Dulles
in Berlin, some of it in code, gathers dust in the Dulles papers at Princeton
University.

By the end of June 1933, Dulles, Schacht, and the others had worked out a
deal for looting the German population and stopping payment to American
holders of German bonds, while paying the Swiss their due.

In November 1933, the father of the present author, Jacob Chaitkin, filed
suit in New York municipal court, to compel the North German Lloyd company to
pay a client of his $30 they owed her. Jacob Chaitkin's opponent in the court
case was John Foster Dulles, representing the shipping line, claiming that
North German Lloyd under German government decrees (which Dulles himself had
personally arranged) was unfortunately forbidden to pay its American debts.

Jacob Chaitkin argued that Schacht had not declared a legal debt moratorium,
because his decrees were discriminatory between the creditors: against the
Americans and for the Swiss. The suit had a desperate political motivation—to
block the financial operations which Hitler was using to consolidate his
regime of terror and to arm the Nazi state for war.

Dulles lost the $30 case; a writ was issued to tie up a 30,000 ton Lloyd
liner in New York harbor until the coupon was paid, and a precedent was set
that Jacob Chaitkin and others used to stop millions of dollars from going to
Hitler.(23)


But Dulles, Harriman, and their allies stepped up the trade between -Nazi
Germany and the United States. American Jews and others including the
American Federation of Labor organized a boycott of German imports. In 1934
the American Jewish Congress hired Jacob Chaitkin as the legal director of
their Joint Boycott Committee. Chaitkin negotiated with Macy's and other
department stores; Macy's and others stopped selling goods from Nazi Germany
under threats of demonstrations and boycott.

With the news of increasing terror against German Jews, Americans paraded and
held mass protest meetings to mobilize support for the boycott and other
actions against Hitler. While the Jewish War Vets, Hadassah, many Zionist
organizations, orthodox Jewish groups and Eastern Europeans participated in
the boycott, two Jewish organizations opposed the boycott and warned Jews not
to take any public action whatsoever against the Hitler regime. These two
anti-boycott groups were the B'nai B'rith and the American Jewish Committee,
whose leaders were deeply involved in the politics, commerce and—to the
extent Jews were allowed—the social life of the pro-Nazi Harriman-Dulles
circle, and the Venetian-German-"Jewish" Warburgs.(24)
--cont--
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to