-Caveat Lector- *Did dubious docs indeed docket dubious 9/11 doc?* < http://www.total411.info/2007/06/did-dubious-docs-indeed-docket-dubious.html>
[ http://www.total911.info/2007/06/did-dubious-docs-indeed-docket-dubious.html] After independent researchers filed Requests for Correction earlier this year with federal agency NIST regarding the WTC, disinformation cell STJ911<http://stj911.org/>followed quickly, claiming to have filed a copycat RFC<http://stj911.org/actions/NIST_DQA_Petition.pdf>which unfortunately suckered in naive co-complainants including victims family members. However, several months after claiming to have filed the RFC, the Department of Commerce, which oversees NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology), has not posted the RFC has received to its online archive of received RFCs<http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619>as maintained by its Chief Information Officer. This, despite the fact that the STJ911 RFC was purportedly filed April 12, and a supplement, dated April 20<http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/s/groups/public/@doc/@os/@ocio/@oitpp/documents/content/prod01_002899.pdf>, to independent researcher Dr. Judy Wood's RFC, has been posted to the CIO's website for some weeks now. One possible explanation is that the RFC filed by STJ911 did not in fact challenge the quality of NIST's data so much as praise it. The RFC process is a result of the Data Quality Act, which provides a form of redress for citizens who find data ginned up by federal bureaucracy to fraudulent. Yet the RFC filed by STJ911 in fact praises the quality of NIST's fraudulent aircraft collision data and only demands that NIST share more of their purportedly fabulous (yet factually fraudulent) data with the public. This is a classic false-opposition tactic, pretending to argue with the powers-that-be when in fact buttressing their central premises. Indeed, the purported RFC filed by STJ911 asserts that "in real life" Boeing airliners crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This appears to be an attempt to bait NIST into explicitly endorsing claims made by the criminal federal agency FEMA regarding Boeing air crashers. One of the co-authors of the purported STJ911 RFC, Los Alamos' Mormon WMD developer Dr. Steven Jones, has cited obviously planted aircraft debris pimped by FEMA in its reports regarding 9/11. Dr. Jones has recently claimed on 911blogger.com that NIST will be responding on June 11th to his fraudulent complaint. Given the efforts by Dr. Jones' false-opposition cell to prop up NIST's fraudulent claims, Dr. Jones may indeed have the inside track on what NIST is to do next. -- www.total411.info www.total911.info www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
