-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: June 20, 2007 12:28:43 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Prison Time for Any Website That Prints User Comments
"Supporting 'Terrorism'"
UK extends E-commerce Directive to terrorism laws
OUT-LAW News, 19/06/2007
Regulations come into force this week that explain how and when a
foreign company can be brought to justice in the UK over blog
postings that encourage terrorism. The Regulations integrate
Europe's e-commerce laws with the UK's Terrorism Act.
The Electronic Commerce Directive (Terrorism Act 2006) Regulations
2007 were laid before Parliament on 31st May and come into force on
21st June.
The Terrorism Act 2006 is already in force. It created offences
relating to the encouragement of acts of terrorism and the
dissemination of terrorist publications. The Act contains a notice
and takedown regime that applies to all website operators. If a
person posts any remark to a blog that encourages an act of
terrorism, a police constable can serve a notice on the operator of
the blog requiring the removal of the offending post within two days.
Failure to comply within the two-day period, in the absence of
"reasonable excuse", means that the operator will be deemed to have
endorsed the post and its directors could face up to seven years in
prison.
The Terrorism Act made action against UK and companies in the
European Economic Area (EEA) possible and Home Office Guidance of
October 2006 described procedures that should be followed. The EEA
member states comprise the 27 EU member states plus Iceland,
Lichtenstein and Norway.
If, for example, a blog posting is deemed a threat to public
security and a police constable asked the EEA member state to
effect its removal and that state failed to do so, proceedings in
the UK will be possible.
A Home Office spokesperson stressed to OUT-LAW that the new
Regulations do not extend the application of the Terrorism Act to
service providers overseas beyond what is already possible under
that Act. Instead, they restrict the circumstances in which this is
possible, setting conditons that must be satisfied.
The Regulations also extend certain protections of the E-commerce
Directive to the Terrorism Act.
These protections apply to intermediaries acting as mere conduits
or those that cache or host third party content. They were aimed at
ISPs and website hosting companies. However, the UK's implementing
rules, the E-commerce Regulations 2002, do not apply to legislation
that postdates them and so the protections need to be given on a
case-by-case basis. This month's Regulations add the protections of
the E-commerce Regulations to the Terrorism Act. The protections
are qualified. For example, hosting a user's offending content is
not an offence provided it is removed or blocked expeditiously
"upon obtaining actual knowledge that the information was
unlawfully terrorism-related".
The Terrorism Act presented a significant challenge for operators
of social networking sites or any others that encourage users'
contributions when it was introduced. The notice and takedown
regime goes further than the laws that control copyright
infringements on websites because it also applies to any "repeat
statement". That is defined in the Terrorism Act as a statement
which "is for all practical purposes, to the same effect as the
statement to which the notice related". The two-day time limit for
removal of the statement will begin to run from the date of re-
publication.
The Terrorism Act says a person is not deemed to endorse a repeat
statement if he "is not aware of the publication of the repeat
statement" or where he has taken "every step he reasonably could to
prevent a repeat statement" becoming available to the public.
However, the explanatory notes to the Act provide little guidance
as to what is reasonable for the host of a website, blog or message
board.
See:
The Electronic Commerce Directive (Terrorism Act 2006) Regulations
2007
Terrorism Act 2006
Home Office Guidance on notices issued under section 3 of the
Terrorism Act (12-page / 122KB PDF)
See what's free at AOL.com.
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
