-Caveat Lector-

[1]http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/2007/07/07/535.a
spx

             9/11: Controlled Demo Proven in 19 Seconds

 Folks, here I have included a series of comments that were added in
 the days ensuing my blogging this item last year. The video, perhaps
 the most important video in the public pursuit of truth regarding
 9/11 not only because of its brevity but, as well, because of the
 sheerly indisputable content! The video is [2]here.

[3]Check it out!

7 Comments:
At [4]November 10, 2006 1:49 AM, [5]Eric Stewart said...

Folks, Google has yanked my access to their videos. Of course,
Google owns Blogger so this is not entirely unforseen. First they
changed the url of the video I was accessing and THEN yanked all
access from this blog to their vids.
This was easily the most useful 9/11 controlled demo out there.
It was from a BBC special and nothing anywhere I have seen comes
close to providing EXTREMELY CLEAR shots and audio of rapid
explosions, charges going off one floor after another.
They have implicated themselves. If Google continues to deny me
access to their videos, then I will be forced to mount a serious
campaign against their censorship tactics. If Google thinks that
they can get away with this I will remind them what happened when
I decided that Echelon no longer needed to be a conspiracy
theory. The National Security Agency couldn't shut me up. What
makes you think you can?
You had better get with it Google or I'm coming after you.
  At [6]November 10, 2006 6:43 AM, [7]Eric Stewart said...

That's better. Threatening these guys with bad press usually
works.
  At [8]November 10, 2006 7:15 AM, [9]Eric Stewart said...

Of course, since Google is now allowing linkage to my blog, the
inevitable wave of naysayers, claiming that I am off my rocker
for observing a CONSISTENT pattern, has begun. For those of you
and for others that would like just a little more information on
all of this, here is something I sent to someone today:
Google has never let me upload vids and whenever I have tried to
use their service that automatically blogs items, it simply
hasn't worked. Let me be clear here: certain online outfits and
well known intelligence outfits have a long and rocky history
with me. I could give you examples but I'd rather not toot my own
horn so much. I am known in national security issues. Have you
ever heard of Echelon?
As well, every time I try to download anything from Google, I get
multiple megs of information that, if it does anything at all, is
doing so invisibly. In other words, I never get a video but I am
suspicious of what exactly that code was.
At any rate, recently I was sent the embed code by someone and
began to use it and yesterday I found a video that is the single
most explosive video ever in regards to the 9/11 controlled
demolition. Several people emailed me incredulously (veteran
researchers), calling it a long awaited smoking gun. It is
undeniable. Multiple, orderly explosions are seen going off,
floor by floor and they are easily heard.
Suddenly - BAM! My history in dealing with such situations is to
wait. My experience is that when I happen upon something
revelatory and SUDDENLY get problems, that there is good reason
to be suspicious. Still, in the past I have reserved judgement.
More often than not, such problems persist without end until I
raise a whole lot of hell about it and the pattern is that my
problems miraculously stop when I do so.
Glitches are not sensitive to complaints, though some have
seemingly implied such.
I have, in the past, waited for hours and sometimes even days
before I did anything, waiting to see of such a glitch resolves
itself. My batting average for CAUSING such glitches to go away
by merely drawing attention to them is well over .500 - this over
about a hundred at bats, if you know what I mean.
I threatened Google and they responded. This time the threat
(with deserved bad press) was issued almost immediately by
myself, which is rare. I usually wait but this time I thought the
subject matter too important to let slide and the timing,
coinciding with the most revelatory thing I have blogged ever,
was too suspicious. These people I spoke of that know me and of
me, these elites, are quite aware of my capability to reach
several thousand influential people quickly and without warning.
I'm really glad people are beginning to take on the issue of
Google and its memetic support of the fascist state. As for
myself, I have been all over Yahoo for similar things.
  At [10]November 11, 2006 6:43 AM, [11]Eric Stewart said...

FYI : While attempting to view a video at YouTube on the LAPD's
brutal ways, my anti-virus program picked up a trojan. This kind
of thing ought to be able to be proven.
  At [12]November 11, 2006 6:53 AM, [13]Eric Stewart said...

I just picked up an incoming virus at a YouTube vid on LAPD
brutality (I was backing my browser up when it happened so I
don't know which one did it - I had to shut it down):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUD0JRnW7oc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE20OPv4I28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVW5_PJHzR4
  At [14]November 13, 2006 7:30 AM, [15]Eric Stewart said...

[16]Rick Siegel wrote:
Today, 2 days after posting that video I find the site hacked. I
am pretty sure you are right about this. Someone very good
slipped in and cut root access to the site. I had to have
physical people go and open it back up. We are tracking the
hacker.
http://www.ricksiegel.com/web was cut and there were some 600
missed hits to that single page. 1700 read and saw it already. It
is back up and if you can get the original I will host it. The
digg, reddit and shoutwire pages are
spreading it. I guess you should promote it and get it out. Must
be
something if they are hacking so bad at it.
See [17]Site Hacked to Keep BBC 911 Anniversary Video Off Web
  At [18]December 13, 2006 2:06 PM, [19]Tahoma Activist said...

Hey guys, I can believe that Google would do this crap. Their
slogan used to be "Don't be evil", but I guess, just like the
Jesuits, once they got some power they decided to start altering
the substance of what "evil" really is.
As we've seen with this current administration, once you began
playing fast and loose with your own morality, you lose the
ability to control the situation. Your underlings and your
allies, as well as your enemies, will not understand or
appreciate your subtle calculations about morality and will use
your justifications to justify even worse abuses themselves. The
best way to prevent this is, of course, to not do things that
violate your own moral code, but when you're dealing with
corporations and unaccountable governments, their ability to
stick to any rules is next to nil.
This is why we must use every opportunity we have to speak loudly
and forcefully against all violations of, law, principles,
ethics, and morality. Good on you, Eric, for doing so.
Hey, would you link to my post on CoolAqua about the question
everyone should be asking presidential candidates? The question
is: "Do you believe that agents of the Bush administration
planned, executed, supported or covered up any elements of the
9/11 attacks, and if so, what are you going to do about it?"


Published 08 July 2007 12:02 AM by [20]smileycoyote Filed under:
[21]9/11, [22]Conspiracy, [23]classics, [24]censorship,
[25]revolution in military affairs, [26]big brother
*

References

Visible links
1. http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/2007/07/07/535.aspx
2. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html
3. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html
4. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116314137064057764
5. http://www.blogger.com/profile/08716453279351795322
6. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116315899565715386
7. http://www.blogger.com/profile/08716453279351795322
8. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116316092723334236
9. http://www.blogger.com/profile/08716453279351795322
  10. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116324541868509595
  11. http://www.blogger.com/profile/08716453279351795322
  12. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116324599710815531
  13. http://www.blogger.com/profile/08716453279351795322
  14. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116342101484960959
  15. http://www.blogger.com/profile/08716453279351795322
  16. http://www.ricksiegel.com/
  17. http://www.ricksiegel.com/web/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=120
  18. 
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/11/911-controlled-demo-proven-in-19.html#c116603676165911587
  19. http://www.blogger.com/profile/09651911314887304989
  20. http://eeng.net/CS/members/smileycoyote.aspx
  21. http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/tags/9_2F00_11/default.aspx
  22. http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/tags/Conspiracy/default.aspx
  23. http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/tags/classics/default.aspx
  24. http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/tags/censorship/default.aspx
  25. 
http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/tags/revolution+in+military+affairs/default.aspx
  26. 
http://eeng.net/CS/blogs/smileycoyote/archive/tags/big+brother/default.aspx

Hidden links:
  27. 
http://www.blogger.com/delete-comment.g?blogID=34631279&postID=116314137064057764
  28. 
http://www.blogger.com/delete-comment.g?blogID=34631279&postID=116315899565715386
  29. 
http://www.blogger.com/delete-comment.g?blogID=34631279&postID=116316092723334236
  30. 
http://www.blogger.com/delete-comment.g?blogID=34631279&postID=116324541868509595
  31. 
http://www.blogger.com/delete-comment.g?blogID=34631279&postID=116324599710815531
  32. 
http://www.blogger.com/delete-comment.g?blogID=34631279&postID=116342101484960959

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to