-Caveat Lector-


Begin forwarded message:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 15, 2007 5:52:46 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Russia, "Free Again"

Gorbachev: Russia's Suspension of Arms Treaty Justified

Voice of America, 15 July 2007
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-07-15-voa25.cfm

Mikhail Gorbachev (file photo)
Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev says Russia's decision to suspend participation in a major European arms treaty is an "absolutely logical" move.

Mr. Gorbachev signed the original Conventional Forces in Europe treaty - a key Cold War-era agreement with the United States and NATO - in 1990.

The treaty was revised in 1999, after the Warsaw Pact communist alliance was dissolved, but neither the United States nor NATO's members have ratified those changes. Mr. Gorbachev tells Russia's Interfax news agency it would be "incomprehensible" for Moscow to abide by the treaty under those circumstances.

U.S. plans to deploy a missile shield in central Europe are widely seen as the major factor behind Russia's treaty suspension. Mr. Gorbachev, however, says Russia wants to save the treaty, by reopening talks on the accord.

The United States, NATO and the European Union all have said they are disappointed by Mr. Putin's suspension of the treaty.

Mr. Putin hinted at such action earlier this year and linked the treaty issue to the U.S. missile plan. Official announcement of the Kremlin decree on Saturday in Moscow did not mention the missile proposal, but a Russian Foreign Ministry statement said the decision was based NATO's failure to ratify the 1999 revision.

The conventional-forces treaty put specific limits on the number of tanks, heavy artillery and fighter jets that could be deployed in Europe or western Russia -- from the Atlantic Coast to the Ural Mountains -- and the original version is credited for major reductions in military hardware in the region after 1992.

The United States and its NATO allies refused to ratify the revised treaty in 1999 after Russia refused to withdraw troops it has stationed in the former Soviet republics, including Georgia and Moldova.

-------------------

No defence against missiles

The Guardian (UK), July 16, 2007


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2127232,00.html

The current fad of tearing up vital arms-control agreements was started by America when it abrogated the anti-ballistic missile treaty in order to build its missile shield.

Russia followed suit on Saturday by announcing that it would suspend its obligations under the conventional forces in Europe (CFE) treaty. If the trend continues, the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty could be next. And then Europe, freshly liberated from the Cold-War threat of instant extinction, will be bristling with missiles.

The US will have its missile interceptor base in Poland and a long- range radar in the Czech Republic that can direct a missile on to a target anywhere in Russia. To counter that, Russia will deploy long- range Iskander missiles in its enclave in Kaliningrad, behind the line of the Baltic states and right on the Polish border. Heavy tanks will once again roam the forests of Germany and central Russia, just like the good old days.

Does this sound insane on a continent which has said goodbye to war? It may, but it could come to pass. For all the touchy-feely togetherness that Vladimir Putin and George Bush indulged in at their recent "lobster" summit in Maine, both leaders continue to send each other messages of a more traditional kind. Mr Bush is intent on pushing ahead with missile defence plans come what may, and is finalising an agreement with the Polish president Lech Kaczynski today.

Mr Putin has made it crystal clear that if there is no compromise on missile defence, Russia is prepared to carry out its threat to point its missiles at Europe again.




Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL.com.


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to