-Caveat Lector-


Begin forwarded message:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 14, 2007 7:07:29 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Neocon link to the ABC TV Network "Fake News" scandal

The neocon link to the ABC "Fake News" scandal

http://www.attytood.com/2007/09/the_neocon_link_to_the_abc_new.html
As predicted yesterday, the scandal over disgraced ex-ABC News consultant Alexis Debat continues to spin out of control, with major implications for the way that Americans have been getting their news about the flashpoints that could determine war or peace in the Persian Gulf and South Asia.

The story first broke in Debat's native France, but here at home Laura Rozen continues to lead the pack on the coverage. http:// www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2007/09/abc-debat.html

Writing online for Mother Jones, she exposes that there were long- time, serious questions about Debat by some at ABC News -- yet those questions never stopped star investigative reporter Brian Ross from airing sensational and inflamatory articles about U.S. meddling in Iran and the hunt for Osama bin Laden, using Debat as a prime source. Writes Rozen:

Interviews with journalists, think tank associates, and a former government official indicate that there were warning signs about Debat for years — even within the network itself. Two journalists familiar with Debat's work point to ABC chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross not only as the victim of Debat's alleged deceptions, but as an enabler, who has promoted sensational stories —including some that Debat brought the network— at the expense at times of rigorous journalism standards. She notes two Ross ABC "scoops" on Pakistan that were either corrected or instantly denounced as false by Pakistani officials.

In the meantime, little attention had been paid to the French journal Politique Internationale -- which published Debat's bogus "interviews" with Barack Obama, as well as Hillary Clinton, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, former Microsoft chairman Bill Gates, and former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.

But the French magazine deserves closer scrutiny. In continuing to connect the dots between Debat and the push for a neoconservative agenda that includes ratcheting up war tensions with Iran, it turns out that a prominent member of the neocon movement has served as editor of Politique Internationale for much of this decade.

Iranian-borm Amir Taheri (pictured at top) -- who edited a leading Iranian newspaper prior to the 1979 overthrow of the Shah and has since written for a number of western publications, including several owned by conservative press lord Rupert Murdoch -- has been a leading voice in Politique Internationale. It's not clear what his current role is, but in numerous press reports from 2001 through 2006 he was listed as its editor.

In recent years, Taheri's work has been prominently promoted by Benador Associates, a New York based public-relations firm that specializes in Middle Eastern affairs with a roster of experts, according to its own Web site, that reads like a Who's Who of the neo-conservative movement, including Richard Perle and James Woolsey.

Taheri's articles appear frequently in Murdoch-owned publications like the New York Post, the Times of London (which front-paged colleague Debat's accusations of the pending U.S. bombing of Iran), and the Weekly Standard. Ironically, Taheri has also written occasionally for the Wall Street Journal, which will soon be owned by Murdoch as well.

And like Debat, Taheri's work has been called into question in recent years.

Most notably, Taheri reported in a column in Canada's National Post in May 2006 that Iran had passed a law requiring the country's Jews and other religious minorities to wear coloured badges identifying them as non-Muslims. The story was received wide play in conservative circles, but it was not true -- the newspaper had to publish a retraction the next day.

A month later, the Nation reported there has been a long history of questions about Taheri's work, including numerous inaccuracies in a popular 1988 book by Taheri about Islamic terrorism called Nest of Spies. The article lays out the allegations against Taheri in detail and concludes that:

Even among a crowd notable for wrongheaded analyses, Taheri stands out, with a rap sheet that leaves one amazed that he continues to be published. It is here that the role of Benador is key; the firm gives Taheri a political stamp of approval that provides entree to hawkish media venues, where journalistic criteria are secondary. It notes that just days after the bogus National Post article, Taheri was invited to the White House to consult with President Bush on Iraq with other "experts."

Now it turns out that Taheri also served as editor -- or claimed to, anyway -- of a publication that also came to print Debat and his fake "interviews" with world leaders who are opponents of the neoconservatve movement, like Obama, Clinton, and Kofi Anan.

The made-up quotes attached to Obama -- saying the U.S. had suffered a "defeat" in Iraq -- were quite inflammatory and could be re-surfaced in the heat of a presidential campaign.

What type of working relationship did Taheri have with Debat at Politique Internationale? Was the Iranian also a second-hand source for Ross' inflamatory pieces?

In nearly seven years of the Bush administration, we've grown used to the loud and often wrong drumbeat in the usual right-wing publications. However, for this kind of clap-trap to find its way -- unfiltered, apparently -- onto ABC News and into millions of American homes was a huge coup for the neocon movement, but a huge blow to the U.S. media, and our political discourse on the Middle East.

------------------

http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2007/09/abc-debat.html

Overall, the picture of Debat that emerges from these interviews is of a smart, ambitious and cunning operator who would claim to be getting text messages from Middle Eastern intelligence operatives while at meetings with Ross and others at ABC, with tips that seemed too good to be true (which some colleagues believe were bogus), yet were used as "exclusives."

Sources provided multiple examples of stories that Ross—often with Debat's contributions—reported, only to be forced to run a correction the next day. For instance, one source noted, on September 5 last year, Ross reported that a Pakistani general had said that Pakistan would leave Osama bin Laden alone as long as he didn't cause any trouble. The Pakistani government angrily denied it, and the next day the ABC investigative unit's blog, the Blotter ran a correction.

Another ABC news story largely sourced to Debat – claiming that the U.S. government was advising and encouraging an Iranian Baluchi separatist group Jundullah which was carrying out attacks against the Iranian regime – was followed by an ABC report the next day carrying a "sharply-worded" denunciation from the Pakistani government.

One ethical issue raised by ABC's handling of Debat concerns the investigative unit's use of paid sources/consultants, who are often put on monthly retainer. But in ABC's use of Debat as a paid "consultant" who also had for the past year and a half an appointment at the Nixon Center, ABC also frequently had him reporting on its blog, the Blotter, and appearing as a "source" inside others' stories, blurring the line between source (and a paid one at that, with outside -- also paid -- affiliations) and a journalist, not clearly identified in the report. ABC also sent Debat frequently abroad, to gather information which he would put on the air and on the investigative unit's website.

Network officials strongly deny that ABC has tried to sweep the Debat matter under the rug, and say they are taking the matter of investigating his stories very seriously. "We acted expeditiously to sever ties with Debat when we could not establish his credentials and we did immediately investigate his work," ABC senior vice president Jeffrey W. Schneider emailed me.

In fact, the French news service AFP reported as far back as 2002 that according to the French government, Debat had never been a defense ministry official. "Alexis Debat, presented by the American [TV] channel ABC as 'a former official at the French Defence Ministry' in the context of the case of [Zacarias] Moussaoui … 'has never belonged' to this ministry," the AFP reported Sept. 6, 2002. According to the annotated Debat CV, he had at one time had a low- rank desk job at the Ministry for less than a year.



Comments

My, my...how the tables are turned. During the Dan Rather/CBS News debacle, it was yt and his ilk who continuously spouted "it doesn't matter if CBS lied, the crux of the matter was accurately reported". Apparently it no longer matters to yt if the crux of the reportage is accurate, only that there were lies told.

Posted by: who's that guy in the mirror at September 14, 2007 12:51 PM

Holy cow guys! Have you read the Nation article on Benador yet? I knew of a few instances where Taheri had fabricated stories, but OMGWTF it is way, way worse than I ever imagined. Read the part where he claims the Iranian UN ambassador Javad Zarif was one of the students who seized the hostages in 1979. Turns out Zarif was working as a teaching assistant at San Francisco State University.

Posted by: Chris at September 14, 2007 2:03 PM

I think the report is pretty explosive. The American right is planting false information in newpapers and journals around the world to achieve various policy objectives. In this case it is war with Iran. No underhandedness is too low for these conservative cadres.

Posted by: Northern Observerver at September 14, 2007 2:31 PM

Pundit payola under the Bush administration (or, things that ARE Bush' fault):
1. Drug abuse fake news stories by Mike Morris
2. Medicare Bill fake news stories by Karen Ryan
3. NCLB news stories by Armstrong Williams, paid $250K by Dept of Education 4. Marriage initiative article in Natl Review by Maggie Gallagher, paid $21.5K by HHS 5. Michael McManus, paid by HHS to write syndicated columns on "Ethics & Religion" 6. Jeff Gannon (James Guckert) pseudo-reporter for a pseudo- news website, called on frequently at press briefings to ask propaganda questions 7. Dave Smith, paid by the Agriculture Dept in 2003 to write articles for hunting and fishing magazines describing the benefits of NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) programs.

8. And of course, Judith Miller of the NYT, who happily passed along the propaganda fed to her by Curveball et al, all of which proved false, in aid of the push to invade Iraq.


Posted by: demit at September 14, 2007 2:37 PM

The liberal movement in the US has nothing like the network of well- funded, well-connected propaganda engines that the right-wing movement has. The WSJ, FOX News, the entire AM radio band, Washington "think tanks" and "experts symposiums" as well as the majority of column space in newspapers, presence on cable networks, etc etc etc.

I'm not even going to go into the Christian fundamentalist propaganda factories.

Posted by: Chris at September 14, 2007 4:51 PM





See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to