-Caveat Lector-

>From South Africa

Whilst working on a project which had  a (small)  political effect I came
across
an organisation called "The editors" who consisted of the retired editors of
the major newspaper groups who at a price would act a s a loby and influence
the way that a news report would be slanted.

At the truth and reconciliation comission  (the press have used it as a half
truth and humiliation comission--the comission has been relatively fair in
its basic reports but the press has not been " comprehensive in its
reporting)--the manipuation of the press was one of the things coverred. The
Nats had to admit that they controlled the flow of information by having
selected insiders in the press offices(they didnt do a particular good job
as they did not have the support of the owners) but that with the new ANC
goverment there are more spooks aand controllers in the press under the ANC
than with the previous government.

I could send articles on how the ANC government is ridding itself of
journalists who, although
sympathetic to the ANC in the "struggle" have been shafted because they are
to independent to control.

John

THIS TIME, THINGS ARE DIFFERENT
===============================

(CNNS, 05/10/99) -- The year is  1992, and the U.S. is shocked by
starvation in Somalia.  But an article in EXTRA!  asks,  "If  the
U.S.  has  not  consistently acted in an altruistic manner toward
starving people in Africa, why  did it dispatch troops to Somalia
at this point?"  [1]  But  Washington  Post  lullabied  us  that,
"Unlike   previous  large-scale  operations,  there  is  no  U.S.
strategic or  economic  interests  in  the  Somalia deployments."
[2].  Later on though, we learned that "...four  major  U.S.  oil
companies  are  quietly  sitting  on  a  prospective  fortune  in
exclusive  concessions to explore and exploit tens of millions of
acres of the Somali countryside."  [3]

Then the U.S. deployed into Haiti.  The cover story was that we'd
again  become  very  humanitarian,  concerned about the Haitians.
What we didn't widely understand was  that for years the U.S. has
been quietly involved in Haitian politics.   [4]  We  wanted  the
leader  of  Haiti  to  be  *our* stooge, not just any stooge.  It
turned out that Haiti is "a major transshipment point for cocaine
traffickers..." [5]

In 1918, President Woodrow Wilson  authorized  formation  of  the
Committee  on  Public  Information  (CPI).  CPI was "a propaganda
machine headed up  by  George  Creel."   [6]  The  USA mass media
played along:  "most newspapers reportedly  published  all  6,000
press  releases  sent out by the CPI News Division."  [7] The USA
mass  media  even  today  is   a  "team  player"  with  the  U.S.
government; night after night their  news  coverage  mostly  just
relays  whatever  the government said that day.  (Nightly "News":
"Bill Clinton said this"; "Madeleine Albright said that.")

In 1941, President  Franklin  Delano  Roosevelt "created the U.S.
Office of Censorship, appointing Byron  Price,  former  executive
news editor of the Associated Press, director."  [8] Also helping
control the news during wartime was the Office of War Information
(OWI),  "a  propaganda  organization  headed  up  by Elmer Davis,
formerly with CBS News and the New York Times..." [9]

In 1968, "some 570 South Vietnamese civilians were slaughtered in
Mylai."  [10] But  the  U.S.  mass  media  did  not challenge the
Pentagon's story that it was really 128  commies  that  had  been
killed,  even  though  they  were  aware of controverting reports
coming from Europe and  elsewhere.   [11].   It's  all in a day's
work for the lambkins of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, PBS, etc.

In 1991, "the networks rejected uncensored videotape  footage  of
the  heavy  Iraqi  civilian damage," during the Persian Gulf War.
[12]   Instead,   "the    networks    continued   to   feed   the
Pentagon-approved,     high-tech,     smart-bomb,     antiseptic,
non-threatening version of the war." [13]

In 1992, the "Department of Defense and a group of  self-selected
media executives agreed on nine out of ten ground rules for press
coverage of America's next military engagement." [14]

President George Bush  once  exclaimed,  "The American people are
not stupid!"  Why did Bush feel he needed  to  say  that?   Polls
supposedly  show  that  most  of the U.S. public is supportive of
current U.S. intervention in  Yugoslavia.  They've obviously been
seduced by U.S. mass media news reports.   In  spite  of  a  long
history   of   the   consistent  untrustworthiness  of  the  U.S.
government and  the  mainstream  news  media,  Americans  seem to
believe that, "This time, things are different."

---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
[1] "The Somalia Intervention:   Tragedy  Made  Simple,"  by  Jim
Naureckas.   EXTRA!   March  1993.   Qtd. in *Censored:  The News
That Didn't Make The News  --  And  Why* by Carl Jensen & Project
Censored.  New York:  Four  Walls  Eight  Windows,  1994.   ISSN:
1074-5998. (A.k.a. The 1994 Project Censored Yearbook.)
[2] Washington Post, 12/6/92. Qtd. in Jensen, op. cit.
[3] "The Oil Factor in Somalia," by Mark  Fineman.   Los  Angeles
Times, 1/18/93. Qtd. in Jensen, op. cit.
[4] Jensen, op. cit.
[5] Jensen, op. cit.
[6] *Censored:  The News That Didn't Make The News -- And Why* by
Carl  Jensen  & Project Censored.  Chapel Hill:  Shelburne Press,
1993.  ISBN:  1-882680-00-6.  (A.k.a.   The 1993 Project Censored
Yearbook.)
[7] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[8] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[9] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[10] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[11] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[12] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[13] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.
[14] Jensen, 1993. Op. cit.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to