-Caveat Lector- WEDNESDAY JUNE 02 1999 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Mad Madeleine and WWIII ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- By Samuel L. Blumenfeld © 1999 WorldNetDaily.com Time magazine is the CFR's mouthpiece when it comes to getting its readers to see the world through NATO-colored glasses. By reading Time's back issues, you begin to see a pattern of persuasion as its experts give us their New World Order slant on things. Sometimes it's subtle, sometimes not, as when Strobe Talbott wrote in July 1992 that "perhaps national sovereignty was not such a great idea after all" and that "the case for world government" was clinched. It should be noted that Strobe is a Rhodes Scholar and was Clinton's roommate at Oxford. He is now shuttling between Washington, Brussels and Moscow to see if he can get the Russians to put pressure on Milosevic to surrender to NATO unconditionally. When Madeleine Albright, our Secretary of State, was asked recently on a radio interview whether the Russians were helping us "negotiate" with Milosevic, she replied that there were no negotiations going on. If Milosevic wanted the bombing to stop, he simply had to accept and implement all of NATO's demands unconditionally. We haven't heard such uncompromising talk since World War II, when the Allies demanded unconditional surrender on the part of the Germans and Japanese. That is why on May 17, Time headlined its puff cover story on the Madame Secretary as "Madeleine's War." Time explained, "In a literal sense of course, that's not true these days. Now that it's become an armed conflict, she plays a supporting role to the President, National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Defense Secretary Bill Cohen and the military brass." Those are the intellectual cretins who believe it is moral to bomb the Serbs into the Stone Age simply to prove that NATO must be obeyed, or else. Stupid leaders can lead us into untold destruction without even trying. Consider our own morally outstanding leaders: the president, a politically corrupt pathological liar and adulterer; Sandy Berger, with the brain and aplomb of a used-car salesman; our moronic war secretary, William Cohen, who mouths drivel every time he speaks. And we all know the famous statement by Madame Halfbright: "What's the point of having this superb military that you're always talking about if we can't use it?" It doesn't occur to her that the purpose of our military is to defend our country, not to wage aggressive wars against others who have not harmed us. Hers is the talk of an ignoramus who hasn't learned a single lesson in American history. Yet Time is trying to persuade us that she is a wise and compassionate human being who provides the moral backbone for this war. Compassionate? Madeleine and her family once lived in Belgrade when her father was Czech ambassador to Yugoslavia. So she knows the city and the Serbs. Who knows what kind of hatred she's been harboring in her guts all these years and is now getting great pleasure watching the Serbs suffer. Now that NATO has destroyed Belgrade's electrical system, incubators can't work, hospitals must perform their services under candlelight if they don't have their own generators. Children are traumatized by the continued bombing, and 1,200 civilians have been killed. But forgetting the suffering of the Serbs and the Kosovars whose plight simply gets worse as the bombing increases, Madeleine's war is inexorably setting the stage for World War III. When NATO shows the world that it is now the 900-pound gorilla on the block, very few nations will be tempted to resist NATO's demands. This has always been the goal of the New World Order folks. The ruling world authority has to be ruthless enough, powerful enough, and determined enough to make its rule supreme. You can't achieve that kind of authority by being weak or compromising. The very fact that NATO has become this kind of monster is an indication that the New World Order has arrived. As Arthur Schlesinger Jr. explained in Foreign Affairs in July/August 1995, "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." Whose blood will it be? The blood of today's American high school students. And whose money will it be? The money of the American taxpayer, which the Congress is already spending to pay for the bombing of Yugoslavia. The fiscal budget for the year 2000 is already at $1.74 trillion! Actually, Yugoslavia and Milosevic are small potatoes when it comes to establishing world hegemony for the CFR crowd. That's why NATO must win this one hands down. They can't afford to lose to Milosevic. Otherwise, what chance will NATO have where the stakes are bigger? At the moment, their bigger sights are on Israel and Russia. China will be a much more difficult nut to crack. But a world conflagration may make it possible for the New World Order to impose its will on Russia while the latter is as weak as it will ever be. An article on the Russian problem in Time (July 6, 1992) asked, "Is Russia now part of the West, or still something clearly, if inexplicably different? ... The basis for doubts about Russia's long-term commitment to "Westerness" lies not in Yeltsin or his democratic supporters but in the ambivalence about the West that still seems endemic to many Russians." Incidentally, we read the guest list for the upcoming Bilderberger meeting in Portugal and were surprised by the number of Israelis who were invited. Obviously, pressure will be put on Israel to accept NATO terms. What will they be? Recognition of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital? Surrender of the Golan Heights to Syria? The war against Yugoslavia has already jeopardized the long-delayed Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START II, with Russia, which aims to slash both countries' long-range nuclear weapons. NATO's strategic partnerships with the countries surrounding Russia is seen as an unfriendly move by an aggressive military alliance. Also, the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade is seen in Beijing as deliberate. The Chinese simply cannot believe that we would be using outdated maps to plan surgical strikes on a city like Belgrade. We're too smart to be that incompetent. Or are we? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Samuel L. Blumenfeld is the author of eight books on education, including "Homeschooling: A Parents Guide to Teaching Children." His books are available on Amazon.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- © 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_excomm/19990602_xex_mad_madelein.shtml Bard Visit me at: The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm Federal Government defined: ....a benefit/subsidy protection racket! DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
