-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998
Subj: Re: [prj] Fwd: THE ROCKEFELLER / HERITAGE CONNECTION
( BF>comments by batesfam )
Date: Thursday, January 22, 1998
THE ROCKEFELLER / HERITAGE CONNECTION
The Money Trail of the New Right Leads to the Edge of the Cliff
by Chey Simonton, August 12, 1995
Revised January 22, 1998
To understand why various "Conservative / Christian" organizations
in Washington State as well as every other state in the nation have
been less than stunning in their battle for Parents Rights and
Family Values in public education, it is necessary to examine the
financial contributions or "scientific giving" and patronage of the
Rockefeller family, through their family members, various
businesses and foundations to social causes over the past century.
Bearing in mind that, "He who pays the piper calls the tune," a
singleminded piper with very deep pockets can control ALL the
tunes, regardless of which band is playing.
We'll start with history from a century ago. One of the early
philanthropies of the Rockefellers was the 1903 creation and
funding of the General Education Board that focused on controlling
education of minority populations in the rural south. During these
early days of involvement they also founded and funded Columbia
Teachers College in New York City to train teachers in the new
science of behavioral psychology pioneered by Wundt in Leipzig and
John B. Watson here in the U.S. The Rockefeller children had
their personal education supervised by the well-known humanist/
socialist progressive educator, John Dewey. After the successful
Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 Dewey spent considerable time in the
newly created USSR and helped the brand new commissars devise their
school system.
In 1921 the Council on Foreign Relations was founded by the
global-minded Rockefellers and other likeminded individuals. There
has been a cloud of controversy surrounding the CFR since it's
inception. Great personal wealth and a drive for power in all
spheres of society and business have been the hallmark of it's
membership from the beginning. If there is an "Elite" in our
representative republic, the membership of the CFR represents the
"Elite", if only to themselves. The list of media moguls,
appointed and elected national politicians, military leaders, etc.
goes on for pages and pages. These people, through elected and
appointed positions, have been "leading" this nation since the
1920s and if anyone considers the decline of America to have begun
60 years ago, various members of the CFR can be "thanked" for it.
Regarding CFR members' participation in setting up the United
Nations at the close of WWII,
"...who would shape American policy in the postwar era,
the best and brightest of their time and place, but who,
outside their own elite world, were virtually anonymous."
(The Rockefellers: an American Dynasty," by Peter Collier
and David Horowitz, 1976.)
In the mid-1920s the Rockefeller's General Board of Education
evolved into the International Bureau of Education and formed a
partnership with UNESCO (the United Nations Education Scientific
and Cultural Organization) when it was formed shortly after World
War II. The Rockefellers so strongly supported creation of the
United Nations that they specially purchased then donated the New
York City real estate where the towering UN is located.
In 1948 the Rockefeller Foundation made a four year grant to
Harvard University Department of Economics to develop a
mathematically-based method for a totally predictable Planned
Economy through social engineering techniques. This program was
called Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars technology. It involves
intensive control and manipulation of the masses through media,
markets, advertising, labor and wages, and public education.
(See Tech. Manual No. SW7905.1)
BF> Can anyone document this? (Other than William Cooper,
all due respects to the man, but I need original sources if
anyone can provide it.
In the early 1950s Tennessee Congressman, Carroll Reece, chaired an
investigation into the subversive activities of tax-exempt
foundations. The overwhelming evidence compiled by Director of
Research, Norman Dodd, was that the vast wealth of the foundations
was being funneled into activities that promoted a socialist
Anti-American worldview. In 1953 Rowan Gaither, president of the
Ford Foundation, personally confided to Norman Dodd,
"The substance of the directives under which we operate is
that we shall use our grant-making power to alter life in the
United States so that we can be comfortably merged with the
Soviet Union."
(The directives emanated, according to Gaither, from the White
House which has been staffed over the past 60 years with an
unbroken chain of CFR members in key positions, regardless of
Democrat /Republican rhetoric)
The Rockefeller Foundations' activities were found to line up
exactly with Gaither's admissions and are well-documented in
Congressman Reece's hearings and can be ordered from the
Superintendent of Documents in Washington D.C. The entire text of
this series of these hearings is voluminous and contains thousands
of pages. It is also available on microfilm at the University of
Washington library.
In mid-1960s the Rockefeller-funded International Bureau of
Education and UNESCO discovered an ideal education vehicle for
their Silent Weapon model developed by the Harvard Dept. of
Economics. This is the Lifelong Learning model, that as
Educational Restructuring, we are experiencing today. Over the
next decade the IBE UNESCO partnership published many books
expounding and refining every facet of the Lifelong Learning model.
Many of these books serve as evidence in the video "The People vs.
the Educational Confederacy, Educational Restructuring on Trial".
These publications are on the shelves at the University of
Washington library.
BF>Expound. I generally agree withm the proposition that the
Foundation influence on education has been destructive, but
can anyone address "Life long learning" in particular?
Culturally, we look back to the 1950s, and early 1960s when the
majority of Americans, many veterans of WWII and Korea, were
traditional nuclear families and carried out their daily lives with
minimal interest in the political life of the nation or the world,
catching the nightly news and reading the newspapers to keep
current, but not intensely involved. This great majority of the
population was dubbed the Silent Majority.
A Silent Majority of sensible, responsible people who believe in
the integrity of their elected officials and system of government
is not conducive to "moving the United States towards a merger with
the Soviet Union." Such a merger requires intense emotional and
financial upheaval of vast populations, here in America and in the
Soviet Union, as well. In order to have a social revolution and
manipulate an entire people into a new social order, it is
necessary to incite them to the point of activism due to heightened
perceptions of threatening issues. Nuclear holocaust, ecology,
feminism, gay rights, abortion, euthanasia, drugs and crime are
issues that have become headlines during this process of fomenting
revolution. This manipulation is basic to Marx's Dialectical
Materialism where opposing forces are pitted against each other
relentlessly until the crisis point where, to avert cataclysm, a
preconceived but carefully obscured compromise is enacted and the
desired "synthesis" has been achieved, in this case, the Planned
Economy and different social order, on a global scale.
BF>Or planned disintegration of the national model in order
for the non-national model to be implemented.
One successful tactic has been to change the public perception of
the Republican party. Republicans, always considered the party of
Big Business interests, has supposedly become morally
"traditional", appearing to trumpet and champion issues close to
the hearts of the Silent Majority. The demographics of the Silent
Majority had been carefully mapped using the sociological component
of the Rockefeller financed Silent Weapons developed by the Harvard
Dept. of Economics in the early 1950s.
Under intense manipulation, the Silent Majority could remain silent
no longer. Successful recruitment and control of a large and
emotionally volatile group requires careful rhetoric and skill.
It also requires strong central organization, leadership that is
perceived as "moral", and lots and lots of money. There emerged
one man who has been extremely successful over the past 20 years,
quietly channelling the activities and loyalties of New Right
activists in directions compatible with the desires of his money
masters. Paul Weyrich, a Wisconsin born "conservative" first
founded the Washington D.C. based think tank, Heritage Foundation,
and served as it's president for a number of years.
In William Greider's bestseller, "Who Will Tell the People: The
Betrayal of American Democracy", (1992, pg 28) reveals , "Not
withstanding its role as "populist" spokesman, Weyrich's
organization, for instance, has received grants from Amoco, General
Motors, Chase Manhattan Bank and right-wing foundations like Olin
and Bradley." Remember, he who pays the piper calls the tune.
If whoever funds your paycheck is your "boss", Weyrich is paid by
multinational business to promote a multinational business agenda.
It takes a heck of a stretch to maintain a pious pro-family
demeanor with fianancial backing from these sources.
Ivy Lee, the public relations genius guiding the Rockefeller image
in the first half of the century explained the successful
manipulation in a nutshell, "Crowds are led by symbols and phrases
... success in dealing with crowds... rests upon the art of getting
believed in. We know that Henry the Eighth by his obsequious
deference to forms of law was able to get the people to believe in
him so completely that he was able to do almost anything with
them." ("The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty" pg. 115). In 1934
Lee was sent to Germany, assigned to design a positive public image
for the Third Reich. He was subsequently called to account by the
Special House Committee of Un-American Activities. Paul Weyrich
and his Heritage affiliates, whether students of Lee's or not,
apparently have attained mastery of the symbols and phrases of
their target group, traditional christians.
Weyrich then formed the Committee for the Survival of Free
Congress Foundation making an emotional appeal to protestant
pastors that political activism is a mandate of patriotic
Christianity, suggesting that New Right leadership be provided by
organizations like Heritage Foundation and direct mail entrepreneur
Richard Viguerie (who owes his financial solvency to the
intervention of one of Rev. Sun Myung Moon's religio-political
organizations. They, too, are actively "Reclaiming the Culture".)
Reclaiming the Culture has been the dominant theme of recent
Heritage affiliated conservative organizations. Their outcry
against evolution, abortion, and the political correctness brings
fervent support from the masses.
BF>Some of the masses.
This certainly sounds like patriotic pro-family All-Americanism.
Many stirring speeches have been made at Heritage sponsored
fundraisers. Yet, the decidedly socialistic and unconsititutional
concept of federal block grants to states is also touted as
All-American. Weyrich & Co. support of NAFTA and GATT, two
agreements that must be in place for Big Big Business and will, in
time, destroy the economic stability of American families forever.
Pro-Family? The founding fathers of this nation did not advocate
the pursuit of any agenda that disregards the Constitution.
A global economy existed 200 years ago. Tea came from Asia then,
as it does now. The founding fathers did not advocate a
redistribution of wealth to promote a global economy and I believe
they would have scorned the Heritage "level playing field" sales
pitch for the hollow come-on it is.
Another Weyrich organization, The American Legislative Exchange
Council, writes and disseminates "sample" legislation. In 1994 the
self-proclaimed conservative pro-family American Legislative
Exchange Council chose to honor one of the most radically
anti-family socialist education reform plans in the nation, "
Because of the state plan's scope and high standards, the American
Legislative Exchange Council last month chose Oregon as one of
eight states to receive its A+ award in education." (Oregonian,
9/8/94).
This explains the resounding silence of the Heritage Foundation and
it's affiliates in denouncing the National Center of Education and
the Economy headed by Workforce designer Marc Tucker and his
Carnegie cohort David Hornbeck. In addition to the usually
targeted liberal boardmembers, Hilary Clinton and Ira Magaziner,
this NASDC funded design team includes David Rockefeller, Jr.
Heritage is obviously not about to bite the hand that feeds it.
The above cited A+ award to the state of Oregon, pilot of Tucker's
Certificate of Mastery plan, suggests that Weyrich, through the
American Legislative Exchange Council is paying homage to the
Rockefeller interest in Marc Tucker's Design Team. Vera Katz of
Oregon is also on the NCEE board of Directors.
At the height of the Vietnam war David Rockefeller's Chase
Manhattan Bank accepted a Soviet invitation to open a
representative bank in Moscow. ("The official address of the Moscow
branch, somewhat incongruously, was 1 Karl Marx Square and it was
located 1 block from the Kremlin." The Rockefellers: an American
Dynasty, pg 427.) A footnote on page 426 of this same book
amplifies that, "After the 1968 elections, the Russians let it be
known through diplomatic channels that chances for reapproachment
would be dramatically increased if David were ambassador."
Top men of the Heritage Foundation, Weyrich and his second in
command, Ed Feulner, with the trust and cooperation of masses of
sincerely committed conservatives have been in a position to
further elitist Rockefeller goals. Along with radical World
Government advocate, Walter Hoffman of the World Federalist
Association, they participated on the 16 member U.S. Commission on
Improving the Effectiveness of the United Nations. Working with
the US Information Agency, Feulner also participated in
facilitating the infamous 1985 US-Soviet Education Technology and
Cultural Exchange Agreement. Soviet pedagogy, based on behavioral
conditioning for a compliant collective labor force, is a dream
come true for the dozens of multinational corporations funding all
the think tanks promoting American education reform. The humanist
Carnegie Foundation, a century-long collaborator with Rockefeller
philanthropy, facilitated the Soviet side of this Exchange
Agreement. Americans AND Russians, we are all targets to be
restructured/perestroika'd. Remember Gaither's assertion to Dodd
... the merger of the United States multi-national corporations'
version of "free enterprise" married to the Soviet-perfected
collectivist workforce, described in 1953 is nearly complete.
Will it be complete by the year 2000? Could there possibly be
a new global entity managed by a "reinvented" United Nations?
With a state by state interlock of affiliates having a media-hyped
public persona of Judeo-Christian morality, Heritage Foundation
affiliates have skillfully marketed the specific facets of the
socialist agenda of Rockefeller's International Bureau of
Education-UNESCO agenda for education ie. Character Education and
Choice/Vouchers or Charter Schools. Character Education was
primary to humanist John Dewey's input into the Bolshevik school
system and was the heart of Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution in
Red China in the 1960s. Both of these systems are designed to
condition compliancy for the benefit of the collective's Workforce.
UNESCO foresees an actual character evolution within the human
species in coming generations where mankind will evolve into Homo
Moralis. Heritage/Hudson/Empower America insider, Dr. William J.
Bennett's bestseller, "THE BOOK OF VIRTUES" correlates as the New
Right counterpart of Chairman Mao's Little Red Book.
The 1955 UNESCO book, MENTAL HEALTH IN EDUCATION, is the earliest
reference for the need for "choice" in education. Choice, vouchers
and Charter Schools are part of the octopus approach. It radically
changes school governance and finance, diminishes local control and
fulfills the "all children will...." mandate of the UNESCO inspired
national goals. The Charter Schools concept, strongly marketed
around the country by Heritage affiliates, attempts to link
patriotic free enterprise themes to a blatantly un-constitutional
system of corporate fascism business /governmental partnerships in
the education of children. Wall Street is currently gearing up for
a brand new field of investment, for-profit public education.
Convicted junk bond dealer, Michael Miliken, has expressed
enthusiasm for this new trend, "He told the Wall Street Journal on
Friday that he's trying to build his own education company. 'If we
are successful, I really believe you can have a $50 billion to $100
billion company in the field of education.' " (Washington Post,
7/5/95).
As Americans we have a right and an obligation to political action,
but Christians have a higher obligation. We must not join
questionable coalitions or jump on any passing bandwagon that plays
a catchy tune. Our home is not in this world, or of this world.
Reclaiming the Culture is not a new agenda. Indeed, there were
many Israelites fighting to "Reclaim the Culture" when Jesus Christ
walked the pavements of Jerusalem. They were not followers of our
Lord Jesus. They wanted no part of Him or his plan of salvation.
They were followers of men like Eleazar the Zealot who ultimately
led his people to their fatal end on the ramparts of Masada nearly
2000 years ago. Make your stand for what is right, but be very
careful of man's institutions, be wary of coalitions, examine the
money-trail... for whoever pays the piper calls the tune, the
tune the whole world will dance to in the 21st Century.
*************************
....and one final quote from the Heritage Foundation founder that
illustrates his true views of our Constitutional Representative
Republic:
"Our current system institutionalizes amateurism. Unlike European
parliamentary democracies, we have no "shadow cabinet" (emphasis
added, ed.), no group of experts who are groomed by their party for
decades before they take high office...
...If we are going to be a serious nation, we need a serious sytem
for selecting our leaders and advisors, we need some sort of shadow
government (emphasis added, ed.), in which leaders and top advisors
can be developed, and through which our politics can be better
focused on policy choices. The world is a professional league, and
we cannot win fielding amateur teams." -- Paul M. Weyrich in the
Washington Post, 3/8/87
*********************************
"Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the
ungodly..." Psalm 1:1 KJV
"And many shall follow their pernicious ways: by reason of
whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through
covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise
of you..." II Peter 2:2-3 KJV
----------
BF> Dynamite! I have a few questions and concerns, intersperced
throughout the post, but basically it is "out of sight"! It helps
to show that the New Right is a basically synthetic phenomenon, an
alteration of the Old Right, a movement that was largely
politically impotent but with consistency and integrity. The New
Right has been manipulated, as have the multi-culturalist movements
(many of whom have their origins in Fascism!) and the
internationalist movement, by the unseen hand of the cryptocracy in
order to polarize the American population and further destabilize
the One Nation that Schlessinger justly praises.
The individualist "Old Right" was the plaything of aristocrats and
old families, along with eccentric intellectuals. It was no match
against the onslaught of the New Deal, and of the rise of the
internationalist world order so detested by Old Rightists. The Old
Left, on the other hand, was impotent in the face of the power of
capitalism to reform itself, and to "co-opt" the workers. They
both faded in to virtual oblivion before the emerging IMF/UN world
order.
Soon, they resurrected under new forms. Buckley ressurected the
Right, fully in service to the needs of the CFR Establishment.
The Left ressurected on American campuses as an anarchical movement
manipulated by "drug gurus" and outright CIA operatives who were
not intent on revolution but altering the culture in service of
hidden agendas. These have been under the control of hidden
operatives and outright liars for some time. Cointelpro may have
been necessary to hold off the threat of revolution (Hoover was
useful when hounding domestic dissidents, it was when he eventually
went after the CFR that there appeared to be trouble for him), but
the real agenda behind the scenes was transformation of the
culture. I think that this has been accomplished!
Most in the New Right and New Left movements are innocent,
including, in my opinion, Weyrich. They both operate mostly as
smokescreens to keep the serfs fighting among themselves while the
true unseen hand, the Establishment "center", truly controls. The
"center", in other words the controlled arm of the Foundations,
military-industrial complex, and other powerful agencies in
alliance, is shaping the internationalist agenda as it defines
education and social control. Within the "Establishment center"
there is a very big split, an inter-factional warfare that uses the
factional split below as much against its rival as against thinking
individuals challenging the hidden control network operating on
society, but the Establishment is, on the top, agreed on the need
for taxes, conditioning, educational conditioning, and
non-democratic world government. Questions of nationalism vs.
internationalism, technology vs. anti-tech, and use of traditional
religion for manipulative purposes vs. atheistic political
philosophy will continue to divide the controllers, and it may be
this that we can turn to our advantage!
The Right and Left will keep on fighting, but in the end the fight
is rigged by the New World Order (like Wrestling? Pardon the
pun...). The only freedom is to break free of any conformity, even
dissident conformities. The green pasture is near, we just have to
climb the fence. If we can keep from dividing, we can claim our
freedom together. No more rigged matches, please!
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
