-Caveat Lector- from: http://www-douzzer.ai.mit.edu:8080/conspiracy/conspiracy.html <A HREF="http://www-douzzer.ai.mit.edu:8080/conspiracy/conspiracy.html">The World Government Conspiracy </A> ----- Many embeds, links and more at site. Om K ----- The Architecture of Modern Political Power Compiled and edited, with introductory and interstitial essays and commentary, by Daniel Pouzzner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>home page: http://www-douzzer.ai.mit.edu:8080All material in this compilation is private property protected by intellectual property laws. For all non-17USC107 use, and when in doubt, contact me at the above address for instructions.The views expressed on this web site do not necessarily reflect the views of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, its faculty, or its students.version: Monday, 31-May-1999 15:22:23 EDT Introduction ``The combination is here to stay. Individualism has gone, never to return.''John Davison Rockefeller I, born 1839-July-18, died 1937-May-23 Reading the following is somewhat like a stiff drink for breakfast. Perhaps you would like to first read my agenda brief, which describes Innovism and compares it to laissez faire capitalism, socialism, fascism, and anarchism. This is the story of America's death by a thousand cuts. It is not the story of America; it is not the whole story; it is simply an unlimited hangout of a nefarious plot: a deciphering of the events of the Twentieth Century, revealing a national security strategy of self-immolation. Exposition Modern American civilization is substantially shaped and controlled by the House of Rockefeller and a handful of others, the inheritors of the empire of influence and ideology founded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812), John Davison Rockefeller I (1839-1937), Junius Pierpoint Morgan (1837-1913), Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919), John Cecil Cecil RhodesRhodes (1853-1902), and a few of their contemporary cohorts. This control apparatus is directed at the highest (global) level by affiliates of the Bilderberg group, founded in 1954 and dominated by the House of Rothschild and by their collaborating, subordinate, far more visible rival, the House of Rockefeller. Bilderberg is the most powerful of the surviving descendents of the Round Table, a secret society founded in an 1877 will by the spectacularly chauvinist Cecil Rhodes. Rhodes was financially supported by Lord Rothschild and by Alfred Beit of de Beers (a Rothschild agent), and his vision was directly inspired by proto-Nazi John Ruskin, a professor of fine arts at Oxford. Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) maintains (in his voluminous 1966 tome, Tragedy and Hope) that the Round Table was formally organized as a semi-secret multinational anglophile society starting in 1908, and that its unifying principle was the oligarchical federation of the English-speaking world - evidently, the political, economic, and cultural reconstitution of the British Empire. This initial goal has evolved into the goal of oligarchical world federation. Despite the disproportionate influence of David Rockefeller and the Rothschild agenda he subtly conveys at each meeting, Bilderberg is a true committee, and the actions of its affiliates are driven by consensus which all involved can influence and none involved can dictate. Affiliates are not commanded. Their cooperation is secured through dialogue, incentives, and hints. Affiliates are chosen partly on the basis of their compatibility with this modus operandi. Affiliates of Bilderberg, and of the other major committees, establish symbiotic, often exclusionary relationships among the organizations they command or influence; the dividends of affiliation are enormous. Committee Cosmology An array of subsidiary committees, most famously the Trilateral Commission (TLC), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Council of the Americas (COA), and the Royal Institute for International Affairs ( RIIA), operate in a manner vaguely similar to Bilderberg, but with far less secrecy, and often de-emphasizing frank dialogue in favor of more formal policy addresses. To the untrained eye, the proceedings of a CFR colloquium (many examples of which are available on their web site) will by and large seem innocuous if not, indeed, crushingly dull. Embedded in these proceedings, however, is the agenda of Bilderberg, just as the agenda of the Rothschilds is embedded in the proceedings of Bilderberg. The CFR and RIIA themselves, as it happens, are the immediate progeny of the Round Table, Bilderberg is the immediate progeny of the CFR and RIIA, and the Trilateral Commission is the immediate progeny of Bilderberg. COA is a Rockefeller project for coordination of machinations in Central and South America, and though in one sense it is the progeny of the CFR, it is really more an invention without specific ancestry. Bohemian Grove can be viewed as a US version of Bilderberg (though it was founded in 1872, almost a century earlier), with tantamount secrecy and frankness, and substantially more fraternization. A constellation of foundations and action groups also research, develop, and espouse various aspects of the Rothschild and constituent Bilderberg and Rockefeller agendas, in order to develop and refine strategy, and to coordinate indoctrination, enlistment, and marginalization of sectors of the public, and in particular, of sectors within government, academia, and industry. Notable among these is the Center for International Studies (joint organization of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University of Zurich), prominent within and close to which are the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS, on Tavistock Street in London), the Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research, and the International Relations and Security Network (ISN). The Tavistock Institute (Tabernacle Street in London) and the Club of Rome are also notable. Stateside, notable are the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Institute for Policy Studies, the RAND Corporation, the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University, the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown, the Brookings Institution , the Heritage Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation, the Macarthur Foundation, the Soros Foundation, the Institute for Global Communications (IGC) and its component Association for Progressive Communications, the John Birch Society, the Gorbachev Foundation, the Scaife Foundation, Media Research Center, Accuracy in Media and Accuracy in Academia, and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Of course, most insiders in these organizations are as oblivious to the true nature of their mission as are those they fund or target. Organizations with agendas that coincide with some aspect of the conspirators' are nurtured and guided in an often covert manner, are often infiltrated, and are sometimes co-opted with the knowledge of an organization's leadership. Certain organizations, such as the CSIS, consist almost entirely of conspirators proper. Unknown to the vast majority of Bilderberg, TLC, CFR, COA, and RIIA affiliates of record, at least in its specifics, is a parallel apparatus of covert action, closely intertwined with the intelligence community, law enforcement community, certain elite secret societies, criminal and labor syndicates, and the middle and lower ranks of various industries. This apparatus protects and facilitates the activities of the affiliates, with the subtly menacing promise of accountability. Many of the visible council affiliates harbor vague, largely unarticulated suspicions of the existence of this parallel apparatus, and some even suspect its relationship with the first families of Bilderberg. A small proportion of affiliates deliberately and explicitly collaborate with th e parallel apparatus, which like the councils is dominated by the Houses of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The Rockefellers generally attend to command and control outside Europe. The parallel apparatus is largely unknown to most members of the intelligence and law enforcement communities proper, despite its thorough penetration thereof, and despite the fact that a very high proportion of intelligence and law enforcement activities are the covert bidding of the conspirators. Certain dimensions of the Rothschild-Rockefeller agenda are pursued directly via this apparatus of covert action - particularly, those that are manifestly unsavory or criminal. In some contrast to Bilderberg and the other councils, this parallel apparatus constitutes an explicit, intricate, fluid, highly compartmentalized set of sometimes interlacing command hierarchies. Bilderberg proper is a command hierarchy only within actual corporate hierarchies, and is of course neither significantly covert nor compartmentalized. The total Rothschild-Rockefeller apparatus is structured in such a way that those who, by design, are public leaders and subject to public scrutiny - corporate leaders, for example - are generally given no obvious reason to perceive the apparatus as coercive or as a conspiracy. Those who are, by design, essentially hidden from public view - including most of the intelligence and law enforcement communities, and obviously, secret societies and criminal syndicates - are directly exposed to the coercive and conspiratorial character of the apparatus, but have no political capital with which to threaten it. There are a few positions of both threatening political capital and s trategic criticality occasionally necessitating candid coercion. Major union leaderships and the presidency are prime examples. Uncooperative occupiers of these positions are periodically murdered by operatives of the apparatus. The Houses of Rothschild and Rockefeller, whose central occupation is international banking and finance, by themselves constitute the greatest concentrations of political and economic power in the world. These houses do not, of course, consist solely of hereditary namesakes. Henry Kissinger is a key member of the House of Rockefeller, just as George Soros is a key member of the House of Rothschild. Moreover, there is no sharp boundary between the two houses. Nelson Aldrich was a darling of the House of Rothschild, and became a member proper of the House of Rockefeller. The present-day fortune of the House of Rothschild is of unknown magnitude, perhaps the equivalent of many trillions of dollars, and the present-day fortune of the House of Rockefeller has been estimated at over a trillion dollars. J. D. Rockefeller I, the consummate collectivist patriarch, has been reported by mainstream media as the richest man to ever live, at an estimated $189 billion in 1998 dollars. The tale of the Rockefeller patriarchal dynasty is one of malignant evil. The tale of the Rothschild patriarchal dynasty is quite similar. The tale of their collaboration has no parallel in the annals of evil. This compilation is a documentary of Rothschild and Rockefeller machinations. America is no longer a functioning constitutional representative democracy, and its failure is due not to a natural decay of its citizens, but to the manipulations of these few pernicious elite. They are transforming America, and the world, into a giant steel trap that springs when, where, and how they desire. Moreover, American society in particular has been transformed into a small collection of massive cults, through a complex campaign of marginalization. * Power structure research and analysis, and conspiracy research and analysis, are evidently one and the same enterprise. History has vital prosopographic elements, many hidden, and the organization of these elites indeed constitutes a conspiracy. The vagaries of individual elites have broad effects that echo through history. History also has vital structuralist/functionalist elements, many misunderstood or ignored, and the phenomena that frustrate and eventually defeat the machinations of elites such as these are inevitable consequences of the unpredictable and diffuse wellspring of humanity. The geneses of many of the cultural veins addressed in my treatment are predominantly the consequence of the natural cultural evolution of this unpredictable and diffuse wellspring, but as soon as a vein becomes politically significant, the elites start meddling with it. The instant conspiracy is not quite of the traditional variety. Like many conspiracies, its members do not all know each other, have sometimes conflicting conceptions of what is to be done, and have sometimes conflicting agendas. From here, the distinctions mount. It is a largely ``open'' conspiracy, in that much of its membership, structure, methods, and operations, are matters of public record, however scattered and obscure. Its manner of coordination is atypical. Two nuclei - the elite core of the Wall Street clique (orbiting the House of Rockefeller) and the elite core of the European financial clique (orbiting the House of Rothschild) - coordinate this global conspiracy by waging psychological warfare on the rest of the conspirators, telling each no more than is necessary for him to fulfill his designated role, often with explicit recognition neither of his role, nor of the unarticulated rules that govern him. Thus, the overwhelming bulk of the conspirators do not know, but only suspect, that they are part of and in service to ``a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it'' (quoting Woodrow Wilson). About the Editor I am an independent system architect and system analyst. In the first half of the 90's, as an undergrad at MIT, I was occupied with distributed computing software architecture including applied cryptography, artificial intelligence including machine understanding of human language, and cognitive science including functional neuroanatomy (neuroarchitecture) and abnormal psychology. In the latter half of the 90's, I have continued my work on distributed computing system architecture and cognitive science. I have also trained myself in law, sociology, economics, political science, and military science, and have been applying the methodology of the system architect and analyst to the morally imperative task of reforming civilization. I was born in 1972 in Connecticut, and my schooling before MIT was predominantly government-operated. Since 1995 I have been an ovo-lacto vegetarian. I am a deist in the 18th century sense, and am an erisian (by which I mean, an adherent of the premise that chaos is part and parcel of life, health, and prosperity). I am the founder of Innovism. About the Compilation This compilation is intended for consumption by agile intellectuals, though I am certain it has been and will continue to be of immediate utility for those who do not consider themselves to rate such a description. I have largely avoided using specialized terminology, and where I have considered it appropriate to use it, I have made an effort to provide explanations or references. The sheer complexity of the topics and presentations is the principal obstacle that the non-intellectual will encounter in attempting to make use of this work. However, with sufficient patience and attentional investment, any intelligent person can reach a thorough understanding of these topics as I have presented them. Though most of my hypotheses are proven directly with contemporary sources that command popular respect, some of the composite hypotheses are proven using a systems methodology. Obviously, the broadest hypotheses require integration of those constituent hypotheses proven directly. At any rate, all of my assertions are accompanied by specific and compelling evidence within the body of the compilation, and most of them - particularly, those that conflict with the popular mindset - are supported many times over. I have spent thousands of hours composing this vast opus - researching, writing, and editing. It contains a great deal of information, in the form of essays, press articles, reference material, and a small selection of books. Much of this is information that influential people and organizations - principally, the subjects of the compilation - do not want you to have access to. Though they have not yet found a way to prevent you from receiving this information, they will surely keep trying. In light of this, I strongly recommend that readers with a serious interest make local copies of as much of the compilation as possible. The current total size is approximately 100MB. The schemes, trends, and phenomena documented herein are also immediately relevant to Britain, the European Union, and Australia, and these intimately interrelated regions are directly and often extensively covered throughout. When the treatment is US-centric, it is only a matter of preferential detail and depth, and is not the obtuse, arrogant, lamentably routine dismissal by Americans of the economic and cultural significance and relevance of the states in the above-enumerated regions. Regions outside Western Europe, North America, and Australia, are necessarily treated with less depth, and typically only when they are implicated in machinations that affect these primary regions. Russia and China in particular receive attention. My treatment should group Japan with North America and Western Europe and give it substantial coverage, since its cultural and economic circumstance is characteristic of this group, but Japan is as yet almost completely ignored. When there's fire in a crowded theater, it is well to shout ``fire,'' especially if no one else seems to notice the fire. Here I stand, shouting ``FIRE!'' This is not a drill. As William S. Burroughs said (in a short spoken word piece tracked on a Ministry CD single), ``There is nowhere else to go. The theater is global.'' There is no flight, there is only fight. I invite comments, corrections, and correspondence with those who share my interests. Contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here is my PGP 2.2 key. Conspirators who are using this treatise as a reference manual are callous twerps. The elite conspirators' vision is to transform world political and legal reality so that the historic role of the nation-state is played by largely sovereign transnational corporate trusts, to which nation-states are subordinate. Their envisioned seat of world government is not a United Nations but a United Trusts, a transnational oligarchy ruling from behind closed doors. This is the role for which Bilderberg fancies itself suited. In order to empower a global banking, regulatory, and managerial infrastructure, they cultivate economic interdependence at scales from the household to the multinational region, to a degree that cannot be justified by appeal to efficiency or profit advantages. Central to the vision is the economic and eugenical regimentation of wor ld society. The plan, in summary, is paternalistic, feudalistic, oligarchical, techno-industrial world government. Most Bilderberg affiliates of record pursue this agenda unwittingly, and were it laid out for them clearly and concisely, they would find it congenial in most of its aspects. The most dreadful aspects of the vision - eugenical regimentation and feudalism - are not explicit or conscious Bilderberg programs, but instead are consciously pursued only by the nuclei of the conspiracy - the houses of Rothschild and Rockefeller. The conspirators' vision is substantially implemented, in each of its facets, today. They now seek only to make their control more precise and complete, its exercise less unwieldy and risk-laden, and its instruments and infrastructure more permanent and unchallengeable. The conspiracy protects its interests by cultivating public indifference and incredulity, or outright endorsement of an operational facet (manufacturing consent through the media-democracy engine), as regularly as by conventional secrecy, skullduggery, and foul play. Feeling insulted, and often sensing impending humiliation and mental bankruptcy, the indoctrinated public rejects the revelations of wise dissenters. * Cultural trends are initiated, and behaviors fostered, through three principal mechanisms: (1) by the mass media, which displays exemplary behavior, and creates the expectation that emulators will be socially and economically rewarded and deviants penalized, (2) by the education system, which explicitly and implicitly inculcates beliefs, thought patterns, and behaviors, and (3) by the visible social and economic hierarchies of society, through which behaviors are propagated through transitivity of authority. The manner in which the mass media and the education system instill behaviors is discussed extensively below. The manner in which social and economic hierarchies do so is fairly straightforward. The visible councils of elites are subjected to the behavior of nuclear (core) elites such as David Rockefeller, who either deliberately cultivate or involuntarily exhibit the behavior. The behaviors of nuclear elites such as Rockefeller are often directed by nuclear intellectuals such as Henry Kissinger; thus often it is the intellectual who is at the apex of the pyramid. Those in subordinate positions emulate those in higher positions, completely aside from any explicit directives. In particular, systems of reward and punishment are emulated. Banking hierarchies are highly formalized, and propagate behavioral directives by extending loans to the compliant and withholding them from the deviant. Moreover, the Federal Reserve (the central banking apparatus of the United States) has the authority to remove any banking officer that it determines to be non-compliant. When a superior determines to encourage, discourage, demand, or forbid among his subordinates a mode of action, thought, or awareness, those modes will be encouraged or discouraged among everyone below him in the hierarchy. If that superior is a nuclear elite, then these modes will be encouraged or discouraged throughout most of society. In this case, only those not within the conventional hierarchy of civilized society escape the brunt of the behavioral tyranny. Hierarchicalization is a memetic amplifier for people in higher echelons, and an attenuator for those in lower echelons. The memetic gain factor is not intrinsically correlated with the actual memetic aptitude of each individual; whatever characteristics favor ascension to higher echelons are the characteristics common to those positioned for high memetic gain factors. The characteristics are arbitrarily dictated by those who are already in the upper echelons of the hierarchy, and once those who exhibit them have ascended, the characteristics are themselves efficiently spread through society. The neo-orthodoxy and concatenated censorship-by-category of ``Political Correctness,'' briefly a subject of conscious contemplation and public commentary, has been so thoroughly consolidated that its dictates are now silently, automatically, and ubiquitously enforced. Free thought and speech are increasingly perilous indulgences. The intellectual totalitarianism of Political Correctness, having burrowed below the surface, is no longer challengeable. Multiculturalism (by which I mean, the premise that a behavior within a particular culture is morally virtuous by dint of being recognized and treated as such within that culture - cultural and moral relativism, Hegelian anthropology) has become a religion - or more specifically, a sort of cultural doomsday cult - unto itself. But there are more insidious and profound instruments of mental censorship, preeminent among which is the cult of expertise. People in the professions, in industry, and in academia, are expected to direct their attention to a specialty, to refrain from concern or involvement with matters outside their specialty, and to view with disdain and suspicion those who do not similarly refrain. People who conform to these rules cannot but be cogs in a machine they do not understand. Generally, they cannot but haplessly serve evil. And particularly, they cannot possibly discern the identities and methods of the conspirators. Thus, the whole of society is finely compartmentalized. Underscoring this compartmentalization is the epidemic of specialized vocabularies. Each field invents its own selection of buzz words, specialized definitions, and often whole morphological and syntactic methodologies. The professional and academic world is thus divided into tribes that largely lack mutual intelligibility. Four striking examples are medicine, law, computer technology, and the military. Evidently, specialized language is appropriate in each of these cases, and there are inherent difficulties in interdisciplinary communication. It also must be conceded that the technique of specialization itself is effective at enabling certain types of innovation and productivity - though multiple specialization should be the norm, rather than the exception. But returning to the four examples cited above: the prodigious use and abuse of Latin in medicine and law, and the prodigious invention of semi-English terms and acronyms with unobvious meanings in computer technology and the military, often go far beyond the level of specialization warranted by practical considerations. In many instances, in these and other fields, it seems the very intent is to obfuscate. Moreover, the very rigidity of these specialized languages tends to constrict thinking. With freedom thus crushed between the quiet hammers and hidden anvils of political correctness and the cult of specialization (among other systematic constraints), the pacifier of an ersatz liberty becomes necessary. This, precisely, is the role of sexual liberalism (among other such pacifiers) - to toss the slave a bone. John Ralston Saul (RIIA affiliate) notes in Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West, ``These acts of personal freedom are irrelevant to the exercise of power. So in lieu of taking a real part in the evolution of society, the individual struggles to appear as if no one has power over his personal evolution. Thus victories won for these individual liberties may actually be an acceptance of defeat by the individual.'' Saul calls the system of specialization and encyclopedic formulism ``the rational approach,'' but this is a non-starter. Clearly, in refraining from concern for matters outside his specialty, a person abandons rationality. The true rational approach necessarily involves grand integration, and necessarily deprecates any form of degenerate censorship - the abandoning of a train of thought for reasons other than the determination of logical invalidity or of practical inconsequentiality. The counterpart to degenerate censorship is degenerate distortion (as faith, mystical ideation, etc.), in which a train of thought is continued beyond, and logically predicated upon, a premise that is known to be logically invalid. A vital secondary form of degenerate censorship occurs here, in which people refrain from recognizing logical invalidities - this is the central mental phenomenon of faith. Mental errors can yield results identical to degenerate censorship or distortion, but their commission as such is morally ambivalent, whereas fostering or deliberately practicing degenerate censorship or distortion is evil. The conspirators cloak themselves in cultural camouflage, employing tactics for which they almost seamlessly maintain plausible deniability. Generally, an errant public attributes the results of their meddlesome actions to happenstance, or to motives viewed as essentially innocuous or virtuous. The design is irrefutably evident only in the pattern of results, or by actually showing proof of meddling. The public has been systematically conditioned to ignore such patterns, and to condemn those who draw attention to them (derisively calling them ``conspiracy theorists''). Thus, controlling access to and dissemination of information that constitutes proof of meddling suffices in large part to protect the conspiracy from exposure. The compartmentalization of the conspirators' covert apparatus assures that those exposures which do transpire cause only limited damage. Society is arranged so that the behaviors desired by the elite are more convenient or more profitable than the alternatives. The media and education apparatuses are used to manipulate popular perception in a manner that discourages undesired behavior and encourages desired behavior, and laws and corporate policies are subtly - or sometimes, blatantly - formed to alter the relative profitabilities of behaviors. Media campaigns leverage particularly off the tendency of people to be concerned with others' unreasoned opinions; this tendency is, of course, encouraged. Over time, a majority of the population comes to abandon the undesired behaviors and exhibit the desired behaviors, without having been forced to. Once the cooperation of a majority of the population has been secured, a campaign is often waged to enact a prohibition of the undesired behavior, often incrementally through increasingly onerous impediments. These measures will have no effect on a majority of the population, since most have already abandoned the behavior. They are thus not inclined to actively oppose a campaign for prohibition. Once the prohibition campaign is underway, the media and education campaign is subtly changed, from one primarily intended to manipulate people into abandoning the undesired behavior, to one primarily intended to manipulate people to view those who engage in the undesired behavior as a threat. This secures the support for prohibition among a majority of the population. The minority that resists the campaign for prohibition is ostracized and vilified, and in some cases actively harassed and persecuted by the state, allied private corporations, and the community, annihilating its last vestiges of political capital. Frequently, no explicit prohibition is necessary. Through the concatenation of ostensibly non-prohibitive impediments, the undesired behavior can be made practically impossible. This technique is particularly effective in suppressing complex commercial and political activities. Compared to explicit prohibition, it has the advantage that supporters of the effective prohibition can technically - though disingenuously - claim that the undesired behavior is ``perfectly legal.'' Many of the conspirators' strategies are so complex and subtle that few are capable of understanding them even as a purely intellectual exercise. Moreover, some of their strategies strike the layman as plainly outlandish, with their actual effectiveness evident only to serious economists and sociologists. Using the mass media, civilization is placed within a cultural feedback loop filtered as directed by the elite. Over the course of decades, culture drifts in the directions they intend. At any given instant of the progression, there is a substantial supply of program generators (script writers, directors, producers, talent, song writers, etc.) who, due to their immersion in the previous generation of elite-filtered programming, readily produce programming consistent with the elite vision of next generation culture. It is to their products that the masses are exposed. The course of cultural evolution appears to be largely organic, but is in fact nothing of the sort. Culture is engineered to lull and shock the population into a continuous intellectual and moral stupor, through scripted campaigns of collective mental trauma piped through the mass media, and by the studious excision from the mass media of ideas, individuals, and production styles, that might jolt the viewer or listener intellectually or morally awake and into independent, politically significant action. Cohesion among the nation's citizens borne of common experience centers on the largely dysfunctional and destructive product piped through centrally controlled mass media conduits. Through a torrential, pervasive, orchestrated campaign of mental assaults, a propensity to embrace novel religion is manufactured among a population made desperate and hopeless. A religion has been designed and is being refined and promulgated by minions of the same conspirators who orchestrate the campaign of assaults. It is called Maitreyanism, very loosely based upon Buddhist principles and mythology, and it is extraordinarily evil even for a religion. Moral relativism is a crucial enabler for subsequent religious indoctrination, since its adherents discard the moral and cognitive absolutes which are an individual's preeminent mechanism of defense against the madness of religion. Because only people of autonomous aptitude and reasoned principle are equipped to resist psychomanipulation, blackmail, reputation assassination, bribery, and enticement to vice, they and their principles are particularly under incessant multifaceted siege. Moreover, society incessantly pressures and incentivizes its members to involve themselves in corruption - to participate in economic processes that wreak havoc on the environment and on disfranchised sectors of the citizenry, to lie, to abuse the legal system, to betray friends and neighbors, all with a view to fostering guilt and the camaraderie of the corrupt, and annihilating self-respect and the possibility of adherence to personal principle. The income tax system, combined with the breathtaking campaign of evil the US government pursues, means that anyone who earns a living is either a party to evil and corruption (unwittingly, grudgingly, or willingly), or a tax evader exposed to the real possibility of deprivation of property or incarceration and its c oncomitant gruesome risks and degradation. The effect of all of this is to deprive people of their humanity and endow them with the morality of animals - which is to say, deprive them of morality in toto. The public's perception of the world is manipulated not through the fabrication of news, but through selective omission, the staging of events, psychomanipulative fiction, and consuming distractions (spectator sports et al.). Moreover, in terms of production values, the signals propagated by the mass media are so whipped and blended and contoured that they are utterly unreal - this describes the rigid formats that uniformly dominate commercial and corporate radio broadcasting, the linguistic and conceptual style of establishment print media, all the movies showing in a typical cinema, the on-the-record presentations of major politicians and bureaucrats, and of course, very nearly every second of television broadcast or cablecast. The conspirators employ the full palette of their political control apparatus, in a grand public works project to transform the popular mind. The final consequence of this campaign is that ordinary people dedicate the bulk of their mental energy to the apprehension of the desires of the conspirators, and the bulk of their action to the fulfillment of those desires. In this frightening, eager yet stealthy obedience, people abdicate their individuality and become automatons devoid of reasoned discrimination and consistency. They vote for the candidates they think the conspirators want them to vote for. They spend and invest their money the way they think the conspirators want them to. Subconsciously, this ``intelligent obedience'' is declarative reality. This secret is hiding inside the mind of every mainstream conformist American. To protect their capacity to operate under the radar of popular awareness, the elites promote and encourage the impression of a linkage between themselves and an encyclopedia of conspiratorial absurdities. In this way, many of the people who might otherwise provide a reasoned account of the identities and methods of the elite are bamboozled, and wind up sounding like, or in fact being, lunatics. In particular, stories of elite involvement with extraterrestrial visitors and paranormal phenomena thwart the efforts of many to distinguish the real from the fictitious. Chris Carter's ``X Files'' and ``Millenium'' are inheritors of a prodigious legacy of programs that encourage this confusion. More than simply acting as intellectual equivalents of radar chaffe and heat flares, these programs deflect blame to an unaccountable and incomprehensible ``other.'' Since this type of paranoid conspiratorial pseudscience horror programming is naturally appealing to some writers and producers, the conspirators need only covertly grease the path to assure some of this programming is budgeted and distributed for maximum effect. In the particular case of Chris Carter's shows, the involvement is more direct: whether or not Carter and his writers understand the connection, his shows dramatize conspiracy myths promulgated by heretofore fringe organizations that are funded by Laurance Rockefeller (David's brother, the only other survivor of the ``Fortunate Five'' Rockefeller brothers). * The expenditures of a typical member of the public fall into four categories: (1) taxation, by which wealth is assigned to the state within various extortive regimes (this includes Social Security), (2) material subsistence and means of earning, including food, utilities, housing/mortgage/rent, automotive, insurance (often extortive), etc., (3) frivolous luxuries and indulgences, including resort vacations, dining in expensive restaurants, extravagant entertainment and recreation equipment and facilities, etc., and (4) donations, often to one of the conspirators' strategic foundations or organizations, often to charities that diffuse wealth among the poor (i.e., in a manner which is irrelevant to the exercise of power), and almost invariably to one, the other, or both. When a member of the public invests wealth in government bonds, he delegates control over that wealth to the state. When he invests in the stock market, he delegates control to corporations. When he invests in managed funds, he delegates control to financiers. When he deposits money in checking and savings accounts, he delegates control to bankers. In a wide variety of settings, he delegates control to lawyers. The inconsistencies that characterize the fiscal mindset of the ordinary American are many and grave. Americans widely distrust and resent taxes, the state, corporations, financiers, bankers, lawyers, and the mass media, yet they engage in behavior that perpetuates and amplifies their extent and power. They tolerate or support the bell-ringers who collect money ostensibly slated for distribution to, and perpetuation of dependency among, those who have not earned it and will not likely make of it anything good, believing (without thinking) that the bell-ringer wields a towering moral authority. But the same person who drops a dollar into the charity can would not likely consider dropping a dollar into the can of a towering but starving intellectual dissident, even though he recognizes the effectiveness of the dissident, agrees with his views and objectives (particularly, diminution of taxes and of the corruption and oppressive power of the state, corporations, financiers, bankers, lawyers, and the mass media), and thus has a personal interest in materially assisting him. Often, he reflexively condemns those who want to be paid for doing serious dissident political work, calling them ``sell-outs'' and other such invectives. The good at heart, apparently, are expected to be bluntly superhuman. He asks, rhetorically, what he will receive in exchange for his payment, knowing full well - at least if he gives it a moment's thought - that he will receive the material and emotional advantages bestowed by the activities of the dissident, which are almost surely worth far more to him than is the money that could constitute a contribution. On the other hand, he knows he will receive nothing whatever in exchange for his payment to the Salvation Army or other such charities, but he does not consider that this impairs the virtuosity or rationality of the donation - likely because he has not given it any serious thought. All those who oppose the conspirator agenda and want to see changes, and who control wealth in excess of that necessary for the maintenance of a comfortable and sufficient lifestyle, but who fail to assign wealth to those most able to bring about those changes, are unwitting co-conspirators. By their actions, they help to assure that those who dedicate themselves to bringing about those changes become destitute. Thus, they help to assure that these dissidents are broken and themselves made to serve the conspirators, choosing biological survival as slaves or conspirator minions, over death by starvation, hypothermia, or trauma. These are the stakes, this is the system. If those who are financially able to, do not assign wealth to those dissidents who have the potential to precipitate positive change, then most of those dissidents will eventually become evil, often as criminals or servants of the conspirators, accelerating the spiral toward the demise of civilization. Brilliant dissidents who are left in abject poverty cannot but recognize the ambivalence and insincerity of the public, even of its most supportive members, and therefore grow disgusted and cynical. Being finally forced to choose among death, corruption (attaining monetary and material prosperity through criminality, or by working with the conspirators and using their tactics), and slavery (as a burger flipper, a ditch digger, a grocery bagger, or even a software engineer), most become conspirators themselves, often maintaining for themselves the delusion that they have not succumbed. * The conspirators are often called ``shadows.'' This term is appropriate, not because the conspirators are anonymous or secreted away in hidden lairs (they are not), but because they exercise their control so subtly that they are as hard to hold accountable, and their handiwork as hard to recognize, as shadows. It is well to observe that the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence community components are engines of conspiracy. Espionage, insurgency, and covert action in general, are treasonous conspiracies from the perspective of the target nation (whose laws are broken), and counterintelligence is little more than the art of concealing and camouflaging these conspiracies. The regimented systemic compartmentalization endemic to the intelligence community is perfectly suited to conspiratorial strategem. That the intelligence community with its Rothschild and Rockefeller ancestry (partly by way of the Nazi intelligence apparatus) is central to the world government conspiracy is emphatically unsurprising. The conspiracy orchestrates changes in laws to suit its intentions as regularly as it breaks laws outright. It is fluid, changing its boundaries to include or exclude people and ideas as dictated by the elite conspirators, most of whose names are not secret, just largely unacknowledged. Fundamentally, the conspirators are driven by fear, power lust, malice, and Thanatos, seeking nothing but the consolidation and perpetuation of the power structure they command, in terminal pursuit of total order. In the process, they seek, among other nefarious goals, to transmogrify the constitutional government of the United States into a fascistic oligarchy, by inexorable increments. The Rothschilds themselves pursue world hegemony partly as a game for their titillation and amusement. It is my hope that by laying bare the agenda, strategy, tactics, and operational particulars of these power brokers, the reader will recognize and gain immunity to their propaganda, and be emboldened to fight them, to conceive and implement novel counterstrikes, to undermine their power base, to hurl them from their thrones, to make the world hostile for the power brokers and a sanctum for freedom lovers and innovators. It is also my hope that those readers who oppose evil will come to recognize and condemn the habitual accomodation of evil that is the mainstay of the popular mindset. The only thing necessary to ensure the prompt defeat of the conspirators' inevitably self-destructive plan is to reject the vices they promote, and to promote and adhere to the principles they disdain: honesty, rationality, and independence. They rely utterly on the cooperation of others, and without it, their empires are annihilated. Whether you are in government, industry, banking and finance, law, education, academia and consulting firms, or the media, and even if you know yourself to be at this moment a conspirator, you are in a position to make a difference for the better, by doing the right thing at the right time. The Rothschilds and Rockefellers have planned a gradual, incremental tightening of the noose. Their efforts will be thwarted peaceably, before they reach maturity, if they carefully abandon them of their own accord, or if others in positions to do so insistently and carefully loosen the noose through personal, often covert, campaigns of virtue. If the conspirators persist, their eventual and total overthrow is an absolute surety, but is not likely to be peaceable. --[cont]-- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, Omnia Bona Bonis, All My Relations. Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End Kris DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
